Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrer
Plus de filtres











Base de données
Gamme d'année
1.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 118(40)2021 10 05.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34580225

RÉSUMÉ

This article analyzes the specific and critical role of trust in scientists on both the support for and compliance with nonpharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) during the COVID-19 pandemic. We exploit large-scale, longitudinal, and representative surveys for 12 countries over the period from March to December 2020, and we complement the analysis with experimental data. We find that trust in scientists is the key driving force behind individual support for and compliance with NPIs and for favorable attitudes toward vaccination. The effect of trust in government is more ambiguous and tends to diminish support for and compliance with NPIs in countries where the recommendations from scientists and the government were not aligned. Trust in others also has seemingly paradoxical effects: in countries where social trust is high, the support for NPIs is low due to higher expectations that others will voluntary social distance. Our individual-level longitudinal data also allows us to evaluate the effects of within-person changes in trust over the pandemic: we show that trust levels and, in particular, trust in scientists have changed dramatically for individuals and within countries, with important subsequent effects on compliant behavior and support for NPIs. Such findings point out the challenging but critical need to maintain trust in scientists during a lasting pandemic that strains citizens and governments.


Sujet(s)
Pandémies/prévention et contrôle , Personnel de recherche , Confiance , Attitude envers la santé , COVID-19/épidémiologie , COVID-19/prévention et contrôle , Gouvernement , Humains , Études longitudinales , SARS-CoV-2 , Enquêtes et questionnaires
2.
JAMA Netw Open ; 3(6): e2012403, 2020 06 01.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32556260

RÉSUMÉ

Importance: Data from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic in the US show large differences in hospitalizations and mortality across race and geography. However, there are limited data on health information, beliefs, and behaviors that might indicate different exposure to risk. Objective: To determine the association of sociodemographic characteristics with reported incidence, knowledge, and behavior regarding COVID-19 among US adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: A US national survey study was conducted from March 29 to April 13, 2020, to measure differences in knowledge, beliefs, and behavior about COVID-19. The survey oversampled COVID-19 hotspot areas. The survey was conducted electronically. The criteria for inclusion were age 18 years or older and residence in the US. Data analysis was performed in April 2020. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were incidence, knowledge, and behaviors related to COVID-19 as measured by survey response. Results: The survey included 5198 individuals (mean [SD] age, 48 [18] years; 2336 men [45%]; 3759 white [72%], 830 [16%] African American, and 609 [12%] Hispanic). The largest differences in COVID-19-related knowledge and behaviors were associated with race/ethnicity, sex, and age, with African American participants, men, and people younger than 55 years showing less knowledge than other groups. African American respondents were 3.5 percentage points (95% CI, 1.5 to 5.5 percentage points; P = .001) more likely than white respondents to report being infected with COVID-19, as were men compared with women (3.2 percentage points; 95% CI, 2.0 to 4.4 percentage points; P < .001). Knowing someone who tested positive for COVID-19 was more common among African American respondents (7.2 percentage points; 95% CI, 3.4 to 10.9 percentage points; P < .001), people younger than 30 years (11.6 percentage points; 95% CI, 7.5 to 15.7 percentage points; P < .001), and people with higher incomes (coefficient on earning ≥$100 000, 12.3 percentage points; 95% CI, 8.7 to 15.8 percentage points; P < .001). Knowledge of potential fomite spread was lower among African American respondents (-9.4 percentage points; 95% CI, -13.1 to -5.7 percentage points; P < .001), Hispanic respondents (-4.8 percentage points; 95% CI, -8.9 to -0.77 percentage points; P = .02), and people younger than 30 years (-10.3 percentage points; 95% CI, -14.1 to -6.5 percentage points; P < .001). Similar gaps were found with respect to knowledge of COVID-19 symptoms and preventive behaviors. Conclusions and Relevance: In this survey study of US adults, there were gaps in reported incidence of COVID-19 and knowledge regarding its spread and symptoms and social distancing behavior. More effort is needed to increase accurate information and encourage appropriate behaviors among minority communities, men, and younger people.


Sujet(s)
Betacoronavirus/isolement et purification , Infections à coronavirus/épidémiologie , Infections à coronavirus/psychologie , Comportements à risque pour la santé/physiologie , Pneumopathie virale/épidémiologie , Pneumopathie virale/psychologie , Adulte , /psychologie , /statistiques et données numériques , Sujet âgé , COVID-19 , Études cas-témoins , Infections à coronavirus/mortalité , Infections à coronavirus/prévention et contrôle , Culture (sociologie) , Femelle , Hispanique ou Latino/psychologie , Hispanique ou Latino/statistiques et données numériques , Hospitalisation/tendances , Humains , Incidence , Revenu/tendances , Savoir , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Mortalité/tendances , Pandémies/prévention et contrôle , Pneumopathie virale/mortalité , Pneumopathie virale/prévention et contrôle , Prévalence , SARS-CoV-2 , Enquêtes et questionnaires , États-Unis/épidémiologie , États-Unis/ethnologie , /psychologie , /statistiques et données numériques
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE