RÉSUMÉ
Mild therapeutic hypothermia has been shown to mitigate cerebral ischemia, reduce cerebral edema, and improve the prognosis of patients with cerebral ischemia. Adipose-derived stem cell-based therapy can decrease neuronal death and infiltration of inflammatory cells, exerting a neuroprotective effect. We hypothesized that the combination of mild therapeutic hypothermia and adipose-derived stem cells would be neuroprotective for treatment of stroke. A rat model of transient middle cerebral artery occlusion was established using the nylon monofilament method. Mild therapeutic hypothermia (33°C) was induced after 2 hours of ischemia. Adipose-derived stem cells were administered through the femoral vein during reperfusion. The severity of neurological dysfunction was measured by a modified Neurological Severity Score Scaling System. The area of the infarct lesion was determined by 2,3,5-triphenyltetrazolium chloride staining. Apoptotic neurons were detected by terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase-mediated dUTP-biotin nick end labeling (TUNEL) staining. The regeneration of microvessels and changes in the glial scar were detected by immunofluorescence staining. The inflammatory responses after ischemic brain injury were evaluated by in situ staining using markers of inflammatory cells. The expression of inflammatory cytokines was measured by reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Compared with mild therapeutic hypothermia or adipose-derived stem cell treatment alone, their combination substantially improved neurological deficits and decreased infarct size. They synergistically reduced the number of TUNEL-positive cells and glial fibrillary acidic protein expression, increased vascular endothelial growth factor levels, effectively reduced inflammatory cell infiltration and down-regulated the mRNA expression of the proinflammatory cytokines interleukin-1ß, tumor necrosis factor-α and interleukin-6. Our findings indicate that combined treatment is a better approach for treating stroke compared with mild therapeutic hypothermia or adipose-derived stem cells alone.
RÉSUMÉ
AIM: To evaluate the accuracy of a practical method (the Actual K(a+p) method) of corneal power measurement for post-LASIK eyes undergoing cataract surgery. METHODS: Ten eyes of 7 patients (4 male, 3 female, average age 50.10±4.01 years, with -11.01±3.55D mean refraction before LASIK), underwent post-LASIK phaco+IOL cataract surgery. We used the posterior corneal curvature as measured by the Pentacam in a method we named Actual K(a+p) to calculate the post-LASIK corneal power for IOL calculation. The refractive outcomes after cataract surgery were evaluated. The Actual K(a+p) was compared with the back- calculated corneal power (BCK), which was thought to be the benchmark of true corneal power. The corneal power estimated by other published methods, including Maloney, Shammas, Koch-Maloney, Savini, and McCulley, together with the true net power and equivalent K reading (EKR) as found by the Pentacam were also compared with the BCK. RESULTS: All eyes achieved satisfied refractive status after cataract surgery. The difference between the postoperative refraction and the target refraction was 0.04±0.40D, range from -0.63D and +0.85D. Among all the methods we studied, although the Bonferroni multiple comparison tests did not detect significant differences between any two of them, the Actual K(a+p) yielded the highest agreement with the BCK, with 80% of the eyes falling within ±0.5D and 100% within ±1.0D from the BCK values. CONCLUSION: The Actual K(a+p) method can provide encour- aging results in post-LASIK eyes undergoing cataract surgery.
RÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: To estimate the accuracy of posterior curvature method in corneal power calculation after LASIK surgery. METHODS: Corneal power calculation in 11 eyes that underwent Intraocular Lens (IOL) implantation after LASIK surgery (10 cases of Phaco + IOL, 1 case of IOL displacement), all of which used posterior curvature method, was analyzed retrospectively. The differences between post-operative stable refraction and target refraction were calculated, the actual corneal powers were deduced, and the expected refractive errors using other corneal power evaluation methods (auto-keratometry, corneal topography, spherical equivalent method, anterior curvature method, Equivalent K Reading method provided by Pentacam) were analyzed. In addition, refraction of 23 eyes underwent LASIK surgery were done on their 6 months follow-up. The theoretical corneal powers were deduced by subtracting the change of refraction before and after LASIK surgery from the pre-operative corneal powers. The differences between calculated corneal powers using posterior curvature method and the theoretical corneal powers were analyzed, and were compared with other corneal power evaluation methods. RESULTS: The mean uncorrected post-operative visual acuity of IOL implantation eyes using posterior curvature method was 0.8 +/- 0.2, with mean absolute refractive error from target of (0.36 +/- 0.36) D (-0.63 to +0.85 D). The ratio of eyes with absolute error within 0.25 D, 0.50 D, and 1.00 D was 55%, 73%, and 91% respectively. This result was significantly lower than that of the auto-keratometry (2.50 +/- 1.08) D, corneal topography (1.90 +/- 0.88) D, and those obtained from spherical equivalent method (2.09 +/- 1.62) D (P < 0.01) or anterior curvature method (1.45 +/- 1.10) D (P < 0.05). It also showed less bias (-1.13 to 0.85 D) when compared to the Equivalent K Reading (-1.10 to 1.80 D), but the difference was not significant (P > 0.05). For the 23 post LASIK eyes, the absolute difference between the corrected corneal power using posterior curvature method and theoretical power was (0.67 +/- 0.45) D, also showed least bias compared with other methods. CONCLUSION: It is a practical and accurate way to calculate the corneal power after LASIK surgery using posterior curvature method.
