Drug-Drug Interactions and the Clinical Tolerability of Colchicine Among Patients With COVID-19: A Secondary Analysis of the COLCORONA Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Colchicine has many drug-drug interactions with commonly prescribed medications. Only pharmacokinetic studies have provided data on colchicine drug-drug interactions. Objective: To evaluate the clinical tolerability of colchicine according to the presence or absence of a drug-drug interaction. Design, Setting, and Participants: A secondary analysis of the COLCORONA trial was performed. The COLCORONA trial was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial conducted in Brazil, Canada, Greece, South Africa, Spain, and the US between March 23, 2020, and January 20, 2021. The COLCORONA trial included ambulatory patients with COVID-19 with at least 1 high-risk characteristic and compared the effects of colchicine (0.5 mg twice daily for 3 days, then 0.5 mg daily thereafter) with placebo for 27 days. Data analysis was performed from February 24, 2023, to June 20, 2024. Exposure: In this secondary analysis, baseline medications that had interactions with colchicine were identified using a previously published expert classification. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome for this analysis was the composite of serious and nonserious treatment-related and treatment-unrelated gastrointestinal adverse events. The secondary outcomes were other adverse events and the composite of death or hospital admission due to COVID-19 infection. Logistic regression models adjusted for age, sex, estimated glomerular filtration rate, diabetes, heart failure, and myocardial infarction were assessed for effect modification of the association between the randomization arm and the outcomes of interest by drug-drug interaction status. Results: The cohort included 2205 participants in the colchicine arm and 2227 in the placebo arm (median age, 54 [IQR, 47-61] years; 2389 [54%] women). The most common colchicine drug-drug interactions were rosuvastatin (12%) and atorvastatin (10%). In fully adjusted models, the odds of any gastrointestinal adverse event were 1.80 (95% CI, 1.51-2.15) times higher in the colchicine arm than the placebo arm among people without a drug-drug interaction and 1.68 (95% CI, 1.24-2.26) times higher in the colchicine arm than the placebo arm among people with a drug-drug interaction (P = .69 for interaction). Drug-drug interaction status did not significantly modify the effect of colchicine on the composite of COVID-19 hospitalization or death (odds ratio, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.59-1.40 for drug-drug interaction and 0.84; 95% CI, 0.60-1.19 for no drug-drug interaction; P = .80 for interaction). Conclusions and Relevance: In this secondary analysis of the COLCORONA trial, operational classification of drug interactions system class 3 or 4 drug-drug interactions did not appear to significantly increase the risk of colchicine-related adverse effects. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04322682.

Pericardial Diseases: International Position Statement on New Concepts and Advances in Multimodality Cardiac Imaging.

Pericardial diseases have gained renewed clinical interest, leading to a renaissance in the field. There have been many recent advances in pericardial diseases in both multimodality cardiac imaging of diagnoses, such as recurrent, transient constrictive and effusive-constrictive pericarditis, and targeted therapeutics, especially anti-interleukin (IL)-1 agents that affect the inflammasome as part of autoinflammatory pathophysiology. There remains a large educational gap for clinicians, leading to variability in evaluation and management of these patients. The latest pericardial imaging (American Society of Echocardiography, European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging) and clinical guidelines (European Society of Cardiology) are >8-10 years of age and may not reflect current practice. Recent clinical trials involving anti-IL-1 agents in recurrent pericarditis, including anakinra (AIRTRIP), rilonacept (RHAPSODY), and goflikicept have demonstrated their efficacy. The present document represents an international position statement from world leaders in the pericardial field, focusing on novel concepts and emphasizing the role of multimodality cardiac imaging as well as new therapeutics in pericardial diseases.

Relationship of Subendocardial Perfusion to Myocardial Injury, Cardiac Structure, and Clinical Outcomes Among Patients With Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: Coronary microvascular dysfunction has been implicated in the development of hypertensive heart disease and heart failure, with subendocardial ischemia identified as a driver of sustained myocardial injury and fibrosis. We aimed to evaluate the relationships of subendocardial perfusion with cardiac injury, structure, and a composite of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events consisting of death, heart failure hospitalization, myocardial infarction, and stroke. METHODS: Layer-specific blood flow and myocardial flow reserve (MFR; stress/rest myocardial blood flow) were assessed by 13N-ammonia perfusion positron emission tomography in consecutive patients with hypertension without flow-limiting coronary artery disease (summed stress score <3) imaged at Brigham and Women's Hospital (Boston, MA) from 2015 to 2021. In this post hoc observational study, biomarkers, echocardiographic parameters, and longitudinal clinical outcomes were compared by tertiles of subendocardial MFR (MFRsubendo). RESULTS: Among 358 patients, the mean age was 70.6±12.0 years, and 53.4% were male. The median MFRsubendo was 2.57 (interquartile range, 2.08-3.10), and lower MFRsubendo was associated with older age, diabetes, lower renal function, greater coronary calcium burden, and higher systolic blood pressure (P<0.05 for all). In cross-sectional multivariable regression analyses, the lowest tertile of MFRsubendo was associated with myocardial injury and with greater left ventricular wall thickness and volumes compared with the highest tertile. Relative to the highest tertile, low MFRsubendo was independently associated with an increased rate of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.99 [95% CI, 1.39-6.44]; P=0.005) and heart failure hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.76 [95% CI, 1.04-7.32; P=0.042) over 1.1 (interquartile range, 0.6-2.8) years median follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with hypertension without flow-limiting coronary artery disease, impaired MFRsubendo was associated with cardiovascular risk factors, elevated cardiac biomarkers, cardiac structure, and clinical events.

Lipoprotein(a) as a cardiovascular risk factor among patients with and without diabetes Mellitus: the Mass General Brigham Lp(a) Registry.

BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus (DM) and Lp(a) are well-established predictors of coronary artery disease (CAD) outcomes. However, their combined association remains poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between elevated Lp(a) and DM with CAD outcomes. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the MGB Lp(a) Registry involving patients ≥ 18 years who underwent Lp(a) measurements between 2000 and 2019. Exclusion criteria were severe kidney dysfunction, malignant neoplasms, and prior atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). The primary outcome was a combination of cardiovascular death or myocardial infarction (MI). Elevated Lp(a) was defined as > 90th percentile (≥ 216 nmol/L). RESULTS: Among 6,238 patients who met the eligibility criteria, the median age was 54, 45% were women, and 12% had DM. Patients with DM were older, more frequently male, and had a higher prevalence of additional cardiovascular risk factors. Over a median follow-up of 12.9 years, patients with either DM or elevated Lp(a) experienced higher rates of the primary outcome. Notably, those with elevated Lp(a) had a higher incidence of the primary outcome regardless of their DM status. The annual event rates were as follows: No-DM and Lp(a) < 90th% - 0.6%; No-DM and Lp(a) > 90th% - 1.3%; DM and Lp(a) < 90th% - 1.9%; DM and Lp(a) > 90th% - 4.7% (p < 0.001). After adjusting for confounders, elevated Lp(a) remained independently associated with the primary outcome among both patients with DM (HR = 2.66 [95%CI: 1.55-4.58], p < 0.001) and those without DM (HR = 2.01 [95%CI: 1.48-2.74], p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated Lp(a) constitutes an independent and incremental risk factor for CAD outcomes in patients with and without DM.

Comparative effectiveness of positron emission tomography and single-photon emission computed tomography myocardial perfusion imaging for predicting risk in patients with cardiometabolic disease.

BACKGROUND: The epidemiology of coronary artery disease (CAD) has shifted, with increasing prevalence of cardiometabolic disease and decreasing findings of obstructive CAD on myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI). Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), defined as impaired myocardial flow reserve (MFR) by positron emission tomography (PET), has emerged as a key mediator of risk. We aimed to assess whether PET MFR provides additive value for risk stratification of cardiometabolic disease patients compared with single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) MPI. METHODS: We retrospectively followed patients referred for PET, exercise SPECT, or pharmacologic SPECT MPI with cardiometabolic disease (obesity, diabetes, or chronic kidney disease) and without known CAD. We compared rates and hazards of composite major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) (annualized cardiac mortality or acute myocardial infarction) among propensity-matched PET and SPECT patients using Poisson and Cox regression. Normal SPECT was defined as a total perfusion deficit (TPD) of <5%, reflecting the absence of obstructive CAD. Normal PET was defined as a TPD of <5% plus an MFR of ≥2.0. RESULTS: Among 21,544 patients referred from 2006 to 2020, cardiometabolic disease was highly prevalent (PET: 2308 [67%], SPECT: 9984 [55%]) and higher among patients referred to PET (P < 0.001). Obstructive CAD findings (TPD > 5%) were uncommon (PET: 21% and SPECT: 11%). Conversely, impaired MFR on PET (<2.0) was common (62%). In a propensity-matched analysis over a median 6.4-year follow-up, normal PET identified low-risk (0.9%/year MACE) patients, and abnormal PET identified high-risk (4.2%/year MACE) patients with cardiometabolic disease; conversely, those with normal pharmacologic SPECT remained moderate-risk (1.6%/year, P < 0.001 compared to normal PET). CONCLUSIONS: Cardiometabolic disease is common among patients referred for MPI and is associated with a heterogenous level of risk. Compared with pharmacologic SPECT, PET with MFR can detect nonobstructive CAD including CMD and can more accurately discriminate low-risk from higher-risk individuals.