Ablative Radiation Therapy to Restrain Everything Safely Treatable (ARREST): A Phase I study of Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) for poly-metastatic disease.

PURPOSE: This phase 1 study aimed to assess the safety and feasibility of SABR delivery to all sites of polymetastatic disease (>10 metastases). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A 3+3 study design was used with five dose levels from 6 Gy (6 Gy x 1) to 30 Gy (6 Gy weekly x 5). Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as any grade 4 or 5 toxicity, or more than three grade 3 toxicities within six weeks of treatment. The primary endpoint was the maximal tolerated dose, defined as the dose level where ≥ 2/6 of patients experienced DLT. Secondary endpoints included quality of life (QOL; FACT-G and EQ-5D-5L) at 6-weeks post-treatment, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Thirteen patients were accrued: 12 Gy (n=3), 18 Gy (n=3), 24 Gy (n=4), 30 Gy (n=3) and 207 lesions were treated. Nine patients (69%) had acute toxicity: grade 1 (n=6, 46%), grade 2 (n=2, 15%; n=1 pneumonitis and n=1 fatigue) and grade 3 (n=1, 7.7%, neutropenia). There were no grade 4 or 5 toxicities. Mean ± SD QOL (FACT-G and EQ-5D-5L health state) was 80.4 ± 21.9 and 77.4 ± 20.9 at baseline versus 76.4 ± 21.8 and 68.0 ± 24.2 at 6-week follow-up (p=0.009 and p=0.055, respectively). With a median follow-up of 8.7 months post-treatment (IQR: 2.4-24 months), 8 of 13 patients had disease progression (62%). The median and 12-month PFS were 3.6 months and 11.3% respectively. The median and 12-month OS were 13.8 months and 62% respectively. CONCLUSIONS: In this phase I trial, SABR for polymetastatic disease was technically feasible with acceptable acute toxicity at dose levels up to 30 Gy (6 Gy weekly x 5). DLT was not observed.

Deep learning-based ultrasound auto-segmentation of the prostate with brachytherapy implanted needles.

BACKGROUND: Accurate segmentation of the clinical target volume (CTV) corresponding to the prostate with or without proximal seminal vesicles is required on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) images during prostate brachytherapy procedures. Implanted needles cause artifacts that may make this task difficult and time-consuming. Thus, previous studies have focused on the simpler problem of segmentation in the absence of needles at the cost of reduced clinical utility. PURPOSE: To use a convolutional neural network (CNN) algorithm for segmentation of the prostatic CTV in TRUS images post-needle insertion obtained from prostate brachytherapy procedures to better meet the demands of the clinical procedure. METHODS: A dataset consisting of 144 3-dimensional (3D) TRUS images with implanted metal brachytherapy needles and associated manual CTV segmentations was used for training a 2-dimensional (2D) U-Net CNN using a Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) loss function. These were split by patient, with 119 used for training and 25 reserved for testing. The 3D TRUS training images were resliced at radial (around the axis normal to the coronal plane) and oblique angles through the center of the 3D image, as well as axial, coronal, and sagittal planes to obtain 3689 2D TRUS images and masks for training. The network generated boundary predictions on 300 2D TRUS images obtained from reslicing each of the 25 3D TRUS images used for testing into 12 radial slices (15° apart), which were then reconstructed into 3D surfaces. Performance metrics included DSC, recall, precision, unsigned and signed volume percentage differences (VPD/sVPD), mean surface distance (MSD), and Hausdorff distance (HD). In addition, we studied whether providing algorithm-predicted boundaries to the physicians and allowing modifications increased the agreement between physicians. This was performed by providing a subset of 3D TRUS images of five patients to five physicians who segmented the CTV using clinical software and repeated this at least 1 week apart. The five physicians were given the algorithm boundary predictions and allowed to modify them, and the resulting inter- and intra-physician variability was evaluated. RESULTS: Median DSC, recall, precision, VPD, sVPD, MSD, and HD of the 3D-reconstructed algorithm segmentations were 87.2 [84.1, 88.8]%, 89.0 [86.3, 92.4]%, 86.6 [78.5, 90.8]%, 10.3 [4.5, 18.4]%, 2.0 [-4.5, 18.4]%, 1.6 [1.2, 2.0] mm, and 6.0 [5.3, 8.0] mm, respectively. Segmentation time for a set of 12 2D radial images was 2.46 [2.44, 2.48] s. With and without U-Net starting points, the intra-physician median DSCs were 97.0 [96.3, 97.8]%, and 94.4 [92.5, 95.4]% (p < 0.0001), respectively, while the inter-physician median DSCs were 94.8 [93.3, 96.8]% and 90.2 [88.7, 92.1]%, respectively (p < 0.0001). The median segmentation time for physicians, with and without U-Net-generated CTV boundaries, were 257.5 [211.8, 300.0] s and 288.0 [232.0, 333.5] s, respectively (p = 0.1034). CONCLUSIONS: Our algorithm performed at a level similar to physicians in a fraction of the time. The use of algorithm-generated boundaries as a starting point and allowing modifications reduced physician variability, although it did not significantly reduce the time compared to manual segmentations.

Is Ultrahypofractionated Whole Pelvis Radiation Therapy (WPRT) as Well Tolerated as Conventionally Fractionated WPRT in Patients With Prostate Cancer? Early Results From the HOPE Trial.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this work was to evaluate the acute toxicity and quality-of-life (QOL) impact of ultrahypofractionated whole pelvis radiation therapy (WPRT) compared with conventional WPRT fractionation after high-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy (HDR-BT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: The HOPE trial is a phase 2, multi-institutional randomized controlled trial of men with prostate-confined disease and National Comprehensive Cancer Network unfavorable intermediate-, high-, or very-high-risk prostate cancer. Patients were randomly assigned to receive conventionally fractionated WPRT (standard arm) or ultrahypofractionated WPRT (experimental arm) in a 1:1 ratio. All patients underwent radiation therapy with 15 Gy HDR-BT boost in a single fraction followed by WPRT delivered with conventional fractionation (45 Gy in 25 daily fractions or 46 Gy in 23 fractions) or ultrahypofractionation (25 Gy in 5 fractions delivered on alternate days). Acute toxicities measured during radiation therapy and at 6 weeks posttreatment were assessed using the clinician-reported Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0, and QOL was measured using the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-50) and International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS). RESULTS: A total of 80 patients were enrolled and treated across 3 Canadian institutions, of whom 39 and 41 patients received external radiation therapy with conventionally fractionated and ultrahypofractionated WPRT, respectively. All patients received androgen deprivation therapy except for 2 patients treated in the ultrahypofractionated arm. The baseline clinical characteristics of the 2 arms were similar, with 51 (63.8%) patients having high or very-high-risk prostate cancer disease. Treatment was well tolerated with no significant differences in the rate of acute adverse events between arms. No grade 4 adverse events or treatment-related deaths were reported. Ultrahypofractionated WPRT had a less detrimental impact on the EPIC-50 bowel total, function, and bother domain scores compared with conventional WPRT in the acute setting. By contrast, more patients treated with ultrahypofractionated WPRT reached the minimum clinical important difference on the EPIC-50 urinary domains. No significant QOL differences between arms were noted in the sexual and hormonal domains. CONCLUSIONS: Ultrahypofractionated WPRT after HDR-BT is a well-tolerated treatment strategy in the acute setting that has less detrimental impact on bowel QOL domains compared with conventional WPRT.

Isolated Hodgkin lymphoma of the intracranial dura: A case report and review of the literature.

Primary dural Hodgkin lymphoma (PDHL) is an extremely rare subset of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Its existence is controversial, as Hodgkin lymphoma is not traditionally thought to arise from the central nervous system (CNS) or its meninges and only 0.02% of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma have any CNS involvement. We report a case of a 71-year-old Caucasian man who presented with progressive fatigue and sudden onset slurred speech, disorientation, and memory loss. Brain imaging identified a large extra-axial right frontal mass, and he underwent urgent subtotal resection. Pathology and subsequent workup revealed Stage IAE classical Hodgkin lymphoma of the right frontal dura, with no extra-cranial disease or leptomeningeal spread detected. The patient was subsequently treated with ABVD chemotherapy (completed 2.5 of 4 planned cycles) and 36 Gy in 20 fractions of consolidative involved-site radiotherapy (ISRT). He has been followed for 5 years with no clinical or radiological signs of recurrence. This is the second confirmed case of intracranial PDHL reported in the literature, with the longest follow-up for any case of PDHL.

The use of Lutetium-177 PSMA radioligand therapy with high dose rate brachytherapy for locally recurrent prostate cancer after previous definitive radiation therapy: a randomized, single-institution, phase I/II study (ROADSTER).

BACKGROUND: Isolated local failure (ILF) can occur in patients who initially receive definitive radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Salvage therapy for ILF includes high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy. Prostate Specific Membrane Antigen (PSMA) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) can accurately detect ILF and can exclude extraprostatic disease. Lutetium-177 PSMA Radioligand Therapy (RLT) is a novel treatment for prostate cancer that can target prostate cancer accurately, while sparing radiation dose to normal tissues. METHODS: ROADSTER is a phase I/II randomized, single-institution study. Patients with an ILF of prostate cancer after definitive initial radiation therapy are eligible. The ILF will be confirmed with biopsy, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and PSMA PET. Patients will be randomized between HDR brachytherapy in two fractions (a standard of care salvage treatment at our institution) (cohort 1) or one treatment of intravenous Lutetium-177 PSMA RLT, followed by one fraction of HDR brachytherapy (cohort 2). The primary endpoints for the phase I portion of the study (n = 12) will be feasibility, defined as 10 or more patients completing the study protocol within 24 months of study activation; and safety, defined as zero or one patients in cohort 2 experiencing grade 3 or higher toxicity in the first 6 months post-treatment. If feasibility and safety are achieved, the study will expand to a phase II study (n = 30 total) where preliminary efficacy data will be evaluated. Secondary endpoints include changes in prostate specific antigen levels, acute toxicity, changes in quality of life, and changes in translational biomarkers. Translational endpoints will include interrogation of blood, urine, and tissue for markers of DNA damage and immune activation with each treatment. DISCUSSION: ROADSTER explores a novel salvage therapy for ILF after primary radiotherapy with combined Lutetium-177 PSMA RLT and HDR brachytherapy. The randomized phase I/II design will provide a contemporaneous patient population treated with HDR alone to facilitate assessment of feasibility, tolerability, and biologic effects of this novel therapy. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT05230251 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Dose-Escalated Radiation Alone or in Combination With Short-Term Total Androgen Suppression for Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer: Patient-Reported Outcomes From NRG/Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0815 Randomized Trial.

PURPOSE: To report patient-reported outcomes (PROs) of a phase III trial evaluating total androgen suppression (TAS) combined with dose-escalated radiation therapy (RT) for patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer. METHODS: Patients with intermediate-risk prostate cancer were randomly assigned to dose-escalated RT alone (arm 1) or RT plus TAS (arm 2) consisting of luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonist/antagonist with oral antiandrogen for 6 months. The primary PRO was the validated Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC-50). Secondary PROs included Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-fatigue and EuroQOL five-dimensions scale questionnaire (EQ-5D). PRO change scores, calculated for each patient as the follow-up score minus baseline score (at the end of RT and at 6, 12, and 60 months), were compared between treatment arms using a two-sample t test. An effect size of 0.50 standard deviation was considered clinically meaningful. RESULTS: For the primary PRO instrument (EPIC), the completion rates were ≥86% through the first year of follow-up and 70%-75% at 5 years. For the EPIC hormonal and sexual domains, there were clinically meaningful (P < .0001) deficits in the RT + TAS arm. However, there were no clinically meaningful differences by 1 year between arms. There were also no clinically meaningful differences at any time points between arms for PROMIS-fatigue, EQ-5D, and EPIC bowel/urinary scores. CONCLUSION: Compared with dose-escalated RT alone, adding TAS demonstrated clinically meaningful declines only in EPIC hormonal and sexual domains. However, even these PRO differences were transient, and there were no clinically meaningful differences between arms by 1 year.

A power Doppler ultrasound method for improving intraoperative tip localization for visually obstructed needles in interstitial prostate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: High-dose-rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy (BT) is a common treatment technique for localized intermediate to high-risk prostate cancer. Transrectal ultrasound (US) imaging is typically used for guiding needle insertion, including localization of the needle tip which is critical for treatment planning. However, image artifacts can limit needle tip visibility in standard brightness (B)-mode US, potentially leading to dose delivery that deviates from the planned dose. To improve intraoperative tip visualization in visually obstructed needles, we propose a power Doppler (PD) US method which utilizes a novel wireless mechanical oscillator, validated in phantom experiments and clinical HDR-BT cases as part of a feasibility clinical trial. METHODS: Our wireless oscillator contains a DC motor housed in a 3D printed case and is powered by rechargeable battery allowing the device to be operated by one person with no additional equipment required in the operating room. The oscillator end-piece features a cylindrical shape designed for BT applications to fit on top of the commonly used cylindrical needle mandrins. Phantom validation was completed using tissue-equivalent agar phantoms with the clinical US system and both plastic and metal needles. Our PD method was tested using a needle implant pattern matching a standard HDR-BT procedure as well as an implant pattern designed to maximize needle shadowing artifacts. Needle tip localization accuracy was assessed using the clinical method based on ideal reference needles as well as a comparison to computed tomography (CT) as a gold standard. Clinical validation was completed in five patients who underwent standard HDR-BT as part of a feasibility clinical trial. Needle tips positions were identified using B-mode US and PD US with perturbation from our wireless oscillator. RESULTS: Absolute mean ± standard deviation tip error for B-mode alone, PD alone, and B-mode combined with PD was respectively: 0.3 ± 0.3 mm, 0.6 ± 0.5 mm, and 0.4 ± 0.2 mm for the mock HDR-BT needle implant; 0.8 ± 1.7 mm, 0.4 ± 0.6 mm, and 0.3 ± 0.5 mm for the explicit shadowing implant with plastic needles; and 0.5 ± 0.2 mm, 0.5 ± 0.3 mm, and 0.6 ± 0.2 mm for the explicit shadowing implant with metal needles. The total mean absolute tip error for all five patients in the feasibility clinical trial was 0.9 ± 0.7 mm using B-mode US alone and 0.8 ± 0.5 mm when including PD US, with increased benefit observed for needles classified as visually obstructed. CONCLUSIONS: Our proposed PD needle tip localization method is easy to implement and requires no modifications or additions to the standard clinical equipment or workflow. We have demonstrated decreased tip localization error and variation for visually obstructed needles in both phantom and clinical cases, including providing the ability to visualize needles previously not visible using B-mode US alone. This method has the potential to improve needle visualization in challenging cases without burdening the clinical workflow, potentially improving treatment accuracy in HDR-BT and more broadly in any minimally invasive needle-based procedure.

Validation of a surface-based deformable MRI-3D ultrasound image registration algorithm toward clinical implementation for interstitial prostate brachytherapy.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and clinically implement a deformable surface-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to three-dimensional ultrasound (US) image registration algorithm for prostate brachytherapy (BT) with the aim to reduce operator dependence and facilitate dose escalation to an MRI-defined target. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Our surface-based deformable image registration (DIR) algorithm first translates and scales to align the US- and MR-defined prostate surfaces, followed by deformation of the MR-defined prostate surface to match the US-defined prostate surface. The algorithm performance was assessed in a phantom using three deformation levels, followed by validation in three retrospective high-dose-rate BT clinical cases. For comparison, manual rigid registration and cognitive fusion by physician were also employed. Registration accuracy was assessed using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and target registration error (TRE) for embedded spherical landmarks. The algorithm was then implemented intraoperatively in a prospective clinical case. RESULTS: In the phantom, our DIR algorithm demonstrated a mean DSC and TRE of 0.74 ± 0.08 and 0.94 ± 0.49 mm, respectively, significantly improving the performance compared to manual rigid registration with 0.64 ± 0.16 and 1.88 ± 1.24 mm, respectively. Clinical results demonstrated reduced variability compared to the current standard of cognitive fusion by physicians. CONCLUSIONS: We successfully validated a DIR algorithm allowing for translation of MR-defined target and organ-at-risk contours into the intraoperative environment. Prospective clinical implementation demonstrated the intraoperative feasibility of our algorithm, facilitating targeted biopsies and dose escalation to the MR-defined lesion. This method provides the potential to standardize the registration procedure between physicians, reducing operator dependence.

Does brachytherapy boost improve survival outcomes in Gleason Grade Group 5 patients treated with external beam radiotherapy and androgen deprivation therapy? A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Background: Localized Gleason Grade Group 5 (GG5) prostate cancer has a poor prognosis and is associated with a higher risk of treatment failure, metastases, and death. Treatment intensification with the addition of a brachytherapy (BT) boost to external beam radiation (EBRT) maximizes local control, which may translate into improved survival outcomes. Methods: A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed to compare survival outcomes for Gleason GG5 patients treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and either EBRT or EBRT + BT. The MEDLINE (PubMed), EMBASE and Cochrane databases were searched to identify relevant studies. Survival probabilities for distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS), and overall survival (OS) were extracted and pooled to create a summary survival curve for each treatment modality, which were then compared at fixed points in time. An additional analysis was performed among studies directly comparing EBRT and EBRT + BT using a random-effects model. Results: Eight retrospective studies were selected for inclusion, representing a total of 1393 EBRT patients and 877 EBRT + BT patients. EBRT + BT was associated with higher DMFS starting at 6 years (86.8 % vs 78.8 %; p = 0.018) and extending out to 10 years (81.8 % vs 66.1 %; p < 0.001), with an overall hazard ratio of 0.53 (p = 0.02). There was no difference in PCSS or OS between treatment modalities. Differences in toxicity were not assessed. There was a wide range of heterogeneity between studies. Conclusion: The addition of BT boost is associated with improved long-term DMFS in Gleason GG5 prostate cancer, but its impact on PCSS and OS remains unclear. These results may be confounded by the heterogeneity across study populations with concern for a risk of bias. Therefore, prospective studies are necessary to further elucidate the survival advantage associated with BT boost, which must ultimately be weighed against the toxicity-related implications of this treatment strategy.

Can We Identify Predictors of Success in Contouring Education for Radiation Oncology Trainees? An Analysis of the Anatomy and Radiology Contouring Bootcamp.

PURPOSE: Although several different contouring instructional programs are available to radiation oncologists and trainees, very little is known about which methods and resources benefit learners most, and whether some learners may need alternate forms of instruction. This study aimed to determine the factors that were predictors of learners' success in anatomy, radiology, and contouring education. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Participants in the online and face-to-face Anatomy and Radiology Contouring (ARC) Bootcamp completed pre- and postintervention evaluations that assessed anatomy/radiology knowledge, contouring skills, self-confidence, and spatial ability. Baseline factors were assessed as predictors of outcomes across multiple educational domains. RESULTS: One hundred and eighty (face-to-face: n = 40; online: n = 140) participants enrolled in the ARC Bootcamp, and 57 (face-to-face: n = 30; online: n = 27) participants completed both evaluations. Of the participants enrolled, 37% were female, and most were radiation oncology residents (62%). In the anatomy/radiology knowledge testing, all quartiles (based on baseline performance) improved numerically; however, the largest improvements occurred in learners with the lowest baseline scores (P < .001). At the end of the Bootcamp, learners with lower-performing scores did not reach the level of learners with the highest baseline scores (Bonferroni-corrected P < .001). Regarding the contouring assessment, improvements were only evident for the participants with lower-performing baseline scores (P < .05). Spatial anatomy skills, as measured by the spatial anatomy task, were correlated to contouring ability. Overall, the greatest improvements were seen for learners in postgraduate year 1 to 3, those with no previous rotation experience in a given discipline, and those who attended from other programs (ie, medical physics residents and medical students). CONCLUSIONS: The ARC Bootcamp improved all levels of performers' anatomy and radiology knowledge but only lower-performers' contouring ability. The course alone does not help lower-performing learners reach the abilities of higher-performers. The ARC Bootcamp tends to be most beneficial for participants with less radiation oncology experience. Curriculum modifications can be made to help support ARC Bootcamp participants with lower performing scores.

Synchronous colonic B cell lymphoma and adenocarcinoma in an elderly patient treated with R-mini-CHOP followed by resection.

The simultaneous diagnosis of colonic lymphoma and adenocarcinoma in the same location is rare and presents challenges in its treatment considerations, especially in elderly patients. While previous cases have been described, there is little consistency in treatment regimens, and outcomes are generally poor. We describe the case of a man in his late 80s who presented with primary cecal and colonic B cell lymphoma, treated with R-mini-CHOP chemotherapy, but was found to have a residual adenocarcinoma in the cecum after treatment that was then successfully resected. The patient remains alive and well 3 years postoperation. This case highlights the need to consider lymphoma as a possible diagnosis for any colonic mass, and the need to consider rebiopsy of residual abnormal-appearing tissue postchemotherapy to confirm the diagnosis. Moreover, our report affirms that aggressive, curative-intent treatment with age-adjusted chemotherapy, and subsequent surgical resection is feasible for certain elderly patients with dual malignant diagnoses.

Quality-of-Life Outcomes and Toxic Effects Among Patients With Cancers of the Uterus Treated With Stereotactic Pelvic Adjuvant Radiation Therapy: The SPARTACUS Phase 1/2 Nonrandomized Controlled Trial.

Importance: Adjuvant radiation plays an important role in reducing locoregional recurrence in patients with uterine cancer. Although hypofractionated radiotherapy may benefit health care systems and the global community while decreasing treatment burden for patients traveling for daily radiotherapy, it has not been studied prospectively nor in randomized trials for treatment of uterine cancers, and the associated toxic effects and patient quality of life are unknown. Objective: To evaluate acute genitourinary and bowel toxic effects and patient-reported outcomes following stereotactic hypofractionated adjuvant radiation to the pelvis for treatment of uterine cancer. Design, Setting, and Participants: The Stereotactic Pelvic Adjuvant Radiation Therapy in Cancers of the Uterus (SPARTACUS) phase 1/2 nonrandomized controlled trial of patients accrued between May 2019 and August 2021 was conducted as a multicenter trial at 2 cancer centers in Ontario, Canada. In total, 61 patients with uterine cancer stages I through III after surgery entered the study. Interventions: Stereotactic adjuvant pelvic radiation to a dose of 30 Gy in 5 fractions administered every other day or once weekly. Main Outcomes and Measures: Assessments of toxic effects and patient-reported quality of life (European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires C30 and endometrial EN24) were collected at baseline, fractions 3 and 5, and at 6 weeks and 3 months of follow-up. Descriptive analysis was conducted, calculating means, SDs, medians, IQRs, and ranges for continuous variables and proportions for categorical variables. Univariate generalized linear mixed models were generated for repeated measurements on the quality-of-life scales. Results: A total of 61 patients were enrolled (median age, 66 years; range, 51-88 years). Tumor histologic results included 39 endometrioid adenocarcinoma, 15 serous or clear cell, 3 carcinosarcoma, and 4 dedifferentiated. Sixteen patients received sequential chemotherapy, and 9 received additional vault brachytherapy. Median follow-up was 9 months (IQR, 3-15 months). Of 61 patients, worst acute gastrointestinal tract toxic effects of grade 1 were observed in 33 patients (54%) and of grade 2 in 8 patients (13%). For genitourinary worst toxic effects, grade 1 was observed in 25 patients (41%) and grade 2 in 2 patients (3%). One patient (1.6%) had an acute grade 3 gastrointestinal tract toxic effect of diarrhea at fraction 5 that resolved at follow-up. Only patient-reported diarrhea scores were both clinically (scores ≥10) and statistically significantly worse at fraction 5 (mean [SD] score, 35.76 [26.34]) compared with baseline (mean [SD] score, 6.56 [13.36]; P < .001), but this symptom improved at follow-up. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this phase 1/2 nonrandomized controlled trial suggest that stereotactic hypofractionated radiation was well tolerated at short-term follow-up for treatment of uterine cancer. Longer follow-up and future randomized studies are needed to further evaluate this treatment. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04866394.

Is Remote Learning as Effective as In-Person Learning for Contouring Education? A Prospective Comparison of Face-to-Face versus Online Delivery of the Anatomy and Radiology Contouring Bootcamp.

PURPOSE: The Anatomy and Radiology Contouring (ARC) Bootcamp was a face-to-face (F2F) intervention providing integrated education for radiation oncology (RO) residents and medical physicists. To increase access, we launched an online offering in 2019. We evaluated the effect of the online course on participants' knowledge acquisition, contouring skills, and self-confidence by comparing it with the F2F course. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Using modules, the online course offers content similar to that of the F2F comparator. Participants from the 2019 F2F and the 2019-2020 online course completed pre- and postevaluations assessing anatomy and radiology knowledge, contouring skills, self-confidence, and course satisfaction. RESULTS: There were 180 individuals enrolled (F2F: n = 40; online: n = 140); 57 participants (F2F: n = 30; online: n = 27) completed both evaluations. The online course had a wider geographic participation (19 countries) than F2F (4 countries). F2F had primarily RO resident participation (80%), compared with online (41%). Both cohorts demonstrated similar improvements in self-confidence pertaining to anatomy and radiology knowledge, contouring skills, and interpreting radiology images (all P < .001). Both the online (mean ± SD improvement: 6.6 ± 6.7 on a 40-point scale; P < .001) and F2F (3.7 ± 5.7; P = .002) groups showed anatomy and radiology knowledge improvement. Only the F2F group demonstrated improvement with the contouring assessment (F2F: 0.10 ± 0.17 on a 1-point Dice scale; P = .004; online: 0.07 ± 0.16; P = .076). Both cohorts perceived the course as a positive experience (F2F: 4.8 ± 0.4 on a 5-point scale; online: 4.5 ± 0.6), stated it would improve their professional practice (F2F: 4.6 ± 0.5; online: 4.2 ± 0.8), and said they would recommend it to others (F2F: 4.8 ± 0.4; online: 4.4 ± 0.6). CONCLUSIONS: The online ARC Bootcamp demonstrated improved self-confidence, knowledge scores, and high satisfaction levels among participants. The offering had lower completion rates but was more accessible to geographic regions, provided a flexible learning experience, and allowed for ongoing education during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Implementation and evaluation of an online anatomy, radiology and contouring bootcamp for radiation therapists.

BACKGROUND: As new treatments and technologies have been introduced in radiation oncology, the clinical roles of radiation therapists (RTs) have expanded. However, there are few formal learning opportunities for RTs. An online, anatomy, radiology and contouring bootcamp (ARC Bootcamp) originally designed for medical residents was identified as a prospective educational tool for RTs. The purpose of this study was to evaluate an RT edition of the ARC Bootcamp on knowledge, contouring, and confidence, as well as to identify areas for future modification. METHODS: Fifty licensed RTs were enrolled in an eight-week, multidisciplinary, online RT ARC Bootcamp. Contouring practice was available throughout the course using an online contouring platform. Outcomes were evaluated using a pre-course and post-course multiple-choice quiz (MCQ), contouring evaluation and qualitative self-efficacy and satisfaction survey. RESULTS: Of the fifty enrolled RTs, 30 completed the course, and 26 completed at least one of the post-tests. Nineteen contouring dice similarity coefficient (DSC) scores were available for paired pre- and post-course analysis. RTs demonstrated a statistically significant increase in mean DSC scoring pooled across all contouring structures (mean ± SD improvement: 0.09 ± 0.18 on a scale from 0 to 1, p=0.020). For individual contouring structures, 3/15 reached significance in contouring improvement. MCQ scores were available for 26 participants and increased after RT ARC Bootcamp participation with a mean ± SD pre-test score of 18.6 ± 4.2 (46.5%); on a 40-point scale vs. post-test score of 24.5 ± 4.3 (61.4%) (p < 0.001). RT confidence in contouring, anatomy knowledge and radiographic identification improved after course completion (p < 0.001). Feedback from RTs recommended more contouring instruction, less in-depth anatomy review and more time to complete the course. CONCLUSIONS: The RT ARC Bootcamp was an effective tool for improving anatomy and radiographic knowledge among RTs. The course demonstrated improvements in contouring and overall confidence. However, only approximately half of the enrolled RTs completed the course, limiting statistical power. Future modifications will aim to increase relevance to RTs and improve completion rates.

Development, Implementation, and Initial Participant Feedback of an Online Anatomy and Radiology Contouring Bootcamp in Radiation Oncology.

BACKGROUND: The Anatomy and Radiology Contouring (ARC) Bootcamp was a face-to-face (F2F) course designed to ensure radiation oncology residents were equipped with the knowledge and skillset to use radiation therapy techniques properly. The ARC Bootcamp was proven to be a useful educational intervention for improving learners' knowledge of anatomy and radiology and contouring ability. An online version of the course was created to increase accessibility to the ARC Bootcamp and provide a flexible, self-paced learning environment. This study aimed to describe the instructional design model used to create the online offering and report participants' motivation to enroll in the course and the online ARC Bootcamp's strengths and improvement areas. METHODS: The creation of the online course followed the analysis, design, development, implementation, and evaluation (ADDIE) framework. The course was structured in a linear progression of locked modules consisting of radiology and contouring lectures, anatomy labs, and integrated evaluations. RESULTS: The online course launched on the platform Teachable in November 2019, and by January 2021, 140 participants had enrolled in the course, with 27 participants completing all course components. The course had broad geographic participation with learners from 19 different countries. Of the participants enrolled, 34% were female, and most were radiation oncology residents (56%), followed by other programs (24%), such as medical physics residents or medical students. The primary motivator for participants to enroll was to improve their subject knowledge/skill (44%). The most common strength identified by participants was the course's quality (41%), and the most common improvement area was to incorporate more course content (41%). CONCLUSIONS: The creation of the online ARC Bootcamp using the ADDIE framework was feasible. The course is accessible to diverse geographic regions and programs and provides a flexible learning environment; however, the course completion rate was low. Participants' feedback regarding their experiences will inform future offerings of the online course.

Red Blood Cell Transfusion Practices for Patients With Cervical Cancer Undergoing Radiotherapy.

Importance: Packed red blood cell (PRBC) transfusions are used to treat anemia in patients with cervical cancer undergoing radiotherapy (RT) owing to concerns of hypoxia-induced radioresistance. In the absence of high-quality evidence informing transfusion practices for patients receiving external beam RT (EBRT) and brachytherapy, various arbitrary hemoglobin target levels are used worldwide. Objective: To develop consensus statements to guide PRBC transfusion practices in patients with cervical cancer receiving curative-intent RT with EBRT and brachytherapy. Design, Setting, and Participants: This international Delphi consensus study was completed between November 1, 2019, and July 31, 2020. A total of 63 international clinical experts in gynecologic radiation oncology were invited; 39 (62%) accepted and consented to participate. Consensus building was achieved using a 3-round anonymous Delphi consensus method. Participants rated their agreement or disagreement with statements using a 5-point Likert scale. An a priori threshold of 75% or more was required for consensus. Main Outcomes and Measures: The preplanned primary outcome of this study was to assess hemoglobin transfusion thresholds and targets for both EBRT and brachytherapy by expert consensus. Results: Response rates of 100% (39 of 39), 92% (36 of 39), and 97% (35 of 36) were achieved for the first, second, and third rounds of surveys, respectively. Twenty-three experts (59%) practiced in Canada, 11 (28%) in the United States, 3 (8%) in South America, 1 (3%) in Europe, and 1 (3%) in Asia. Consensus was reached for 44 of 103 statements (43%), which were combined to form the final 27-statement consensus guideline. No specific hemoglobin transfusion threshold was agreed on by consensus for EBRT or brachytherapy. By consensus (89% [31 of 35]), a hemoglobin transfusion target for patients who receive a PRBC transfusion should be 9 g/dL or more and less than 12 g/dL. Conclusions and Relevance: This study presents the first international expert consensus guideline informing PRBC transfusion practices for patients with cervical cancer undergoing EBRT and brachytherapy. A minimum hemoglobin transfusion target of 9 g/dL was endorsed to balance tumor radiosensitivity with appropriate use of a scarce resource. Randomized clinical trials are required to evaluate the optimal transfusion threshold and target that maximize clinical benefit in this patient population.

3D image-guided interstitial brachytherapy for primary vaginal cancer: A multi-institutional experience.

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: High dose rate (HDR) interstitial brachytherapy (ISBT) boost is integral for definitive radiation treatment of primary vaginal cancer. Technological advances with CT or MRI guidance provide improved precision and ability to treat more extensively invasive tumors over historical techniques, but reported experience is limited. We sought to provide updated outcome and toxicity data for women with primary vaginal cancer undergoing treatment with a modern ISBT technique. MATERIAL/METHODS: Databases of primary vaginal carcinoma patients treated at two Canadian academic cancer institutions were combined including patient, tumor and treatment characteristics, and survival outcomes and toxicity data. Descriptive statistics, survival estimates based on the Kaplan-Meier method, and univariable/multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analyses are reported. RESULTS: Between 2002 and 2017, 67 women with primary vaginal cancer were treated with 3D HDR ISBT. FIGO stage distribution was I (22.4%), II (50.8%), III (17.9%), IVa (9.0%). All patients received external beam radiotherapy and HDR ISBT of 500-750 cGy per fraction over 2-4 fractions. Median follow-up was 2.68 years (95% confidence interval: 2.04-6.04). Cumulative rate of grade 3-4 genitourinary/gastrointestinal toxicity was 10.4%. Four patients developed vaginal fistula. Progression-free survival at 2 and 3 years was 73.5% and 66.4% for all patients, 78.3% and 75.0% for stage I-II and 61.6% and 46.2% for stage III-IVa, respectively (log-rank p = 0.252). CONCLUSIONS: Use of 3D image-guided HDR ISBT boost was safe and resulted in improved survival outcomes compared to historical rates in this series of primary vaginal cancer patients. Prospective study is warranted to better define clinical and dosimetric predictors of local control.

Managing a Locally Advanced Cervix Cancer Patient With COVID-19: Lessons Learned.

We present the case of a woman diagnosed with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) while undergoing chemoradiation for locally advanced cervix cancer. This diagnosis had implications for the treatment of her cancer, and a number of important decisions had to be made. We present the issues that arose and how her oncologic care was managed.

Is hypofractionated whole pelvis radiotherapy (WPRT) as well tolerated as conventionally fractionated WPRT in prostate cancer patients? The HOPE trial.

BACKGROUND: Patients with high-risk prostate cancer are at increased risk of lymph node metastasis and are thought to benefit from whole pelvis radiotherapy (WPRT). There has been recent interest in the use of hypofractionated radiotherapy in treating prostate cancer. However, toxicity and cancer outcomes associated with hypofractionated WPRT are unclear at this time. This phase II study aims to investigate the impact in quality of life associated with hypofractionated WPRT compared to conventionally fractionated WPRT. METHODS: Fifty-eight patients with unfavourable intermediate-, high- or very high-risk prostate cancer will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio between high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDR-BT) + conventionally fractionated (45 Gy in 25 fractions) WPRT vs. HDR-BT + hypofractionated (25 Gy in 5 fractions) WPRT. Randomization will be performed with a permuted block design without stratification. The primary endpoint is late bowel toxicity and the secondary endpoints include acute and late urinary and sexual toxicity, acute bowel toxicity, biochemical failure-, androgen deprivation therapy-, metastasis- and prostate cancer-free survival of the hypofractionated arm compared to the conventionally fractionated arm. DISCUSSION: To our knowledge, this is the first study to compare hypofractionated WPRT to conventionally fractionated WPRT with HDR-BT boost. Hypofractionated WPRT is a more attractive and convenient treatment approach, and may become the new standard of care if demonstrated to be well-tolerated and effective. TRIAL REGISTRATION: This trial was prospectively registered in ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT04197141 on December 12, 2019.

Is prostate brachytherapy a dying art? Trends and variation in the definitive management of prostate cancer in Ontario, Canada.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Declining prostate brachytherapy utilization has been reported in several studies, despite strong evidence for efficacy and safety compared to alternatives. We sought to evaluate contemporary trends in brachytherapy, external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and prostatectomy utilization in a publicly funded healthcare system. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men with localized prostate cancer diagnosed and treated between 2006 and 2017 in Ontario, Canada were identified using administrative data. Men received EBRT, brachytherapy (monotherapy or boost) or prostatectomy as initial definitive management. Multivariable logistic regression evaluated patient-, tumour-, and provider-factors on treatment utilization. RESULTS: 61,288 men were included. On multivariable regression, the odds of receiving brachytherapy boost increased 24% per year (odds ratio [OR]:1.24, 95% CI 1.22-1.26, p < 0.01), brachytherapy monotherapy increased 3% per year (OR:1.03, 95% CI:1.02-1.04, p < 0.01), and prostatectomy declined by 6% per year (OR:0.94, 95% CI 0.93-0.95, p < 0.01). Treatment year was not significant on multivariable modelling of EBRT. In a separate multivariable model limited to those who received radiotherapy, if the first radiation oncologist seen performed brachytherapy, the OR of receiving brachytherapy monotherapy over EBRT was 5.66 (95% CI: 5.11-6.26, p < 0.01) and 2.88 (95% CI: 2.60-3.19, p < 0.01) for brachytherapy boost over EBRT alone. Substantial geographic, provider and patient variation in treatment receipt was observed. CONCLUSION: We found increasing brachytherapy utilization, largely driven by increasing utilization of brachytherapy boost. To our knowledge, this is the first report of increasing brachytherapy use in the era of dose escalated EBRT.