Protocol Variation in Functional Coronary Angiography Among Patients With Suspected Angina With Non-Obstructive Coronary Arteries: A Nationwide Snapshot of Current Practice Within Australia and New Zealand.

BACKGROUND: Functional coronary angiography (FCA) for endotype characterisation (vasospastic angina [VSA], coronary microvascular disease [CMD], or mixed) is recommended among patients with angina with non-obstructive coronary arteries. Whilst clear diagnostic criteria for VSA and CMD exist, there is no standardised FCA protocol. Variations in testing protocol may limit the widespread uptake of testing, generalisability of results, and expansion of collaborative research. At present, there are no data describing protocol variation across an entire geographic region. Therefore, we aimed to capture current practice variations in the approach to FCA to improve access and standardisation for diagnosis of coronary vasomotor disorders in Australia and New Zealand. METHOD: Between July 2022 and July 2023, we conducted a national survey across all centres in Australia and New Zealand with an active FCA program. The survey captured attitudes towards FCA and protocols used for diagnosis of coronary vasomotor disorders at 33 hospitals across Australia and New Zealand. RESULTS: Survey responses were received from 39 clinicians from 33 centres, with representation from centres within all Australian states and territories and both North and South Islands of New Zealand. A total of 21 centres were identified as having an active FCA program. In general, respondents agreed that comprehensive physiology testing helped inform clinical management. Barriers to program expansion included cost, additional catheter laboratory time, and the absence of an agreed-upon national protocol. Across the clinical sites, there were significant variations in testing protocol, including the technique used (Doppler vs thermodilution), order of testing (hyperaemia resistance indices first vs vasomotor function testing first), rate and dose of acetylcholine administration, routine use of temporary pacing wire, and routine single vs multivessel testing. Overall, testing was performed relatively infrequently, with very little follow-on FCA performed, despite nearly all respondents believing this would be clinically useful. CONCLUSIONS: This survey demonstrates, for the first time, variations in FCA protocol among testing centres across two entire countries. Furthermore, whilst FCA was deemed clinically important, testing was performed relatively infrequently with little or no follow-on testing. Development and adoption of a standardised national FCA protocol may help improve patient access to testing and facilitate further collaborative research within Australia and New Zealand.

Prevalence of Coronary Vasomotor Disorders in Patients With Angina and Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries: A Sydney Experience.

BACKGROUND: Patients with angina and non-obstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA) frequently have coronary vasomotor disorders (CVaD), characterised by transient pathological vasoconstriction and/or impaired microvascular vasodilatation. Functional coronary angiography is the gold standard for diagnosing CVaD. Despite recommendations, testing is only available at a limited number of Australian and New Zealand centres. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of CVaDs in an Australian ANOCA population and identify predictive factors associated with specific endotypes. METHOD: Functional coronary angiography was performed in patients with suspected ANOCA. Vasoreactivity testing was performed using intracoronary acetylcholine provocation. A pressure-temperature sensor guidewire was used for coronary physiology assessment. Comprehensive clinical data on patient characteristics, cardiac risk factors, and symptom profiles was collected before testing. RESULTS: This prospective observational study at Royal Prince Alfred and Concord Repatriation General Hospital included 110 patients (58±13 years with 63.6% women), with 81.8% (90/110) having a CVaD. Regarding specific ANOCA endotypes, microvascular angina (MVA) occurred in 31.8% (35/110) of cases, vasospastic angina (VSA) in 25.5% (28/110) and a mixed presentation of MVA and VSA in 24.5% (27/110) of patients. Patients with CVaD were found to be older (59±11 vs 51±15, p=0.024), overweight (61.1% vs 15.0%, p<0.001) and had a worse quality of life (EuroQol 5 Dimensions-5 Levels; 0.61 vs 0.67, p=0.043). MVA was associated with being overweight (odds ratio [OR] 4.2 [95% confidence interval [CI] 1.9-9.3]; p=0.015) and ischaemia on stress testing (OR 2.4 [95% CI 1.1-4.3]; p=0.028), while VSA was associated with smoking (OR 9.1 [95% CI 2.21-39.3]; p=0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Coronary vasomotor disorders are highly prevalent among ANOCA patients. This study highlights the importance of increasing national awareness and the use of functional coronary angiography to evaluate and manage this unique cohort.

Intracoronary thrombolysis in ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Despite restoration of epicardial blood flow in acute ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), inadequate microcirculatory perfusion is common and portends a poor prognosis. Intracoronary (IC) thrombolytic therapy can reduce microvascular thrombotic burden; however, contemporary studies have produced conflicting outcomes. OBJECTIVES: This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of adjunctive IC thrombolytic therapy at the time of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) among patients with STEMI. METHODS: Comprehensive literature search of six electronic databases identified relevant randomised controlled trials. The primary outcome was major adverse cardiac events (MACE). The pooled risk ratio (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) with a 95% CI were calculated. RESULTS: 12 studies with 1915 patients were included. IC thrombolysis was associated with a significantly lower incidence of MACE (RR=0.65, 95% CI 0.51 to 0.82, I2=0%, p<0.0004) and improved left ventricular ejection fraction (WMD=1.87; 95% CI 1.07 to 2.67; I2=25%; p<0.0001). Subgroup analysis demonstrated a significant reduction in MACE for trials using non-fibrin (RR=0.39, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.78, I2=0%, p=0.007) and moderately fibrin-specific thrombolytic agents (RR=0.62, 95% CI 0.47 to 0.83, I2=0%, p=0.001). No significant reduction was observed in studies using highly fibrin-specific thrombolytic agents (RR=1.10, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.96, I2=0%, p=0.75). Furthermore, there were no significant differences in mortality (RR=0.91; 95% CI 0.48 to 1.71; I2=0%; p=0.77) or bleeding events (major bleeding, RR=1.24; 95% CI 0.47 to 3.28; I2=0%; p=0.67; minor bleeding, RR=1.47; 95% CI 0.90 to 2.40; I2=0%; p=0.12). CONCLUSION: Adjunctive IC thrombolysis at the time of primary PCI in patients with STEMI improves clinical and myocardial perfusion parameters without an increased rate of bleeding. Further research is needed to optimise the selection of thrombolytic agents and treatment protocols.

Influence of Pathophysiological Patterns of Coronary Artery Disease on Immediate Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Outcomes.

BACKGROUND: Diffuse coronary artery disease (CAD) impacts the safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Pathophysiological CAD patterns can be quantified using fractional flow reserve (FFR) pullbacks incorporating the pullback pressure gradient (PPG) calculation. This study aimed to establish the capacity of PPG to predict optimal revascularisation and procedural outcomes. METHODS: This prospective, investigator-initiated, single-arm, multicentre study enrolled patients with at least one epicardial lesion with an FFR ≤ 0.80 scheduled for PCI. Manual FFR pullbacks were employed to calculate PPG. The primary outcome of optimal revascularisation was defined as a post-PCI FFR ≥ 0.88. RESULTS: 993 patients with 1044 vessels were included. The mean FFR was 0.68 ± 0.12, PPG 0.62 ± 0.17, and post-PCI FFR 0.87 ± 0.07. PPG was significantly correlated with the change in FFR after PCI (r=0.65, 95% CI 0.61-0.69, p<0.001) and demonstrated excellent predicted capacity for optimal revascularisation (AUC 0.82, 95% CI 0.79-0.84, p<0.001). Conversely, FFR alone did not predict revascularisation outcomes (AUC 0.54, 95% CI 0.50-0.57). PPG influenced treatment decisions in 14% of patients, redirecting them from PCI to alternative treatment modalities. Periprocedural myocardial infarction occurred more frequently in patients with low PPG (<0.62) compared to those with focal disease (OR 1.71, 95% CI: 1.00-2.97). CONCLUSIONS: Pathophysiological CAD patterns distinctly affect the safety and effectiveness of PCI. The PPG showed an excellent predictive capacity for optimal revascularisation and demonstrated added value compared to a FFR measurement.

Validation of oscillometric ratio and maximum gradient methods for non-invasive blood pressure measurement with intra-arterial blood pressure measurements as reference.

Most non-invasive blood pressure (BP) measurements are carried out using instruments which implement either the Ratio or the Maximum Gradient oscillometric method, mostly during cuff deflation, but more rarely during cuff inflation. Yet, there is little published literature on the relative advantages and accuracy of these two methods. In this study of 40 lightly sedated individuals aged 64.1 ± 9.6 years, we evaluate and compare the performance of the oscillometric ratio (K) and gradient (Grad) methods for the non-invasive estimation of mean pressure, SBP and DBP with reference to invasive intra-arterial values. There was no significant difference between intra-arterial estimates of mean pressure made via Korotkoff sounds (MP-OWE) or the gradient method (MP-Grad). However, 17.7% of MP-OWE and 15% of MP-Grad were in error by more than 10 mmHg. SBP-K and SBP-Grad underestimated SBP by 14 and 18 mmHg, whilst accurately estimating DBP with mean errors of 0.4 ±â€Š5.0 and 1.7 ±â€Š6.1 mmHg, respectively. Relative to the reference standard SBP-K, SBP-Grad and DBP-Grad were estimated with a mean error of -4.5 ±â€Š6.6 and 1.4 ±â€Š5.6 mmHg, respectively, noting that using the full range of recommended ratios introduces errors of 12 and 7 mmHg in SBP and DBP, respectively. We also show that it is possible to find ratios which minimize the root mean square error (RMSE) and the mean error for any particular individual cohort. We developed linear models for estimating SBP and SBP-K from a range of demographic and non-invasive OWE variables with resulting mean errors of 0.15 ±â€Š5.6 and 0.3 ±â€Š5.7 mmHg, acceptable according to the Universal standard.

Evaluation of the oscillometric method for noninvasive blood pressure measurement during cuff deflation and cuff inflation with reference to intra-arterial blood pressure.

There is little quantitative clinical data available to support blood pressure measurement accuracy during cuff inflation. In this study of 35 male and 5 female lightly anaesthetized subjects aged 64.1 ±â€Š9.6 years, we evaluate and compare the performance of both the oscillometric ratio and gradient methods during cuff deflation and cuff inflation with reference to intra-arterial measurements. We show that the oscillometric waveform envelopes (OWE), which are key to both methods, exhibit significant variability in both shape and smoothness leading to at least 15% error in the determination of mean pressure (MP). We confirm the observation from our previous studies that K1 Korotkoff sounds underestimate systolic blood pressure (SBP) and note that this underestimation is increased during cuff inflation. The estimation of diastolic blood pressure (DBP) is generally accurate for both the ratio and the gradient method, with the latter showing a significant increase during inflation. Since the gradient method estimates SBP and DBP from points of maximum gradient on each OWE recorded, it may offer significant benefits over the ratio method. However, we have shown that the ratio method can be optimized for any data set to achieve either a minimum mean error (ME) of close to 0 mmHg or minimum root mean square error (RMSE) with standard deviation (SD) of <5.0 mmHg. We conclude that whilst cuff inflation may offer some advantages, these are neither significant nor substantial, leaving as the only benefit, the potential for more rapid measurement and less patient discomfort.

Prognostic Value of Microvascular Resistance Reserve Measured Immediately After PCI in Stable Coronary Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND: Microvascular resistance reserve (MRR) has been proposed as a specific metric to quantify coronary microvascular function. The long-term prognostic value of MRR measured in stable patients immediately after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unknown. This study sought to determine the prognostic value of MRR measured immediately after PCI in patients with stable coronary artery disease. METHODS: This study included 502 patients with stable coronary artery disease who underwent elective PCI and coronary physiological measurements, including pressure and flow estimation using a bolus thermodilution method after PCI. MRR was calculated as coronary flow reserve divided by fractional flow reserve times the ratio of mean aortic pressure at rest to that at maximal hyperemia induced by hyperemic agents. An abnormal MRR was defined as ≤2.5. Major adverse cardiac events (MACEs) were defined as a composite of all-cause mortality, any myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularization. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 3.4 years, the cumulative MACE rate was significantly higher in the abnormal MRR group (12.5 versus 8.3 per 100 patient-years; hazard ratio 1.53 [95% CI, 1.10-2.11]; P<0.001). A higher all-cause mortality rate primarily drove this difference. On multivariable analysis, a higher MRR value was independently associated with lower MACE and lower mortality. When comparing 4 subgroups according to MRR and the index of microcirculatory resistance, patients with both abnormal MRR and index of microcirculatory resistance (≥25) had the highest MACE rate. CONCLUSIONS: An abnormal MRR measured immediately after PCI in patients with stable coronary artery disease is an independent predictor of MACE, particularly all-cause mortality.

Multivessel Coronary Function Testing Increases Diagnostic Yield in Patients With Angina and Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries.

BACKGROUND: Invasive CFT is the gold standard for diagnosing coronary vasomotor dysfunction in patients with ANOCA. Most institutions recommend only testing the left coronary circulation. Therefore, it is unknown whether testing multiple coronary territories would increase diagnostic yield. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield of multivessel, compared with single-vessel, invasive coronary function testing (CFT) in patients with angina and nonobstructive coronary arteries (ANOCA). METHODS: Multivessel CFT was systematically performed in patients with suspected ANOCA. Vasoreactivity testing was performed using acetylcholine provocation in the left (20 to 200 µg) and right (20 to 80µg) coronary arteries. A pressure-temperature sensor guidewire was used for coronary physiology assessment in all three epicardial vessels. RESULTS: This multicenter study included a total of 228 vessels from 80 patients (57.8 ± 11.8 years of age, 60% women). Compared with single-vessel CFT, multivessel testing resulted in more patients diagnosed with coronary vasomotor dysfunction (86.3% vs 68.8%; P = 0.0005), coronary artery spasm (60.0% vs 47.5%; P = 0.004), and CMD (62.5% vs 36.3%; P < 0.001). Coronary artery spasm (n = 48) predominated in the left coronary system (n = 38), though isolated right coronary spasm was noted in 20.8% (n = 10). Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD), defined by abnormal index of microcirculatory resistance and/or coronary flow reserve, was present 62.5% of the cohort (n = 50). Among the cohort with CMD, 27 patients (33.8%) had 1-vessel CMD, 15 patients (18.8%) had 2-vessel CMD, and 8 patients (10%) had 3-vessel CMD. CMD was observed at a similar rate in the territories supplied by all 3 major coronary vessels (left anterior descending coronary artery = 36.3%, left circumflex coronary artery = 33.8%, right coronary artery = 31.3%; P = 0.486). CONCLUSIONS: Multivessel CFT resulted in an increased diagnostic yield in patients with ANOCA compared with single-vessel testing. The results of this study suggest that multivessel CFT has a role in the management of patients with ANOCA.

Accurate detection of Korotkoff sounds reveals large discrepancy between intra-arterial systolic pressure and simultaneous noninvasive measurement of blood pressure with brachial cuff sphygmomanometry.

Cardiovascular disease is the number 1 cause of death globally, with elevated blood pressure (BP) being the single largest risk factor. Hence, BP is an important physiological parameter used as an indicator of cardiovascular health. Noninvasive cuff-based automated monitoring is now the dominant method for BP measurement and irrespective of whether the oscillometric or the auscultatory method is used, all are calibrated according to the Universal Standard (ISO 81060-2:2019), which requires two trained operators to listen to Korotkoff K1 sounds for SBP and K4/K5 sounds for DBP. Hence, Korotkoff sounds are fundamental to the calibration of all NIBP devices. In this study of 40 lightly sedated patients, aged 64.1 ±â€Š9.6 years, we compare SBP and DBP recorded directly by intra-arterial fluid filled catheters to values recorded from the onset (SBP-K) and cessation (DBP-K) of Korotkoff sounds. We demonstrate that whilst DBP-K measurements are in good agreement, with a mean difference of -0.3 ±â€Š5.2 mmHg, SBP-K underestimates true intra-arterial SBP (IA-SBP) by an average of 14 ±â€Š9.6 mmHg. The underestimation arises from delays in the re-opening of the brachial artery following deflation of the brachial cuff to below SBP. The reasons for this delay are not known but appear related to the difference between SBP and the pressure under the cuff as blood first begins to flow, as the cuff deflates. Linear models are presented that can correct the underestimation in SBP resulting in estimates with a mean difference of 0.2 ±â€Š7.1 mmHg with respect to intra-arterial SBP.

Comparison of cuff inflation and cuff deflation brachial sphygmomanometry with intra-arterial blood pressure as reference.

Conventional sphygmomanometry with cuff deflation is used to calibrate all noninvasive BP (NIBP) instruments and the International Standard makes no mention of calibrating methods specifically for NIBP instruments, which estimate systolic and diastolic pressure during cuff inflation rather than cuff deflation. There is however increasing interest in inflation-based NIBP (iNIBP) instruments on the basis of shorter measurement time, reduction in maximal inflation pressure and improvement in patient comfort and outcomes. However, we have previously demonstrated that SBP estimates based on the occurrence of the first K1 Korotkoff sounds during cuff deflation can underestimate intra-arterial SBP (IA-SBP) by an average of 14 ±â€Š10 mmHg. In this study, we compare the dynamics of intra-arterial blood pressure (IABP) measurements with sequential measurement of Korotkoff sounds during both cuff inflation and cuff deflation in the same individual. In 40 individuals aged 64.1 ±â€Š9.6 years (range 36-86 years), the overall dynamic responses below the cuff were similar, but the underestimation error was significantly larger during inflation than deflation, increasing from 14 ±â€Š10 to 19 ±â€Š12 mmHg ( P  < 0.0001). No statistical models were found which could compensate for this error as were found for cuff deflation. The statistically significant BP differences between inflation and deflation protocols reported in this study suggest different behaviour of the arterial and venous vasculature between arterial opening and closing which warrant further investigation, particularly for iNIBP devices reporting estimates during cuff inflation. In addition, measuring Korotkoff sounds during cuff inflation represents significant technical difficulties because of increasing pump motor noise.

Insights into the invasive diagnostic challenges of coronary artery vasospasm - A systematic review.

Coronary provocation testing is an essential diagnostic procedure when evaluating vasospastic angina. Invasive methods using acetylcholine or ergonovine are considered the current gold standard. Despite efforts from global cardiovascular institutions, current protocols vary in dosage, administration time, and procedural approach. In addition, concerns over the specificity of findings and potential complications have limited routine uptake of this procedure in clinical practice. This systematic review evaluates current diagnostic protocols, focusing on invasive provocation testing. We included studies using intracoronary provocation testing with acetylcholine or ergonovine for the assessment of coronary artery vasospasm that detailed specific elements of the procedure (dosage, administration time, etc.) and included ≥50 patients. A total of 28 articles met strict inclusion criteria. Our review highlights the heterogeneity between current diagnostic protocols for invasive provocation testing. We believe standardization of a diagnostic protocol will encourage both current and future cardiologists to incorporate such procedures in the evaluation of variant angina.

Practical Application of Coronary Physiologic Assessment: Asia-Pacific Expert Consensus Document: Part 1.

Coronary physiologic assessment is performed to measure coronary pressure, flow, and resistance or their surrogates to enable the selection of appropriate management strategy and its optimization for patients with coronary artery disease. The value of physiologic assessment is supported by a large body of evidence that has led to major recommendations in clinical practice guidelines. This expert consensus document aims to convey practical and balanced recommendations and future perspectives for coronary physiologic assessment for physicians and patients in the Asia-Pacific region based on updated information in the field that including both wire- and image-based physiologic assessment. This is Part 1 of the whole consensus document, which describes the general concept of coronary physiology, as well as practical information on the clinical application of physiologic indices and novel image-based physiologic assessment.

New Perspectives on Non-invasive Blood Pressure Measurement.

Noninvasive blood pressure (NIBP) devices are calibrated against validated auscultation sphygmomanometers using Korotkoff sounds. This study aimed to investigate the timing of Korotkoff sounds in relation to pulse appearance in the brachial artery and values of intra-arterial blood pressure. Experiments were carried out on 15 participants, (14 males, 64.3 ± 10.4 years; one female, 86 yo), undergoing coronary angiography. A conventional occluding cuff, with a microphone for Korotkoff sounds, was placed on the upper arm (on the brachial artery). Intra-arterial blood pressure (IABP) was measured below the cuff with a fluid-filled catheter inserted via the radial artery and an external transducer. Finger photoplethysmography was used to measure brachial pulse wave velocity (PWV). Korotkoff sounds were processed electronically and custom algorithms identified the cuff pressure (CP) at which the first and last Korotkoff sounds were heard. PWV and max slope of the IABP pressure pulse were recorded to estimate arterial stiffness. The brachial artery closed at a CP of 132.0 ± 17.1 mmHg. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP and DBP) were 147.6 ± 14.3 and 72.7 ± 10.1 mmHg; mean pressure (MP, 100.1 ± 10.4 mmHg) was similar to MP derived from the peak of the oscillogram (98.5 ± 13.6 mmHg). Difference between IABP and CP recorded at first and last occurrence of Korotkoff sounds were, SBP: 19.0 ± 8.3 (range 2-29) mmHg, DBP: 4.0 ± 4.3 (range 2-12) mmHg. SBP derived from the onset of Korotkoff sounds can underestimate IABP by up to 19 mmHg. Since Korotkoff sounds are the recommended method mandated by the universal standard for the validation of blood pressure measuring devices, these errors are propagated through to all NIBP measurement devices irrespective of whether they use auscultatory or oscillometric methods.

