Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrer
1.
Open Heart ; 8(2)2021 08.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34344723

RÉSUMÉ

INTRODUCTION: The COVID-19 pandemic has seen the introduction of important public health measures to minimise the spread of the virus. We aim to identify the impact government restrictions and hospital-based infection control procedures on ST elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) care during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: Patients meeting ST elevation criteria and undergoing primary percutaneous coronary intervention from 27 March 2020, the day initial national lockdown measures were announced in Ireland, were included in the study. Patients presenting after the lockdown period, from 18 May to 31 June 2020, were also examined. Time from symptom onset to first medical contact (FMC), transfer time and time of wire cross was noted. Additionally, patient characteristics, left ventricular ejection fraction, mortality and biochemical parameters were documented. Outcomes and characteristics were compared against a control group of patients meeting ST elevation criteria during the month of January. RESULTS: A total of 42 patients presented with STEMI during the lockdown period. A significant increase in total ischaemic time (TIT) was noted versus controls (8.81 hours (±16.4) vs 2.99 hours (±1.39), p=0.03), with increases driven largely by delays in seeking FMC (7.13 hours (±16.4) vs 1.98 hours (±1.46), p=0.049). TIT remained significantly elevated during the postlockdown period (6.1 hours (±5.3), p=0.05), however, an improvement in patient delays was seen versus the control group (3.99 hours (±4.5), p=0.06). There was no difference seen in transfer times and door to wire cross time during lockdown, however, a significant increase in transfer times was seen postlockdown versus controls (1.81 hours (±1.0) vs 1.1 hours (±0.87), p=0.004). CONCLUSION: A significant increase in TIT was seen during the lockdown period driven mainly by patient factors highlighting the significance of public health messages on public perception. Additionally, a significant delay in transfer times to our centre was seen postlockdown.


Sujet(s)
COVID-19 , Évaluation des résultats et des processus en soins de santé/tendances , Intervention coronarienne percutanée/tendances , Infarctus du myocarde avec sus-décalage du segment ST/thérapie , Sujet âgé , Bases de données factuelles , Femelle , Humains , Prévention des infections/tendances , Irlande , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Acceptation des soins par les patients , Transfert de patient/tendances , Intervention coronarienne percutanée/effets indésirables , Intervention coronarienne percutanée/mortalité , Études rétrospectives , Infarctus du myocarde avec sus-décalage du segment ST/imagerie diagnostique , Infarctus du myocarde avec sus-décalage du segment ST/mortalité , Facteurs temps , Délai jusqu'au traitement/tendances , Résultat thérapeutique
2.
J Cardiovasc Nurs ; 36(4): E1-E10, 2021.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33833191

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: The implementation of international guidelines within everyday practice remains problematic, which can have a detrimental impact on quality of care delivered. This study aimed to ascertain the factors associated with clinical nurses' perceived knowledge of international guidelines. METHODS: In this cross-sectional survey, nurses from 45 hospitals across Ireland were recruited. A previously validated anonymous questionnaire that assessed guideline knowledge, use, and barriers to implementation was used. Data were analyzed using SPSS 23 and logistic regression. RESULTS: Of the 542 responses, 54% had used international guidelines relevant to their practice and 50% had consulted within the last year. Most nurses perceived that poor patient follow-up, lack of time and resources, poor clinical leadership, workload, long guidelines, and not understanding guideline detail were barriers to guideline use and implementation. Forty-five percent rated their perceived knowledge of guidelines as "low." Logistic regression identified that "high" knowledge levels were significantly associated with having read guidelines in the last year and their use with practice. In contrast, low knowledge of the guidelines was associated with perceptions that they were lengthy and not easy to use, lack of confidence to challenge colleagues when guidelines are not implemented, or not being able to influence current practice. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified the specific knowledge needs in this cohort of mainly basic grade registered nurses, with low perceived guideline knowledge. A whole unit or team approach led by nurse champions is needed to develop and establish practice and educational strategies that would increase the availability, application, and knowledge of guidelines within everyday practice.


Sujet(s)
Infirmières et infirmiers , Études transversales , Humains , Irlande , Enquêtes et questionnaires
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE
...