Sacituzumab govitecan in previously treated hormone receptor-positive/HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer: final results from a phase I/II, single-arm, basket trial.

BACKGROUND: Trophoblast cell-surface antigen-2 (Trop-2) is expressed in epithelial cancers, including hormone receptor-positive (HR+) metastatic breast cancer (mBC). Sacituzumab govitecan (SG; Trodelvy®) is an antibody-drug conjugate composed of a humanized anti-Trop-2 monoclonal antibody coupled to SN-38 at a high drug-to-antibody ratio via a unique hydrolyzable linker that delivers SN-38 intracellularly and in the tumor microenvironment. SG was granted accelerated FDA approval for metastatic triple-negative BC treatment in April 2020. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed a prespecified subpopulation of patients with HR+/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative (HER2-) HR+/HER2- mBC from the phase I/II, single-arm trial (NCT01631552), who received intravenous SG (10 mg/kg) and whose disease progressed on endocrine-based therapy and at least one prior chemotherapy for mBC. End points included objective response rate (ORR; RECIST version 1.1) assessed locally, duration of response (DOR), clinical benefit rate, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. RESULTS: Fifty-four women were enrolled between 13 February 2015 and 1 June 2017. Median (range) age was 54 (33-79) years and all received at least two prior lines of therapy for mBC. At data cut-off (1 March 2019), 12 patients were still alive. Key grade ≥3 treatment-related toxicities included neutropenia (50.0%), anemia (11.1%), and diarrhea (7.4%). Two patients discontinued treatment due to treatment-related adverse events. No treatment-related deaths occurred. At a median follow-up of 11.5 months, the ORR was 31.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 19.5%-45.6%; 17 partial responses]; median DOR was 8.7 months (95% CI 3.7-12.7), median PFS was 5.5 months (95% CI 3.6-7.6), and median OS was 12 months (95% CI 9.0-18.2). CONCLUSIONS: SG shows encouraging activity in patients with pretreated HR+/HER2- mBC and a predictable, manageable safety profile. Further evaluation in a randomized phase III trial (TROPiCS-02) is ongoing (NCT03901339). TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01631552; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT01631552.

Hybrid capture-based genomic profiling of circulating tumor DNA from patients with estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Genomic changes that occur in breast cancer during the course of disease have been informed by sequencing of primary and metastatic tumor tissue. For patients with relapsed and metastatic disease, evolution of the breast cancer genome highlights the importance of using a recent sample for genomic profiling to guide clinical decision-making. Obtaining a metastatic tissue biopsy can be challenging, and analysis of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) from blood may provide a minimally invasive alternative. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Hybrid capture-based genomic profiling was carried out on ctDNA from 254 female patients with estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer. Peripheral blood samples were submitted by clinicians in the course of routine clinical care between May 2016 and March 2017. Sequencing of 62 genes was carried out to a median unique coverage depth of 7503×. Genomic alterations (GAs) in ctDNA were evaluated and compared with matched tissue samples and genomic datasets of tissue from breast cancer. RESULTS: At least 1 GA was reported in 78% of samples. Frequently altered genes were TP53 (38%), ESR1 (31%) and PIK3CA (31%). Temporally matched ctDNA and tissue samples were available for 14 patients; 89% of mutations detected in tissue were also detected in ctDNA. Diverse ESR1 GAs including mutation, rearrangement and amplification, were observed. Multiple concurrent ESR1 GAs were observed in 40% of ESR1-altered cases, suggesting polyclonal origin; ESR1 compound mutations were also observed in two cases. ESR1-altered cases harbored co-occurring GAs in PIK3CA (35%), FGFR1 (16%), ERBB2 (8%), BRCA1/2 (5%), and AKT1 (4%). CONCLUSIONS: GAs relevant to relapsed/metastatic breast cancer management were identified, including diverse ESR1 GAs. Genomic profiling of ctDNA demonstrated sensitive detection of mutations found in tissue. Detection of amplifications was associated with ctDNA fraction. Genomic profiling of ctDNA may provide a complementary and possibly alternative approach to tissue-based genomic testing for patients with estrogen receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer.

Tetrathiomolybdate-associated copper depletion decreases circulating endothelial progenitor cells in women with breast cancer at high risk of relapse.

BACKGROUND: Bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cells (EPCs) are critical for metastatic progression. This study explores the effect of tetrathiomolybdate (TM), an anti-angiogenic copper chelator, on EPCs in patients at high risk for breast cancer recurrence. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This phase 2 study enrolled breast cancer patients with stage 3 and stage 4 without evidence of disease (NED), and stage 2 if triple-negative. TM 100 mg orally was administered to maintain ceruloplasmin <17 mg/dl for 2 years or until relapse. The primary end point was change in EPCs. RESULTS: Forty patients (28 stage 2/3, 12 stage 4 NED) were enrolled. Seventy-five percent patients achieved the copper depletion target by 1 month. Ninety-one percent of triple-negative patients copper-depleted compared with 41% luminal subtypes. In copper-depleted patients only, there was a significant reduction in EPCs/ml by 27 (P = 0.04). Six patients relapsed while on study, of which only one patient had EPCs maintained below baseline. The 10-month relapse-free survival was 85.0% (95% CI 74.6%-96.8%). Only grade 3/4 toxicity was hematologic: neutropenia (3.1% of cycles), febrile neutropenia (0.2%), and anemia (0.2%). CONCLUSIONS: TM is safe and appears to maintain EPCs below baseline in copper-depleted patients. TM may promote tumor dormancy and ultimately prevent relapse.

Employment after a breast cancer diagnosis: a qualitative study of ethnically diverse urban women.

Employment status is related to treatment recovery and quality of life in breast cancer survivors, yet little is known about return to work in immigrant and minority survivors. We conducted an exploratory qualitative study using ethnically cohesive focus groups of urban breast cancer survivors who were African-American, African-Caribbean, Chinese, Filipina, Latina, or non-Latina white. We audio- and video-recorded, transcribed, and thematically coded the focus group discussions and we analyzed the coded transcripts within and across ethnic groups. Seven major themes emerged related to the participants' work experiences after diagnosis: normalcy, acceptance, identity, appearance, privacy, lack of flexibility at work, and employer support. Maintaining a sense of normalcy was cited as a benefit of working by survivors in each group. Acceptance of the cancer diagnosis was most common in the Chinese group and in participants who had a family history of breast cancer; those who described this attitude were likely to continue working throughout the treatment period. Appearance was important among all but the Chinese group and was related to privacy, which many thought was necessary to derive the benefit of normalcy at work. Employer support included schedule flexibility, medical confidentiality, and help maintaining a normal work environment, which was particularly important to our study sample. Overall, we found few differences between the different ethnic groups in our study. These results have important implications for the provision of support services to and clinical management of employed women with breast cancer, as well as for further large-scale research in disparities and employment outcomes.

Treatment of metastatic breast cancer: second line and beyond.

Increasing use of standard chemotherapy, especially anthracycline- and taxane-based therapies, in early-stage breast cancer has led to a corresponding increase in heavily pretreated and/or treatment-resistant cases of metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Thus, second and later lines of MBC therapy frequently involve the clinically challenging picture of progressive disease and limited treatment options. While several prognostic factors have been identified to aid treatment selection in MBC patients, treatment is palliative and aimed at prolonging survival, controlling symptoms, and maximizing patients' quality of life. No globally accepted standard exists for meeting these goals, and treatment patterns vary according to region. The list of available agents for the treatment of MBC is increasing with newer chemotherapeutic agents and molecular-targeted therapies. Within recent years, several single-agent and combination chemotherapy regimens have been shown to improve progression-free survival and reduce symptoms of disease in clinical studies in patients with resistant and/or heavily pretreated MBC. However, at present, the demonstrated benefits of these medical interventions have usually not included extension of overall survival times. It is hoped that in the near future, ongoing refinements to treatment approaches used in second-line settings and beyond will allow meaningful improvements in symptom control and survival in MBC.

Phase II trial of the farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib plus fulvestrant in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer: New York Cancer Consortium Trial P6205.

BACKGROUND: Fulvestrant produces a clinical benefit rate (CBR) of approximately 45% in tamoxifen-resistant, hormone receptor (HR)-positive metastatic breast cancer (MBC) and 32% in aromatase inhibitor (AI)-resistant disease. The farnesyltransferase inhibitor tipifarnib inhibits Ras signaling and has preclinical and clinical activity in endocrine therapy-resistant disease. The objective of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of tipifarnib-fulvestrant combination in HR-positive MBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Postmenopausal women with no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease received i.m. fulvestrant 250 mg on day 1 plus oral tipifarnib 300 mg twice daily on days 1-21 every 28 days. The primary end point was CBR. RESULTS: The CBR was 51.6% [95% confidence interval (CI) 34.0% to 69.2%] in 31 eligible patients and 47.6% (95% CI 26.3% to 69.0%) in 21 patients with AI-resistant disease. A futility analysis indicated that it was unlikely to achieve the prespecified 70% CBR. Tipifarnib dose modification was required in 8 of 33 treated patients (24%). CONCLUSIONS: The target CBR of 70% for the tipifarnib-fulvestrant combination in HR-positive MBC was set too high and was not achieved. The 48% CBR in AI-resistant disease compares favorably with the 32% CBR observed with fulvestrant alone in prior studies and merit further clinical and translational evaluation.

Randomized trial of low-dose interleukin-2 vs cyclosporine A and interferon-gamma after high-dose chemotherapy with peripheral blood progenitor support in women with high-risk primary breast cancer.

High-risk primary breast cancer patients treated with high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) and stem cell support (SCS) have shown prolonged disease-free survival (DFS) in many studies; however, only one trial has demonstrated an overall survival benefit (OS). We hypothesize that the period following myeloablative therapy is ideal for immunologic manipulation and studied the effects of two different methods of immunotherapy following HDC with SCS aimed at the window of immune reconstitution. Seventy-two women with high-risk stage II or III breast cancer were randomized following HDC to receive either interleukin 2 (IL-2) at 1 million units/m(2) SQ daily for 28 days or combined cyclosporine A (CsA) at 1.25 mg/kg intravenously daily from day 0 to +28 and interferon gamma (IFN-gamma) 0.025 mg/m(2) SQ every 2 days from day +7 to +28. At a median follow-up of 67 months, no significant difference was observed in DFS or OS between the two treatment groups. The IL-2 arm had a 59% DFS (95% CI (0.45, 0.78)) and a 72% OS (95% CI (0.58, 0.88)) at 5 years. The CsA/INF-gamma arm had a similar outcome with a 55% DFS (95% CI (0.40, 0.76)) and a 78% OS (95% CI (0.65, 0.94)) at 5 years. Treatment was well tolerated, without increased toxicity.

Phase I/II study of tandem cycles of high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell support in women with advanced ovarian cancer.

The objectives of this study were to investigate the tolerability of a novel high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) regimen with peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) support in patients with pretreated advanced ovarian cancer and to determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) of topotecan in this setting. Advanced ovarian cancer patients previously treated with platinum-based first-line therapy were enrolled. After PBPC mobilization and harvesting, patients received three consecutive cycles of HDC with PBPC support. Cycle 1 was carboplatin area under the concentration curve 20 and paclitaxel 250 mg/m(2). Cycle 2 was topotecan starting at 5 mg/m(2), dose escalated in 2 mg/m(2) increments, and etoposide 600 mg/m(2). Cycle 3 was thiotepa 500 mg/m(2). After each cycle, PBPCs were infused. Granulocyte colony stimulating factor (5 microg/kg/day) was administered until neutrophil recovery occurred. Seventeen patients were enrolled; all were safety evaluable. The most common nonhematologic toxicity was grade 3 mucositis (44%). Engraftment of PBPCs was successful in all patients after each cycle, and no treatment-related deaths occurred. Of 14 patients with measurable disease, 5 (36%) had complete responses, 2 (14%) had partial responses, and 4 (29%) had stable disease. The median progression-free and overall survivals were 7 and 18 months, respectively. The MTD of topotecan was not reached. The tolerability and activity of this regimen in patients with advanced ovarian cancer warrant further investigation.

Glutamine as a neuroprotective agent in high-dose paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy: a clinical and electrophysiologic study.

AIMS: The appearance of peripheral neuropathy is the dose-limiting toxicity in many chemotherapy protocols, and glutamine has been proposed as a potentially neuroprotective agent in patients receiving paclitaxel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this non-randomised study, we assessed neurologic signs and symptoms, and changes in nerve-conduction studies in 46 consecutive patients given high-dose paclitaxel either with (n=17) or without (n=29) glutamine. Neurological assessments and electrodiagnostic studies were carried out at baseline and at least 2 weeks (median 32 days) after treatment. RESULTS: Patients who received glutamine developed significantly less weakness (P = 0.02), less loss of vibratory sensation (P = 0.04) and less toe numbness (P = 0.004) than controls. The per cent change in the compound motor action potential (CMAP) and sensory nerve action potential (SNAP) amplitudes after paclitaxel treatment was lower in the glutamine group, but this finding was not statistically significant in these small groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, serial neurologic assessment of patient symptoms and signs seemed to be a better indicator of a possible glutamine effect than sensory- or motor-nerve-conduction studies. Prospective randomised trials are needed to clarify the effect of glutamine on paclitaxel and other types of chemotherapy-induced neuropathy.

Phase II trial of sequential high-dose chemotherapy with paclitaxel, melphalan and cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and carboplatin with peripheral blood progenitor support in women with responding metastatic breast cancer.

A single high-dose cycle of chemotherapy can produce response rates in excess of 50%. However, disease-free survival (DFS) is 15-20% at 5 years. The single most important predictor of prolonged DFS is achieving a complete response (CR). Increasing the proportion of patients who achieve a complete response may improve disease-free survival. Women with metastatic breast cancer and at least a partial response (PR) to induction chemotherapy received three separate high-dose cycles of chemotherapy with peripheral blood progenitor support and G-CSF. The first intensification was paclitaxel (825 mg/m(2)), the second melphalan (180 mg/m(2)) and the third consisted of cyclophosphamide 6000 mg/m(2) (1500 mg/m(2)/day x 4), thiotepa 500 mg/m(2) (125 mg/m(2)/day x 4) and carboplatin 800 mg/m(2) (200 mg/m(2)/day x 4) (CTCb). Sixty-one women were enrolled and 60 completed all three cycles. Following the paclitaxel infusion most patients developed a reversible, predominantly sensory polyneuropathy. Of the 30 patients with measurable disease, 12 converted to CR, nine converted to a PR*, and five had a further PR, giving an overall response rate of 87%. The toxic death rate was 5%. No patient progressed on study. Thirty percent are progression-free with a median follow-up of 31 months (range 1-43 months) and overall survival is 61%. Three sequential high-dose cycles of chemotherapy are feasible and resulted in a high response rate. The challenge continues to be maintenance of response and provides the opportunity to evaluate strategies for eliminating minimal residual disease.

The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of high-dose paclitaxel monotherapy (825 mg/m2 continuous infusion over 24 h) with hematopoietic support in women with metastatic breast cancer.

PURPOSE: We evaluated the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of high-dose paclitaxel (HDP) monotherapy (825 mg/m2 continuous infusion over 24 h) with peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) and G-CSF support in 17 women with metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic data were collected in 17 women entered in a phase II trial of sequential HDP, and high-dose melphalan and cyclophosphamide/thiotepa/carboplatin. RESULTS: The maximal plasma concentration (Cmax), area under the plasma concentration time curve (AUC), apparent clearance (Clapp), duration of plasma concentration above 0.05 microM (t > 0.05 microM) for paclitaxel were (means SD): 9.11 +/- 7.45 microM, 145 +/- 88 microM x h, 8.06 +/- 2.90 l/h per m2 and 82.4 +/- 31.2 h, respectively. There was a significant correlation between the plasma paclitaxel concentration at 1 h (r2 = 0.87), 12 h (r2 = 0.85) and 23 h (r2 =0.92) and the AUC (P < 0.0001). Duration of neutropenia was brief (median 3 days, range 0-5 days) and neutrophil recovery occurred earlier (median 6 days, range 0-7 days) than could be attributed to infused PBPC. Median nadir count for platelets was 66 x 10(9)/l (range 13-160 x 10(9)/l). Pharmacodynamic analysis showed no correlation between pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax, AUC, t > 0.05 microM) and time to neutropenic nadir, duration of neutropenia, platelet count nadir and grades of neuropathy or mucositis. In ten patients in whom detailed neurologic and nerve conduction studies were performed, linear regression analysis showed a significant correlation between pre- and post-HDP treatment total neuropathy scores (r2 = 0.46, P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: HDP (825 mg/m2 continuous infusion over 24 h) did not appear to be myeloablative. The degree of neurotoxicity subsequent to HDP was associated with the degree of baseline neuropathy but was not predictable from pharmacokinetic parameters.

Bilateral facial nerve palsy secondary to the administration of high-dose paclitaxel.

Bilateral facial nerve palsy is an uncommon occurrence. We describe a case of bilateral facial nerve palsy secondary to a single cycle of high-dose paclitaxel therapy (825 mg/m2), in a woman with breast cancer. Prior to her high-dose therapy, she had a residual grade 2 peripheral neuropathy following treatment with ten cycles of standard-dose paclitaxel (total dose 3200 mg). The features of the peripheral neuropathy due to standard-dose paclitaxel, which can be both motor and sensory, are well described. Cumulative paclitaxel dose is considered a risk factor for development of the neuropathy. Although facial nerve palsy secondary to paclitaxel is not previously reported, other cranial nerve toxicity has been described. Consistent with reports of the reversibility of paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy, the facial nerve palsies in our patient resolved over 23 months. Ongoing studies of high-dose paclitaxel warrant close attention to its cumulative neurotoxic effects, particularly in patients previously treated with neurotoxic chemotherapy.

CD34+ cell dose requirements for rapid engraftment in a sequential high-dose chemotherapy regimen of paclitaxel, melphalan, and cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin (CTCb) with PBPC support in metastatic breast cancer.

Sequential high-dose chemotherapy may increase the threshold dose of CD34+ cells necessary for rapid and successful hematologic recovery. There are limited data regarding the pharmacodynamics and threshold CD34+ cell dose required for engraftment following high-dose paclitaxel. To determine the dose of CD34+ PBPC sufficient for rapid engraftment, 65 women with metastatic breast cancer undergoing a sequential high-dose paclitaxel, melphalan, and cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin (CTCb) chemotherapy regimen were evaluated. The intertreatment interval was a median of 27 days. Paclitaxel was escalated from 400 to 825 mg/m2, infused continuously (CI) over 24 h on day -4 with PBPC reinfusion on day 0. Following marrow recovery, 90 mg/m2/day of melphalan was given over 30 min on days -2 and -1, with PBPC reinfusion on day 0. On recovery, patients received CTCb on days -7 to -3, with PBPC reinfusion on day 0. G-CSF was administered after each cycle until WBCC recovery. For paclitaxel, an ANC >0.5 x 10(9)/L occurred at a median of 6 days (range 0-7 days) after PBPC reinfusion. The median nadir platelet count was 63 x 10(9)/L (range 6 x 10(9)/L-176 x 10(9)/L). Eight patients (12%) had platelet nadir <20 x 10(9)/L, and all recovered their counts to >20 x 10(9)/L on day 7. There was no clinical difference in days to engraftment between women receiving <2 or > or =2 x 10(6) CD34+ PBPC/kg following paclitaxel. All patients recovered neutrophil and platelet counts within 7 days after reinfusion of > or =1 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg and G-CSF. The data suggest that a paclitaxel dose of 825 mg/m2 is not myeloablative. For melphalan, median days to ANC >0.5 x 10(9)/L was 10 days (range 9-15), and platelet recovery to >20 x 10(9)/L was 13 days (range 0-28) after PBPC reinfusion. Median time to engraftment was more rapid in patients receiving > or =2 x 10(6) CD34+/kg versus <2 x 10(6)CD34+/kg, for both neutrophils (11 days versus 10 days, p = 0.05) and platelets (14 days versus 12 days, p < 0.01). Ninety-eight percent of patients infused with > or =2 x 10(6) CD34+/kg engrafted within 21 days. Following CTCb in this sequential regimen, a dose of > or =2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg provided for significantly more rapid neutrophil engraftment than <2 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg (9 days versus 10 days,p = 0.01), but a dose > or =3 X 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg is necessary for reliable, rapid, and sustained neutrophil and platelet engraftment by day 21.

A phase I study of high-dose BCNU, etoposide and escalating-dose thiotepa (BTE) with hematopoietic progenitor cell support in adults with recurrent and high-risk brain tumors.

This phase I dose-escalation study was performed to determine the tolerability of three-drug combination high-dose BCNU (B) (450 mg/m2), escalating-dose thiotepa (500-800 mg/m2) and etoposide (1200 mg/m2) in divided doses over four days in 22 adults with malignant primary brain tumors. Patients received G-CSF and hematopoeitic support with peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) (n = 18) or both PBPC and marrow (n = 4). The maximum tolerated dose of thiotepa with acceptable toxicity was determined as 800 mg/m2. The 100-day mortality rate was 9% (2/22). Grade III/IV toxicities included mucositis (71%), diarrhea (29%), nausea/vomiting (19%), and hepatic toxicity (14%). Neurological toxicities occurred in 24% and included seizures (two patients) and encephalopathy (three patients). Encephalopathy was transient in two patients and progressive in one patient. All patients had neutropenic fever. Median time to engraftment with absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >0.5 x 10(9)/l was 10 days (range 8-30 days). Platelet engraftment >20 x 10(9)/l occurred after 11 days (range 9-65 days). In the eighteen patients supported solely with PBPC, there was a significant inverse correlation between CD34+ dose and days to ANC (rho = -0.78, p = 0.001) and platelet engraftment (rho = -0.76, p = 0.002). Overall, 11% of evaluable patients (2/18) had a complete response to BTE. Median time to tumor progression (TTP) was 9 months, with an overall median survival of 17 months. BCNU (450 mg/m2), thiotepa (800 mg/m2) and etoposide (1200 mg/m2) in divided doses over four days is a tolerable combination HDC regimen, the efficacy of which warrants further investigation in adults with optimally resected chemoresponsive brain tumors.

High-dose thiotepa and etoposide-based regimens with autologous hematopoietic support for high-risk or recurrent CNS tumors in children and adults.

The prognosis in patients with primary brain tumors treated with surgery, radiotherapy and conventional chemotherapy remains poor. To improve outcome, combination high-dose chemotherapy (HDC) has been explored in children, but rarely in adults. This study was performed to determine the tolerability of three-drug combination high-dose thiotepa (T) and etoposide (E)-based regimens in pediatric and adult patients with high-risk or recurrent primary brain tumors. Thirty-one patients (13 children and 18 adults) with brain tumors were treated with high-dose chemotherapy: 19 with BCNU (B) and TE (BTE regimen), and 12 with carboplatin (C) and TE (CTE regimen). Patients received growth factors and hematopoietic support with marrow (n = 15), peripheral blood progenitor cells (PBPC) (n = 11) or both (n = 5). The 100 day toxic mortality rate was 3% (1/31). Grade III/IV toxicities included mucositis (58%), hepatitis (39%) and diarrhea (42%). Five patients had seizures and two had transient encephalopathy (23%). All patients had neutropenic fever and all pediatric patients required hyperalimentation. Median time to engraftment with absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >0.5 x 10(9)/l was 11 days (range 8-37 days). Time to ANC engraftment was significantly longer (P = 0.0001) in patients receiving marrow (median 14 days, range 10-37) than for PBPC (median 9.5 days, range 8-10). Platelet engraftment >50 x 10(9)/l was 24 days (range 14-53 days) in children. In adults, platelet engraftment >20 x 10(9)/l was 12 days (range 9-65 days). In 11 patients supported with PBPC, there was a significant inverse correlation between CD34+ dose and days to ANC (rho = -0.87, P = 0.009) and platelet engraftment (rho = -0.85, P = 0.005), with CD34+ dose predicting time to engraftment following HDC. Overall, 30% of evaluable patients (7/24) had a complete response (CR) (n = 3) or partial response (PR) (n = 4). Median time to tumor progression (TTP) was 7 months, with an overall median survival of 12 months. These TE-based BCNU or carboplatin three-drug combination HDC regimens are safe and tolerable with promising response rates in both children and older adults.

Phase I trial of sequential high-dose chemotherapy with escalating dose paclitaxel, melphalan, and cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin with peripheral blood progenitor support in women with responding metastatic breast cancer.

A single high-dose cycle of chemotherapy with stem cell support can produce disease-free survival of 15-20% for at least 3 years in women with responding stage IV breast cancer. North American Autologous Bone Marrow Transplant Registry data suggest that a complete response (CR) is the single most important prognostic factor associated with prolonged disease-free survival. Therefore, if sequential high-dose chemotherapy can increase the CR rate, then perhaps an increased proportion of patients will remain disease free. Women with at least a partial response (PR) to induction chemotherapy received three separate high-dose cycles of chemotherapy with peripheral blood progenitor support and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor. The first intensification was a dose escalation of paclitaxel (400-825 mg/ m2), the second intensification was melphalan (180 mg/m2), and the third intensification consisted of 6000 mg/m2 cyclophosphamide (1500 mg/m2/day), 500 mg/m2 thiotepa (125 mg/m2/day), and 800 mg/m2 carboplatin (200 mg/m2/day; CTCb). Thirty-six women were enrolled and 31 completed all three cycles. After the paclitaxel infusion most patients developed reversible predominantly sensory neuropathy. Of the 19 patients with measurable disease, 6 converted to CR, 7 converted to a PR* (the complete resolution of all soft tissue or visceral disease with sclerosis of prior lytic bone lesions), and 2 had a further PR for an overall response rate of 79%. Two patients had no further response and disease in two patients progressed, and thus they were taken off the study before CTCb. Seventy-eight percent are progression-free at a median follow-up of 14 months (range, 3-24+). Three sequential cycles of high-dose chemotherapy are feasible and were administered in this study with no mortality. Single agent paclitaxel at doses up to 825 mg/m2 were well tolerated with moderate reversible toxicity.

Harvest quality and factors affecting collection and engraftment of CD34+ cells in patients with breast cancer scheduled for high-dose chemotherapy and peripheral blood progenitor cell support.

The use of CFU-GM and CD34+ cell enumeration for assessing harvest quality and factors affecting peripheral blood progenitor cell (PBPC) harvest and engraftment were investigated in 45 women with high-risk and metastatic breast cancer scheduled for dose-intensive cyclophosphamide, thiotepa, and carboplatin (CTCb). PBPC were mobilized with standard breast cancer regimens or cyclophosphamide (1.5 g/m2) and 5 micrograms/kg/day G-CSF and used together with G-CSF for hematopoietic support post-CTCb. There was a significant correlation between peripheral blood CD34+ cells/microliter and harvest CD34+/kg (r = 0.73, p < 0.0001) and between harvest CFU-GM and CD34+ cells/kg (r = 0.5, p < 0.0001). CFU-GM clonogenic assays were of no clinical use beyond that of CD34+ cell enumeration, with the latter allowing for real-time decisions regarding harvesting. Multiple stepwise regression identified the number of prior chemotherapy cycles as the only significant clinical predictor of CD34+ cell yield. For 34 patients proceeding to CTCb with PBPC support, multiple stepwise regression identified as the best predictors for engraftment CFU-GM and CD34+ cells/kg for neutrophils and CFU-GM, CD34+ cells/kg, and the number of prior cycles of chemotherapy for platelets, respectively. A threshold dose of 1 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, obtained in 87% of these heavily pretreated breast cancer patients, was adequate to ensure engraftment within 15 days. There was no significant difference in length of hospital stay or blood product use between patients receiving 1-2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg and greater than 2.5 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg, although median time to engraftment of neutrophils (9 days versus 8 days, p = 0.007) and platelets (12 days versus 9 days, p = 0.006) was significantly longer. The established threshold of > or = 1 x 10(6) CD34+ cells/kg will allow for more confident consideration of using aliquots of this threshold dose for hematopoietic support in sequential high-dose regimens inclusive of CTCb.

Systemic adjuvant therapy of breast cancer.

Systematic adjuvant therapy has improved the outcome for women with operable breast cancer. As a result, a substantial proportion of patients with this disease are candidates for adjuvant treatment. In providing a woman with recommendations for therapy, her risk of developing recurrent breast cancer needs to be assessed in relationship to the degree of benefit she will obtain from treatment. With the range of presently available treatments, an individualized approach is necessary to provide the patient with options appropriate for her own situation. For women with a high risk of recurrence despite current standard adjuvant therapies, innovative approaches with high dose chemotherapy followed by infusion of autologous hematopoietic stem cells and growth factors are being evaluated. Ongoing clinical trials will demonstrate whether or not these newer therapies result in a better outcome.