Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 1 de 1
Filtrer
Plus de filtres










Base de données
Gamme d'année
1.
Cogn Emot ; 26(8): 1359-70, 2012.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22650378

RÉSUMÉ

There is evidence of maladaptive attentional biases for lexical information (e.g., Atchley, Ilardi, & Enloe, 2003; Atchley, Stringer, Mathias, Ilardi, & Minatrea, 2007) and for pictographic stimuli (e.g., Gotlib, Krasnoperova, Yue, & Joormann, 2004) among patients with depression. The current research looks for depressotypic processing biases among depressed out-patients and non-clinical controls, using both verbal and pictorial stimuli. A d' measure (sensitivity index) was used to examine each participant's perceptual sensitivity threshold. Never-depressed controls evidenced a detection bias for positive picture stimuli, while depressed participants had no such bias. With verbal stimuli, depressed individuals showed specific decrements in the detection of positive person-referent words (WINNER), but not with positive non-person-referent words (SUNSHINE) or with negative words. Never-depressed participants showed no such differences across word types. In the current study, depression is characterised both by an absence of the normal positivistic biases seen in individuals without mood disorders (consistent with McCabe & Gotlib, 1995), and by a specific reduction in sensitivity for person-referent positive information that might be inconsistent with depressotypic self-schemas.


Sujet(s)
Attention , Perception auditive , Trouble dépressif majeur/psychologie , Sémantique , Perception visuelle , Stimulation acoustique/méthodes , Stimulation acoustique/psychologie , Adulte , Anxiété/psychologie , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Stimulation lumineuse/méthodes , Échelles d'évaluation en psychiatrie/statistiques et données numériques , Performance psychomotrice
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE
...