Variation in nerve autograft length increases fibre misdirection and decreases pruning effectiveness: an experimental study in the rat median nerve.

OBJECTIVES: In the clinical set, autologus nerve grafts are the current option for reconstruction of nerve tissue losses. The length of the nerve graft has been suggested to affect outcomes. Experiments were performed in the rat in order to test this assumption and to detect a possible mechanism to explain differences in recovery. METHODS: The rat median nerve was repaired by ulnar nerve grafts of different lengths. Rats were evaluated for 12 months by behavioural assessment and histological studies, including ATPase myofibrillary histochemistry and retrograde neuronal labelling. RESULTS: It was demonstrated that graft length interferes in behavioural functional recovery that here correlates to muscle weight recovery. Short nerve grafts recovered faster and better. Reinnervation was not specific either at the trunk level or in the muscle itself. The normal mosaic pattern of Type I muscle fibres was never restored and their number remained largely augmented. An increment in the number of motor fibres was observed after the nerve grafting in a predominantly sensory branch in all groups. This increment was more pronounced in the long graft group. In the postoperative period, about a 20% reduction in the number of misdirected motor fibres occurred in the short nerve graft group only. CONCLUSION: Variation in the length of nerve grafts interferes in behavioural recovery and increases motor fibres misdirection. Early recovery onset was related to a better outcome, which occurs in the short graft group.

Selective restoration of sensation by peripheral nerve grafts directly implanted into the contralateral C7 dorsal root ganglion: an experimental study in rat brachial plexus.

OBJECTIVE: In brachial plexus injuries, when the dorsal root ganglion (DRG) is avulsed from the spinal cord there is no possibility of direct repair. Therefore, in the present report the median nerve was connected directly to the contralateral C7 DRG, to restore forepaw sensation. METHODS: The ulnar nerve was sectioned, and a 15-mm segment of nerve was removed. The median nerve was sectioned, transposed dorsally, and repaired using a sural nerve graft directly implanted into the C7 contralateral DRG. Rats were then assessed 6 and 12 months later by behavioral, histological, and plasma extravasion techniques. RESULTS: All animals recovered sensation in the forepaw. Retrogradely labeled sensory neurons were demonstrated in the C7 DRG, and the whole forepaw was labeled after plasma extravasion induction by median nerve antidromic stimulation. Several myelinated and positively neurofilament-stained fibers were demonstrated in the grafted median nerve. CONCLUSION: The surgical strategy proposed might be a useful alternative to selective sensory repair in the emerging field of brachial plexus reconstruction by direct spinal cord surgery.

Muscle fiber type reorganization and behavioral functional recovery of rat median nerve repair with vascularized or conventional nerve grafts.

In 1921, Ney introduced the concept of nerve grafts with preservation of the vascular blood supply. Today, over 70 years later, the use of vascularized nerve grafts in clinical practice is still controversial. Although the results of experiments with vascularized and conventional nerve grafts have been compared on the basis of electrophysiological and histological observations, the literature includes no vaJid comparison of the clinical and behavioral significance of these results. Therefore, in the experiments reported here, the rat median nerve was repaired using either a vascularized or a conventional ulnar nerve graft. The rates behavior between 0 and 360 days after surgery was assessed by the grasping test. Nienty-five, 120, 150, 210 and 360 days after surgery rats were submitted to retrograde labeling studies and muscle samples were removed and studied using routine hematoxilin-eosin and ATPase histochemistry. The present study provides evidence that autografting is a reliable procedure for nerve repair. Motor axons were able to reinnervate and largely respecify muscle properties. Reinnervation was not selective either at the nerve trunk level or at the muscle fiber. A mechanism of collateral pruning might have been present in the early phases of reinnervation. This mechanism was, however, self limiting and unable to correct all wrong projections. A mechanism of terminal sprouting was in part responsible for time-related improvement in muscle force recovery. While the present study does provide evidence that recovery was 20% faster in rats with vascularized grafts than in those with conventional grafts (P < 0.0001), it does not, however, provide evidence for better functional recovery in long-term assessment.