RÉSUMÉ
Typhoid ileal perforation (TIP) is a common surgical emergency in low-middle income countries (LMICs). Its high surgical morbidity and mortality is due to its often late presentation or diagnosis, the patient's malnutrition, severe peritoneal contamination and unavailability of intensive care in most peripheral hospitals. This prompted the philosophy of minimizing the crisis by avoiding any repair or anastomosis, limiting the surgery in these physiologically compromised patients and performing only a temporary defunctioning ileostomy (DI) which could then be closed 10-12 weeks later.
Sujet(s)
Iléostomie , Perforation intestinale , Fièvre typhoïde , Humains , Perforation intestinale/chirurgie , Perforation intestinale/étiologie , Fièvre typhoïde/complications , Maladies de l'iléon/chirurgie , Maladies de l'iléon/étiologie , Maladies de l'iléon/microbiologie , Iléum/chirurgieRÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVES: Surgical procedures for vaginal hydroceles have been varied with the aims of preventing recurrence, hematoma and edema formation and providing a better cosmetic outcome. The Jaboulay's procedure remains a preferred procedure owing to its simplicity and good long term outcome. However, sac eversion during the procedure leads to scrotal edema and mass sensation due to remnant sac in cases of large or secondary hydrocele sacs. Sac excision in these cases may provide better outcomes by removing the excess tissue. We aimed to compare the postoperative outcome after Jaboulay's procedure and harmonic scalpel excision of the sac in terms of scrotal edema, hematoma formation and the final cosmetic appearance. PATIENTS AND METHODS: 72 adult patients with vaginal hydrocele were randomized into two groups, who underwent harmonic scalpel sac excision and Jaboulay's procedure respectively, performed by a single surgeon. Preoperatively, patient demographics were noted. Postoperatively, data was recorded on the 1st day, 3rd day & 10th day about postoperative complications, and outcomes. Satisfaction on final cosmetic outcome was compared between the groups at the 3rd month. RESULTS: Post operative edema and sensation of mass in the scrotum were more (but not significant) in the Jaboulay's procedure group. Seroma and wound infection rates were similar in both groups. Patient satisfaction on cosmesis was better in the sac excision group. CONCLUSION: Hydrocelectomy with excision of the sac using a harmonic scalpel results in a lower incidence of postoperative oedema and better patient satisfaction in terms of cosmetic outcome compared to Jaboulay's procedure in the treatment of adult hydroceles.
Sujet(s)
Satisfaction des patients , Hydrocèle , Adulte , Mâle , Femelle , Humains , Études prospectives , Complications postopératoires/épidémiologie , Complications postopératoires/prévention et contrôle , Hydrocèle/chirurgie , Hématome/complications , Oedème/étiologie , Oedème/prévention et contrôle , Résultat thérapeutiqueRÉSUMÉ
Introduction: Treatment of complex fistulas such as inter- or transsphincteric, recurrent, and high fistulae have high rate of recurrence or incontinence. Fistulectomy with primary sphincter reconstruction might represent an effective and safe alternative to reduce rate of recurrence and incontinence. The aim of this study is to assess incontinence and recurrence after fistulectomy with primary sphincter reconstruction for management of complex fistulas. Material and Methods: There were 60 patients with complex fistulae involving the sphincter, with 56 male and 4 female, mean age 40.6 years, operated by fistulectomy and primary sphincter repair over a period of 7 years. Patients were followed up for 6months for any complications, recurrence, and incontinence. Results: The majority of patients (50, 83.3%) had complete wound healing in 2 weeks, while 4 (6.6%) patients had hematoma and superficial wound dehiscence, which were managed conservatively and healed in 4 weeks. There was one recurrence. All patients had good continence postoperatively, except for mild fecal incontinence (FI, score 3), seen in 6 (10%) patients. However, all these patients regained continence within 6 weeks. Conclusions: Primary reconstruction of anal sphincter with fistulectomy is a safe option for complex fistula-in-ano. (AU)
Sujet(s)
Humains , Mâle , Femelle , Adolescent , Adulte , Adulte d'âge moyen , Canal anal/chirurgie , Fistule rectale/chirurgie , Récidive , Résultat thérapeutique , Incontinence analeRÉSUMÉ
Purpose: Many methods have been used to treat complex fistulas, but no single technique has been considered standard. Damage to the sphincter may sometimes be unavoidable, and incontinence may be an important cause of morbidity. This study aimed to validate the results of transanal opening of the intersphincteric space (TROPIS), as a technique that avoids damaging the anal sphincter, in patients with complex fistula in ano. Methods: A prospective study was conducted among 35 consecutive patients with complex fistula in ano. After a preoperative magnetic resonance fistulogram, TROPIS was performed in all patients. The St. Mark's incontinence score was assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at 3 months. Results: The tracts were intersphincteric in 16 patients, transsphincteric in 10, extrasphincteric in 2, and horseshoe in 3. Four patients had recurrent tracts (3 transsphincteric and 1 intersphincteric). A defined follow-up schedule was used. Curettage was done if postoperative pus drainage from the wound was noted. The fistula healed in 29 patients (82.86%) following TROPIS. The remaining 6 patients received curettage, with healing in 3 (overall healing rate, 91.4%). Patients who received curettage were followed for 3 months, and the outcome was labeled as healed or failed. The mean preoperative incontinence score was 0. One patient developed incontinence to gas postoperatively in week 2, but there was no significant change in the scores at 3 months postoperatively. The mean postoperative incontinence score was 0.02. Conclusion: TROPIS is an effective method for the treatment of complex fistula in ano, with minimal risk for incontinence.
RÉSUMÉ
Objective: We evaluated the beneficial effect of Ormeloxifene (Centchroman) versus a combination of Gamma Linolenic acid (GLA), methylcobalamine and vitamin C on mastalgia in a three-arm, open-label, placebo-controlled trial. Materials and Methods: Patients aged above 18 years with mastalgia were recruited between January 2019 and July 2021. Patients were divided in three arms: Ormeloxifene arm, GLA arm and Placebo arm. Response was evaluated using visual analogue scale (VAS) and score below 3/10 was defined as complete relief. Results: A total of 113 consecutive women with mastalgia were randomized to the GLA group (Group 1, n = 39 women), Ormeloxifene (Group 2, n = 36) and Placebo (Group 3, n = 38). Complete response was observed in 94% patient in Group 1, 96% in Group 2 and 87% in Group 3 at the end of 12 weeks and it was not significant (p = 0.49). Adverse events were reported by eleven patients taking Ormeloxifene, compared to none in the other two groups. Conclusion: In this study Ormeloxifene and GLA were not superior to placebo for pain relief in mastalgia. Furthermore, there were concerning side effects associated with Ormeloxifene therapy. The role of Ormeloxifene in mastalgia needs further evaluation before recommending it as preferred therapy.
RÉSUMÉ
Prophylactic mesh placement (PMP) is increasingly being used to reduce the incidence of incisional hernia after routine and emergency midline laparotomy (EML). However, such studies are not available for EMLs done solely for intestinal perforation. Patients who underwent non-absorbable PMP during EML for intestinal perforation (Group A, 15 patients) were compared with those who had a conventional abdominal wall closure (Group B, 20 patients). The incidence of wound dehiscence was significantly higher in Group A, while surgical site infection (SSI), and incisional hernia were similar in both groups. Mesh explantation was needed in half the cases. A prophylactically placed non-absorbable mesh in patients undergoing EML for intestinal perforation is associated with significantly higher rates of wound dehiscence and of mesh explantation and therefore, routine use of such a mesh appears not to be justified.