Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 20 de 22
Filtrer
1.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 2024 Aug 01.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39090487

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: In response to growing evidence that proper performance of operative techniques during cancer surgery is associated with improved patient outcomes, the American College of Surgeons (ACS) implemented six operative standards as part of Commission on Cancer (CoC) accreditation. This study aimed to assess surgeon familiarity with these standards when first introduced and 2 years after their adoption. METHODS: The ACS Cancer Surgery Standards Program distributed an anonymous 36-question survey to CoC-accredited cancer programs in 2021 and 2023. Questions specific to operative techniques determined the Surgery Score, and those specific to the accreditation standards determined the Standards Score. Mean scores were compared using one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and t tests. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 376 surgeons in 2021 and 380 surgeons in 2023. The Surgery Scores were higher than the Standards Scores in 2021 and 2023. The surgeons who practiced at institutions with CoC accreditation had significantly higher Standards Scores than the surgeons at non-accredited institutions in 2021 (p = 0.005) and 2023 (p = 0.004), but not significantly different Surgery Scores. CONCLUSIONS: The baseline survey in 2021 demonstrated significant knowledge of technical aspects of cancer surgery among a broad surgeon base, but a need for greater understanding of the accreditation standards. The repeat survey distribution 2 years after rollout of the operative standards and associated educational programing showed increased awareness surrounding the operative standards in 2023 and a trend toward improvement in knowledge of the accreditation standards across all specialties. Further evaluation will be directed toward compliance with the accreditation standards.

6.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 30(12): 7015-7025, 2023 Nov.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37458948

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Completion axillary node dissection (CLND) is routinely omitted in cT1-2 N0 breast cancer treated with upfront, breast-conserving therapy and sentinel node biopsy (SLNB) showing one to two positive sentinel nodes (SLNs). The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence and impact of axillary treatment among patients treated with mastectomy in a contemporary cohort. METHODS: A prospective, institutional database was reviewed from 2006 to 2015 to identify patients with T1-2 breast cancer treated with upfront mastectomy and SLNB found to have one to two positive SLNs. Patients were stratified by axillary therapy [including CLND and/or post-mastectomy radiation therapy (PMRT)], and clinicopathologic factors and incidence rates of local-regional and distant recurrence were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 548 patients were identified, including 126 (23%) without CLND. Rates of PMRT were similar between those with and without CLND (35.3% vs. 28.6%, p = 0.16). On multivariate analysis, two rather than one positive SLN, larger SLN metastasis size, frozen-section analysis of the SLNB, and adjuvant chemotherapy were significantly associated with receipt of CLND. At a median follow-up of 7 years, there were only two local-regional recurrences in the no-CLND group, of which only one was an axillary recurrence. The 5-years incidence rate of LRR was not significantly different for those with and without CLND (1.3% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.93). CONCLUSIONS: We found extremely low rates of local-regional recurrence among those with T1-2 breast cancer undergoing upfront mastectomy with 1-2 positive SLNs. Further axillary surgery may not be indicated in selected patients treated with a multidisciplinary approach, including adjuvant therapies.

9.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 29(11): 6692-6703, 2022 Oct.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35697955

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Racial disparities in breast cancer care have been linked to treatment delays. We explored whether receiving care at a comprehensive breast center could mitigate disparities in time to treatment. METHODS: Retrospective chart review identified breast cancer patients who underwent surgery from 2012 to 2018 at a comprehensive breast center. Time-to-treatment intervals were compared among self-identified racial and ethnic groups by negative binomial regression models. RESULTS: Overall, 2094 women met the inclusion criteria: 1242 (59%) White, 262 (13%) Black, 302 (14%) Hispanic, 105 (5%) Asian, and 183 (9%) other race or ethnicity. Black and Hispanic patients more often had Medicaid insurance, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores, advanced-stage breast cancer, mastectomy, and additional imaging after breast center presentation (p < 0.05). After controlling for other variables, racial or ethnic minority groups had consistently longer intervals to treatment, with Black women experiencing the greatest disparity (incidence rate ratio 1.42). Time from initial comprehensive breast center visit to treatment was also significantly shorter in White patients versus non-White patients (p < 0.0001). Black race, Medicaid insurance/being uninsured, older age, earlier stage, higher ASA score, undergoing mastectomy, having reconstruction, and requiring additional pretreatment work-up were associated with a longer time from initial visit at the comprehensive breast center to treatment on multivariable analysis (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Racial or ethnic minority groups have significant delays in treatment even when receiving care at a comprehensive breast center. Influential factors include insurance delays and necessity of additional pretreatment work-up. Specific policies are needed to address system barriers in treatment access.


Sujet(s)
Tumeurs du sein , Délai jusqu'au traitement , Tumeurs du sein/chirurgie , Ethnies , Femelle , Disparités d'accès aux soins , Humains , Mastectomie , Minorités , Études rétrospectives , États-Unis
11.
World J Surg ; 46(7): 1660-1666, 2022 07.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35394230

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: The misuse of opioids is a serious national crisis that is fueled by prescriptions medications. Opioid prescribing habits are known to be highly varied amongst providers. The purpose of this study is to identify patient and surgeon characteristics that predict postoperative opioid prescribing patterns. METHODS: This is a serial cross-sectional analysis of 20,497 patients who underwent general surgical procedures at a large academic center. Our primary outcome was the total amount of opioids prescribed within 30 days of the surgery. Univariate and multivariate linear regression models were used to identify patient and provider characteristics that were associated with increased opioids prescribed. RESULTS: Among patient characteristics studied, patient age, sex, ethnicity, and insurance status were found to have a significant association with the amount of opioids prescribed. Younger patients and male patients received higher morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) on discharge (p < 0.05). Patients of Hispanic background were prescribed significantly lower opioids compared to Non-Hispanic patients (p < 0.0001). Among the provider characteristics studied, surgeon sex and years in practice were significantly predictive of the amount of opioids prescribed, with surgeons in practice for <15 years prescribing the highest MMEs (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSION: While opioid prescribing habits after surgery seem highly varied and arbitrary, we have identified key predictors that highlight biases in surgeon opioid prescribing patterns. Surgeons tend to prescribe significantly larger amounts of opioids to younger, male patients and those of certain ethnic backgrounds, and surgeons with fewer years in practice are more likely to prescribe more opioids.


Sujet(s)
Analgésiques morphiniques , Chirurgiens , Analgésiques morphiniques/usage thérapeutique , Biais (épidémiologie) , Études transversales , Humains , Mâle , Douleur postopératoire/traitement médicamenteux , Types de pratiques des médecins
12.
Am J Surg ; 224(1 Pt B): 418-422, 2022 07.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34974887

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Opioid prescription patterns in elderly patients undergoing general surgery are not well characterized. The purpose of this study was to identify trends in postoperative opioid prescriptions in geriatric patients undergoing general surgery procedures and determine prescribing differences between the geriatric and non-geriatric patient population. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated geriatric and non-geriatric patients undergoing the most frequently performed open and laparoscopic general surgery procedures at our institution from 2014 to 2019. Differences in opioid prescriptions between the groups were analyzed. RESULTS: We identified 5874 non-geriatric and 3306 geriatrics patients who underwent the included procedures at our institution. 5169 (88.0%) of non-geriatric patients and 2692 (81.4%) of geriatric patients received a perioperative opioid prescription. While the vast majority of both groups were prescribed opioids, geriatric patients were less likely to receive an opioid prescription (p < 0.0001). Between 2016 and 2019, the amount of opioid prescribed in the geriatric population decreased each year (p < 0.0001). Prescription amounts were significantly higher in geriatric patients aged 65-74 compared to patients 85 or older (p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Individuals older than 65 years of age represent a growing percent of the population and there is a need to better understand opioid prescribing practices in this complex patient group. Postoperative opioid prescribing patterns differ significantly between the geriatric and non-geriatric patient population and warrant further investigation.


Sujet(s)
Analgésiques morphiniques , Ordonnances médicamenteuses , Sujet âgé , Analgésiques morphiniques/usage thérapeutique , Humains , Douleur postopératoire/traitement médicamenteux , Types de pratiques des médecins , Études rétrospectives
13.
Am Surg ; 88(11): 2686-2694, 2022 Nov.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35081002

RÉSUMÉ

INTRODUCTION: Based on the ACOSOG Z0011 trial, women who undergo breast conservation therapy (BCT) and have limited disease in the axilla on sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy do not require axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). In this study we investigate the incidence of ALND in patients undergoing elective mastectomy with limited disease in the axilla to identify how many women may have been spared additional axillary surgery if they chose BCT. METHODS: All women with invasive breast cancer treated at a single tertiary care breast center from 2010-2018 who were candidates for BCT but elected mastectomy and underwent SLN biopsy were identified through retrospective review of a prospectively maintained database. The primary outcome of interest was the incidence of ALND in women found to have a limited burden of disease in the axilla (1-2 positive SLNs). RESULTS: The study population comprised 151 patients with invasive breast cancer eligible for BCT who chose mastectomy. On final pathology, 34 patients had 1-2 positive SLNs, and 16 of these patients underwent completion ALND. These 16 patients out of 151 overall lumpectomy candidates electing mastectomy (10.6%) could have been spared ALND if they did not elect mastectomy. DISCUSSION: BCT candidates electing mastectomy have a 10.6% chance of undergoing more extensive axillary surgery than would have been recommended with BCT alone. The increased risk of undergoing additional axillary surgery should be incorporated into the preoperative discussion for patients choosing between BCT and mastectomy.


Sujet(s)
Tumeurs du sein , Mastectomie , Aisselle/chirurgie , Tumeurs du sein/anatomopathologie , Tumeurs du sein/chirurgie , Femelle , Humains , Lymphadénectomie , Métastase lymphatique , Mastectomie partielle/effets indésirables , Biopsie de noeud lymphatique sentinelle
14.
Surgery ; 169(4): 929-933, 2021 04.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32684334

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Studies demonstrate wide variation in postoperative opioid prescribing and that patients are at risk of chronic opioid abuse after surgery. The factors that influence prescribing, however, remain obscure. This study investigates whether day of the week or the postoperative day at the time of discharge impacts prescribing patterns. METHODS: We identified patients who underwent commonly performed procedures at our institution from January 2014 through April 2019 and analyzed the relationship between postoperative opioids prescribed (oral morphine milligram equivalents) and both the day of the week and the postoperative day at discharge. RESULTS: In ambulatory operations (n = 13,545), each day progressing from Monday was associated with increased morphine milligram equivalents prescribed on discharge (P = .0080). For inpatient cases (n = 10,838), surgeons prescribed more morphine milligram equivalents at discharge in the latter half of the week and during the weekend (P = .0372). Every additional postoperative day at discharge was associated with a +19.25 morphine milligram equivalent prescribed (P < .0001). CONCLUSION: More opioids were prescribed on discharges later in the week and after prolonged hospital stays perhaps to avoid patients running out of medication. Providers may unintentionally allow such non-clinical factors to influence postoperative opioid prescribing. Increased awareness of these inadvertent biases may help decrease excess prescribing of potentially addicting opioids after an operation.


Sujet(s)
Analgésiques morphiniques/administration et posologie , Ordonnances médicamenteuses/statistiques et données numériques , Durée du traitement , Durée du séjour , Douleur postopératoire/traitement médicamenteux , Douleur postopératoire/épidémiologie , Types de pratiques des médecins , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Troubles liés aux opiacés/épidémiologie , Troubles liés aux opiacés/étiologie , Gestion de la douleur , Soins postopératoires , Facteurs de risque
15.
Am Surg ; 86(12): 1677-1683, 2020 Dec.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32816522

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Since 1999, >200 000 people in the United States have died from a prescription opioid overdose. Lower socioeconomic status (SES) is one important risk factor. This study investigates socioeconomic disparities in postoperative opioid prescription and consumption. METHODS: September 2018-April 2019, 128 patients were surveyed postoperatively regarding opioid consumption. The neighborhood disadvantage was calculated using area deprivation index (ADI). The top 3 quartiles were "high SES" and the bottom quartile "low SES." RESULTS: The study population included 96 high SES patients, median ADI 6 (2-12.3) and 32 low SES, median ADI 94.5 (81.3-97.3). For both, median Oxycodone 5 mg prescribed was 20 pills. 29.2% of high SES consumed 0 pills, 40.6% consumed 1-9 pills, and 27.1% consumed 10+ pills. 25.0% of low SES consumed 0 pills, 46.9% consumed 1-9 pills, and 18.8% consumed 10+ pills. No significant difference in opioid prescription (P = .792) or consumption (P = .508) between SES groups. DISCUSSION: Patients of all SES are prescribed and consumed opioids in similar patterns with no significant difference in postoperative pain following ambulatory surgery.


Sujet(s)
Analgésiques morphiniques/usage thérapeutique , Douleur postopératoire/traitement médicamenteux , Types de pratiques des médecins/statistiques et données numériques , Classe sociale , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Facteurs de risque , États-Unis
16.
Eur J Breast Health ; 16(3): 162-166, 2020 Jul.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32656514

RÉSUMÉ

Breast implant-associated anaplastic large cell lymphoma (BIA-ALCL) is a rare peripheral T-cell lymphoma with approximately 650-700 reported cases worldwide. The incidence, however, is increasing as more practitioners become aware of the diagnosis, and recent studies show that early diagnosis and treatment is critical to improve prognosis. There have been four cases of BIA-ALCL in total reported in the transgender population in the literature. These reported cases were reviewed in detail to determine presentation and management of BIA-ALCL in transgender patients compared to the larger population of BIA-ALCL patients. This review highlights BIA-ALCL in transgender women, a population that is often excluded from breast screening and follow-up. Transgender women may not routinely go through the same post-operative follow-up protocols as patients with breast implants for breast cancer reconstruction and can thus be at risk for delayed recognition and diagnosis. BIA-ALCL is a rare complication of breast implantation, and it is important to counsel all patients undergoing implant placement, including transgender women, on its risk.

18.
J Gastrointest Surg ; 24(3): 688-694, 2020 03.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31152348

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Chronic postoperative opioid use has been demonstrated after surgery, but there is a paucity of data on whether the amount of opioids given at discharge is a significant contributor to the risk of prolonged use. The purpose of this study was to determine if higher amounts of opioids prescribed after ambulatory surgery increases chronic opioid use in opioid-naïve and non-naïve patients. METHODS: Using the Institutional Data Warehouse, 15,220 adult patients were identified who underwent ambulatory elective surgeries at our institution between January 2014 and July 2018 and received a perioperative opioid prescription. Multivariate logistic regression was used to characterize the relationship between amount of perioperative opioids prescribed and chronic opioid use. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 14,378 (94%) opioid-naïve and 842 (6%) non-naïve patients. Seven hundred fifty-seven (5%) patients received a new opioid prescription 90 to 365 days after surgery. Patients that had a lower amount of total perioperative opioids (0-150MMEs, 151-300MMEs, or 301-450MMEs) had 44-54% lower risk of persistent opioid use after surgery compared to those who received > 450 MMEs or > 60 pills of 5 mg oxycodone (p < 0.0001). This relationship was especially prominent on subset analysis of opioid non-naïve patients, a group that has thus far been left out of opioid-related studies. CONCLUSION: Persistent opioid use is a known complication after surgery. A higher number of opioid pills on discharge after ambulatory surgery is associated with increased risk of chronic opioid use. Surgeons should consider limiting the number of opioid pills prescribed after ambulatory surgery for both opioid-naïve and non-naïve patients.


Sujet(s)
Analgésiques morphiniques , Troubles liés aux opiacés , Adulte , Procédures de chirurgie ambulatoire , Analgésiques morphiniques/effets indésirables , Interventions chirurgicales non urgentes , Humains , Troubles liés aux opiacés/épidémiologie , Troubles liés aux opiacés/étiologie , Douleur postopératoire/traitement médicamenteux , Douleur postopératoire/étiologie , Types de pratiques des médecins
19.
Ann Vasc Surg ; 64: 411.e17-411.e20, 2020 Apr.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31669478

RÉSUMÉ

We report the case of a woman presenting with livedo reticularis of the breast who was found to have atheroembolism to the breast following upper extremity percutaneous access. Atheroembolism is the embolization of cholesterol crystals off an atherosclerotic plaque that can occur spontaneously or as a result of vascular intervention. This is a unique presentation of an otherwise well-described complication of vascular catheterization, and we propose that livedo reticularis of the breast can be interpreted as a sign of atheroembolism in the appropriate clinical context.


Sujet(s)
Angioplastie par ballonnet/effets indésirables , Artère brachiale , Cathétérisme périphérique/effets indésirables , Embolie de cholestérol/étiologie , Livedo réticulaire/étiologie , Maladie artérielle périphérique/thérapie , Sujet âgé , Anticoagulants/usage thérapeutique , Artère brachiale/imagerie diagnostique , Région mammaire , Embolie de cholestérol/diagnostic , Embolie de cholestérol/traitement médicamenteux , Femelle , Humains , Livedo réticulaire/diagnostic , Livedo réticulaire/traitement médicamenteux , Maladie artérielle périphérique/imagerie diagnostique , Ponctions , Résultat thérapeutique
20.
Am J Surg ; 217(4): 613-617, 2019 04.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30554665

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Recent data has demonstrated that postoperative patients are at risk of chronic opioid abuse. It is unknown whether surgeon postoperative opioid prescribing changed as the opioid crisis entered its peak. METHODS: The Institutional Data Warehouse was queried to identify patients who underwent three common elective ambulatory procedures between 2014 and 2018 (n = 3495), including: laparoscopic cholecystectomy, laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (IHR), and open IHR. The main outcome of interest was opioid pills prescribed, converted to an equianalgesic pill number (1 pill = 5 mg oxycodone). RESULTS: Postoperative opioid prescribing was stable from 2014 to 2016 then decreased significantly in 2017 and 2018 (p < 0.0001). While the median number of pills prescribed remained stable at 30 between 2014 and 2018, the frequency of patients receiving 30 pills decreased significantly. Multivariate analysis demonstrated significantly fewer pills prescribed postoperatively after 2016. CONCLUSIONS: Reductions in postoperative pills prescribed over time as the opioid crisis worsened suggests that surgeons may be considering the potential for opioid abuse and diversion. Persistently high median number of pills prescribed and continued variation in number of pills prescribed suggests room for further improvement.


Sujet(s)
Analgésiques morphiniques/usage thérapeutique , Épidémie d'opioïdes/tendances , Douleur postopératoire/traitement médicamenteux , Types de pratiques des médecins/tendances , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Cholécystectomie laparoscopique , Femelle , Herniorraphie , Humains , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Études rétrospectives , Facteurs temps
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE