RÉSUMÉ
Point-spread-function (PSF) correction is not recommended for amyloid PET images due to Gibbs artifacts. Q.Clear™, a Bayesian Penalized Likelihood (BPL) reconstruction method without incorporating PSF correction reduces these artifacts but degrades image contrast by our previous findings. The present study aimed to recover lost contrast by optimizing reconstruction parameters in time-of-flight (TOF) BPL reconstruction of amyloid PET images without PSF correction. We selected candidate conditions based on a phantom study and then determined which were optimal in a clinical study. Phantom images were reconstructed under conditions of 1â9 iterations, ß 300-1000 and γ factors from 2 to 10 in TOF-BPL without PSF correction. We evaluated the %contrast and the coefficients of variation (CV, %). Standardized uptake value ratios (SUVr) and Centiloid scales (CL) were calculated from PET images acquired from 71 participants after an [18F]flutemetamol injection. Both %contrast and CV were independent of iterations, whereas a trade-off was found between γ factors and ß. We selected a γ factors of 5 without PSF correction (iterations, 1; ß, 500) and of 10 without PSF correction (iterations, 1; ß, 800) as candidates for clinical investigation. The SUVr and CL remained stable across various conditions, and CL scales effectively discriminated amyloid PET using measured values. The optimal reconstruction parameters of TOF-BPL for [18F]flutemetamol PET images were γ factor 10, iterations 1 and ß 800, without PSF correction.
RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: The Bayesian penalized likelihood PET reconstruction (BPL) algorithm, Q.Clear (GE Healthcare), has recently been clinically applied to clinical image reconstruction. The BPL includes a relative difference penalty (RDP) as a penalty function. The ß value that controls the behavior of RDP determines the global strength of noise suppression, whereas the γ factor in RDP controls the degree of edge preservation. The present study aimed to assess the effects of various γ factors in RDP on the ability to detect sub-centimeter lesions. METHODS: All PET data were acquired for 10 min using a Discovery MI PET/CT system (GE Healthcare). We used a NEMA IEC body phantom containing spheres with inner diameters of 10, 13, 17, 22, 28 and 37 mm and 4.0, 5.0, 6.2, 7.9, 10 and 13 mm. The target-to-background ratio of the phantom was 4:1, and the background activity concentration was 5.3 kBq/mL. We also evaluated cold spheres containing only non-radioactive water with the same background activity concentration. All images were reconstructed using BPL + time of flight (TOF). The ranges of ß values and γ factors in BPL were 50-600 and 2-20, respectively. We reconstructed PET images using the Duetto toolbox for MATLAB software. We calculated the % hot contrast recovery coefficient (CRChot) of each hot sphere, the cold CRC (CRCcold) of each cold sphere, the background variability (BV) and residual lung error (LE). We measured the full width at half maximum (FWHM) of the micro hollow hot spheres ≤ 13 mm to assess spatial resolution on the reconstructed PET images. RESULTS: The CRChot and CRCcold for different ß values and γ factors depended on the size of the small spheres. The CRChot, CRCcold and BV increased along with the γ factor. A 6.2-mm hot sphere was obvious in BPL as lower ß values and higher γ factors, whereas γ factors ≥ 10 resulted in images with increased background noise. The FWHM became smaller when the γ factor increased. CONCLUSION: High and low γ factors, respectively, preserved the edges of reconstructed PET images and promoted image smoothing. The BPL with a γ factor above the default value in Q.Clear (γ factor = 2) generated high-resolution PET images, although image noise slightly diverged. Optimizing the ß value and the γ factor in BPL enabled the detection of lesions ≤ 6.2 mm.