Older Adults' Likelihood of Participating in Home-Based Cognitive Assessment.

INTRODUCTION: Timely detection of cognitive impairment among older adults has shown to lead to better health and financial outcomes but is hampered by psychological, financial, and physical barriers to participation in cognitive assessment. Home-based cognitive assessment (HBCA) could help overcome some of these barriers. This study aimed to examine older adults' likelihood of participation in HBCA and identify factors predicting this likelihood. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey distributed through Amazon Mechanical Turk, was used to collect data from adults aged 50 years or older residing in the USA The survey was designed to gauge attitudes toward technology and cognitive assessment and to measure psychological variables including subjective cognitive decline (SCD), depression, and anxiety. Information on income and geographic location (rural vs. suburban and urban) was also collected. Univariate and hierarchical regression analyses were conducted to examine the contributions of these variables to a composite measure of likelihood of participation in HBCA. RESULTS: Complete data were obtained on n = 483 (age 50-79). Approximately, two-thirds of respondents described themselves as likely or very likely to participate in HBCA. In univariate analyses, younger age, higher income, higher technology assessment acceptance scores, and higher SCD burden were associated with higher likelihood of participation. Hierarchical regression revealed significant stepwise increments in explained variance: demographic variables 4.1%, technology acceptance 25.2%, assessment acceptance 15.4%, and SCD burden 1.6%. The contribution of SCD was moderated by sex and found for women but not for men. DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION: A large proportion of adults aged 50 and above described themselves likely to participate in HBCA. Middle-aged, technology-savvy, higher income adults expressed the most positive attitudes toward this type of service. Of interest is that HBCA may be particularly acceptable among older women with SCD, a group known to be at risk of cognitive decline. Our findings support the expansion of cognitive assessment services to the home setting.

Distance Assessment for Detecting Cognitive Impairment in Older Adults: A Systematic Review of Psychometric Evidence.

INTRODUCTION: Distance or remote cognitive assessments, administered via phone or computer platforms, have emerged as possible alternatives to traditional assessments performed during office visits. Distance refers to any nontraditional assessment feature, not only or necessarily location. We conducted a systematic review to examine the psychometric soundness of these approaches. METHOD: We searched PubMed, PsycINFO, AgeLine, and Academic Search Premier for articles published between January 2008 and June 2020. Studies were included if participants were over the age of 50, a structured assessment of cognitive function in older adults was evaluated, the assessment method was deemed distant, and validity and/or reliability data were reported. Assessment distance was defined as having any of the following features: use of an electronic test interface, nonroutine test location (e.g., home), test self-administered, and test unsupervised. Distance was categorized as low, intermediate, or high. RESULTS/DISCUSSION: Twenty-six studies met inclusion criteria. Sample sizes ranged from n = 8 to 8,627, and the mean age ranged from 57 to 83. Assessments included screens, brief or full batteries, and were performed via videoconferencing, phone, smartphone, or tablet/computer. Ten studies reported on low distance, 11 on intermediate distance, and 5 studies for high distance assessments. Invalid performance data were observed with older age and cognitive impairment. Convergent validity data were reported consistently and suggested a decline with increasing distance: r = 0.52-0.80 for low, 0.49-0.75 for intermediate, and 0.41-0.53 for high distance. Diagnostic validity estimates presented a similar pattern. Reliability data were reported too inconsistently to allow evaluation. CONCLUSION: The validity of cognitive assessments with older adults appears supported at lower but not higher distance. Less is known about the reliability of such assessments. Future research should delineate the person and procedure boundaries for valid and reliable test results.