Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 8 de 8
Filtrer
1.
Obes Res Clin Pract ; 10(6): 728-733, 2016.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27380731

RÉSUMÉ

To determine whether methane and hydrogen on breath test affects weight loss after bariatric surgery, 156 subjects (pre-surgery BMI ≥33) were recruited ≥4 months after surgery. Pre- and post-surgery weights and BMIs were recorded. Post-surgery methane and hydrogen levels were determined. % total weight loss and % change in BMI were prorated to six months after surgery. M+/H+ subjects (N=13) exhibited lower prorated % change in BMI vs. all other subjects (N=144) (p=0.13), and significantly lower prorated % total weight loss (p=0.036). These findings may suggest that subjects with positive breath methane and hydrogen lose less weight following bariatric surgery.


Sujet(s)
Chirurgie bariatrique , Indice de masse corporelle , Muqueuse intestinale/métabolisme , Méthane/métabolisme , Obésité morbide/métabolisme , Perte de poids , Adulte , Tests d'analyse de l'haleine , Femelle , Microbiome gastro-intestinal , Humains , Hydrogène/métabolisme , Intestins/microbiologie , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Obésité morbide/chirurgie
2.
Endocr Pract ; 19(2): 337-72, 2013.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23529351

RÉSUMÉ

The development of these updated guidelines was commissioned by the AACE, TOS, and ASMBS Board of Directors and adheres to the AACE 2010 protocol for standardized production of clinical practice guidelines (CPG). Each recommendation was re-evaluated and updated based on the evidence and subjective factors per protocol. Examples of expanded topics in this update include: the roles of sleeve gastrectomy, bariatric surgery in patients with type-2 diabetes, bariatric surgery for patients with mild obesity, copper deficiency, informed consent, and behavioral issues. There are 74 recommendations (of which 56 are revised and 2 are new) in this 2013 update, compared with 164 original recommendations in 2008. There are 403 citations, of which 33 (8.2%) are EL 1, 131 (32.5%) are EL 2, 170 (42.2%) are EL 3, and 69 (17.1%) are EL 4. There is a relatively high proportion (40.4%) of strong (EL 1 and 2) studies, compared with only 16.5% in the 2008 AACE-TOS-ASMBS CPG. These updated guidelines reflect recent additions to the evidence base. Bariatric surgery remains a safe and effective intervention for select patients with obesity. A team approach to perioperative care is mandatory with special attention to nutritional and metabolic issues.


Sujet(s)
Médecine de l'obésité/normes , Chirurgie bariatrique , Obésité morbide/chirurgie , Soins périopératoires , Complications postopératoires/prévention et contrôle , Adulte , Chirurgie bariatrique/effets indésirables , Liste de contrôle , Association thérapeutique , Médecine factuelle , Humains , Obésité morbide/diétothérapie , Médecine de précision
3.
Obesity (Silver Spring) ; 21 Suppl 1: S1-27, 2013 Mar.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23529939

RÉSUMÉ

The development of these updated guidelines was commissioned by the AACE, TOS, and ASMBS Board of Directors and adheres to the AACE 2010 protocol for standardized production of clinical practice guidelines (CPG). Each recommendation was re-evaluated and updated based on the evidence and subjective factors per protocol. Examples of expanded topics in this update include: the roles of sleeve gastrectomy, bariatric surgery in patients with type-2 diabetes, bariatric surgery for patients with mild obesity, copper deficiency, informed consent, and behavioral issues. There are 74 recommendations (of which 56 are revised and 2 are new) in this 2013 update, compared with 164 original recommendations in 2008. There are 403 citations, of which 33 (8.2%) are EL 1, 131 (32.5%) are EL 2, 170 (42.2%) are EL 3, and 69 (17.1%) are EL 4. There is a relatively high proportion (40.4%) of strong (EL 1 and 2) studies, compared with only 16.5% in the 2008 AACE-TOS-ASMBS CPG. These updated guidelines reflect recent additions to the evidence base. Bariatric surgery remains a safe and effective intervention for select patients with obesity. A team approach to perioperative care is mandatory with special attention to nutritional and metabolic issues.


Sujet(s)
Chirurgie bariatrique/méthodes , Obésité morbide/chirurgie , Soins périopératoires/méthodes , Référenciation , Comorbidité , Techniques d'aide à la décision , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Évaluation de l'état nutritionnel , Obésité morbide/thérapie , Sélection de patients , Orientation vers un spécialiste , Appréciation des risques , États-Unis
4.
Obesity (Silver Spring) ; 21(6): 1093-103, 2013 Jun.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23512841

RÉSUMÉ

UNLABELLED: Obesity continues to be a major public health problem in the United States and worldwide. While recent statistics have demonstrated that obesity rates have begun to plateau, more severe classes of obesity are accelerating at a faster pace with important implications in regards to treatment. Bariatric surgery has a profound and durable effect on weight loss, being to date one of the most successful interventions for obesity. OBJECTIVE: To provide updates to the possible role of gut hormones in post bariatric surgery weight loss and weight loss maintenance. DESIGN AND METHODS: The current review examines the changes in gastro-intestinal hormones with bariatric surgery and the potential mechanisms by which these changes could result in decreased weight and adiposity. RESULTS: The mechanism by which bariatric surgery results in body weight changes is incompletely elucidated, but it clearly goes beyond caloric restriction and malabsorption. CONCLUSION: Changes in gastro-intestinal hormones, including increases in GLP-1, PYY, and oxyntomodulin, decreases in GIP and ghrelin, or the combined action of all these hormones might play a role in induction and long-term maintenance of weight loss.


Sujet(s)
Chirurgie bariatrique , Hormones gastrointestinales/métabolisme , Perte de poids , Acides et sels biliaires/métabolisme , Restriction calorique , Diabète de type 2/chirurgie , Ghréline/métabolisme , Glucagon-like peptide 1/métabolisme , Humains , Obésité/chirurgie , Oxyntomoduline/métabolisme , Peptide YY/métabolisme , Période postopératoire , États-Unis
5.
Surg Obes Relat Dis ; 9(2): 159-91, 2013.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23537696

RÉSUMÉ

The development of these updated guidelines was commissioned by the AACE, TOS, and ASMBS Board of Directors and adheres to the AACE 2010 protocol for standardized production of clinical practice guidelines (CPG). Each recommendation was re-evaluated and updated based on the evidence and subjective factors per protocol. Examples of expanded topics in this update include: the roles of sleeve gastrectomy, bariatric surgery in patients with type-2 diabetes, bariatric surgery for patients with mild obesity, copper deficiency, informed consent, and behavioral issues. There are 74 recommendations (of which 56 are revised and 2 are new) in this 2013 update, compared with 164 original recommendations in 2008. There are 403 citations, of which 33 (8.2%) are EL 1, 131 (32.5%) are EL 2, 170 (42.2%) are EL 3, and 69 (17.1%) are EL 4. There is a relatively high proportion (40.4%) of strong (EL 1 and 2) studies, compared with only 16.5% in the 2008 AACE-TOS-ASMBS CPG. These updated guidelines reflect recent additions to the evidence base. Bariatric surgery remains a safe and effective intervention for select patients with obesity. A team approach to perioperative care is mandatory with special attention to nutritional and metabolic issues.


Sujet(s)
Chirurgie bariatrique/méthodes , Obésité morbide/chirurgie , Soins périopératoires/méthodes , Marqueurs biologiques/métabolisme , Indice de masse corporelle , Maladies cardiovasculaires/prévention et contrôle , Contraception , Diabète de type 2/prévention et contrôle , Humains , Soins de longue durée/méthodes , Recueil de l'anamnèse/méthodes , Sélection de patients , Examen physique/méthodes , Complications postopératoires/prévention et contrôle , Prise en charge préconceptionnelle/méthodes , Appréciation des risques , Perte de poids
6.
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y) ; 8(1): 22-8, 2012 Jan.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-22347829

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Obesity is an epidemic that affects 1 in 3 individuals in the United States, and recent evidence suggests that enteric microbiota may play a significant role in the development of obesity. This study evaluated the association between methanogenic archaea and obesity in human subjects. METHODS: Subjects with a body mass index (BMI) of 30 kg/m² or higher were prospectively recruited from the weight loss program of a tertiary care medical center. Subjects who met the study's inclusion criteria were asked to complete a questionnaire that included a series of visual analogue scores for bowel symptom severities. Subjects then provided a single end-expiratory breath sample to quantitate methane levels. Bivariate and multivariate analyses were used to determine associations with BMI. RESULTS: A total of 58 patients qualified for enrollment. Twenty percent of patients (n = 12) had breath test results that were positive for methane (>3 parts per million [ppm]), with a mean breath methane concentration of 12.2±3.1 ppm. BMI was significantly higher in methane-positive subjects (45.2±2.3 kg/m²) than in methane-negative subjects (38.5±0.8 kg/m²; P=.001). Methane-positive subjects also had a greater severity of constipation than methane-negative subjects (21.3±6.4 vs 9.5±2.4; P=.043). Multiple regression analysis illustrated a significant association between BMI and methane, constipation, and antidepressant use. However, methane remained an independent predictor of elevated BMI when controlling for antidepressant use (P<.001) and when controlling for both constipation and antidepressant use (6.55 kg/m² greater BMI; P=.003). CONCLUSION: This is the first human study to demonstrate that a higher concentration of methane detected by breath testing is a predictor of significantly greater obesity in overweight subjects.

7.
J Immunol ; 173(9): 5398-405, 2004 Nov 01.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15494486

RÉSUMÉ

The intestinal epithelium serves as a barrier to the intestinal flora. In response to pathogens, intestinal epithelial cells (IEC) secrete proinflammatory cytokines. To aid in defense against bacteria, IEC also secrete antimicrobial peptides, termed defensins. The aim of our studies was to understand the role of TLR signaling in regulation of beta-defensin expression by IEC. The effect of LPS and peptidoglycan on beta-defensin-2 expression was examined in IEC lines constitutively or transgenically expressing TLRs. Regulation of beta-defensin-2 was assessed using promoter-reporter constructs of the human beta-defensin-2 gene. LPS and peptidoglycan stimulated beta-defensin-2 promoter activation in a TLR4- and TLR2-dependent manner, respectively. A mutation in the NF-kappaB or AP-1 site within the beta-defensin-2 promoter abrogated this response. In addition, inhibition of Jun kinase prevents up-regulation of beta-defensin-2 protein expression in response to LPS. IEC respond to pathogen-associated molecular patterns with expression of the antimicrobial peptide beta-defensin-2. This mechanism may protect the intestinal epithelium from pathogen invasion and from potential invaders among the commensal flora.


Sujet(s)
Muqueuse intestinale/immunologie , Muqueuse intestinale/métabolisme , Glycoprotéines membranaires/physiologie , Récepteurs de surface cellulaire/physiologie , Transduction du signal/immunologie , bêta-Défensines/biosynthèse , Animaux , Antigènes de surface/physiologie , Cellules Caco-2 , Lignée cellulaire , Lignée cellulaire tumorale , Humains , Muqueuse intestinale/cytologie , Muqueuse intestinale/microbiologie , Lipopolysaccharides/pharmacologie , Antigène lymphocytaire-96 , Souris , Peptidoglycane/pharmacologie , Récepteur de type Toll-2 , Récepteur de type Toll-4 , Récepteur de type Toll-6 , Récepteurs de type Toll , Régulation positive/immunologie
8.
Inflamm Bowel Dis ; 10(4): 333-8, 2004 Jul.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-15475739

RÉSUMÉ

The anti-TNF-alpha antibody infliximab (Remicade) is highly effective in the treatment of Crohn's disease. A subset of patients experience allergic reactions as a result of antibodies to infliximab (ATIs). The purpose of the current study is to describe the safety and efficacy of adalimumab (Humira) in patients previously allergic or intolerant to infliximab. Adalimumab is an anti-TNF-alpha agent containing only human peptide sequences. Seven patients have been treated with adalimumab who had experienced immediate- or delayed-hypersensitivity reactions to infliximab and one with infliximab-induced lupus. Except for injection site discomfort, adalimumab was well tolerated without signs or symptoms of allergic reactions. One patient who had previously received pooled human immunoglobulin developed a pruritic rash after each dose of adalimumab. Patients with active disease who had previously experienced a robust response to infliximab responded to adalimumab as reflected by an improvement in Harvey-Bradshaw index and inflammatory markers. Based on these preliminary data, adalimumab may be a safe and effective substitute for infliximab-allergic patients. Individuals who have been exposed to human antibodies may be sensitized to other human antibodies such as adalimumab.


Sujet(s)
Anticorps monoclonaux/effets indésirables , Anticorps monoclonaux/usage thérapeutique , Maladie de Crohn/traitement médicamenteux , Hypersensibilité retardée , Adalimumab , Adulte , Anticorps monoclonaux/immunologie , Anticorps monoclonaux humanisés , Hypersensibilité médicamenteuse , Femelle , Agents gastro-intestinaux/effets indésirables , Humains , Infliximab , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Projets pilotes , Indice de gravité de la maladie , Résultat thérapeutique , Facteur de nécrose tumorale alpha
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE
...