Practical Application of Coronary Physiologic Assessment: Asia-Pacific Expert Consensus Document: Part 2.

Coronary physiologic assessment is performed to measure coronary pressure, flow, and resistance or their surrogates to enable the selection of appropriate management strategy and its optimization for patients with coronary artery disease. The value of physiologic assessment is supported by a large body of clinical data that has led to major recommendations in all practice guidelines. This expert consensus document aims to convey practical and balanced recommendations and future perspectives for coronary physiologic assessment for physicians and patients in the Asia-Pacific region, based on updated information in the field that includes both wire- and image-based physiologic assessment. This is Part 2 of the whole consensus document, which provides theoretical and practical information on physiologic indexes for specific clinical conditions and patient statuses.

Variability in Contemporary Heparin Prescription and Activated Clotting Time Monitoring During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: Call for Up-To-Date Evidence-Based Guidelines.

BACKGROUND: Unfractionated heparin (UFH) is the preferred anticoagulant agent in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) procedures for minimising the risk of thrombotic complications. Because of the narrow therapeutic range of UFH, some society guidelines have advocated the use of the activated clotting time (ACT) test to monitor anticoagulation intensity during PCI to reduce thrombotic and bleeding complications. We aimed to assess the current practice of UFH prescription and its monitoring in Australia and New Zealand (ANZ). METHOD: We conducted an anonymous voluntary cross-sectional survey of interventional cardiologists (ICs) who were members of the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand in 2022. The survey included 10 questions pertaining to the current practice of anticoagulation during PCI. RESULTS: Of 430 ICs surveyed, 148 responded (response rate, 34.4%). Most ICs (84.4%) prescribed 70-100 IU/kg of UFH for PCI. Over half of ICs (58.7%) routinely measured ACT during PCI, whereas only 22.2% routinely measured ACT after PCI to guide additional UFH prescription. Among ICs who prescribed additional UFH, approximately half (48%) aimed for ACT ≥250 seconds. Factors that influenced post-PCI UFH prescription included vascular access site and concomitant antiplatelet or anticoagulant therapy. CONCLUSIONS: The contemporary practice of UFH prescription during PCI and ACT monitoring in ANZ is variable and based on outdated evidence preceding current drug-eluting stents, antiplatelet therapies, and radial-first practice. Current society guideline recommendations lack clarity and agreement, reflecting the quality of the available evidence. Up-to-date clinical trials evaluating UFH prescription and ACT monitoring are needed to optimise clinical outcomes in contemporary PCI procedures.

Rationale and design of the pullback pressure gradient (PPG) global registry.

INTRODUCTION: Diffuse disease has been identified as one of the main reasons leading to low post-PCI fractional flow reserve (FFR) and residual angina after PCI. Coronary pressure pullbacks allow for the evaluation of hemodynamic coronary artery disease (CAD) patterns. The pullback pressure gradient (PPG) is a novel metric that quantifies the distribution and magnitude of pressure losses along the coronary artery in a focal-to-diffuse continuum. AIM: The primary objective is to determine the predictive capacity of the PPG for post-PCI FFR. METHODS: This prospective, large-scale, controlled, investigator-initiated, multicenter study is enrolling patients with at least 1 lesion in a major epicardial vessel with a distal FFR ≤ 0.80 intended to be treated by PCI. The study will include 982 subjects. A standardized physiological assessment will be performed pre-PCI, including the online calculation of PPG from FFR pullbacks performed manually. PPG quantifies the CAD pattern by combining several parameters from the FFR pullback curve. Post-PCI physiology will be recorded using a standardized protocol with FFR pullbacks. We hypothesize that PPG will predict optimal PCI results (post-PCI FFR ≥ 0.88) with an area under the ROC curve (AUC) ≥ 0.80. Secondary objectives include patient-reported and clinical outcomes in patients with focal vs. diffuse CAD defined by the PPG. Clinical follow-up will be collected for up to 36 months, and an independent clinical event committee will adjudicate events. RESULTS: Recruitment is ongoing and is expected to be completed in the second half of 2023. CONCLUSION: This international, large-scale, prospective study with pre-specified powered hypotheses will determine the ability of the preprocedural PPG index to predict optimal revascularization assessed by post-PCI FFR. In addition, it will evaluate the impact of PPG on treatment decisions and the predictive performance of PPG for angina relief and clinical outcomes.

Role of Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Troponin T in Definitive Diagnosis of Myocardial Infarction With Nonobstructive Coronary Arteries (MINOCA).

BACKGROUND: It is unknown whether the degree of high-sensitivity troponin T (hsTropT) elevation in patients with suspected myocardial infarction without obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) presentations can help predict the likelihood of an abnormal cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) scan. In this study we describe the diagnostic utility of CMR in patients with MINOCA and assesses the effect of peak hsTropT levels at presentation on CMR diagnostic yield. METHODS: Records of consecutive patients (n = 1407) referred for CMR at a tertiary referral hospital between January 2016 and September 2021 were reviewed. A total of 70 patients met the criteria of MINOCA including ischemic chest pain, elevated peak hsTropT, and nonobstructive coronary artery disease (< 50% stenosis). The peak hsTropT levels within 72 hours of admission were identified. CMR images were generated using a 3.0 T Siemens scanner. Predictors of having an abnormal CMR were evaluated. RESULTS: CMR established a diagnosis in 71% (n = 50) of patients, with the most common CMR diagnosis being myopericarditis (n = 27; 39%). Time to CMR was an independent predictor of a normal CMR scan (odds ratio, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.97-0.999). Peak hsTropT had a high diagnostic accuracy for identifying patients with an abnormal CMR scan (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve, 0.81; P < 0.001). The optimal hsTropT cutoff was 166 ng/L, with 72% sensitivity and specificity. A troponin value ≥ 166 ng/L was independently predictive of an abnormal CMR scan (odds ratio, 4.76; 95% confidence interval, 1.32-17.11). CONCLUSIONS: HsTropT and early CMR imaging are independently predictive of an abnormal CMR scan in patients with MINOCA. Additionally, the use of a hsTropT cutoff provides incremental predictive value to clinical parameters and time to CMR scanning in determining an abnormal scan.

Haemodynamic and metabolic adaptations in coronary microvascular disease.

OBJECTIVE: We aimed to evaluate the microcirculatory resistance (MR) and myocardial metabolic adaptations at rest and in response to increased cardiac workload in patients with suspected coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD). METHODS: Patients with objective ischaemia and/or myocardial injury and non-obstructive coronary artery disease underwent thermodilution-derived microcirculatory assessment and transcardiac blood sampling during graded exercise with adenosine-mediated hyperaemia. We measured MR at rest and following supine cycle ergometry. Patients (n=24) were stratified by the resting index of MR (IMR) into normal-IMR (IMR<22U, n=12) and high-IMR groups (IMR≥22U, n=12). RESULTS: The mean age was 57 years; 67% were males and 38% had hypertension. The normal-IMR group had increased IMR response to exercise (16±5 vs 23±12U, p=0.03) compared with the high-IMR group, who had persistently elevated IMR at rest and following exercise (38±19 vs 33±15U, p=0.39) despite similar exercise duration and rate-pressure product between the groups, both p>0.05. The normal-IMR group had augmented oxygen extraction ratio following exercise (53±18 vs 64±11%, p=0.03) compared with the high-IMR group (65±14 vs 59±11%, p=0.26). The postexercise lactate uptake was greater in the high-IMR (0.04±0.05 vs 0.11±0.07 mmol/L, p=0.004) compared with normal-IMR group (0.08±0.06 vs 0.09±0.09 mmol/L, p=0.67). The high-IMR group demonstrated greater troponin release following exercise compared with the normal-IMR group (0.13±0.12 vs 0.001±0.05 ng/L, p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with suspected CMD appear to have distinctive microcirculatory resistive and myocardial metabolic profiles at rest and in response to exercise. These differences in phenotypes may permit individualised therapies targeting microvascular responsiveness (normal-IMR group) and/or myocardial metabolic adaptations (normal-IMR and high-IMR groups).