Barriers to Participation in a Structured Quality Improvement Initiative to Reduce Avoidable Emergency Department Visits-A Qualitative Study.

INTRODUCTION: Barriers to quality improvement (QI) initiatives in multi-institutional hospital settings are understudied. Here we describe a qualitative investigation of factors negatively affecting a QI initiative focused on reducing avoidable emergency department (ED) visits after bariatric surgery across 17 hospitals. Our goal was to explore participant perspectives and identify themes describing why the program was not effectively implemented or why the program may have been ineffective when correctly implemented. METHODS: We performed semistructured group interviews with 17 sites (42 interviews) participating in a statewide bariatric QI program. We used descriptive content analysis to identify challenges, facilitators, and barriers to implementation of the QI program. All analyses were conducted using MAXQDA software. RESULTS: Results revealed barriers across hospitals related to four themes: buy-in, provider accessibility, resources at participating hospitals, and patient barriers to care. In particular, the initiative faced difficulty if it was not well-matched to the factors driving increasing ED visits at a particular site, such as lack of patient access to outpatient or primary care. Additional challenges occurred if the initiative was not adapted and customized to the working systems in place at each site, involving employees, surgeons, support staff, and leadership. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, findings can direct future focused efforts aimed at site-specific interventions to reduce unnecessary postoperative ED visits. Results demonstrated a need for a nuanced approach that can be adapted based on facility needs and resources.

Is Everyone Beating Around the Bush?: A Qualitative Study Examining the Status of Shared Decision-Making Between Veterans Affairs Providers and Surgical Patients in the ICU.

Objective: We sought to determine if and how providers use elements of shared decision-making (SDM) in the care of surgical patients in the intensive care unit (ICU). Background: SDM is the gold standard for decision-making in the ICU. However, it is unknown if this communication style is used in caring for critically ill surgical patients. Methods: Qualitative interviews were conducted with providers who provide ICU-level care to surgical patients in Veterans Affairs hospitals. Interviews were designed to examine end-of-life care among veterans who have undergone surgery and require ICU-level care. Results: Forty-eight providers across 14 Veterans Affairs hospitals were interviewed. These participants were diverse with respect to age, race, and sex. Participant dialogue was deductively mapped into 8 established SDM components: describing treatment options; determining roles in the decision-making process; fostering partnerships; health care professional preferences; learning about the patient; patient preferences; supporting the decision-making process; and tailoring the information. Within these components, participants shared preferred tools and tactics used to satisfy a given SDM component. Participants also noted numerous barriers to achieving SDM among surgical patients. Conclusions: Providers use elements of SDM when caring for critically ill surgical patients. Additionally, this work identifies facilitators that can be leveraged and barriers that can be addressed to facilitate better communication and decision-making through SDM. These findings are of value for future interventions that seek to enhance SDM among surgical patients both in the ICU and in other settings.

Patient adherence to an oral rehydration solution intervention to prevent dehydration following ileostomy creation: A qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Patients undergoing surgery for ileostomy creation frequently experience postoperative dehydration and subsequent renal injury. The use of oral rehydration solutions (ORS) has been shown to prevent dehydration, but compliance may be variable. METHODS: Semi-structured qualitative interviews were conducted with 17 patients who received a postoperative hydration kit and dehydration education to assess barriers and facilitators to compliance with ORS kit instructions. RESULTS: Qualitative analysis revealed five themes affecting patient adherence to the ORS intervention: (1) patient's perception of the effectiveness of the ORS solution, (2) existing co-morbidities, (3) kit quality and taste of the ORS product, (4) quality of the dehydration education, and (5) social support. CONCLUSIONS: Given that patient adherence can greatly affect the success of an ORS intervention, the design of future ORS interventions should emphasize the educational component, the "patient friendliness" of the ORS kit, and ways that social supports can be leveraged to increase adherence.

Family perspectives on end-of-life care after surgery: A qualitative analysis of the veteran affairs bereaved family surveys.

BACKGROUND: Using open-text responses from the Bereaved Family Survey (BFS), we sought to explore Veteran family experiences on end-of-life care after surgery. METHODS: We evaluated 936 open-text responses for all decedents who underwent any high-risk surgical procedure across 124 Veterans Affairs facilities between 2010 and 2019. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Respondents expressed a belief in the decedent's unnecessary pain, expressing distrust in the treatment decisions of the care team. Limited communication regarding the severity of disease or risks of surgery caused conflicting and unresolved narratives regarding the cause or timing of death. Respondents described feelings of disempowerment when they were not involved in decision-making and when their wishes were not respected. CONCLUSIONS: Timely and sensitive conversations, including acknowledging uncertainty in outcomes, may ensure a more positive experience for bereaved families.

Finding Comfort in Discomfort Reflecting on Stories Told.

INTRODUCTION: The 2022 Presidential Address for the Association for Academic Surgery was focused on better understanding the personal and professional challenges faced by surgeons during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: As part of this work, we embarked on a listening tour, inviting surgeons from all over the country to tell us their stories. This led to forming a panel of five selected participants based on how their stories crosscut many of the most prevalent themes during those conversations. Here, we present thematic excerpts of the 2022 presidential panel, intending to capture that moment and challenge surgeons to contribute to an ever-evolving movement that pushes us to unpack some of our greatest areas of discomfort. RESULTS: We found that, in many ways, the COVID-19 pandemic brought into focus what many surgeons from marginalized groups have historically struggled with. Dominant themes from these conversations included the role of surgery in informing identity, the tensions between personal and professional identity, the consequences of maintaining medicine as an apolitical space, and reflections on initiatives to address inequities. Panelists also reflected on the hope that these conversations are part of a movement that leads to sustained change rather than a passing moment. CONCLUSIONS: The primary goal of this work was to center voices and experiences in a way that challenges us to become comfortable with topics that often cause discomfort, validate experiences, and foster a community that allows us to rethink what and whom we value in surgery. We hope this work serves as a guide to having these conversations in other institutions.

Life after "no": barriers to behavior change for persons declined hernia repair due to high-risk features.

INTRODUCTION: Delaying an elective operation to mitigate risk factors improves patient outcomes. Elective ventral hernia repair is one such example. To address this issue, we developed a pre-operative optimization clinic to support high-risk patients seeking elective ventral hernia repair. Unfortunately, few patients progressed to surgery. Within this context, we sought to understand the barriers to behavior change among these patients with the goal of improving care for patients undergoing elective surgery. METHODS: We performed semi-structured, qualitative interviews with 20 patients who were declined ventral hernia repair due to either active tobacco use or obesity. Patients were recruited from a pre-operative optimization clinic at an academic hospital. Interviews sought to characterize patients' perceived barriers to behavior change. Interviews were concluded once thematic saturation was reached. We used an inductive thematic analysis to analyze the data. All data analysis was performed using MAXQDA software. RESULTS: Among 20 patients (mean age 50, 65% female, 65% White), none had yet undergone ventral hernia repair. While most patients had a positive experience in the clinic, among those who did not, we found three dominant themes around behavior change: (1) Patient's role in behavior change: how the patient perceived their role in making behavior changes optimize their health for surgery; (2) Obtainability of offered resources: the need for more support for patients to access the recommended healthcare; and (3) Patient-provider concordance: the extent to which patients and providers agree on the relative importance of different attributes of their care. CONCLUSION: Behavior change prior to elective surgery is complex and multifaceted. While improving access to tobacco cessation resources and obesity management may improve outcomes for some, patients may benefit from increased on-site facilitation to promote access to resources as well as the use of patient-facing decision support tools to promote patient-provider concordance.

Qualitative Research and Applications in Colorectal Surgery.

Traditionally employed in medical anthropologic and sociologic literature, qualitative methods are emerging as an essential component of clinical research as surgeons and researchers strive to optimize care informed by patient perspectives. Qualitative methods in health care-related research may be used to understand subjective experiences, beliefs, and concepts that are not captured using quantitative analyses and to gain in-depth knowledge of a specific context or culture. A qualitative approach may also be employed to explore under-researched problems and generate new ideas. Here, we provide an overview of aspects to consider when designing and conducting a qualitative research study.

To feel or not to feel: a scoping review and mixed-methods meta-synthesis of moral distress among surgeons.

BACKGROUND: There is increasing concern about the prevalence and impact of moral distress among healthcare workers. While this body of literature is growing, research specifically examining sources of moral distress among surgeons remains sparse. The unique attributes of the surgeon-patient relationship and the context of surgery may expose surgeons to sources of distress that are distinct from other healthcare providers. To date, a summative assessment of moral distress among surgeons does not exist. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review of studies focused on moral distress among surgeons. Using guidelines established by Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), relevant articles were identified in EBSCOhost PsycINFO, Elsevier EMBASE, Ovid MEDLINE, and Wiley Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials Library from January 1, 2009 to September 29, 2022. Detailed data abstraction was performed on a predetermined instrument and compared across studies. A mixed-methods meta-synthesis was employed for data analysis, and both deductive and inductive methodology was used in our thematic analysis. RESULTS: A total of 1,003 abstracts were screened, and 26 articles (19 quantitative and 7 qualitative) were included for full-text review. Of these, 10 focused only on surgeons. Our analysis revealed numerous definitions of moral distress and 25 instruments used to understand the sources of distress. Moral distress among surgeons is complex and influenced by factors at multiple levels, The most frequent sources originate at the individual and interpersonal levels. However, the environmental, community and policy levels also noted sources of distress. CONCLUSIONS: The reviewed articles identified several common themes and sources of moral distress among surgeons. We also found that research investigating sources of moral distress among surgeons is relatively sparse and confounded by various definitions of moral distress, multiple measurement tools, and frequently conflated terms of moral distress, moral injury, and burnout. This summative assessment presents a model of moral distress delineating these distinct terms, which may be applied to other professions at risk for moral distress.

Surgeon behaviors related to engaging patients in smoking cessation at the time of elective surgery.

BACKGROUND: Despite the abundance of evidence supporting smoking cessation before elective surgery, there is wide variation in surgeon adherence to these best practices. METHODS: This qualitative study used convenience sampling to recruit General Surgery trained surgeons. Surgeons participated in semi-structured interviews based on domains from the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). Content analysis was guided by the TDF. RESULTS: Of the 14 TDF domains, social or professional role/identity, memory, attention and decision processes, environmental context and resources, and beliefs about consequences emerged most frequently. Mapping these domains to the Behavior Change Wheel identified education, enablement, and incentivization as effective intervention functions. CONCLUSIONS: Using the TDF, this study identified a widespread sense of responsibility among surgeons to engage patients in perioperative smoking cessation despite workplace barriers and lacking resources. These findings provide valuable insight to facilitate surgeon participation in health promotion through targeted, theory-based interventions informed by surgeon identified barriers to perioperative smoking cessation.

Reducing Ileostomy Readmissions: Using Implementation Science to Evaluate the Adoption of a Quality Improvement Initiative.

BACKGROUND: Translating empirical evidence into clinical practice remains challenging. Prevention of morbidity from new ileostomies may serve as an example. Despite evidence demonstrating improvements in electrolyte levels, kidney function markers, and hospital readmissions, widespread adoption of oral rehydration solutions among patients with new ileostomies has not occurred. The causes of low uptake are unknown and likely multifactorial. OBJECTIVE: We used the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance implementation science framework to identify barriers and facilitators in the adoption of a quality improvement initiative aimed at decreasing emergency department visits and hospital readmissions because of dehydration among patients with new ileostomies using oral rehydration solutions. DESIGN: Qualitative interviews were conducted with stakeholders based on the domains of the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance framework. SETTINGS: Participating community and academic hospitals across Michigan (n = 12). PATIENTS: Convenience sampling was used to recruit 25 key stakeholders, including wound, ostomy, and continence nurses; registered nurses; nurse practitioners; nurse managers; colorectal surgeons; surgery residents; physician assistants; and data abstractors (1-4 participants per site). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Through qualitative content analysis, we located, analyzed, and identified patterns using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance framework. RESULTS: We identified the following factors to increase the adoption of quality improvement initiatives at the provider level: 1) selection and coaching of champions, 2) broadening of multidisciplinary teams, 3) performing structured patient follow-up, and 4) addressing long-term sustainability concerns regarding cost and equity. LIMITATIONS: Limited to high-volume ileostomy surgery hospitals, did not include in-person site visits to each hospital before and after implementation, and did not consider the hospital- and patient-level factors that impact the widespread adoption of quality improvement initiatives. CONCLUSIONS: Integrating implementation science frameworks to rigorously study quality improvement initiatives may reveal the determinants of the widespread adoption of evidence-based practices. REDUCCIN DE REINGRESOS POR ILEOSTOMA USO DE LA CIENCIA DE LA IMPLEMENTACIN PARA EVALUAR LA ADOPCIN DE UNA INICIATIVA DE MEJORA DE LA CALIDAD: ANTECEDENTES:Traducir la evidencia empírica a la práctica clínica sigue siendo un desafío. La prevención de la morbilidad por nuevas ileostomías puede servir como ejemplo. A pesar de la evidencia que demuestra mejoras en los niveles de electrolitos, marcadores de función renal y reingresos hospitalarios, no se ha producido una adopción generalizada de soluciones de rehidratación oral entre pacientes con nuevas ileostomías. Las causas de la baja captación son desconocidas y probablemente multifactoriales.OBJETIVO:Empleamos Alcance, Eficacia, Adopción, Implementación y Mantenimiento, un marco de las ciencias de implementación, para identificar barreras y facilitadores en la adopción de una iniciativa de mejora de la calidad destinada a disminuir las visitas al departamento de emergencias y los reingresos hospitalarios debido a la deshidratación entre los pacientes con nuevos ileostomías utilizando soluciones de rehidratación oral.DISEÑO:Se realizaron entrevistas cualitativas con las partes interesadas basadas en los dominios del marco de Alcance, Efectividad, Adopción, Implementación y Mantenimiento.CONFIGURACIÓN:Hospitales académicos y comunitarios participantes a través de Michigan (n = 12).PARTICIPANTES:Se utilizó un muestreo por conveniencia para reclutar a 25 partes interesadas clave, incluyendo enfermeras de heridas, ostomía y continencia; enfermeras registradas; enfermeras practicantes; gerentes de enfermera; cirujanos colorrectales; residentes de cirugía; asistentes médicos; y extractores de datos (1-4 participantes por sitio).PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:A través del análisis de contenido cualitativo, localizamos, analizamos e identificamos patrones utilizando el marco de Alcance, Eficacia, Adopción, Implementación y Mantenimiento.RESULTADOS:Identificamos los siguientes factores para aumentar la adopción de iniciativas de mejora de la calidad a nivel de proveedores: 1) selección y entrenamiento de campeones, 2) ampliación de equipos multidisciplinarios, 3) seguimiento estructurado de pacientes y 4) abordaje a largo plazo. preocupaciones de sostenibilidad con respecto al costo y la equidad.LIMITACIONES:Limitado a hospitales de cirugía de ileostomía de alto volumen, incapaz de realizar visitas en persona a cada hospital antes y después de la implementación, no considera los factores a nivel del hospital y del paciente que afectan la adopción generalizada de iniciativas de mejora de la calidad.CONCLUSIONES:La integración de marcos científicos de implementación para estudiar rigurosamente las iniciativas de mejora de la calidad puede revelar los determinantes de la adopción generalizada de prácticas basadas en la evidencia. (Traducción-Dr. Aurian Garcia Gonzalez ).

"I Wish There had been Resources": A Photo-Elicitation Study of Rectal Cancer Survivorship Care Needs.

BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer survivors experience unique, prolonged posttherapy symptoms. Previous data indicate that providers are not skilled at identifying the most pertinent rectal cancer survivorship issues. Consequently, survivorship care is incomplete with the majority of rectal cancer survivors reporting at least one unmet posttherapy need. METHODS: This photo-elicitation study combines participant-submitted photographs and minimally structured qualitative interviews to explore one's lived experiences. Twenty rectal cancer survivors from a single tertiary canter provided photographs representative of their life after rectal cancer therapy. The iterative steps informed by inductive thematic analysis were used to analyze the transcribed interviews. RESULTS: Rectal cancer survivors had several recommendations to improve their survivorship care, which fell into three major themes: (1) informational needs (e.g., more details about posttherapy side effects); (2) continued multidisciplinary follow up care (e.g., dietary support); and (3) suggestions for support services (e.g., subsidized bowel altering medications and ostomy supplies). CONCLUSIONS: Rectal cancer survivors desired more detailed and individualized information, access to longitudinal multidisciplinary follow-up care, and resources to ease the burdens of daily life. These needs may be met through the restructuring of rectal cancer survivorship care to include disease surveillance, symptom management, and support services. As screening and therapy continues to improve, providers must continue to screen and to provide services that address the physical and psychosocial needs of rectal cancer survivors.

Rescue Improvement Conference: A Novel Tool for Addressing Failure to Rescue.

OBJECTIVE: To understand the effectiveness of Rescue Improvement Conference, a forum that addresses FTR. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Every year over 150,000 patients die after elective surgery in the United States. FTR is the phenomenon whereby delayed recognition and/or response to serious surgical complications leads to a progressive cascade of adverse events culminating in death. Rescue Improvement Conference is an adapted version of the Ottawa-style morbidity and mortality conference, designed to address common contributors to FTR: ineffective communication and inadequate problem solving. METHODS: Mixed methods data were used to evaluate Rescue Improvement Conference, a bi-monthly forum that was first introduced in our academic medical center in 2018. Conference effectiveness data were collected via survey and open-text responses after 5 conferences between September 2018 and February 2020. We focused on 5 indicators of effectiveness: educational value, conference takeaways, discussion time, changes to surgical practice, and actionable opportunities for improvement. Twelve surgical faculty and house staff also provided feedback during semi-structured interviews. Qualitative data were analyzed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Conference attendees (N = 140) felt that Rescue Improvement Conference was effective-all 5 indicators had mean scores above 5 on Likert scales. The qualitative data supports the quantitative findings, and 3 additional themes emerged: Rescue Improvement Conference enables the representation of diverse voices, promotes interdisciplinary collaboration, and encourages multilevel problem solving. CONCLUSIONS: Rescue Improvement Conference has the potential to support other surgical departments in developing system-level strategies to recognize and manage postoperative complications by providing stakeholders a forum to identify and discuss factors that contribute to FTR.

Factors that influence discharge opioid prescribing among bariatric surgeons across Michigan.

BACKGROUND: Opioid prescribing following bariatric surgery has been a focus due to its association with new persistent opioid use (NPOU) and worse outcomes. Guidelines have led to a reduction in opioids prescribed, but there remains variation in prescribing practices. METHODS: We conducted interviews with 20 bariatric surgeons across Michigan. Transcripts were analyzed using descriptive content analysis. RESULTS: At the patient level, surgeons described the role of surgical history and pain tolerance. At the provider level, surgeons discussed patient dissatisfaction, reputation, and workload. At the institution level, surgeons discussed colleagues, resources, and administration. At a collaborative level, surgeons described the role of evidence and performance measures. There was lack of consensus on whether NPOU is a problem facing patients undergoing bariatric surgery. CONCLUSION: Despite efforts aimed at addressing opioid prescribing, variability exists in prescribing practices. Understanding determinants that impact stakeholder alignment is critical to increasing adherence to guideline-concordant care.

"Their Whole Lives Are Going To Change": A Photo-Elicitation Study of Rectal Cancer Survivorship.

