Acute adverse events of ultra-hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery for early breast cancer in Japan: an interim analysis of the multi-institutional phase II UPBEAT study.

BACKGROUND: The applicability of ultra-hypofractionated (ultra-HF) whole-breast irradiation (WBI) remains unknown in Japanese women. This study aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of this approach among Japanese women and report the results of an interim analysis performed to assess acute adverse events (AEs) and determine whether it was safe to continue this study. METHODS: We enrolled Japanese women with invasive breast cancer or ductal carcinoma in situ who had undergone breast-conserving surgery, were aged ≥ 40 years, had pathological stages of Tis-T3 N0-N1, and had negative surgical margins. Ultra-HF-WBI was delivered at 26 Gy in five fractions over one week. When the number of enrolled patients reached 28, patient registration was paused for three months. The endpoint of the interim analysis was the proportion of acute AEs of grade ≥ 2 (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v5.0) within three months. RESULTS: Of the 28 patients enrolled from seven institutes, 26 received ultra-HF-WBI, and 2 were excluded due to postoperative infections. No AEs of grade ≥ 3 occurred. One patient (4%) experienced grade 2 radiation dermatitis, and 18 (69%) had grade 1 radiation dermatitis. The other acute grade 1 AEs experienced were skin hyperpigmentation (n = 10, 38%); breast pain (n = 4, 15%); superficial soft tissue fibrosis (n = 3, 12%); and fatigue (n = 1, 4%). No other acute AEs of grade ≥ 2 were detected. CONCLUSIONS: Acute AEs following ultra-HF-WBI were within acceptable limits among Japanese women, indicating that the continuation of the study was appropriate.

Multi-institutional phase II study of ultra-hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery for breast cancer in Japan: Kyoto Radiation Oncology Study Group (UPBEAT study).

PURPOSE: The UK-FAST-Forward study showed that ultra-hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation (ultra-HF-WBI) involving five fractions of 26 Gy radiation over 1 week was not inferior to HF-WBI. However, it is not used in Japan due to safety concerns. In April 2022, we commenced a multi-institutional, single-arm, phase II trial. Our aim is to confirm the safety of ultra-HF-WBI after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) for breast cancer in Japanese women. METHOD: We plan to enroll 98 patients from 13 institutions. The primary endpoint is the proportion of late adverse events of grades ≥2 within 3 years. DISCUSSION: We believe that this highly promising clinical study can positively impact the Japanese guidelines for breast cancer treatment. The results will help us decide whether or not ultra-HF-WBI can be used as a more convenient alternative to WBI. REGISTRATION NUMBER AND DATE: This trial was registered in the UMIN Clinical Trials Registry (UMIN000047080) on March 4, 2022.

Evaluation of health-related quality of life via the Computer-Based Health Evaluation System (CHES) for Japanese metastatic breast cancer patients: a single-center pilot study.

BACKGROUND: The main purposes of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) treatment are to prolong survival and maintain health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Compliance with the HRQOL assessment can be poor, particularly among patients who receive long-term treatment. One possible solution to overcoming this problem is to engage in real-time home monitoring by having patients report outcomes on their personal electronic devices. The objective of this study was to investigate compliance with HRQOL monitoring from home among MBC patients using the Computer-Based Health Evaluation System (CHES) to collect patient data. METHODS: Sixteen MBC patients who received outpatient chemotherapy or endocrine therapy, both with and without targeted therapy, were recruited. One eligibility criterion was the availability of a personal electronic device with access to the Internet. Patients were asked to enter HRQOL ratings from their personal electronic devices via CHES once every week for 12 weeks. The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ C30) was used to evaluate HRQOL. The outcome examined was the questionnaire collection rate. RESULTS: Six patients (37.5%) were treated with chemotherapy only, one (6.2%) with endocrine therapy only, three (18.8%) with a combination of chemotherapy and targeted therapy, and six (37.5%) with a combination of endocrine and targeted therapy. Median questionnaire collection rate for the total of 12 weeks was 84.6% (interquartile range 44.3-100). The reasons for missing data were worsening of disease, forgetting, and device malfunction. CONCLUSIONS: Compliance with electronic HRQOL data collection in this cohort was acceptable, considering the general ideal collection rate of 70-80%. We are conducting a prospective study to determine whether the use of CHES to input electronic real-time feedback of HRQOL ratings improves patients' overall HRQOL.

Prevalence of hypothyroidism among patients with breast cancer treated with radiation to the supraclavicular field: a single-centre survey.

PURPOSE: We investigated the prevalence of hypothyroidism (HT) in patients with breast cancer who received radiation therapy to the supraclavicular (SC) field to evaluate the effect of radiation on thyroid. METHODS: Between April 2007 and May 2016, consecutive patients with invasive breast cancer who received SC radiation were recruited. Thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) and free thyroxine (fT4) were measured between April and August 2016. On the basis of the radiation-planning CT images, thyroid volume was calculated and dose-volume parameters were estimated. The endpoints were the prevalence of HT as determined by high levels of TSH and low levels of fT4 in serum, and the prevalence of subclinical HT, determined by high-serum TSH and normal fT4. RESULTS: Among the 68 consecutive patients, 26 were excluded from evaluation (10 patients died, 6 had a history of previous thyroid disease and 10 were lost to follow-up). One (2.4%) and six (14.3%) of these patients had HT and subclinical HT, respectively, with a mean TSH level of 8.27 µU/mL. By univariate analysis, a predictive factor of HT and subclinical HT was a thyroid volume <8 cm3 (OR 6.44, 95% CI 1.14 to 36.6; p=0.043). Multivariate analysis also showed an association between thyroid volume <8 cm3 and HT or subclinical HT (OR 18.48, 95% CI 1.48 to 230.86; p=0.024). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of HT in patients with breast cancer studied was relatively low. Although thyroid volume appeared to be a predictive marker of HT in this cohort, further prospective evaluation is needed.