Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrer
Plus de filtres










Base de données
Gamme d'année
1.
Avian Dis ; 63(1): 17-23, 2019 03 01.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31251515

RÉSUMÉ

We have examined a variety of sampling strategies for detecting pathogens in turkey flocks undergoing infections with low pathogenicity avian influenza virus (LPAIV). We found that viral RNA was widely distributed in the barn environment of turkey flocks undergoing an active LPAIV infection and was in both water and drinker biofilm samples. Viral RNA was concentrated in drinker biofilm and sediment and was detectable using real-time reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RRT-PCR) and by virus isolation. Drinker biofilm sample results correlated with concurrently collected oropharyngeal (OP) sample results from flocks on a farm with LPAI in which the two sampling strategies were directly compared. To evaluate the utility of biofilm sampling for the detection of highly pathogenic avian influenza virus (HPAIV), biofilm and OP swabs from mortality pools were collected daily from negative turkey flocks on an HPAI-positive premise. The biofilm swabs were positive 1-2 days prior to positives appearing in the OP sample pools. The drinker biofilm sampling strategy overcame the difficulty of finding a subclinical infectious bird in a population by collecting material from a large number of individuals and testing a sample in which a positive signal persists for several days to weeks. The sampling method is convenient for use in turkey barns and has been reliably used in both active and passive surveillance programs for LPAIV and HPAIV using RRT-PCR.


Muestreo ambiental para el virus de influenza A en casetas de pavos. Se han examinado una variedad de estrategias de muestreo para detectar patógenos en parvadas de pavos que sufren infecciones con el virus de la influenza aviar de baja patogenicidad (con las siglas en inglés LPAIV). Se encontró que el ARN viral se distribuyó ampliamente en el ambiente de las casetas con parvadas de pavos con infección activa por el virus de la influenza aviar de baja patogenicidad y se determinó tanto en muestras de agua como en muestras de la biopelícula de bebederos. El ARN viral se concentró en la biopelícula y en el sedimento de bebederos y se detectó mediante transcripción reversa y reacción en cadena de la polimerasa en tiempo real (RRT-PCR) y mediante el aislamiento del virus. Los resultados de la muestra de la biopelícula del bebedero se correlacionaron con los resultados de la muestra orofaríngea (OP) colectada de forma simultánea de parvadas en una granja con influenza aviar de baja patogenicidad en las que se compararon directamente las dos estrategias de muestreo. Para evaluar la utilidad del muestreo de la biopelícula para la detección del virus de la influenza aviar altamente patógena (HPAIV), se recolectaron diariamente biopelículas e hisopos orofaríngeos de grupos de mortalidad de parvadas de pavos negativas en una granja positiva para la influenza aviar de alta patogenicidad. Los hisopos de biopelículas fueron positivos de uno a dos días antes de que aparecieran resultados positivos en las muestras orofaríngeas agrupadas. La estrategia de muestreo de la biopelícula del bebedero eliminó la dificultad de encontrar un ave infectada subclínicamente en una población al recolectar material de un gran número de individuos y analizar una muestra en la que persiste una señal positiva durante varios días o semanas. El método de muestreo es adecuado para su uso en casetas de pavos y se ha utilizado de manera confiable en los programas de vigilancia activa y pasiva para el virus de influenza aviar tanto de baja como de alta patogenicidad utilizando transcripción reversa y reacción en cadena de la polimerasa en tiempo real.


Sujet(s)
Biofilms , Surveillance de l'environnement/méthodes , Virus de la grippe A/isolement et purification , Grippe chez les oiseaux/virologie , Maladies de la volaille/virologie , Dindons , Élevage , Animaux , Surveillance de l'environnement/instrumentation
2.
Front Microbiol ; 9: 1841, 2018.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30147682

RÉSUMÉ

Salmonella is one of the leading causes of human foodborne gastroenteritis in the United States. In addition, Salmonella contributes to morbidity and mortality in livestock. The control of Salmonella is an increasing problematic issue in livestock production due to lack of effective control methods and the constant adaptation of Salmonella to new management practices, which is often related to horizontal acquisition of virulence or antibiotic resistance genes. Salmonella enterica serotype Heidelberg is one of the most commonly isolated serotypes in all poultry production systems in North America. Emergence and persistence of multi-drug resistant Salmonella Heidelberg isolates further impact the poultry production and public health. We hypothesized that distinct poultry production environments affect Salmonella genomic content, and by consequence its survival and virulence abilities. This study compared the genomic composition of S. Heidelberg isolated from environmental samples (19 chicken and 12 turkey isolates) of different breeder farms (16 chicken and 8 turkey farms) in the Midwest, United States. Whole genome comparison of 31 genomes using RAST and SEED identified differences in specific sub-systems in isolates between the chicken- and turkey-associated farm environmental samples. Genes associated with the type IV secretion system (n = 12) and conjugative transfer (n = 3) were absent in turkey farm isolates compared to the chicken ones (p-value < 0.01); Further, turkey farm isolates were enriched in prophage proteins (n = 53; p-value < 0.01). Complementary studies using PHASTER showed that prophages were all Caudovirales phages and were more represented in turkey environmental isolates than the chicken isolates. This study corroborates that isolates from distinct farm environment show differences in S. Heidelberg genome content related to horizontal transfer between bacteria or through viral infections. Complementary microbiome studies of these samples would provide critical insights on sources of these variations. Overall, our findings enhance the understanding of Salmonella genome plasticity and may aid in the development of future effective management practices to control Salmonella.

3.
J Vet Diagn Invest ; 29(3): 370-375, 2017 May.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28430086

RÉSUMÉ

Salmonella is one of the most common causes of foodborne illnesses in humans in the United States, and domestic poultry is considered an important source of this pathogen. Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar Heidelberg is the fourth most commonly reported Salmonella from retail meats and food animals in the United States. We assessed the genotypes and antimicrobial resistance phenotypes of Salmonella Heidelberg isolated from various chicken and turkey hatcheries and breeder farms in the Midwest. The genotypes of 33 S. Heidelberg isolates from chickens ( n = 19) and turkeys ( n = 14) were compared using pulsed-field gel electrophoresis analysis. Cluster analysis of the fingerprints showed that the majority of the chicken isolates grouped together with 87% similarity; those from turkeys clustered with 88% similarity. Similarity between chicken and turkey isolates was also high (86%). Isolates from turkeys were generally more genetically diverse than those from chickens. Antimicrobial susceptibility analysis detected resistance to sulfisoxazole (36% of the isolates), streptomycin (33%), gentamicin (27%), tetracycline (24%), ampicillin and amoxicillin-clavulanic acid (15%), cefoxitin (12%), ceftriaxone and ceftiofur (12%), and chloramphenicol (9%). None of the isolates was resistant to azithromycin, ciprofloxacin, or nalidixic acid. Although the number of the isolates was limited in our study, we conclude that S. Heidelberg isolates from the same host generally clustered together and that a considerable number of the isolates were resistant to a number of antimicrobial agents.


Sujet(s)
Maladies de la volaille/microbiologie , Salmonelloses animales/microbiologie , Salmonella enterica/isolement et purification , Association amoxicilline-clavulanate de potassium/pharmacologie , Association amoxicilline-clavulanate de potassium/usage thérapeutique , Animaux , Antibactériens/pharmacologie , Anti-infectieux/pharmacologie , Anti-infectieux/usage thérapeutique , Poulets , Multirésistance bactérienne aux médicaments , Électrophorèse en champ pulsé/médecine vétérinaire , Génotype , Tests de sensibilité microbienne/médecine vétérinaire , États du Centre-Ouest des États-Unis/épidémiologie , Maladies de la volaille/traitement médicamenteux , Salmonelloses animales/traitement médicamenteux , Salmonella enterica/effets des médicaments et des substances chimiques , Salmonella enterica/génétique , Dindons
4.
J Vet Diagn Invest ; 29(2): 169-175, 2017 Mar.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28176609

RÉSUMÉ

The incursion of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) into the United States during 2014 resulted in an unprecedented foreign animal disease (FAD) event; 232 outbreaks were reported from 21 states. The disease affected 49.6 million birds and resulted in economic losses of $950 million. Minnesota is the largest turkey-producing state, accounting for 18% of U.S. turkey production. Areas with concentrated numbers of turkeys in Minnesota were the epicenter of the outbreak. The first case was presumptively diagnosed in the last week of February 2015 at the Minnesota Veterinary Diagnostic Laboratory (MVDL) and confirmed as HPAI H5N2 at the National Veterinary Services Laboratories on March 4, 2015. A total of 110 farms were affected in Minnesota, and the MVDL tested >17,000 samples from March to July 2015. Normal service was maintained to other clients of the laboratory during this major FAD event, but challenges were encountered with communications, staff burnout and fatigue, training requirements of volunteer technical staff, test kit validation, and management of specific pathogen-free egg requirements.


Sujet(s)
Épidémies de maladies/médecine vétérinaire , Sous-type H5N2 du virus de la grippe A/isolement et purification , Grippe chez les oiseaux/épidémiologie , Dindons , Animaux , Grippe chez les oiseaux/virologie , Laboratoires/organisation et administration , Minnesota/épidémiologie , Organismes exempts d'organismes pathogènes spécifiques , Médecine vétérinaire
5.
Vet Microbiol ; 180(3-4): 281-285, 2015 Nov 18.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26414999

RÉSUMÉ

Influenza D virus (FLUDV) was isolated from diseased pigs with respiratory disease symptoms in 2011, and since then the new virus has also been spread to cattle. Little is known about the susceptibility of other agricultural animals and poultry to FLUDV. This study was designed to determine if other farm animals such as goats, sheep, chickens, and turkey are possible hosts to this newly emerging influenza virus. 648 goat and sheep serum samples and 250 chicken and turkey serum samples were collected from 141 small ruminant and 25 poultry farms from different geographical locations in the United States and Canada. Serum samples were examined using the hemagglutination inhibition (HI) assay and the sheep and goat samples were further analyzed using the serum neutralization assay. Results of this study showed FLUDV antibodies were detected in 13.5% (17/126) of the sampled sheep farms, and 5.2% (29/557) of tested sheep serum samples were positive for FLUDV antibodies. For the goat results, the FLUDV antibodies were detected in 13.3% (2/15) of the sampled farms, and 8.8% (8/91) of the tested goat serum samples were positive for FLUDV antibodies. Furthermore, all tested poultry serum samples were negative for FLUDV antibodies. Our data demonstrated that sheep and goat are susceptible to FLUDV virus and multiple states in U.S. have this virus infection already in these two species. This new finding highlights a need for future surveillance of FLUDV virus in small ruminants toward better understanding both the origin and natural reservoir of this new virus.


Sujet(s)
Anticorps antiviraux/sang , Capra/virologie , Infections à Orthomyxoviridae/médecine vétérinaire , Ruminants/virologie , Ovis aries/virologie , Thogotovirus/isolement et purification , Animaux , Animaux domestiques/virologie , Canada , Poulets/virologie , Test ELISA/médecine vétérinaire , Maladies des chèvres/virologie , Tests d'inhibition de l'hémagglutination , Tests de neutralisation , Études séroépidémiologiques , Ovis , Maladies des ovins/virologie , Dindons/virologie , États-Unis
6.
Avian Dis ; 56(4 Suppl): 897-904, 2012 Dec.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23402110

RÉSUMÉ

Emergency response during a highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) outbreak may involve quarantine and movement controls for poultry products such as eggs. However, such disease control measures may disrupt business continuity and impact food security, since egg production facilities often do not have sufficient capacity to store eggs for prolonged periods. We propose the incorporation of a holding time before egg movement in conjunction with targeted active surveillance as a novel approach to move eggs from flocks within a control area with a low likelihood of them being contaminated with HPAI virus. Holding time reduces the likelihood of HPAI-contaminated eggs being moved from a farm before HPAI infection is detected in the flock. We used a stochastic disease transmission model to estimate the HPAI disease prevalence, disease mortality, and fraction of internally contaminated eggs at various time points postinfection of a commercial table-egg layer flock. The transmission model results were then used in a simulation model of a targeted matrix gene real-time reverse transcriptase (RRT)-PCR testing based surveillance protocol to estimate the time to detection and the number of contaminated eggs moved under different holding times. Our simulation results indicate a significant reduction in the number of internally contaminated eggs moved from an HPAI-infected undetected flock with each additional day of holding time. Incorporation of a holding time and the use of targeted surveillance have been adopted by the U.S. Department of Agriculture in their Draft Secure Egg Supply Plan for movement of egg industry products during an HPAI outbreak.


