Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrer
Plus de filtres











Base de données
Gamme d'année
1.
Curr Dev Nutr ; 8(8): 104414, 2024 Aug.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39224137

RÉSUMÉ

Background: There is currently no cogent set of standards to guide the design, implementation and evaluation of nutrition social and behavior change (SBC), including for nutrition-sensitive agriculture (NSA). Objectives: We aimed to capture, consolidate, and describe SBC core principles and practices (CPPs), reflecting professional consensus, and to offer programmatic examples that illustrate their application for NSA projects in low- and middle-income countries. Methods: We conducted a narrative review following a 4-step iterative process to identify and describe SBC CPPs. We first reviewed general SBC frameworks and technical documents and developed a preliminary list of CPPs and their definitions. Following review and feedback from 8 content experts, we revised the CPPs, incorporating the panel's feedback, and conducted a more specific search of the peer-reviewed and gray literature. We presented a revised draft of the CPPs to 26 NSA researchers, practitioners, and implementers at the 2022 Agriculture, Nutrition and Health Academy annual conference. We then conducted a focused review of each CPP, and 3 content experts rereviewed the final draft. Results: We reviewed ∼475 documents and resources resulting in a set of 4 core principles: 1) following a systematic, strategic method in designing, implementing, and evaluating SBC activities; 2) ensuring design and implementation are evidence-based; 3) grounding design and implementation in theory; and 4) authentically engaging communities. Additionally, we identified 11 core practices and mapped these to the different stages in the SBC design, implementation, and evaluation cycle. Detailed descriptions, illustrative examples and resources for implementation are provided for each CPP. Conclusions: An explicit set of CPPs for SBC can serve as a guide for design, research, implementation, and evaluation of nutrition and NSA programs; help standardize knowledge sharing and production; and contribute to improved quality of implementation. Broader consultation with SBC practitioners and researchers will further consensus on this work.

2.
Curr Dev Nutr ; 8(8): 104420, 2024 Aug.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39224142

RÉSUMÉ

Background: Limited research exists on the specific approaches and behavior change techniques (BCT) used in nutrition-sensitive agriculture (NSA) programs and their effects on diet diversity. Objectives: We aimed to describe nutrition-related social behavior change (SBC) in the context of NSA and quantify the effectiveness of different SBC components of NSA programs in improving diet diversity. Methods: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, the International Food Policy and Research Institute repository, and Agricola for articles published between 2000 and 2023. We identified the agricultural activities each project used as a pathway to improved nutrition (ag-nutrition pathways), identified SBC approaches used by each project, and coded BCTs using validated coding protocols. Effectiveness ratios (ERs) were calculated to assess pathways, approaches, and BCTs in relation to dietary diversity outcomes (minimum diet diversity for children, child dietary diversity score, and women's dietary diversity). Results: Of 65 included NSA interventions, the most used agriculture-to-nutrition pathways included 1) agricultural production for home consumption (n = 61); 2) women's empowerment (n = 36); and 3) agricultural income (n = 37) pathways. The most used SBC approaches were interpersonal communication (IPC, n = 59) and community-based approaches (n = 53). Frequently used BCTs included "instructions on how to perform the behavior" (n = 65), "social support (unspecified)" (n = 43), and using a "credible source" (n = 43). The increased production for the home consumption pathway, IPC approach, and the BCT "behavioral practice" had high ERs for diet diversity outcomes. Conclusions: Although the agricultural production for home consumption pathway to improved nutrition had the highest ERs for diet diversity, other pathways, such as income generation and reducing wastage, hold promise and require additional investigation. The most commonly applied BCTs focused on information dissemination; however, participatory BCTs related to behavioral demonstration, and behavioral practice had higher ERs. Findings indicate a need to test less frequently utilized SBC components to determine effectiveness.This trial was registered at PROSPERO (=https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/display_record.php?RecordID=179016) as CRD42020179016.

SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE