Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrer
Plus de filtres










Base de données
Gamme d'année
1.
SAGE Open Med ; 6: 2050312118760739, 2018.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29535864

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVES: The overall purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Caring Assessment Tool-Administration survey. Three specific aims were to (1) evaluate construct validity of the Caring Assessment Tool-Administration survey by testing the hypothesized eight-factor structure of staff nurses' perceptions of nurse manager caring behaviors, (2) estimate the internal consistency, and (3) conduct item reduction analysis. METHODS: A 94-item Caring Assessment Tool-Administration designed to assess nurse manager caring behaviors appeared in the literature but lacked robust psychometric testing. Using a foundational theory and a cross-sectional descriptive design, the Caring Assessment Tool-Administration was evaluated for reliability and construct validity. Using convenience sampling, 1143 registered nurses were recruited from acute care hospitals in three states located in the Midwestern, Mid-Atlantic, and Southern Regions of the United States. RESULTS: Psychometric testing of the Caring Assessment Tool-Administration was conducted using confirmatory analysis to determine the dimensionality of the construct, nurse manager caring behavior. The null hypothesis was an eight-factor solution fitting the theoretical model being tested. The null hypothesis was rejected because none of the measures examined for goodness of fit indicated the model fit the data. Confirmatory factor analysis did not support the hypothesized structure; however, exploratory factor analysis supported a one-factor solution that was conceptually labeled caring behaviors. To decrease subject burden, the 94-item survey was reduced to 25 items using item reduction analysis including assessing minimum factor loadings of ≥0.60 and evaluating survey item-total correlation and alpha. The Cronbach's alpha of the new 25-item survey was 0.98. CONCLUSION: The new 25-item Caring Assessment Tool-Administration survey provides hospital administrators, nurse managers, and researchers with a sound, less burdensome instrument to collect valuable information about nurse manager caring behaviors.

2.
J Nurs Care Qual ; 20(1): 56-62, 2005.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15686077

RÉSUMÉ

Assessment, monitoring, and prevention of pressure ulcers in the hospitalized patient are required standards of care. The annual nosocomial pressure ulcer (NPU) rates for the adult intensive care units at our facility had trended up to 33% from 14% over a 13-month period. Our performance improvement team decided to track 5 variables that may have contributed to the increased incidence of NPU. Weekly skin care rounds were conducted to collect data, educate staff, and reinforce skin care policy and standards of care. Data analysis revealed 3 areas that required further emphasis with nursing staff: daily assessment with the Braden Scale, prevention of NPU beginning on the day of hospital admission, and the effect of sedation on patient mobility. Implementation of appropriate interventions targeted to specific Braden subscales needs to be included in the plan of care.


Sujet(s)
Soins de réanimation/méthodes , Escarre/épidémiologie , Escarre/prévention et contrôle , Management par la qualité/organisation et administration , Centres hospitaliers universitaires , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Sédation consciente/effets indésirables , Soins de réanimation/normes , Collecte de données , Interprétation statistique de données , Femelle , Humains , Incidence , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , États du Centre-Ouest des États-Unis/épidémiologie , Évaluation des besoins , Évaluation des besoins en soins infirmiers/méthodes , Évaluation des besoins en soins infirmiers/normes , Audit des soins infirmiers , Recherche en évaluation des soins infirmiers , Planification des soins du patient , Escarre/étiologie , Escarre/soins infirmiers , Comités du personnel de santé/organisation et administration , Appréciation des risques , Facteurs de risque
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE