RÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: To compare the time to oral feeds in infants born to mothers with and without diabetes. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study of infants born at or after 34 weeks gestational age and admitted between 1/1/2020 to 01/31/2022. Time to full oral feedings was compared between infants born to mothers with and without diabetes (267 versus 918) Continuous and binomial variables were analyzed with the Mann Whitney U test and the Chi-Square test respectively. Linear regression was then conducted to explore identified potential relationships from these analyses. RESULT: Comparison of groups via univariate analysis revealed a mean difference of two more days to establish full oral feedings (p = 0.0001). Maternal pregestational diabetes (PGDM) and obesity (Body mass index; BMI > 30 kg/m2) were associated with longer time for infants to complete oral feeds (p 0.034 and 0.013 respectively). CONCLUSION: Infants born to mothers with diabetes took longer to achieve full oral feedings.
RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Late preterm births account for a large portion of preterm births, yet the optimal method of nutrition and enteral feeding in this population remains unclear and often involves intravenous (IV) fluids. PURPOSE: To develop and implement a late preterm feeding protocol in order to decrease the necessity of IV access, decrease the use of starter parenteral nutrition (PN), and reduce the pain endured by an infant in the neonatal intensive care unit. METHODS: The Plan-Do-Study-Act quality improvement model was utilized as a framework for the implementation of this quality improvement project. A literature review was conducted and subsequently, a feeding protocol was developed and included the more judicious use of starter PN. This protocol was implemented, evaluated, and adopted. A second Plan-Do-Study-Act cycle was completed with the addition of an auto-text reminder incorporated into admission notes in the electronic medical record. RESULTS: The implementation of the protocol significantly reduced placement of IV access and the use of starter (PN) in late preterm infants without considerable differences in balancing measures. The percentage of infants who received peripheral IV access declined considerably from 70% to 42% ( P = .0017) subsequently, less pain endured by the infants. There was a decrease in the initiation of starter PN from 55% to 7% ( P < .00001). IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Administering enteral feedings on admission to stable, late preterm infants reduced the need for peripheral IV access and thus decreased pain from this procedure.
Sujet(s)
Cathétérisme périphérique , Prématuré , Unités de soins intensifs néonatals , Douleur liée aux interventions , Amélioration de la qualité , Humains , Nouveau-né , Cathétérisme périphérique/méthodes , Cathétérisme périphérique/normes , Douleur liée aux interventions/prévention et contrôle , Nutrition parentérale/méthodes , Nutrition parentérale/normes , Protocoles cliniques , Femelle , Nutrition entérale/méthodes , Nutrition entérale/normes , MâleRÉSUMÉ
AIM: Determine the utility of prospective spinal ultrasound in infants of mothers with pregestational diabetes (PGDM) for the diagnosis of closed spinal dysraphism (SDs). METHODS: This prospective observational pilot study was completed at a tertiary care center between May 1, 2020 and December 30, 2022. Infants born to mothers with PGDM and with normal spinal physical examinations were included. A total of 25 mother-infant dyads were enrolled in the study and prospectively screened with spinal ultrasound. The study was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (Identifier-NCT05033275). RESULTS: Twenty-five spinal ultrasounds were performed over the course of this study with three (8%) resulting in abnormal findings that required further imaging. Follow-up with magnetic resonance imaging found one case of tethered cord syndrome. CONCLUSION: Prospective screening in infants of mothers with PGDM found one case of tethered cord syndrome. This finding suggests that risk stratified screening of mothers with diabetes might be a reasonable approach to care.
Sujet(s)
Diabète , Anomalies du tube neural , Dysraphie spinale , Nourrisson , Femelle , Humains , Mères , Projets pilotes , Études prospectives , Dysraphie spinale/imagerie diagnostique , Échographie interventionnelleRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to explore North American neonatal health care professionals' (HCPs) experience, confidence, skill, and training with the laryngeal mask airway (LMA). STUDY DESIGN: This was a cross-sectional survey. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 2,159 HCPs from Canada and the United States. Seventy nine percent had no clinical experience with the LMA, and less than 20% considered the LMA an alternative to endotracheal intubation (EI). The majority had received LMA training; however, 28% of registered nurses, 18% of respiratory therapists, 17% of physicians, and 12% of midwives had never inserted an LMA in a mannequin. Less than a quarter of respondents agreed that the current biennial Neonatal Resuscitation Program instruction paradigm is sufficient for LMA training. All groups reported low confidence and skill with LMA insertion, and compared with all other groups, the respiratory therapists had the highest reported confidence and skill. CONCLUSION: This survey study, which is the first of its kind to include midwives, demonstrates that neonatal HCPs lack experience, confidence, skill, and training with the LMA, rarely use the device, and in general, do not consider the LMA as an alternative to EI. These findings contribute to, and support the findings of previous smaller studies, and in conjunction with the diminishing opportunities for EI, highlight the need for programs to emphasize the importance of the LMA for neonatal airway management and prioritize regular LMA training, with focus that parallels the importance placed on the skills of EI and mask ventilation. KEY POINTS: · Lack of training for laryngeal mask airway use in neonatal resuscitation.. · Neonatal health care professionals rarely use the laryngeal mask airway as an alternate airway device.. · Neonatal health care professionals lack confidence and skill with the laryngeal mask airway..
Sujet(s)
Prématuré , Purpura , Nouveau-né , Nourrisson , Humains , Purpura/diagnostic , Purpura/étiologieRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: Ultrasound (US) is a common imaging modality used to evaluate spinal anomalies in newborns. However, many indications for the use of spinal US are associated with low diagnostic yield. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the indications and the diagnostic utility of spinal USs performed in newborns at our institution. We also review patient presentations for caudal regression syndrome (CRS) that was identified from the USs performed. STUDY DESIGN: This study is a retrospective review of spinal USs performed between January 1, 2006, and December 31, 2021, in newborns at a single institution. Indications for each US and any associated abnormalities were noted. Infants with abnormal USs showing CRS are described with their long-term medical outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 592 USs were performed during the specified time period of which 72 (12%) were abnormal. The presence of a sacral dimple was the most common indication for performing a spinal US, although only 14 (4%) were identified as abnormal. Of these 14, 6 (43%) were further evaluated by spinal magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at the recommendations of a pediatric radiologist and of these, only 2 (14%) had abnormal MRI findings. The two newborns with abnormal MRI findings had mothers with diabetes mellitus in their pregnancies. Of note, one additional newborn had abnormalities on spinal US that was never confirmed on MRI due to being lost to follow-up. Among the other indications, anorectal anomalies (odds ratio [OR], 7.55; 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.01-18.91), spinal mass (OR, 17.99; 95% CI, 7.86-41.2), and meningocele were most associated with abnormal findings. CONCLUSION: Overall, spinal US has a low diagnostic yield. Sacral dimple was the most common indication for performing a spinal US but had a low yield with few long-term sequelae. Anorectal anomalies had a strong association with abnormal US findings. KEY POINTS: · Sacral dimple is a common indication for spinal ultrasound.. · Spinal ultrasound has low diagnostic yield when performed for sacral dimple.. · Caudal regression syndrome is associated with maternal diabetes and numerous long-term comorbidities..
RÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess neonatologists' experience and comfort with neonatal electrical cardioversion or defibrillation (EC-D). STUDY DESIGN: Electronic surveys were distributed to academic neonatologists affiliated with 12 Midwest academic hospitals. Neonatologists were asked about their residency training; years since completing residency; current certification/competency training in the Basic Life Support (BLS), Pediatric Advanced Life Support (PALS), Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS), and Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP); experiences with EC-D; availability of a pediatric cardiologist; and their comfort levels with such procedures. Standard statistical tests evaluated comfort with EC-D. RESULTS: Seventy-two out of 180 neonatologists responded to the survey (response rate = 40%). Of them, 98.6% (71), 54.2% (39), and 37.5% (27) maintained current NRP, BLS, and PALS trainings, respectively. Also, 73.6% (n = 53) reported having performed neonatal EC-D. Of those, 50.9% (n = 27) indicated feeling slightly to very uncomfortable performing EC-D. We report a lack of BLS certification being associated with a lack of comfort (odds ratio [OR]: 0.269, 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.071, 0.936]), and a positive association between a pediatric cardiologist being present and being uncomfortable (OR: 3.722, 95% CI: [1.069, 14.059]). Those reporting greater volume and more recent experience with EC-D report more comfort. CONCLUSION: Of neonatologists who performed EC-D, half of them reported being uncomfortable. BLS certification and experience are positively associated with comfort in performing EC-D. Simulations to increase training in EC-D should be offered regularly to academic neonatologists. KEY POINTS: · Most neonatologists have performed EC-D, but many feel uncomfortable with performing EC-D.. · Many do not maintain current certification in BLS, PALS, or ACLS.. · Simulation training in EC-D will increase comfort with EC-D..
Sujet(s)
Défibrillation , Internat et résidence , Humains , Nouveau-né , Enfant , Néonatologistes , Réanimation , Enquêtes et questionnairesRÉSUMÉ
Diabetic embryopathy is defined as congenital anomalies that are linked to maternal diabetes. The association between diabetes and fetal, neonatal, and long-term complications is well-established. These complications include organ or structural maldevelopment, fetal growth abnormalities, and learning/psychiatric comorbidities. Recent studies have elucidated the pathophysiology behind these conditions and outlined new management approaches. Caudal regression syndrome, also known as sacral agenesis, is a well-known but less described complication of maternal diabetes. The purpose of this review is to summarize existing research on common neonatal morbidities in infants of mothers with diabetes with a focus on caudal regression syndrome and its long-term associations.