Sujet(s)
Poulets , Grippe chez les oiseaux/transmission , Ovule/virologie , Animaux , Simulation numérique , Femelle , Grippe chez les oiseaux/virologie , Modèles biologiques , Surveillance de la population , Quarantaine , Facteurs temps
7.
Avian Dis ; 56(4 Suppl): 905-12, 2012 Dec.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23402111

RÉSUMÉ

Early detection of highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) infection in commercial poultry flocks is a critical component of outbreak control. Reducing the time to detect HPAI infection can reduce the risk of disease transmission to other flocks. The timeliness of different types of detection triggers could be dependent on clinical signs that are first observed in a flock, signs that might vary due to HPAI virus strain characteristics. We developed a stochastic disease transmission model to evaluate how transmission characteristics of various HPAI strains might effect the relative importance of increased mortality, drop in egg production, or daily real-time reverse transcriptase (RRT)-PCR testing, toward detecting HPAI infection in a commercial table-egg layer flock. On average, daily RRT-PCR testing resulted in the shortest time to detection (from 3.5 to 6.1 days) depending on the HPAI virus strain and was less variable over a range of transmission parameters compared with other triggers evaluated. Our results indicate that a trigger to detect a drop in egg production would be useful for HPAI virus strains with long infectious periods (6-8 days) and including an egg-drop detection trigger in emergency response plans would lead to earlier and consistent reporting in some cases. We discuss implications for outbreak control and risk of HPAI spread attributed to different HPAI strain characteristics where an increase in mortality or a drop in egg production or both would be among the first clinical signs observed in an infected flock.


Sujet(s)
Poulets , Épidémies de maladies/médecine vétérinaire , Virus de la grippe A/classification , Grippe chez les oiseaux/virologie , Animaux , Épidémies de maladies/prévention et contrôle , Oeufs , Femelle , Grippe chez les oiseaux/diagnostic , Modèles biologiques , Modèles statistiques , Oviposition , Processus stochastiques
8.
Avian Dis ; 56(4 Suppl): 1049-53, 2012 Dec.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23402134

RÉSUMÉ

A highly pathogenic avian influenza (HPAI) outbreak in the United States will initiate a federal emergency response effort that will consist of disease control and eradication efforts, including quarantine and movement control measures. These movement control measures will not only apply to live animals but also to animal products. However, with current egg industry "just-in-time" production practices, limited storage is available to hold eggs. As a result, stop movement orders can have significant unintended negative consequences, including severe disruptions to the food supply chain. Because stakeholders' perceptions of risk vary, waiting to initiate communication efforts until an HPAI event occurs can hinder disease control efforts, including the willingness of producers to comply with the response, and also can affect consumers' demand for the product. A public-private-academic partnership was formed to assess actual risks involved in the movement of egg industry products during an HPAI event through product specific, proactive risk assessments. The risk analysis process engaged a broad representation of stakeholders and promoted effective risk management and communication strategies before an HPAI outbreak event. This multidisciplinary team used the risk assessments in the development of the United States Department of Agriculture, Highly Pathogenic Avian Influenza Secure Egg Supply Plan, a comprehensive response plan that strives to maintain continuity of business. The collaborative approach that was used demonstrates how a proactive risk communication strategy that involves many different stakeholders can be valuable in the development of a foreign animal disease response plan and build working relationships, trust, and understanding.


Sujet(s)
Oiseaux , Virus de la grippe A/pathogénicité , Grippe chez les oiseaux/prévention et contrôle , Communication interdisciplinaire , Agriculture , Animaux , Industrie alimentaire , Gouvernement , Grippe chez les oiseaux/virologie , Appréciation des risques , États-Unis
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE
...