Inhaled fluticasone propionate is effective as well as oral prednisone in reducing sputum eosinophilia during exacerbations of asthma which do not require hospitalization.

The aim of this study was to evaluate whether fluticasone propionate (FP) is effective as well as prednisone (P) in reducing sputum eosinophilia and in improving airway obstruction due to asthma exacerbations not requiring hospitalization. We measured, in a parallel-group, double-blind double-dummy, randomized study, sputum and blood inflammatory cell counts and soluble mediators in 37 asthmatic subjects during a spontaneous exacerbation of asthma (Visit 1) and after a 2 week (Visit 2) treatment with inhaled FP (1000microg bid) (Group A, n=18) or a reducing course of oral P (Group B, n=19). Asthma exacerbation was accompanied by sputum eosinophilia (eosinophils >2%) in almost all patients (95%). FP improved FEV(1) (from 53.9%+/-16.8 at Visit 1 to 76.4%+/-21.2 at Visit 2, p=0.0001) and reduced the percentage of sputum eosinophils (from 38%[0-78] to 3%[1-31, p=0.0008) as well as oral P (FEV(1): from 51.5%+/-14.4 to 83.6%+/-21.1, p=0.0001; sputum eosinophils: from 52%[1-96] to 11%[0-64], p=0.0003). At Visit 2, sputum eosinophils were significantly lower in Group A than in Group B. P but not FP induced significant decrease in blood and sputum ECP. Oxygen saturation, PEF variability, symptom score and use of rescue medication similarly improved in both groups. We conclude that FP is effective at least as well as P in reducing sputum eosinophilia and in improving airway obstruction due to asthma exacerbation. However, the cost/effectiveness ratio of this option should be further evaluated.

Tolerance to the protective effect of salmeterol in mild untreated asthmatics.

The aim of this study was to assess the distribution of the occurrence of tolerance to the protective effect of salmeterol on allergen challenge in a large sample of asthmatic subjects. We investigated 53 subjects (45 male and eight female), mean age 24+/-8.2 years, with mild intermittent asthma, in stable phase of the disease, never previously treated with regular beta2-agonists. All subjects with a previous positive early airway response (EAR) to a screening allergen challenge underwent, in double blind randomized, cross-over manner, three further allergen challenges: after placebo (T0), after a single dose (50 microg) of inhaled salmeterol (T1), and after regular treatment with inhaled salmeterol (50 microg bid) for 1 week (T2). All subjects showed an EAR after placebo treatment (T0), and were completely protected against EAR by the single dose of salmeterol (T1). After 1-week regular treatment with salmeterol (T2). 24 out of 53 subjects (45%) were still protected, whereas 29 subjects (55%) showed a significant EAR. The distribution of the response to allergen challenge, which was quite homogeneous at T0 and T1, showed considerable heterogeneity at T2. Tolerance to the protective effect of salmeterol on allergen challenge can be observed in a large group of previously untreated mild asthmatic subjects. This phenomenon is heterogeneously distributed, with some subjects still showing a complete protection similar to that obtained after a single dose of salmeterol and others showing a response similar to that obtained after placebo. The reason of this heterogeneity needs to be elucidated.

Analysis of sputum cell counts during spontaneous moderate exacerbations of asthma in comparison to the stable phase.

BACKGROUND: Acute airway inflammation is considered to characterize asthma exacerbations, but its specific cellular pattern has not yet been completely evaluated. AIM: To evaluate the prevalence of sputum eosinophilia during acute asthma exacerbations of moderate severity, compared with a stable phase of the disease, and to assess the concordance between changes in pulmonary function and sputum eosinophilia in the period between exacerbation and post exacerbation. METHODS: We compared sputum and blood inflammatory cell counts in 29 asthmatic subjects during a spontaneous moderate exacerbation of asthma (visit 1) with sputum and blood cell counts measured 4 weeks after the resolution of asthma exacerbation (visit 2). At visit 1, all subjects required an appropriate 1 week treatment with oral corticosteroids. RESULTS: At visit 1, all subjects were able to collect spontaneous sputum, whereas at visit 2 sputum was induced by inhalation of hypertonic saline (NaCl 3, 4, and 5%, 10 minutes each) with beta2-agonist pretreatment. Asthma exacerbation was accompanied by a significant increase in sputum eosinophil percentages compared with levels after exacerbation [25% (1-78) versus 4% (0-23), p<0.05). Only four subjects showed low sputum eosinophil percentages during exacerbation, and these showed no differences in main clinical findings with respect to subjects with sputum eosinophilia. At visit 2, the stability of asthma was assessed on the basis of PEF, FEV1, symptoms, and use of rescue beta2-agonist. Asthma was defined as stable in 21 out of 29 subjects. Sputum eosinophil percentages fell significantly between visit 1 and visit 2 in both stable and unstable patients, but at visit 2 sputum eosinophil percentages were still high in subjects with unstable asthma. In patients who proved to be stable at visit 2, there was a significant correlation between the changes recorded in sputum eosinophil percentages and in FEV1 between the two visits (rho: 0.723, p<0.001). CONCLUSION: Sputum cosinophil but not neutrophil percentages increase in most asthmatic subjects during moderate exacerbation of asthma. Changes in the degree of airway eosinophilic inflammation are related to changes in the severity of airway obstruction during asthma exacerbation.

Ozone exposure increases eosinophilic airway response induced by previous allergen challenge.

We investigated whether exposure to ozone (O(3)) 24 hours after an allergen challenge test would increase airway eosinophilia induced by allergen in subjects with mild asthma with late airway response. Twelve subjects with mild atopic asthma participated in a randomized, single-blind study. Subjects underwent allergen challenge 24 hours before a 2 hour exposure to O(3) (0.27 ppm) or filtered air. Pulmonary function was monitored during the allergen challenge and after the exposure to O(3) or air. Six hours later, induced sputum was collected. After 4 weeks, the experiment was repeated with the same subjects. Allergen induced a comparable late airway response in both challenges. O(3) exposure induced a significant decrease in FVC, FEV(1), and vital capacity, and was associated with a significant increase in total symptom score compared with air exposure. The percentage of eosinophils, but not the percentage of neutrophils, in induced sputum was significantly higher after exposure to O(3) than after exposure to air (p = 0.04). These results indicate that O(3) exposure after a late airway response elicited by allergen challenge can potentiate the eosinophilic inflammatory response induced by the allergen challenge itself in subjects with mild atopic asthma. This observation may help explain the synergistic effect of air pollution and allergen exposure in the exacerbation of asthma.