BACKGROUND: Rectal cancer survivors experience persistent symptoms, which may lead to unmet needs. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to explore the rectal cancer survivor experience and identify the impacts of treatment using photo-elicitation. DESIGN: This was a novel study in which patients were instructed to take photographs that showed aspects of life that have been challenging to deal with since undergoing treatment. Participants underwent subsequent qualitative interviews using the photographs as prompts. SETTING: The study was conducted in a cancer center in a tertiary medical center. PATIENTS: Twenty patients were included who underwent curative-intent rectal cancer treatment. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Interviews were designed to explore the lived experiences of patients with rectal cancer after treatment. RESULTS: Three major themes with regard to life after rectal cancer and its treatments emerged: physical symptoms, lifestyle changes, and changes over time. Physical symptoms encompassed GI issues, ostomy difficulties, and genitourinary symptoms. Lifestyle changes included those relating to diet, social life, and hobbies as well as major life changes and finances. Finally, patients spoke of improvement during the time of symptoms and impact on daily life. LIMITATIONS: There may be bias because of the homogeneity of our study population, which may not represent the experiences of younger patients, those of lower socioeconomic status, or those who chose not to participate. Our sample was also overrepresented by patients with a complete pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and excluded individuals with recurrence. Finally, single interviews with each individual at different points from their treatment may have resulted in recall bias. CONCLUSIONS: This photo-elicitation study provided rectal cancer survivors with a unique opportunity to share how rectal cancer treatment has impacted their lives beyond traditional metrics such as postoperative complications and long-term survival. In addition to improving preoperative counseling and expectation setting, future efforts should focus on postoperative symptom surveillance and appropriate referral when needed. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/C7. SUS VIDAS ENTERAS VAN A CAMBIAR UN ESTUDIO DE OBTENCIN DE IMGENES SOBRE LA SUPERVIVENCIA AL CNCER DE RECTO: ANTECEDENTES:Los sobrevivientes de cáncer de recto experimentan síntomas persistentes, lo que puede dar lugar a necesidades no satisfechas.OBJETIVO:Explorar la experiencia de los sobrevivientes de cáncer de recto e identificar los impactos del tratamiento mediante el uso de fotoestimulación.DISEÑO:En este nuevo estudio, se instruyó a los pacientes para que tomaran fotografías que mostraran aspectos de la vida que han sido difíciles de manejar desde que se sometieron al tratamiento. Los participantes se sometieron posteriormente a entrevistas cualitativas utilizando las fotografías como estimuladores.ESCENARIO:Centro oncológico en un centro médico terciario.PARTICIPANTES:Veinte pacientes que se sometieron a tratamiento de cáncer de recto con intención curativa.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:Las entrevistas se diseñaron para explorar las experiencias vividas por los pacientes con cáncer de recto después del tratamiento.RESULTADOS:Surgieron tres temas principales con respecto a la vida después del cáncer de recto y sus tratamientos: síntomas físicos; cambios en el estilo de vida; y cambios en el tiempo. Los síntomas físicos abarcaron problemas gastrointestinales, dificultades de las ostomías y síntomas genitourinarios. Los cambios en el estilo de vida incluyeron aquellos relacionados con la dieta, la vida social y los pasatiempos, así como cambios importantes en la vida y las finanzas. Por último, los pacientes hablaron de una mejoría con el tiempo de los síntomas y el impacto en la vida diaria.LIMITACIONES:Puede haber sesgo debido a la homogeneidad de nuestra población de estudio, que puede no representar las experiencias de los pacientes más jóvenes, los de nivel socioeconómico más bajo o los que optaron por no participar. Nuestra muestra también estuvo sobrerrepresentada por pacientes con una respuesta patológica completa después de la quimioterapia neoadyuvante y excluyó a los individuos con recurrencia. Finalmente, las entrevistas individuales con cada paciente en diferentes puntos de su tratamiento pueden dar lugar a que los participantes experimenten un sesgo de recuerdo.CONCLUSIONES:Este estudio de obtención de fotografías brinda a los sobrevivientes de cáncer de recto una oportunidad única de compartir cómo el tratamiento del cáncer de recto ha impactado sus vidas más allá de las métricas tradicionales, como las complicaciones posoperatorias y la supervivencia a largo plazo. Además de mejorar el asesoramiento preoperatorio y el establecimiento de expectativas, los esfuerzos futuros deben centrarse en la vigilancia de los síntomas posoperatorios y la derivación adecuada cuando sea necesario. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/C7.

Characterizing suicide-related self-disclosure by peer specialists: a qualitative analysis of audio-recorded sessions.

Objective: We characterized peer support specialists' self-disclosures related to suicide and recipient responses to inform services for high-risk individuals that may include peer support. Method: We used an inductive approach and thematic analysis to identify themes from audio recordings of initial sessions between peer support specialists trained in suicide-related self-disclosure and 10 study participants who were admitted to inpatient psychiatry units with suicidal ideation or a suicide attempt. Results: The first theme, "I've been suicidal, but those details are not important", reflects that peers mentioned suicide-related aspects of their histories briefly, often as part of introductions, without participants responding specifically to those aspects. The second theme, "Being suicidal is one of the challenges I've faced", reflects that in more detailed disclosures by peer specialists and in participant responses, suicide is a part of the mental health challenges and life stressors discussed, not the focus. The third theme "Let's focus on my recovery and what I've learned" reflects that peers steered their self-disclosures away from suicide and towards what was helpful in their recovery. Conclusions: Suicide-related self-disclosures embedded within peer specialists' introduction or overall recovery narrative convey a shared experience while focusing conversation on mental health challenges other than suicide.

Female Patient Perceptions on Financial Incentives to Promote Follow-Up After Bariatric Surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Financial incentives to promote recommended behaviors have been applied in many healthcare settings, but to our knowledge, have never been tested as a strategy to improve patient follow-up after bariatric surgery. Given that females make up majority of bariatric surgery patients, our goal was to explore female patient perceptions on the effects of a financial incentive program designed to increase follow-up after bariatric surgery. METHODS: This was an exploratory qualitative study of patient participants in a pilot program investigating financial incentives. We performed qualitative interviews with female patients to include personal experiences with bariatric surgery, progress toward goals, and concerns related to post-surgical behaviors. The data was analyzed iteratively through inductive thematic analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-one female patients who had undergone bariatric surgery and enrolled in the financial incentive program participated in this study. Participants had generally positive impressions of the financial incentive program. Participants described the utility of the program in helping to pay for expenses associated with bariatric surgery; feeling that participation was their way of demonstrating that they were compliant with post-surgical recommendations; and that it provided additional motivation. All patients stated that even without the financial incentive they would have continued to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: While financial incentives can provide additional motivation for patients following bariatric surgery, they are not the primary reason that patients choose to follow-up. Understanding the motivation of patients who choose to follow-up (or not) may better inform investigations intended to improve follow-up rates after bariatric surgery.

A multi-modal study examining long-term bowel, urinary, and sexual function after rectal cancer surgery.

BACKGROUND: Many rectal cancer survivors experience persistent bowel, urinary, and sexual dysfunction. A better understanding of their lived experience can help guide survivorship care. METHODS: Multi-modal study of patients who underwent rectal cancer surgery from 2015 to 2019 at a single institution. Surveys and qualitative interviews were used to describe patients' postoperative symptom burden and its impact on their quality of life. RESULTS: The total number of survey respondents was 188 (response rate = 63.5%). Among participants, 41.5% reported their bowel habits, bladder habits (7.8%) and sexual function (36.2%) to be a "moderate" or "big problem" in the past four weeks. The lived experiences varied widely even among patients who report similar symptom burden. CONCLUSIONS: Rectal cancer survivors commonly face lasting symptoms that negatively impact their quality of life for years after surgery. Additional support extending beyond the perioperative period is needed for patients with persistent dysfunction.

"The captain of the ship." A qualitative investigation of surgeon identity formation.

BACKGROUND: Professional identity formation is essential to medical trainee education. Surgeons are expected to guide trainees through this process but may be unprepared as they may not understand their own professional identity. METHODS: We purposively selected 46 surgeons across Michigan to participate in semi-structured qualitative interviews intended to explore surgical decision-making in 2019. Thematic analysis was used to analyze the transcripts. RESULTS: Surgeon identity formation is a complex process influenced by factors from four domains: individual factors, interpersonal relationships, external influences, and professional experience. We found surgeon identity formation commences prior to residency training and continues to remodel long into practice. CONCLUSIONS: By understanding surgeon identity, surgeons will be prepared to help form trainees' professional identities and recognize opportunities for improvement. We believe changes, especially within the environment and community, will encourage medical students to enter surgical fields, decrease resident attrition, and promote surgeon well-being.