RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in patients with cardiac amyloidosis (CA) and is a significant risk factor for heart failure hospitalization and thromboembolic events. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to investigate the atrial electrofunctional predictors of incident AF in CA. METHODS: A multicenter, observational study was conducted in 4 CA referral centers including sinus rhythm patients with light-chain (AL) and transthyretin (ATTR) CA undergoing electrocardiography and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. The primary end point was new-onset AF occurrence. RESULTS: Overall, 96 patients (AL-CA, n = 40; ATTR-CA, n = 56) were enrolled. During an 18-month median follow-up (Q1-Q3, 7-29 months), 30 patients (29%) had incident AF. Compared with those without AF, patients with AF were older (79 vs 73 years; P = .001). They more frequently had ATTR (87% vs 45%; P < .001); electrocardiographic interatrial block (IAB), either partial (47% vs 21%; P = .011) or advanced (17% vs 3%; P = .017); and lower left atrial ejection fraction (LAEF; 29% vs 41%; P = .004). Age (hazard ratio [HR], 1.059; 95% CI, 1.002-1.118; P = .042), any type of IAB (HR, 2.211; 95% CI, 1.03-4.75; P = .041), and LAEF (HR, 0.967; 95% CI, 0.936-0.998; P = .044) emerged as independent predictors of incident AF. Patients exhibiting any type of IAB, LAEF <40%, and age >78 years showed a cumulative incidence for AF of 40% at 12 months. This risk was significantly higher than that carried by 1 (8.5%) or none (7.6%) of these 3 risk factors. CONCLUSION: In patients with CA, older age, IAB on 12-lead electrocardiography, and reduced LAEF on cardiac magnetic resonance imaging are significant and independent predictors of incident AF. A closer screening for AF is advisable in CA patients carrying these features.
Sujet(s)
Fibrillation auriculaire , Cardiomyopathies , Électrocardiographie , Humains , Fibrillation auriculaire/physiopathologie , Fibrillation auriculaire/épidémiologie , Fibrillation auriculaire/diagnostic , Fibrillation auriculaire/complications , Mâle , Femelle , Sujet âgé , Incidence , Cardiomyopathies/physiopathologie , Cardiomyopathies/diagnostic , Cardiomyopathies/épidémiologie , Cardiomyopathies/étiologie , Atrium du coeur/physiopathologie , Atrium du coeur/imagerie diagnostique , Facteurs de risque , Études de suivi , IRM dynamique/méthodes , Amyloïdose/épidémiologie , Amyloïdose/physiopathologie , Amyloïdose/diagnostic , Amyloïdose/complicationsRÉSUMÉ
Whether non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a cardiovascular (CV) risk factor is debated. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the CV morbidity and mortality related to NAFLD in the general population, and to determine whether CV risk is comparable between lean and non-lean NAFLD phenotypes. We searched multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library, for observational studies published through 2022 that reported the risk of CV events and mortality. Pooled odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for all-cause mortality, CV mortality, myocardial infarction (MI), stroke, atrial fibrillation (AF), and major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCE) were assessed through random-effect meta-analysis. We identified 33 studies and a total study population of 10,592,851 individuals (mean age 53±8; male sex 50%; NAFLD 2, 9%). Mean follow-up was 10±6 years. Pooled ORs for all-cause and CV mortality were respectively 1.14 (95% CI, 0.78-1.67) and 1.13 (95% CI, 0.57-2.23), indicating no significant association between NAFLD and mortality. NAFLD was associated with increased risk of MI (OR 1.6; 95% CI, 1.5-1.7), stroke (OR: 1.6; 95% CI, 1.2-2.1), atrial fibrillation (OR: 1.7; 95% CI, 1.2-2.3), and MACCE (OR: 2.3; 95% CI, 1.3-4.2). Compared with non-lean NAFLD, lean NAFLD was associated with increased CV mortality (OR: 1.50; 95% CI, 1.1-2.0), but similar all-cause mortality and risk of MACCE. While NAFLD may not be a risk factor for total and CV mortality, it is associated with excess risk of non-fatal CV events. Lean and non-lean NAFLD phenotypes exhibit distinct prognostic profiles and should receive equitable clinical care.