Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrer
Plus de filtres











Base de données
Gamme d'année
1.
Undersea Hyperb Med ; 41(4): 301-6, 2014.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25109083

RÉSUMÉ

The United Kingdom Ministry of Defence commissioned work to define the relationship between the internal pressure of a distressed submarine (DISSUB), the depth from which escape is made and the risk of decompression illness (DCI). The program of work used an animal model (goat) to define these risks and this paper reports the incidence and type of DCI observed. A total of 748 pressure exposures comprising saturation only, escape only or saturation followed by escape were conducted in the submarine escape simulator between 1993 and 2006. The DCI following saturation exposures was predominantly limb pain, whereas following escape exposures the DCI predominantly involved the central nervous system and was fast in onset. There was no strong relationship between the risk of DCI and the range of escape depths investigated. The risk of DCI incurred from escape following saturation was greater than that obtained by combining the risks for the independent saturation only, and escape only, exposures. The output from this program of work has led to improved advice on the safety of submarine escape.


Sujet(s)
Mal de décompression/étiologie , Décompression/effets indésirables , Modèles animaux , Médecine sous-marine/méthodes , Animaux , Chambres d'exposition à l'atmosphère , Dioxyde de carbone , Intervalles de confiance , Décompression/méthodes , Mal de décompression/diagnostic , Mal de décompression/épidémiologie , Conception d'appareillage , Femelle , Capra , Syndrome nerveux des hautes pressions/diagnostic , Syndrome nerveux des hautes pressions/étiologie , Mâle , Oxygène , Pression partielle , Projets pilotes , Médecine sous-marine/instrumentation , Facteurs temps
2.
Undersea Hyperb Med ; 41(4): 315-29, 2014.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25109085

RÉSUMÉ

Actions to enhance survival in a distressed submarine (DISSUB) scenario may be guided in part by knowledge of the likely risk of decompression sickness (DCS) should the crew attempt tower escape. A mathematical model for DCS risk estimation has been calibrated against DCS outcome data from 3,738 exposures of either men or goats to raised pressure. Body mass was used to scale DCS risk. The calibration data included more than 1,000 actual or simulated submarine escape exposures and no exposures with substantial staged decompression. Cases of pulmonary barotrauma were removed from the calibration data. The calibrated model was used to estimate the likelihood of DCS occurrence following submarine escape from the United Kingdom Royal Navy tower escape system. Where internal DISSUB pressure remains at - 0.1 MPa, escape from DISSUB depths < 200 meters is estimated to have DCS risk < 6%. Saturation at raised DISSUB pressure markedly increases risk, with > 60% DCS risk predicted for a 200-meter escape from saturation at 0.21 MPa. Using the calibrated model to predict DCS for direct ascent from saturation gives similar risk estimates to other published models.


Sujet(s)
Mal de décompression/étiologie , Modèles théoriques , Maladies professionnelles/étiologie , Médecine sous-marine/méthodes , Animaux , Calibrage , Loi du khi-deux , Capra , Humains , Mâle , Valeurs de référence , Appréciation des risques/statistiques et données numériques , Eau de mer , Facteurs temps , Royaume-Uni
3.
Undersea Hyperb Med ; 41(4): 307-14, 2014.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25109084

RÉSUMÉ

The Royal Navy requires reliable advice on the safe limits of escape from a distressed submarine (DISSUB). Flooding in a DISSUB may cause a rise in ambient pressure, increasing the risk of decompression sickness (DCS) and decreasing the maximum depth from which it is safe to escape. The aim of this study was to investigate the pressure/depth limits to escape following saturation at raised ambient pressure. Exposure to saturation pressures up to 1.6 bar (a) (160 kPa) (n = 38); escapes from depths down to 120 meters of sea water (msw) (n = 254) and a combination of saturation followed by escape (n = 90) was carried out in the QinetiQ Submarine Escape Simulator, Alverstoke, United Kingdom. Doppler ultrasound monitoring was used to judge the severity of decompression stress. The trials confirmed the previously untested advice, in the Guardbook, that if a DISSUB was lying at a depth of 90 msw, then it was safe to escape when the pressure in the DISSUB was 1.5 bar (a), but also indicated that this advice may be overly conservative. This study demonstrated that the upper DISSUB saturation pressure limit to safe escape from 90 msw was 1.6 bar (a), resulting in two cases of DCS.


Sujet(s)
Barotraumatismes/étiologie , Mal de décompression/étiologie , Décompression/méthodes , Oreille moyenne/traumatismes , Syndrome nerveux des hautes pressions/étiologie , Maladies professionnelles/étiologie , Médecine sous-marine/méthodes , Adulte , Chambres d'exposition à l'atmosphère , Pression atmosphérique , Calibrage , Décompression/effets indésirables , Décompression/normes , Mal de décompression/imagerie diagnostique , Embolie gazeuse/imagerie diagnostique , Embolie gazeuse/étiologie , Conception d'appareillage , Humains , Mâle , Personnel militaire , Modèles théoriques , Maladies professionnelles/imagerie diagnostique , Eau de mer , Médecine sous-marine/instrumentation , Échographie , Royaume-Uni
4.
Undersea Hyperb Med ; 30(3): 163-74, 2003.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-14620096

RÉSUMÉ

Raised internal pressure in a distressed submarine rapidly increases the risk of decompression sickness (DCS) following submarine escape. The hypothesis that breathing a hyperoxic gas during escape may reduce the risk of DCS was tested using goats. Shallow air saturation and simulated submarine escape dives were carried out either singularly or in combination (saturation, escape, or saturation followed by escape) using air or 60% / 40% oxygen (O2) / nitrogen (N2) mixture as breathing gas during the escapes. Post-surfacing, animals were observed for signs of DCI and O2 toxicity. Precordial Doppler ultrasound was used to score venous gas emboli (VGE) using the Kisman Masurel (KM) scale. Following escape from 2.5 MPa, the rate at which VGE disappeared in the hyperoxic group (n = 8) was significantly faster(p < 0.05) than the air group (n = 7). One case of pulmonary barotrauma with arterial gas embolism occurred in the air group, but no cases of DCS were observed. After saturation at 0.18 MPa followed by escape from 2.5 MPa, DCS occurred in four of 15 animals in the air group and in two of 16 animals in the hyperoxic group. The rate of disappearance of VGE was significantly faster (p < 0.01) in the hyperoxic group. O2 toxicity was not discernible in any of the animals.


Sujet(s)
Mal de décompression/étiologie , Embolie gazeuse/étiologie , Oxygène/administration et posologie , Médecine sous-marine , Air , Animaux , Barotraumatismes/étiologie , Décompression , Mal de décompression/prévention et contrôle , Embolie gazeuse/prévention et contrôle , Femelle , Capra , Syndrome nerveux des hautes pressions/étiologie , Mâle , Modèles animaux , Oxygène/effets indésirables , Statistique non paramétrique , Facteurs temps
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE