Could conventionally fractionated radiation therapy coupled with stereotactic body radiation therapy improve local control in bone oligometastases?

PURPOSE: To describe clinical outcomes of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) applied alone or as a boost after a conventionally fractionated radiation therapy (CFRT) for the treatment of bone oligometastases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients treated with SBRT from January 2007 to December 2015 in the Institut de cancérologie de Lorraine in France. The inclusion criteria involved adults treated with SBRT for one to three bone metastases from a histological proven solid tumor and a primary tumor treated, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score inferior or equal to 2. Local control (LC), overall survival (OS), progression free survival (PFS), bone progression incidence (BPI), skeletal related events free survival (SRE-FS), toxicity and pain response were evaluated. RESULTS: Forty-six patients and 52 bone metastases were treated. Twenty-three metastases (44.2%) received SBRT alone mainly for non-spine metastases and 29 (55.8%) a combination of CFRT and SBRT mainly for spine metastases. The median follow-up time was 22months (range: 4-89months). Five local failures (9.6%) were observed and the cumulative incidences of local recurrence at 1 and 2years respectively were 4.4% and 8% with a median time of local recurrence of 17months (range: 4-36months). The one- and two-years OS were 90.8% and 87.4%. Visceral metastasis (HR: 3.40, 95% confidence interval [1.10-10.50]) and a time from primary diagnosis (TPD)>30months (HR: 0.22 [0.06-0.82]) were independent prognostic factors of OS. The 1 and 2years PFS were 66.8% and 30.9% with a median PFS time of 18months [13-24]. The one- and two-years BPI were 27.7% and 55.3%. In multivariate analysis, unfavorable histology was associated with worse BPI (HR: 3.19 [1.32-7.76]). The SRE-FS was 93.3% and 78.5% % at 1 and 2years. The overall response rate for pain was 75% in the evaluable patients (9/12). No grade≥3 toxicity nor especially no radiation induced myelopathy (RIM), two patients developed asymptomatic vertebral compression fractures. CONCLUSION: The sole use of SBRT or its association with CFRT is an efficient and well-tolerated treatment that allows high LC for bone oligometastases.

Impact of fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy on activity of daily living and performance status in progressive/recurrent glioblastoma: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: The prognosis of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) is poor, with limited options of palliative localized or systemic treatments. Survival can be improved by a second localized treatment; however, it is not currently possible to identify which patients would benefit from this approach. This study aims to evaluate which factors lead to a lower Karnofsky performance status (KPS) score after fractionated stereotactic RT (fSRT). METHODS: We retrospectively collected data from patients treated with fSRT for recurrent GBM at the Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine between October 2010 and November 2017 and analyzed which factors were associated with a lower KPS score. RESULTS: 59 patients received a dose of 25 Gy in 5 sessions spread over 5-7 days (80% isodose). The median time from the end of primary radiotherapy to the initiation of fSRT was 10.7 months. The median follow-up after fSRT initiation was 8.8 months. The incidence of KPS and ADL impairment in all patients were 51.9% and 37.8% respectively with an adverse impact of PTV size on KPS (HR = 1.57 [95% CI 1.19-2.08], p = 0.028). Only two patients showed early grade 3 toxicity and none showed grade 4 or late toxicity. The median overall survival time, median overall survival time after fSRT, median progression-free survival and institutionalization-free survival times were 25.8, 8.8, 3.9 and 7.7 months, respectively. Initial surgery was associated with better progression-free survival (Hazard ratio (HR) = 0.48 [95% CI 0.27-0.86], p = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: A larger PTV should predicts lower KPS in the treatment of recurrent GBM using fSRT.

Evaluation of two modalities of perioperative treatment in the management of extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcomas: neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy and sequential treatment.

PURPOSE: Patients with locally advanced grade 2-3 extremity/truncal soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are at high risk of recurrence. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and feasibility of neoadjuvant concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) in selected grade 2-3 patients with limb or trunk wall STS, and to compare this schedule to a sequential approach combining neoadjuvant chemotherapy and adjuvant radiotherapy. METHODS: We retrospectively included patients who underwent neoadjuvant cCRT at two comprehensive cancer centers from 1992-2016. We then compared these results to those of patients treated with preoperative chemotherapy and postoperative radiotherapy from a third comprehensive cancer center with a propensity score matched analysis. RESULTS: A total of 53 patients were treated by neoadjuvant cCRT; 58 patients could be matched with 29 patients in each treatment group after propensity score matching. Disease-free survival and overall survival at 5 years were 54.9 and 63.5%, respectively with neoadjuvant cCRT, with no significant difference when compared to the sequential treatment group. R0 resection rate was higher (90.9 vs 44.8%, p < 0.01) in the cCRT group than in the sequential treatment group during a shorter therapeutic sequence (118 vs 210.5 days, p < 0.01), with no impact on the surgical procedure or postoperative complications. CONCLUSION: cCRT is feasible with acceptable immediate and late toxicities. It could facilitate surgery by increasing the R0 resection rate and improve patient compliance by shortening the therapeutic sequence.

[Survivorship care plan (SCP) : The viewpoints of women with breast cancer and their general practitioners]. / Programme personnalisé d'après cancer (PPAC) : vision des patientes atteintes de cancer du sein et de leur médecin traitant.

BACKGROUND: The French National Cancer Institute recommends the use of survivorship care plans (SCP) for all cancer survivors. Developing useful SCP's requires understanding of what survivors and their providers need and how SCP's can be implemented in practice. We conducted a study to assess the delivery of SCP comprehensive binders for breast cancer women (BCW) and their general practitioners (GP) in a Cancer center from January 2019. METHODS: SCP binders, containing a full range of information on topics related to post-cancer care to survivor-specific information and referrals, were given to BCW during a post-treatment dedicated consultation. Then a letter, containing the treatment summary and 5-year follow-up schedule, was sent to their GPs. Comprehensive binder delivery assessment was carried out using item checkbox, and anonymous open-answered, self-reported questionnaires were sent by email to BCW and their GPs. RESULTS: The questionnaire response rates were 81.3% for BCW (n = 109/134) and 48.6% for their GPs (n = 52/107). Most BCW (85%) reported that SCP binders provided useful and comprehensive information. However, some of them (18%) felt abandoned and anonymous during the post-treatment follow-up. Most GPs found SCP letters from our anti-cancer center physicians to be useful for their patients, 38% of them had used this information to assure transition of care with other care providers. In addition, GPs were unanimous to express their feeling that this SCP could improve the long-term surveillance of BCW. There was a high concordance between BCW survivors' and PCP' answers, especially regarding SCPs as a communication bridge between GPs and BCW survivors. Response results concerning use of the binders: to talk about them: 59% for BCW vs. 51% for GPs, and to show them: 35% for BCW vs. 31% for GPs. CONCLUSION: The opinions of BCW survivors' and PCP' opinions about the use of SCP's by our Cancer Center seems to be favourable. It is essential to implement and develop SCP's as a key tool in long-term surveillance and support for cancer patient survivors and they are a useful instrument for care providers in communication and transition.

Long-term outcome of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for patient with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer.

PURPOSE: To investigate clinical outcome and predicting factors of local failures in patients with colorectal cancer treated for unresectable liver metastases with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS: We restrospectively reviewed the medical records of 67 patients treated with the Cyberknife SBRT system for 99 hepatic metastases between January 2007 and December 2015 in our center. In total, 37.5 to 54.0Gy in 3 to 5 fractions were prescribed to the 80% isodose line. Local control (LC), intrahepatic progression incidence, Progression-Free Survival (PFS), Overall Survival (OS) and toxicity were evaluated. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 47 months (IQR, 28-59 months). The median OS was 53 months, the 2-year OS and PFS rates were 81.4% and 54.0%. The 1- and 2-year LC rates were 86.6% and 72.4%. In the multivariate analysis, the degree of differentiation was the only prognostic factor for LC (HR 0.31, 95% CI, 0.10-0.98, P=0.046). Margin expansion>5mm was not associated with a better LC (HR 0.72, 95% CI, 0.38-1.37, P=0.317). Performans Status≥2 (HR 3.27, 95% CI, 1.07-9.98, P=0.038), chemotherapy for metastases before SBRT (HR 0.36, 95% CI, 0.18-0.75, P=0.006) and regional lymph node at diagnosis (HR 2.19, 95% CI, 1.09-4.43, P=0.029) were independent prognostic factors for OS. We report 2 cases of grade≥3 toxicity (3.0%) - one grade 3 acute nausea and one grade 3 late gastric ulcer. CONCLUSION: Stereotactic body radiation therapy is an effective and well-tolerated treatment that allow high LC for liver metastases from colorectal cancer during the first two years. A prescription dose of 45Gy in 3 fractions to the 80% isodose line with a risk adapted schedule to respect Organ At Risk constraints allows a low rate of toxicity.

A step towards international prospective trials in carbon ion radiotherapy: investigation of factors influencing dose distribution in the facilities in operation based on a case of skull base chordoma.

BACKGROUND: Carbon ion radiotherapy (CIRT) has been delivered to more than 20,000 patients worldwide. International trials have been recommended in order to emphasize the actual benefits. The ULICE program (Union of Light Ion Centers in Europe) addressed the need for harmonization of CIRT practices. A comparative knowledge of the sources and magnitudes of uncertainties altering dose distribution and clinical effects during the whole CIRT procedure is required in that aim. METHODS: As part of ULICE WP2 task group, we sent a centrally reviewed questionnaire exploring candidate sources of uncertainties in dose deposition to the ten CIRT facilities in operation by February 2017. We aimed to explore native beam characterization, immobilization, anatomic data acquisition, target volumes and organs at risks delineation, treatment planning, dose delivery, quality assurance prior and during treatment. The responders had to consider the clinical case of a clival chordoma eligible for postoperative CIRT according to their clinical practice. With the results, our task group discussed ways to harmonize CIRT practices. RESULTS: We received 5 surveys from facilities that have treated 77% of the patients worldwide per November 2017. We pointed out the singularity of the facilities and beam delivery systems, a divergent definition of target volumes, the multiplicity of TPS and equieffective dose calculation approximations. CONCLUSION: Multiple uncertainties affect equieffective dose definition, deposition and calculation in CIRT. Although it is not possible to harmonize all the steps of the CIRT planning between the centers, our working group proposed counter-measures addressing the improvable limitations.

Concepts and terms for dose/volume parameters in carbon-ion radiotherapy: Conclusions of the ULICE taskforce.

PURPOSE: The Union of Light Ion Centers in Europe (ULICE) program addressed the need for uniting scientific results for carbon-ion radiation therapy obtained by several institutions worldwide in different fields of excellence, and translating them into a real benefit to the community. Particularly, the concepts for dose/volume parameters developed in photon radiotherapy cannot be extrapolated to high linear energy transfer particles. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The ULICE-WP2 taskforce included radiation oncologists involved in carbon-ion radiation therapy and International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements, radiation biologists, expert physicists in the fields of carbon-ion radiation therapy, microdosimetry, biological modeling and image-guided radiotherapy. Consensual reports emerged from multiple discussions within both the restricted group and the wider ULICE community. Public deliverables were produced and disseminated to the European Commission. RESULTS: Here we highlight the disparity in practices between treating centers, then address the main topics to finally elaborate specific recommendations. Although it appears relatively simple to add geometrical margins around the clinical target volume to obtain the planning target volume as performed in photon radiotherapy, this procedure is not appropriate for carbon-ion radiation therapy. Due to the variation of the radiation quality in depth, there is no generic relative biological effectiveness value for carbon-ions outside of an isolated point, for a given fractionation and specific experimental conditions. Absorbed dose and "equieffective dose" for specified conditions must always be reported. CONCLUSIONS: This work contributed to the development of standard operating procedures for carbon-ion radiation therapy clinical trials. These procedures are now being applied, particularly in the first phase III international, multicenter trial (PHRC Étoile).

[Anal canal cancer: In the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy, outstanding issues]. / Cancer du canal anal : à l'ère de la radiothérapie conformationnelle avec modulation d'intensité, questions en suspens.

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy makes possible to optimize the irradiation and spare normal tissues. The toxicity remains important with concomitant chemotherapy often associated. The improvement of MRI and PET-CT define more precisely the target volumes, which need a higher dose, but necessitates to respect the rules of contouring. The treatment is uniform whatever the stage but should be individualized based on clinical stage and tumor response. New paradigms concern biology, staging, volumes and doses, fractionation and combined treatments.

Pre- and postoperative radiotherapy for extremity soft tissue sarcoma: Evaluation of inter-observer target volume contouring variability among French sarcoma group radiation oncologists.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate, during a national workshop, the inter-observer variability in target volume delineation for primary extremity soft tissue sarcoma radiation therapy. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Six expert sarcoma radiation oncologists (members of French Sarcoma Group) received two extremity soft tissue sarcoma radiation therapy cases 1: one preoperative and one postoperative. They were distributed with instructions for contouring gross tumour volume or reconstructed gross tumour volume, clinical target volume and to propose a planning target volume. The preoperative radiation therapy case was a patient with a grade 1 extraskeletal myxoid chondrosarcoma of the thigh. The postoperative case was a patient with a grade 3 pleomorphic undifferentiated sarcoma of the thigh. Contour agreement analysis was performed using kappa statistics. RESULTS: For the preoperative case, contouring agreement regarding GTV, gross tumour volume GTV, clinical target volume and planning target volume were substantial (kappa between 0.68 and 0.77). In the postoperative case, the agreement was only fair for reconstructed gross tumour volume (kappa: 0.38) but moderate for clinical target volume and planning target volume (kappa: 0.42). During the workshop discussion, consensus was reached on most of the contour divergences especially clinical target volume longitudinal extension. The determination of a limited cutaneous cover was also discussed. CONCLUSION: Accurate delineation of target volume appears to be a crucial element to ensure multicenter clinical trial quality assessment, reproducibility and homogeneity in delivering RT. radiation therapy RT. Quality assessment process should be proposed in this setting. We have shown in our study that preoperative radiation therapy of extremity soft tissue sarcoma has less inter-observer contouring variability.

[Dose constraints to organs at risk for conformational and stereotactic radiotherapy: Small bowel and duodenum]. / Contraintes de doses aux organes à risque en radiothérapie conformationnelle et stéréotaxique : intestin grêle et duodénum.

Radiotherapy of abdominopelvic primary or secondary lesions in conformational or stereotactic techniques is in full development. The small bowel is highly sensitive to irradiation and is the main organ at risk limiting prescription doses. This literature review aims to define the dose constraints to the small bowel and the duodenum in conformational and stereotactic body radiotherapy. The small bowel including the duodenum, jejunum and ileum is delineated on the simulation scanner. The radio-induced intestinal toxicities are acute related to the cellular depopulation of the intestinal mucosa, and late of more complex pathophysiology associating depletion in stem cells, microangiopathy, chronic inflammation and fibrosis. The main predictive factor of intestinal toxicity is the dose-volume ratio. In conformational radiotherapy, the dose constraints to the duodenum are: V25Gy<45% and V35Gy<20%. The jejunum and ileum dose constraints are for delineation by intestinal loop or peritoneal cavity respectively: V15Gy<275mL or V15Gy<830mL and V45Gy<150mL. In stereotactic body radiotherapy, small bowel dose constraints depend on fractionation and are defined on a small volume and on a maximum dose at one point. Intestinal toxicity is also dependent on factors intrinsic to the patient and radiosensitizers such as targeted therapies or chemotherapies. With the development of new techniques allowing dose escalation on the tumour and the development of inverse planning, the definition of dose constraints to the small bowel is essential for current practice.

[Hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastasis: Benefit of additional whole brain radiotherapy?] / Radiothérapie stéréotaxique hypofractionnée des métastases cérébrales : bénéfice de l'irradiation encéphalique totale ?

PURPOSE: To study overall survival, risk of neurological death, local recurrence and development of new brain metastasis in patients treated for brain oligometastases with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with CyberKnife®, according to the association or not with an additional whole brain irradiation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Institutional retrospective study of 102 patients treated for one to three brain metastasis: 76 with exclusive hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and 26 with hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and whole brain irradiation. Objectives were assessed and compared between these two groups according to the Kaplan-Meier method and Cox model. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 18.8 months. There were no difference between exclusive hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy with whole brain irradiation for overall survival (respective median 21.5 and 20.1 months), risk of neurological death (respectively 9.2% and 15.4% at one year). At one year: the risk of cerebral progressive disease was greater in the group receiving exclusive hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (respectively 43.4% vs. 26.2%, P=0.043), the risk of local recurrence was 25% versus 17.6% (P=0.28) and the development of new brain metastasis was 23.7% versus 11.5% (P=0.27). After salvage treatments, crude local control was similar in the two groups, respectively 78.6% and 73.5%. Whole brain irradiation has been avoided for 72.4% of patients in the group receving exclusive hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: Whole brain irradiation improves local control of brain metastatic disease in addition to hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. Sparing whole brain irradiation for salvage treatments only does not affect overall survival or risk of neurological death in selected patients with favourable prognosis.

[Cancer, radiotherapy and immune system]. / Cancer, radiothérapie et système immunitaire.

Novel paradigms emerge in oncology today. Systemic treatments are more effective and diversified along with an increased life expectancy in oligometastatic patients. Stereotactic radiotherapy using hypofractionation opens new perspectives for local tumour control. The area of radiobiology has expanded with integration of tumour microenvironment in which radiation-induced inflammation mediators and immune system play a major role. Immunity checkpoints inhibitors experience a major development. This rapidly evolving field seems involved in the abscopal effects, especially when radiation is combined with checkpoints inhibitors, as demonstrated in numerous preclinical studies and several clinical trials. Paradoxically, irradiation also produces immunosuppressive effects. This manuscript aims to report the dual effects of ionizing radiation on the immune system and reviews some results of the combination of radiation and immunity chekpoints inhibitors and also research perspectives.

[Comparison of survival and chronic gastrointestinal toxicities in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer, treated by conventional or intensity-modulated radiation technique]. / Comparaison de la survie et de la toxicité chronique gastro-intestinale chez les patientes atteintes de cancer du col de l'utérus localement évolué, traité par irradiation classique ou avec modulation d'intensité.

PURPOSE: To evaluate prospectively chronic gastrointestinal toxicity in patients with cervical cancer treated with conventional irradiation or with intensity-modulated irradiation (IMRT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 2005 and September 2013, 109 patients underwent external radiotherapy followed by brachytherapy for cervical cancer at the "Institut de Cancérologie de Lorraine". Each patient receiving IMRT was paired with a patient receiving conventional radiotherapy on the following criteria: concomitant chemotherapy, additional nodal dose, treatment of para-aortic lymph node area, age. The toxicity collection was prospective using the RTOG scale. The main objective was to compare the incidence of gastrointestinal toxicity chronic between the two groups. In a second time, the influence of dosimetric parameters on chronic GI toxicity was investigated. Comparisons of acute toxicity, chronic genitourinary toxicities, overall survival, disease-free survival were secondary objectives. RESULTS: Sixty-six patients were able to be matched. Overall survival at 36 months was 71% in the conventional radiotherapy group against 73% in the IMRT group (P=0.54). There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of digestive chronic toxicity (P=0.17), nor in terms acute gastrointestinal toxicities (P=0.6445) and genitourinary (P=0.5724). IMRT spared significantly small bowel (P=0.0006) and rectum (P=0.0046) from 30Gy dose, and bladder from 45Gy (P<0.001). The incidence of genitourinary toxicity was significantly different between the two groups (P=0.03) in favor of conventional radiotherapy. CONCLUSION: Our study does not seem to show significant difference in the occurrence of chronic gastrointestinal toxicities between the two groups. Clinical efficacy seems comparable. Larger studies with longer follow-up period should be conducted.

[Conformal radiotherapy for vertebral bone metastasis]. / Radiothérapie conformationnelle des métastases osseuses vertébrales.

Analgesic external beam radiation therapy is a standard of care for patients with uncomplicated painful bone metastases and/or prevention of bone complications. In case of fracture risk, radiation therapy is performed after surgery in a consolidation of an analgesic purpose and stabilizing osteosynthesis. Radiotherapy is mandatory after vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. Spinal cord compression - the only emergency in radiation therapy - is indicated postoperatively either exclusively for non surgical indication. Analgesic re-irradiation is possible in the case of insufficient response or recurrent pain after radiotherapy. Metabolic radiation, bisphosphonates or denosumab do not dissuade external radiation therapy for pain relief. Systemic oncological treatments can be suspended with a period of wash out given the risk of radiosensitization or recall phenomenon. Better yet, the intensity modulated radiotherapy and stereotactic radiotherapy can be part of a curative strategy for oligometastatic patients and suggest new treatment prospects.

High dose rate brachytherapy with customized applicators for malignant facial skin lesions.

PURPOSE: Brachytherapy is a well-known treatment in the management of skin tumors. For facial or scalp lesions, applicators have been developed to deliver non-invasive treatment. We present cases treated with customized applicators with high dose rate system. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients with poor performance status treated for malignant skin lesions of the scalp or the facial skin between 2011 and 2014 were studied. Afterloading devices were chosen between Freiburg(®) Flap, silicone-mold or wax applicators. The clinical target volume (CTV) was created by adding margins to lesions (10mm to 20mm). The dose schedules were 25Gy in five fractions for postoperative lesions, 30Gy in six fractions for exclusive treatments and a single session of 8Gy could be considered for palliative treatments. RESULTS: In 30 months, 11 patients received a treatment for a total of 12 lesions. The median age was 80 years. The median follow-up was 17 months and the 2-year local control rate was 91%. The mean CTV surface was 41.1cm(2) with a mean thickness of 6.1mm. We conceived three wax applicators, used our silicone-mold eight times and the Freiburg(®) Flap one time. We observed only low-grade radiodermitis (grade I: 50%, grade II: 33%), and no high-grade skin toxicity. CONCLUSION: High dose rate brachytherapy with customized applicators for facial skin and scalp lesions is efficient and safe. It is a good modality to treat complex lesions in patients unfit for invasive treatment.

Radionecrosis after stereotactic radiotherapy for brain metastases.

INTRODUCTION: Radionecrosis (RN) represents the main complication of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for brain metastases. It may be observed in up to 34% of cases at 24 months after treatment and associated with significant morbidity in 10-17%. AREAS COVERED: Our aim is to discuss the results of original studies on RN related to SRT for brain metastases. Expert commentary: Although the development of RN is unpredictable, larger volume of the lesion, prior whole brain irradiation, and higher dose of radiation represent the major risk factors. RN appears on MRI as contrast-enhancing necrotic lesions, surrounded by edema, occurring at least 3 months after SRT, localized within fields of irradiation. No firm criteria are established. Surgery can provide symptomatic relief but is associated with a risk of complications. Corticosteroids are considered the standard of care treatment, despite limited efficacy and many adverse effects. Bevacizumab represents another interesting option that needs to be validated.

[Head and neck adaptive radiotherapy: A tool for the detection of patients requiring adaptive radiotherapy]. / Radiothérapie adaptative des cancers ORL : un outil permettant d'identifier les patients nécessitant une adaptation de leur traitement.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this work was to implement a simple dosimetric alert tool in a retrospective study for six patients suffering from head and neck cancer to detect when a patient might require an adaptive radiotherapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The dosimetric tool generates a 3D cartography of two dosimetric complementary information: a dose variation tolerance map and a dose differential map. The tolerance map is calculated on the initial scanner (CTinit) using the planned dose distribution. It shows for each voxel of each delineated volume the availability for local dose variations during the course of radiotherapy without exceeding the dose threshold. The differential dose map is generated on the tomographic image CBCT (CBCTtreatment). It shows dose variations between the planned and the actual delivered dose distribution for each voxel. By comparing both maps, when a voxel presents a value superior to the corresponding dose variation tolerance, an alert is generated and the anatomical areas concerned are visually indicated to the physician. RESULTS: The application of the dosimetric tool on six patients with head and neck cancers reveals the ability of the tool to detect cases requiring a new treatment plan. Two patients whose the tumour shrinkage produced an increase of the delivered dose to the spinal cord beyond 45 Gy have been detected. CONCLUSION: The development of the dosimetric tool allows the automatic detection, with no delineation needs, of patients suffering from head and neck cancers requiring an adaptive strategy.

[Radiation therapy of cardiac sarcomas]. / Irradiation des sarcomes cardiaques de l'adulte.

PURPOSE: Primary cardiac sarcomas represent less than 10 yearly cases in France. Their median survival is approximately 18 months. The treatment consists of surgery when possible. The role of chemotherapy and radiation therapy is controversial, especially with respect to limiting cardiac radiation dose that is theoretically incompatible with the requirement of a tumoricidal dose for sarcoma. A recent series of 124 cases of the French Sarcoma Group suggested a benefit of radiation therapy on progression-free survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The dosimetric data of 12 patients were analyzed. RESULTS: There was variety in radiotherapy modalities and definition of target volumes, doses and techniques are evolving more conformal plans. Irradiation appeared feasible with conventional fractionation with respect to toxicities (although probably underestimated due to short follow-up and dismal prognosis) and previously demonstrated benefit of radiotherapy for primitive cardiac sarcomas. CONCLUSION: A scheme of 45Gy in 1.8Gy per fraction to a preoperative volume with an additional dose of 14Gy in 7 fractions on areas at risk or residual disease and margins 1cm, may be proposed based on the preliminary data of this study. Intensity modulated radiotherapy with daily cone-beam CT-scanner should be evaluated.

[Case report of EPPER Syndrome (eosinophilic polymorphic pruritic eruption associated with radiotherapy) in a patient treated against endometrial cancer]. / À propos d'un syndrome EPPER (eosinophilic polymorphic pruritic eruption associated with radiotherapy) survenu chez une patiente après traitement d'un cancer de l'endomètre.

Acute and mainly late toxicity is a major concern for radiotherapists. Here, we describe a case of a generalized acute eruption due to radiation, having a superficial and deep perivascular lymphocytic infiltrate with numerous eosinophils found in skin biopsy: the EPPER syndrome (eosinophilic polymorphic pruritic eruption associated with radiotherapy). A patient who had endometrial cancer was treated first by surgery, then radiotherapy developed the day following the end of irradiation a generalized erythematous, pruriginous eruption (pelvis, trunk, lower and upper limbs, neck, face, ears). Different tests with a skin biopsy found a superficial and deep perivascular lymphohistiocytic infiltrate with many eosinophils, confirming an EPPER syndrome. The description of the syndrome was first published in 1999 by Rueda et al. (1999) [1]. Later on, there have only been a few case reports on this subject. This syndrome can be encountered in many cancers, but more frequently in cervix and breast carcinomas and can occur up to nine and a half months after radiotherapy. The pathogenic mechanism is unknown. Antihistamines, topical corticosteroids or oral corticosteroids as well as ultraviolet B therapy have been used successfully to treat EPPER syndrome. Some cases of spontaneous resolution are also described. EPPER syndrome is probably largely underestimated due to its polymorphic characteristics, its occurrence sometimes late after radiotherapy. Its knowledge is essential to inform and treat patients correctly.

[Localized Ewing sarcoma of the spine: a preliminary dose-escalation study comparing innovative radiation techniques in a single patient]. / Sarcomes d'Ewing localisés du rachis chez l'enfant : étude préliminaire d'escalade de dose comparant les techniques innovantes.

PURPOSE: Although radiosensitive, spinal locations of Ewing's sarcomas are challenging for the radiation oncologist due to poor radiation tolerance of the spinal cord. However, some favorable anatomical compartments - that may represent more than 20% - were associated with a better outcome and could benefit from a radiation dose escalation using the most recent radiation therapy techniques. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a dose escalation study on one patient, declined in two scenarios: (1) a tumour located within a single vertebral body and (2) a locally advanced disease involving the vertebral foramen and paraspinal soft tissues. Five dose-levels are proposed: 44.8Gy, 54.4Gy, 59.2Gy, 65.6Gy and 70.4Gy (1.6Gy per session, 8Gy per week). The 3D-conformational technique is compared with static intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), helical tomotherapy, volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT), stereotactic body robotic radiation therapy (SBRT) and protontherapy (passive scattering). Two constraints had to be respected in order to skip to the next level: the planned target volume (PTV) coverage must exceed 95% and the D(2%) on the spinal cord shall not exceed a given constraint set at 50Gy in case 1 and 44Gy in case 2 due to initial neurological sufferance. RESULTS: Only protontherapy, SBRT, helical tomotherapy and VMAT appear able to reach the last dose level while respecting the constraints in case 1. On the other hand, only helical tomotherapy seems capable of reaching 59.2Gy on the PTV in case 2. CONCLUSION: With the most recent radiation therapy techniques, it becomes possible to deliver up to 70.4Gy in a favorable compartment in this sham patient. Unfavorable compartments can receive up to 59.2Gy. Definitive radiation therapy may be an interesting local treatment option to be validated in an early phase trial.