The WHOQOL-BREF instrument: Psychometric evaluation of the Greek version in patients with advanced cancer and pain and associations with psychological distress.

OBJECTIVES: Assessment of the psychometric characteristics of the Greek version of the brief World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument (WHOQOL-BREF) in patients with advanced cancer and pain, and exploration of the association between psychological distress and quality of life (QoL). METHOD: The sample consisted of 145 patients with advanced cancer and pain who completed the WHOQOL-BREF, the Symptom Checklist-90 (SCL-90), and the Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). In analysis, the following methods were used: Cronbach's alpha, Item Response Theory (IRT), polychoric, Pearson and polyserial correlation, t-test, and Linear regression. RESULTS: The internal consistency was high for all domains of the WHOQOL-BREF (Cronbach's α ≥ 0.731). Similarly, with the exception of three items, the WHOQOL-BREF items has large discrimination parameters suggesting that they have a high ability in differentiating subjects. On SCL-90, the three dimensions with the highest scores were Depression, Somatization, and Anxiety. The overall score for psychological distress, the Global Severity Index (GSI), showed significant negative association with all the WHOQOL-BREF factor scores (Physical Health: B = -1.488, p < 0.001, Psychological Health: B = -1.688, p < 0.001, Social Relationships: B = -0.910, p < 0.001, Environment: B = -1.064, p < 0.001). Male gender was associated with lower scores for Social Relationships (B = -0.358, p = 0.007) and Environment (B = -0.293, p = 0.026). SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: The Greek version of the WHOQOL-BREF showed good psychometric properties in patients with advanced cancer and can be used as a reliable instrument in clinical practice. The level of psychological distress can be considered a determinant of QoL in patients with advanced cancer and pain, independently of pain intensity or other clinical characteristics. In cancer, the disease process can activate multiple physiological and psychological mechanisms that lead to a wide range of symptoms of psychological distress. To improve their QoL, psychological intervention focused on the identification and alleviation of psychological distress in patients with advanced cancer, and help in finding meaning in their experience, should be provided.

Detection of Neuropathic Pain in End-Stage Cancer Patients: Diagnostic Accuracy of Two Questionnaires.

INTRODUCTION: Neuropathic pain is a frequent consequence of cancer pain. Quite often, in the end stage, it is difficult to discern its presence and delineate its characteristics in the context of painful cancer complications. The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the Douleur Neuropathique en 4 Questions (DN4) and painDETECT questionnaires, which were translated to the patient's native language, for the diagnosis of peripheral neuropathic pain in oncology patients. METHODS: End-stage cancer patients who presented to the outpatient pain clinic were prospectively followed. At presentation, all patients completed the DN4 and painDETECT questionnaires, which had been translated to their native language, and the output was compared to the pain specialist's diagnosis of the neuropathic or non-neuropathic nature of the pain, which was considered as the gold standard. The diagnostic accuracy of both questionnaires was tested with receiver operating characteristic curves plotted from the data collected. RESULTS: Ninety patients (48.5% of 185 in total) presented with severe pain. Seventy-six had neuropathic pain (41.1%) and 109 had non-neuropathic pain. Of those with neuropathic pain, most had a mixed pain (bone or visceral in addition to neuropathic pain). The DN4 questionnaire had a sensitivity of 71.1% and a specificity of 88.7% in detecting neuropathic pain, with a cutoff value of ≥ 4, while the painDETECT questionnaire had a sensitivity of 26.3% and a specificity of 100%, with a cutoff value of ≥ 19. CONCLUSION: At standard cutoff values, the DN4 and painDETECT questionnaires, despite having been translated to the patient's native language, failed to adequately discriminate between neuropathic and non-neuropathic pain in our end-stage cancer patients.

Feasibility study and pharmacokinetics of low-dose paclitaxel in cancer patients with severe hepatic dysfunction.

The aim of this study is to investigate the feasibility and determine the pharmacokinetics of low-dose paclitaxel in cancer patients with severe hepatic dysfunction. This was a prospective study. Patients with liver metastases who had either transaminase serum levels higher than 10 times the upper normal limit or bilirubin serum levels higher than 5 times the upper normal limit were eligible. All patients underwent pharmacokinetic evaluation during the first course of treatment. Pharmacokinetics in severe hepatic dysfunction patients were compared with data from a reference group of patients with normal hepatic function who participated in a phase I study. Nine severe hepatic dysfunction patients were treated with paclitaxel 70 mg/m administered as a 1-h infusion every 2 weeks. They received a median three treatment courses (range 1-9) without clinically relevant toxicity. The area under the concentration-time curve of paclitaxel was markedly higher in severe hepatic dysfunction patients when compared with the normal hepatic function control group treated with the same dose (98% increase, P<0.001). Area under the concentration-time curve and the time above 0.1 micromol/l (T>0.1) concentration threshold in the severe hepatic dysfunction patients who received paclitaxel 70 mg/m approximated pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel in patients with normal liver function who received 130 mg/m. Maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) did not differ between the two groups. In conclusion, paclitaxel 70 mg/m was safely delivered every 2 weeks in patients with severe hepatic dysfunction and resulted in adequate plasma concentrations. Paclitaxel at this dosage can be taken as an option for severe hepatic dysfunction patients who are expected to get clinical benefits from taxanes.

Intensified bimonthly cisplatin with bolus 5-fluorouracil, continuous 5-fluorouracil and high-dose leucovorin (LV5FU2) in Patients with advanced gastrointestinal carcinomas: a phase I dose-finding and pharmacokinetic study.

5-fluorouracil (5FU) and cisplatin are commonly used in the treatment of gastric cancer. Continuous 5FU appears to be more effective and less toxic than bolus administration, while increasing the dose intensity of cisplatin may be advantageous. We conducted a phase I study to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of cisplatin, which could be combined with a hybrid bolus/continuous 5-FU regimen (LV5FU2), given every 2 weeks. Thirty-six patients with advanced upper gastrointestinal carcinomas entered the study. Starting cisplatin dose was 40 mg/m2 and it was increased by 10 mg/m2 in cohorts of 3-6 patients. The pharmacokinetics of 5-fluorouracil in 14 patients were compared with those of 6 patients receiving LV5FU2 alone. All patients received prophylactic granulocyte colony-stimulating factor at cisplatin doses > or =50 mg/m2. MTD was reached at 100 mg/m2 of cisplatin and, therefore, the 90 mg/m2 dose is recommended for phase II studies. Bone marrow toxicity was the most frequent dose-limiting toxicity with 1 patient dying of neutropenic sepsis. Grade III/IV neutropenia was observed in 10 patients (27.7%). Nonhematological toxicity was infrequent and mild. Pharmacokinetic analysis showed that the addition of 90 mg/m2 or 100 mg/m2 of cisplatin to LV5FU2 significantly reduced the 5FU area under the curve. Objective response rate in 23 evaluable patients was 39.2%. The combination of LV5FU2 with bimonthly 90 mg/m2 cisplatin is feasible and active and should be further evaluated in patients with advanced gastric cancer.

Interaction pharmacokinetics of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin (Caelyx) on coadministration with paclitaxel or docetaxel.

PURPOSE: To investigate the pharmacokinetics of polyethylene glycol-coated liposomal doxorubicin (PLD, Caelyx) when given as a single agent and in combination with the taxanes paclitaxel or docetaxel in humans. METHODS: The plasma kinetics of PLD were studied in 19 cancer patients treated with PLD every 4 weeks combined with either paclitaxel (on a weekly basis in seven and as a single infusion in three patients) or docetaxel (weekly in seven and as a single infusion in two). Plasma concentrations of PLD were quantified in two sets of samples per patient to compare the same pharmacokinetic parameters in each subject when treated with single-agent PLD and again with the combination. Total doxorubicin concentrations in plasma were quantified by HPLC. Pharmacokinetics were evaluated by noncompartmental analysis and the data obtained were compared for differences by a matched-pairs nonparametric test. RESULTS: Coadministration of paclitaxel produced a median/mean 54/80% increase in PLD AUC(inf) (95% confidence interval 23% to 136%, P=0.002). The observed increase was consistent among all subjects. PLD clearance was also decelerated in the presence of paclitaxel (P=0.013) while other pharmacokinetic parameters were affected modestly. A small increase in the AUC of PLD was observed in the docetaxel/PLD arm (mean increase 12%, P=0.039) while PLD clearance decreased marginally and other pharmacokinetic parameters remained unaffected. AUC extrapolated to infinity was below 8% in both arms. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed the presence of a pharmacokinetic interaction that led to higher plasma concentrations of PLD when combined with paclitaxel and to a minor extent when combined with docetaxel. This pharmacokinetic information may be of value when planning combination therapies of PLD with taxanes.

Pharmacodynamics of non-break weekly paclitaxel (Taxol) and pharmacokinetics of Cremophor-EL vehicle: results of a dose-escalation study.

We characterized the toxicity and determined the maximum tolerated dose of non-break weekly paclitaxel (Taxol) in chemotherapy-naive cancer patients, and studied pharmacokinetics of the formulation vehicle Cremophor-EL with this schedule. Twenty-three patients with primary refractory solid tumors received weekly paclitaxel at the dose range of 70-200 mg/m2. As dose-limiting toxicity we defined granulocytopenia grade > or =2 causing a treatment delay for more than 2 weeks, or febrile neutropenia or grade >2 organ-specific toxicity. Plasma kinetics of Cremophor-EL were analyzed over the first five courses of treatment. Non-break weekly paclitaxel was feasible at doses up to 110 mg/m2, while granulocytopenia precluded scheduled administration of doses > or =130 mg/m2. Clinically relevant peripheral neurotoxicity tended to occur at around 1500 mg/m2 cumulative dosage at weekly doses > or =110 mg/m2. Detectable Cremophor-EL levels were found in all pre-dose samples, but there was no evidence of accumulation up to the sixth course. Our results, discussed in the light of an overview of published data, suggest that chronic weekly administration of paclitaxel is feasible and with a lack of significant accumulation of Cremophor-EL levels at doses up to 90 mg/m2.