Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrer
Plus de filtres











Base de données
Gamme d'année
1.
J Arthroplasty ; 36(2): 616-622, 2021 02.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32896438

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: We assessed the survivorship of a proximally hydroxyapatite coated, double tapered, titanium-alloy femoral stem in a single center, at an average follow up of 12.5 years (10.1-15.8). The majority of stems were inserted as part of a Metal on Metal (MoM) Total Hip Replacement (THR). METHODS: Data was collected prospectively in a local database. A retrospective review was performed of all patients undergoing a primary THR with the prosthesis between 2003 and 2010. Primary outcome was revision of the stem for any cause. Analysis was also performed for stem revision for aseptic loosening, stem revision in the MoM setting and a worst case scenario whereby lost to follow up were presumed to have failed. True stem failure was considered if revision occurred for a stem related complication. RESULTS: 1465 stems were included (1310 patients, 155 bilateral). The bearing surface was cobalt chrome on cobalt chrome in 1351 cases (92%). Seven hips were lost to follow up. Thirty-two stems (31 part of a MoM THR) underwent revision for any cause. Kaplan Meier survival analysis demonstrates an overall 97.4% survivorship. Subset analysis demonstrates 100% survivorship for aseptic loosening, 97.3% in the MoM setting and 96.7% for the worst case senario. Of the 32 cases of stem revision, only 13 were classified as 'true' stem failure. CONCLUSION: This study represents the largest cohort of this uncemented femoral component with a minimum follow-up longer than 10 years. Our results demonstrate excellent long-term survivorship even in the presence of a challenging MoM environment.


Sujet(s)
Arthroplastie prothétique de hanche , Prothèse de hanche , Alliages , Arthroplastie prothétique de hanche/effets indésirables , Durapatite , Études de suivi , Prothèse de hanche/effets indésirables , Humains , Conception de prothèse , Défaillance de prothèse , Réintervention , Études rétrospectives , Titane , Résultat thérapeutique
2.
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg ; 140(11): 1825-1835, 2020 Nov.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32852593

RÉSUMÉ

INTRODUCTION: Acetabular component revision surgery can be a challenging task due to the encountered bone defects. Both cemented and uncemented techniques are described. We report on the survivorship of the Thackray cross plate with rim reinforcement ring for cemented acetabular revision. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective case series of all patients treated with the implant with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Acetabular defects were characterized according to the Paprosky classification. Data on potential risk factors for failure of the construct as well as the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) were collected. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis with radiographic aseptic loosening or revision for aseptic loosening as the end point was performed. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2017, 35 revisions in 18 male and 17 female patients with an average age of 72 years were included. Bone allograft was used in 26 cases and additional implants (medial or supero-lateral mesh) in 13. Seven patients have deceased and the fate of all revisions is known. At an average clinical follow-up of 9.7 (2.6 to 19.6) years, there were no further re-revisions for construct failure. Five hips have demonstrated radiological evidence of aseptic loosening. Radiologically loose components were associated with more severe grades of acetabular bone defects (Paprosky Type 3) (60% vs 3%, p = 0.006). Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrates 79.8% overall survivorship at 7 years. Survivorship for Type 2 defects was significantly higher compared to Type 3 (90% vs 0% at 7 years, Logrank test p = 0.002, Cox proportional hazards p = 0.03). The final median OHS was 38 (12-48) and was not affected by component loosening. CONCLUSION: This is a cost-effective device that protects the underlying bone graft (81% complete remodeling) and prevents subsidence of the cemented cup (2 mm on average). It should be used with caution in high-grade defects and perhaps not advised.


Sujet(s)
Acétabulum/chirurgie , Arthroplastie prothétique de hanche , Plaques orthopédiques , Prothèse de hanche , Réintervention , Sujet âgé , Transplantation osseuse , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Défaillance de prothèse , Études rétrospectives
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE