Assessment of Temporal Somatosensory Discrimination in Females with Fibromyalgia: Reliability and Discriminative Ability of a New Assessment Tool.

We assessed the test-retest reliability and discriminative ability of a somatosensory temporal discrimination (SSTD) assessment tool for fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) and determined if pain-related variables were associated with SSTD performance. Twenty-five women with FMS and twenty-five asymptomatic women were assessed during two sessions 7 to 10 days apart. The proportion of correct responses (range 0-100) was calculated. Sociodemographic information was collected for both groups. The participants with FMS also completed the widespread pain index and the Brief Pain Inventory. Test-retest reliability was verified by calculating intraclass correlation coefficients. Discriminative ability was verified by a between-group comparison of scores using a t-test. Associations between SSTD score and pain variables were tested using Pearson or Spearman correlation coefficients. The test-retest reliability of the SSTD score was excellent (ICC > 0.9, CI: 0.79-0.96) for the asymptomatic group and good for the FMS group (ICC: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.62-0.91). The median (Q1-Q3) test session SSTD score differed significantly between the FMS 84.1 (71-88) and the asymptomatic 91.6 (83.4-96.1) groups (p < 0.001). Only pain duration was associated with the SSTD score. In conclusion, the new SSTD test seems reliable for people with FMS and is discriminative. Further studies should examine its sensitivity to change and correlations with other SSTD tests.

Clinical Value and Reliability of Quantitative Assessments of Lumbosacral Nerve Root Using Diffusion Tensor and Diffusion Weighted MR Imaging: A Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: Lumbosacral radicular pain diagnosis remains challenging. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) have potential to quantitatively evaluate symptomatic nerve root, which may facilitate diagnosis. PURPOSE: To determine the ability of DTI and DWI metrics, namely fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), to discriminate between healthy and symptomatic lumbosacral nerve roots, to evaluate the association between FA and ADC values and patient symptoms, and to determine FA and ADC reliability. STUDY TYPE: Systematic review. SUBJECTS: Eight hundred twelve patients with radicular pain with or without radiculopathy caused by musculoskeletal-related compression or inflammation of a single, unilateral lumbosacral nerve root and 244 healthy controls from 29 studies. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: Diffusion weighted echo planar imaging sequence at 1.5 T or 3 T. ASSESSMENT: An extensive systematic review of the literature was conducted in Embase, Scopus, and Medline databases. FA and ADC values in symptomatic and contralateral lumbosacral nerve roots were extracted and summarized, together with intra- and inter-rater agreements. Where available, associations between DWI or DTI parameters and patient symptoms or symptom duration were extracted. STATISTICAL TESTS: The main results of the included studies are summarized. No additional statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: The DTI studies systematically found significant differences in FA values between the symptomatic and contralateral lumbosacral nerve root of patients suffering from radicular pain with or without radiculopathy. In contrast, identification of the symptomatic nerve root with ADC values was inconsistent for both DTI and DWI studies. FA values were moderately to strongly correlated with several symptoms (eg, disability, nerve dysfunction, and symptom duration). The inter- and intra-rater reliability of DTI parameters were moderate to excellent. The methodological quality of included studies was very heterogeneous. DATA CONCLUSION: This systematic review showed that DTI was a reliable and discriminative imaging technique for the assessment of symptomatic lumbosacral nerve root, which more consistently identified the symptomatic nerve root than DWI. Further studies of high quality are needed to confirm these results. EVIDENCE LEVEL: N/A TECHNICAL EFFICACY: Stage 2.

Exercise therapy including the cervical extensor muscles in individuals with neck pain: A systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To review the use (dosage parameters and combination with other therapeutic interventions) of cervical extensor muscle exercises and their effect on pain, disability (primary outcomes), range of motion, endurance and strength (secondary outcomes) in people with neck pain. DATA SOURCES: An extensive literature search was conducted through MEDLINE (Ovid), Scopus (Elsevier) and Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) up to May 2023. The reference lists of all included studies and relevant reviews were screened for additional studies. REVIEW METHODS: Randomised controlled trials reporting the use of cervical extensor muscle exercises (alone or combined) applied to adults with idiopathic or traumatic neck pain were included. Study selection, data extraction and critical appraisal (PEDro assessment scale) were performed by two blinded reviewers. Data extraction included dosage parameters, other modalities combined with these exercises and outcomes. RESULTS: Thirty-five randomised controlled trails (eight of which were complementary analyses) with 2409 participants fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Twenty-six were of moderate to high quality. In most studies, cervical extensor muscle exercises were combined with various other therapeutic modalities and applied at different dosages. Only two studies (one high and one low quality) specifically assessed their effectiveness. The high-quality study showed significant improvements in neck pain and disability, pressure point threshold and neck mobility after both low load and high load training for 6 weeks. CONCLUSION: The results suggest cervical extensor muscle exercises may reduce neck pain and disability; however firm conclusions cannot be drawn because of the few studies that addressed this question and the heterogeneity of the dosage parameters.

[Recommendations for functional evaluation and rehabilitation of chronic low back pain]. / Recommandations pour l'évaluation et la rééducation fonctionnelles du patient souffrant d'une lombalgie chronique.

The majority of non-specific low back pain has a favourable evolution within a short period of time but in some cases the pain becomes persistent or recurrent. These chronic forms are responsible for most of the social and economic burden of low back pain. The crucial role of psycho-social factors in the chronicisation of low back pain justifies a thorough bio-psycho-social assessment. An active semi-intensive ambulatory multidisciplinary programme (Spine Unit Center) that complies with international and national recommendations (KCE and INAMI) has demonstrated its effectiveness in chronic low back pain in terms of algo-functional, physical and psycho-social components. In contrast to intensive programmes requiring hospitalisation, this outpatient treatment allows the patient to remain in his/her social and professional network. The active participation and motivation of the patient are essential for the success of the treatment. The multidisciplinary team will help the patient to define his/her functional objectives and to manage, via the psychologist, emotional aspects. The programme includes therapeutic education and physical reconditioning sessions including progressive aerobic training, group exercises, and individualised and progressive strengthening of the trunk muscles. The introduction of physical activity at home will be encouraged in order to sustain the changes in the patient's behaviour.

La majorité des lombalgies non spécifiques présente une évolution favorable dans un délai assez court, mais, dans certains cas, les douleurs deviennent persistantes ou récurrentes. Ces formes chroniques sont responsables de l'essentiel du poids social et économique des lombalgies. Le rôle crucial des facteurs psycho-sociaux dans la chronicisation de la lombalgie justifie une évaluation bio-psycho-sociale approfondie. Un programme pluridisciplinaire ambulatoire actif semi-intensif («Clinique du Dos¼) répondant aux recommandations internationales et nationales (KCE et INAMI) a démontré une efficacité sur les composantes algo-fonctionnelles, physiques et psycho-sociales du patient lombalgique chronique. Contrairement aux programmes intensifs imposant une hospitalisation, cette prise en charge ambulatoire permet au patient de rester dans son réseau social et professionnel. La participation active et la motivation du patient constituent les éléments essentiels pour la réussite du traitement. L'équipe pluridisciplinaire l'aidera à définir ses objectifs fonctionnels et à gérer, via le psychologue, certains aspects émotionnels en lien avec la douleur. Le programme comprend des séances d'éducation thérapeutique et de reconditionnement physique, incluant un entraînement aérobie progressif, une gymnastique collective de tonification et un renforcement individualisé et graduel des muscles du tronc. L'instauration d'une activité physique à domicile sera encouragée de manière à pérenniser les changements de comportement du patient.

Feasibility and Acceptability of a Home-Based Sensory Perception Training Game for Patients with Fibromyalgia: A Pilot Study.

Objective: The primary aim of this pilot study was to test the feasibility and acceptability of a prototype of a novel digital system enabling somatosensory training at home by means of a gamified mobile application in patients with chronic pain. The secondary aims were to test the effect size of the intervention on clinical outcomes to power a subsequent randomized controlled trial. Materials and Methods: We conducted a pilot randomized controlled trial in patients with fibromyalgia. This was an 8-week crossover study, which included a 4-week somatosensory training phase (daily use with the novel digital system) and a 4-week control phase (no use of this new system) in a random order. Feasibility was tested by objectively measuring the adherence and retention rates. Acceptability and changes in pain and disability were measured through data from subjective questionnaires. Results: Thirty-five patients completed the study. The satisfaction questionnaire indicated high training enjoyment, ease of use for daily training and interest to continue to use the intervention after the study. The adherence (93%) and retention (94%) rates were high. The effect sizes were moderate for pain intensity (0.57). Conclusion: The novel gamified technology for remotely delivered somatosensory training is feasible in a group of patients with fibromyalgia, and results in high engagement, satisfaction, and adherence. A subsequent clinical trial with the final version of the technology platform, including a longer training with more sensory training tasks and a bigger sample size is necessary.

Effectiveness of resisted training through translation of the pelvis in chronic low back pain.

BACKGROUND: Resisted training of the trunk muscles improves outcomes in chronic low back pain (CLBP). The Itensic b-effect machine was designed to provide resisted training through posterior translation of the pelvis in a seated, forward-tilted position, in contrast with traditional machines that involve extension of the trunk. OBJECTIVE: To study the effectiveness of lumbopelvic training on the Itensic b-effect machine in individuals with CLBP. METHODS: Participants were allocated to 4 weeks of either progressive Itensic (I) training in addition to an education/exercise (EE) program (I+EE group, n= 23) or the education/exercise program alone (EE group, n= 22). PRIMARY OUTCOME: Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ). SECONDARY OUTCOMES: pain (0-10 numeric rating scale), trunk extensor endurance (Sorensen test), motor control (thoraco-lumbar dissociation test) and mobility (finger-to-floor test). RESULTS: RMDQ score improved more in the I+EE group than in the EE group (with a between-group difference at the pos-test). Pain and mobility improved in the I+EE group only, motor control improved in both groups with no between-group difference and the Sorensen test did not improve significantly in either group. CONCLUSIONS: Resisted posterior pelvic translation using the Itensic machine in addition to an education/exercise program improved disability, pain and mobility more than the education/exercise program alone.

Several low back pain-related misbeliefs are still around in 2020: A cross-sectional survey in Belgium.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Low back pain (LBP)-related misbeliefs are known to be among risk factors for LBP chronification and for persistence of chronic pain. The main objective of this study was to investigate the current LBP-related beliefs in the general population in Belgium, considering the fact that the last survey in Belgium about the topic was conducted more than 15 years ago. METHODS: A cross-sectional study design was used. Belgian adults (>17 years old) were recruited in the three regions of the country by means of non-probabilistic recruitment methods. Participants were invited to fill in a battery of questionnaires including demographic questions as well as questions about their LBP history and the LBP Beliefs Questionnaire (LBPBQ). RESULTS: A total of 3724 individuals participated in the study. The LBPBQ scores indicated several LBP-related misbeliefs. About 15%-25% of participants still think that imaging tests can always identify the cause of pain and that bed rest is the mainstay of therapy. The majority of the participants think that "unnecessary" movements should be avoided when having LBP (58% of the respondents), and that they should "take it easy" until the pain goes away (69%). Most respondents also had maladaptive/wrong expectations, for example, a systematic worsening with time (65%) and a need for surgery in case of disc herniation (54%). CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that in 2020 several LBP-related misbeliefs are still current in Belgium, particularly regarding the vulnerability of the spine. Therefore, further efforts to improve LBP-related beliefs/knowledge in the general population are necessary.

The Effect of Adaptive Sports on Individuals with Acquired Neurological Disabilities and Its Role in Rehabilitation: A Systematic Review.

The aims of this systematic review were to report on the feasibility of adaptive sports for individuals with acquired central neurological lesion; to analyze the effects of this approach according to the domains of the International Classification of Functioning, Health and Disability (ICF); and to emit guiding points for future research. Two authors searched PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane, Pedro, and SPORTdiscus for eligible trials. Data concerning demographics, outcome measures, results, and conclusions were extracted, and a qualitative synthesis was performed. Adaptive sports seem to be a feasible, efficient, and cost-effective complement to conventional rehabilitation. Significant effects were found on all domains of the ICF, except "environmental factors." Key factors, such as intervention volume, intensity, and type, play a determining role. This review is the first to expose the beneficial effects of adaptive sports practice among individuals with neurological lesions by relying on prospective evidence.

Beliefs in the population about cracking sounds produced during spinal manipulation.

OBJECTIVES: To examine beliefs about cracking sounds heard during high-velocity low-amplitude (HVLA) thrust spinal manipulation in individuals with and without personal experience of this technique. METHODS: We included 100 individuals. Among them, 60 had no history of spinal manipulation, including 40 who were asymptomatic with or without a past history of spinal pain and 20 who had nonspecific spinal pain. The remaining 40 patients had a history of spinal manipulation; among them, 20 were asymptomatic and 20 had spinal pain. Participants attended a one-on-one interview during which they completed a questionnaire about their history of spinal manipulation and their beliefs regarding sounds heard during spinal manipulation. RESULTS: Mean age was 43.5±15.4years. The sounds were ascribed to vertebral repositioning by 49% of participants and to friction between two vertebras by 23% of participants; only 9% of participants correctly ascribed the sound to the formation of a gas bubble in the joint. The sound was mistakenly considered to indicate successful spinal manipulation by 40% of participants. No differences in beliefs were found between the groups with and without a history of spinal manipulation. CONCLUSIONS: Certain beliefs have documented adverse effects. This study showed a high prevalence of unfounded beliefs regarding spinal manipulation. These beliefs deserve greater attention from healthcare providers, particularly those who practice spinal manipulation.

Cross-cultural translation, validity, and reliability of the French version of the Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire.

Pain physiology education is an important component in the management of patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain. The Neurophysiology of Pain Questionnaire (NPQ) was developed in English to assess pain physiology knowledge in patients. This study aimed to translate the NPQ into French (NPQ-Fr) and to investigate the main psychometric properties of the NPQ-Fr. The translation was performed using the best practice translation guidelines. One hundred and one French-speaking patients with chronic non-specific spinal pain completed the NPQ-Fr to assess its acceptability and presence of floor/ceiling effects and test its dimensionality. The construct validity was tested by comparing the patients' NPQ-Fr scores to those of 17 physiotherapists and investigating its correlation with subscales of the Short Form-36 questionnaire. The reliability (i.e., internal consistency and test-retest reliability) was also investigated. To test the test-retest reliability, 70 patients were asked to complete the NPQ-Fr twice with one week in between. Regarding the NPQ-Fr psychometric properties: 1) acceptability was good; 2) internal consistency reached a Cronbach α-coefficient of 0.44; 3) no floor and ceiling effects were observed in patients; 4) a principal factor analysis generated three major factors; 5) construct validity was good; and 6) reliability was acceptable (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.644; standard error of measurement = 1.5). The NPQ-Fr has satisfactory basic psychometric properties in patients with chronic spinal pain.

A comparison of two stretching programs for hamstring muscles: A randomized controlled assessor-blinded study.

Most parameters regarding hamstring flexibility training programs have been investigated; however, the joint (i.e. hip or knee) on which the stretching should preferentially be focused needs to be further explored. This randomized controlled assessor-blinded study aimed to investigate the influence of this parameter. We randomly assigned 111 asymptomatic participants with tight hamstring muscles in three groups: a control group and two groups following a different home-based 8-week (five 10-minute sessions per week) hamstring stretching program (i.e. stretching performed by flexing the hip while keeping the knee extended [SH] or by first flexing the hip with a flexed knee and then extending the knee [SK]). Range of motion (ROM) of hip flexion and knee extension were measured before and after the stretching program by means of the straight leg raising test and the passive knee extension angle test, respectively. Eighty-nine participants completed the study. A significant increase in ROM was observed at post-test. Analyses showed significant group-by-time interactions for changes regarding all outcomes. Whereas the increase in hip flexion and knee extension ROM was higher in the stretching groups than in the CG (especially for the SH group p < 0.05), no differences between the two stretching groups were observed (p > 0.05). In conclusion, the fact that both stretching programs resulted in similar results suggests no influence of the joint at which the stretching is focused upon, as assessed by the straight leg raising and knee extension angle tests.

Lumbopelvic motor control and low back pain in elite soccer players: a cross-sectional study.

This study aimed to investigate the relationship between the history of low back pain and quality of lumbopelvic motor control in soccer players. Forty-three male elite soccer players (mean age, 18.2 ± 1.4 years) filled in questionnaires related to low back pain and attended a session to assess lumbopelvic motor control by means of five tests (the bent knee fall out test, the knee lift abdominal test, the sitting knee extension test, the waiter's bow and the transversus abdominis test). A physiotherapist, blinded to the medical history of the participants, scored (0 = failed, 1 = correct) the performance of the players for each of the tests resulting in a lumbopelvic motor control score ranging from 0 to 5. Forty-seven per cent of the soccer players reported a disabling low back pain episode lasting at least two consecutive days in the previous year. These players scored worse lumbopelvic motor control than players without a history of low back pain (lumbopelvic motor control score of 1.8 vs. 3.3, P < 0.01). The between-groups difference was particularly marked for the bent knee fall out test, the knee lift abdominal test and the transversus abdominis test (P < 0.01). In conclusion, most soccer players with a history of low back pain had an altered lumbopelvic motor control. Further research should examine whether lumbopelvic motor control is etiologically involved in low back pain episodes in soccer players.

Is the Sørensen test valid to assess muscle fatigue of the trunk extensor muscles?

BACKGROUND: Very few studies have quantified the degree of fatigue characterized by the decline in the maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) force of the trunk extensors induced by the widely used Sørensen test. OBJECTIVE: Measure the degree of fatigue of the trunk extensor muscles induced by the Sørensen test. METHODS: Eighty young healthy subjects were randomly divided into a control group (CG) and an experimental group (EG), each including 50% of the two genders. The EG performed an isometric MVC of the trunk extensors (pre-fatigue test) followed by the Sørensen test, the latter being immediately followed by another MVC (post-fatigue test). The CG performed only the pre- and post-fatigue tests without any exertion in between. RESULTS: The comparison of the pre- and post-fatigue tests revealed a significant (P< 0.05) decrease in MVC force normalized by body mass (-13%) in the EG, whereas a small increase occurred in the CG (+2.7%, P= 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that the Sørensen test performed until failure in a young healthy population results in a reduced ability of the trunk extensor muscles to generate maximal force, and indicates that this test is valid for the assessment of fatigue in trunk extensor muscles.

Protection against muscle damage induced by electrical stimulation: efficiency of a preconditioning programme.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to explore the efficiency of a preconditioning programme composed of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) in the protection against muscle damage induced by a subsequent bout of NMES. METHODS: Sixteen male volunteers were split up into a control group (CG; n = 8) and a preconditioned group (PCG; n = 8). Both groups attended two NMES bouts (test 1 and test 2) spaced 5 weeks apart. Each one consisted in 100 quadriceps contractions and 100 hamstrings contractions. PCG attended five additional progressive NMES sessions between test 1 and test 2. The outcome measures were the changes in muscle soreness [0-10 pain score on visual analogue pain scale (VAS)], muscle flexibility and serum creatine kinase (CK) activity; they were assessed before (pre-T1) and after (post-T1) test 1 and before (pre-T2) and after (post-T2) test 2. RESULTS: Damage markers increased similarly in both groups after test 1 (at post-T1, VAS scores = 4·18 ± 2 and 4·43 ± 1·56 cm in CG and PCG, respectively; CK activity = 2307 ± 3774 and 1671 ± 1790 IU l(-1) in CG and PCG, respectively). Compared with test 1, these damage markers were reduced after test 2 in CG (at post-T2, VAS score = 2·68 ± 1·27 cm and CK activity = 218 ± 72 IU l(-1) ). Muscle soreness was further reduced after test 2 in PCG (VAS score = 0·37 ± 0·74 cm). CONCLUSIONS: A protective effect against muscle damage can be obtained after only one NMES bout, and an additional protective effect can be induced by a preconditioning programme.

Relationship between different measures of pain-related fear and physical capacity of the spine in patients with chronic low back pain.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: It has been controversially stated that pain-related fear is a more important determining factor for disability in chronic low back pain (CLBP) than pain or physical impairment in itself. So far, the relationship between psychological and physiological determinants of chronic pain, that is, pain-related fear and physiological abilities, remains unclear. PURPOSE: To evaluate whether pain-related fear assessed by different tools (both task specific and non task specific) is related to physical capacity measured by specific spine tests and, secondarily, to explore the relationship between different pain-related fear assessment tools. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING: Cross-sectional study. PATIENT SAMPLE: Fifty patients with CLBP (50% women; meanage [standard deviationage]: 44.2 [9.5 years]). OUTCOME MEASURES: Physical capacity by means of three specific spine tests, that is, the finger-floor distance test (flexibility), a maximal isometric strength test of trunk extensor muscles (strength), and the Sorensen test (endurance). Pain-related fear by means of self-report measures, that is, the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), the Photograph Series of Daily Activities (PHODA), and a fear visual analog scale (FVAS) tailored to the spine tests. METHODS: Participants were asked to complete the TSK and PHODA and to perform the three spine tests. Right before performing each of the spine tests, an FVAS was filled out. Linear regression analyses controlling for gender and age were performed to study the association between the pain-related fear measurements and the results of the spine tests. To investigate the relationship between the pain-related fear measurements, correlation tests were performed. RESULTS: The linear regression analyses revealed that neither the TSK and PHODA scores nor the FVAS scores were significantly related to the physical capacity measurements. The correlational tests showed no significant correlation between the PHODA, TSK, and FVAS scores. CONCLUSIONS: The present study shows that neither the task-specific tool (FVAS) nor the non task-specific questionnaires (TSK and PHODA) were significantly correlated to the spine tests in patients with CLBP. This is contrary to earlier evidence according to which physical capacity is inversely related to the level of pain-related fear, and it suggests that one should not draw conclusions about physical capacity based on pain-related fear scores. Furthermore, the different assessment tools for pain-related fear were surprisingly not correlated with each other.

Alteration of muscle function after electrical stimulation bout of knee extensors and flexors.

The purpose was to study the effects on muscle function of an electrical stimulation bout applied unilaterally on thigh muscles in healthy male volunteers. One group (ES group, n = 10) received consecutively 100 isometric contractions of quadriceps and 100 isometric contractions of hamstrings (on-off ratio 6-6 s) induced by neuromuscular electrical stimulations (NMES). Changes in muscle torque, muscle soreness (0-10 VAS), muscle stiffness and serum creatine kinase (CK) activity were assessed before the NMES exercise (pre-ex) as well as 24h (d+1), 48h (d+2) and 120h (d+5) after the bout. A second group (control group, n = 10) were submitted to the same test battery than the ES group and with the same time-frame. The between-group comparison indicated a significant increase in VAS scores and in serum levels of CK only in the ES group. In the ES group, changes were more pronounced in hamstrings than in quadriceps and peaked at d+2 (quadriceps VAS scores = 2.20 ± 1.55 a.u. (0 at pre-ex); hamstrings VAS scores = 3.15 ± 2.14 a.u. (0 at pre-ex); hip flexion angle = 62 ± 5° (75 ± 6° at pre-ex); CK activity = 3021 ± 2693 IU·l(-1) (136 ± 50 IU·l(-1) at pre-ex)). The results of the present study suggested the occurrence of muscle damage that could have been induced by the peculiar muscle recruitment in NMES and the resulting overrated mechanical stress. The sensitivity to the damaging effects of NMES appeared higher in the hamstrings than in quadriceps muscles.

Comparison of active and electrostimulated recovery strategies after fatiguing exercise.

The purpose of this study was to compare an electrostimulated to an active recovery strategy after a submaximal isometric fatiguing exercise. Nineteen healthy men completed three sessions (separated by at least 4 weeks) which included a knee extensors provocation exercise consisting of 3 sets of 25 isometric contractions. Contraction intensity level was fixed respectively at 60%, 55% and 50% of previously determined maximal voluntary contraction for the first, second and third sets. This provocation exercise was followed by either an active (AR) recovery (25 min pedaling on a cycle ergometer), an electrostimulated (ESR) recovery (25-min continuous and non-tetanic (5 Hz) stimulation of the quadriceps) or a strictly passive recovery (PR). Peak torques of knee extensors and subjective perception of muscle pain (VAS, 0-10) were evaluated before (pre-ex), immediately after the provocation exercise (post-ex), after the recovery period (post-rec), as well as 75 minutes (1h15) and one day (24h) after the exercise bout. Time course of peak torque was similar among the different recovery modes: ~ 75% of initial values at post-ex, ~ 90% at post-rec and at 1h15. At 24h, peak torque reached a level close to baseline values (PR: 99.1 ± 10.7%, AR: 105.3 ± 12.2%, ESR: 104.4 ± 10.5%). VAS muscle pain scores decreased rapidly between post-ex and post-rec (p < 0.001); there were no significant differences between the three recovery modes (p = 0.64). In conclusion, following a submaximal isometric knee extension exercise, neither electrostimulated nor active recovery strategies significantly improved the time course of muscle function recovery. Key pointsThree sets of submaximal isometric contractions at 60%, 55% and 50% of MVC induced an early fatigue without DOMS but did not lead to exhaustion.In comparison with passive recovery, active and electrostimulated recovery did not lead to significantly higher MVC torques 24h after the exercise bout.No significant differences were demonstrated between the effects of passive, active and electrostimulated recoveries on muscle pain after repeated submaximal isometric contractions.