Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 10 de 10
Filtrer
Plus de filtres










Base de données
Gamme d'année
1.
ACS Omega ; 9(28): 30794-30803, 2024 Jul 16.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39035895

RÉSUMÉ

Imbibition of fracturing fluid in deep shale nanopores has a significant effect on shale gas production. One of the key parameters affecting imbibition is the interfacial tension of the methane-water system. However, studies on the methane-water interfacial tension in nanopores are very limited, and obtaining the accurate value of the methane-water interfacial tension at the nanoscale is difficult and time-consuming. In this work, a dissipative particle dynamics simulation model was built to study the methane-water interfacial tension in nanopores. This model provides reliable access to methane-water interfacial tension for deep shales under high-temperature, high-pressure conditions at low computation cost. It can be easily used to compute the methane-water interfacial tension in nanopores or the confined space in wide application scenarios. A sensitivity study of methane-water interfacial tension on a variety of factors was conducted. Results demonstrate that under high-pressure conditions, the increase in pressure leads to the rise of interfacial tension. When pressure increases from 20 to 120 MPa, interfacial tension rises from 0.0275 to 0.12 N/m, which contributes to the severe imbibition of fracturing fluid in deep shales. The confinement effect was observed by investigating the influence of pore size. Interfacial tension almost remains unchanged in pores smaller than 7 nm because most of the confined space is occupied by interface layer molecules in these pores. When pore size increases from 7 to 15 nm, the confinement effect is reduced. The interfacial tension experiences a growth from 0.1155 to 0.27 mN/m. Compared with pressure and pore size, the effect of temperature on interfacial tension can be neglected during deep shale gas production.

2.
JMIR Public Health Surveill ; 10: e50595, 2024 Jul 19.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39028548

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Vaccination plays an important role in preventing COVID-19 infection and reducing the severity of the disease. There are usually differences in vaccination rates between urban and rural areas. Measuring these differences can aid in developing more coordinated and sustainable solutions. This information also serves as a reference for the prevention and control of emerging infectious diseases in the future. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the current coverage rate and influencing factors of COVID-19 (second booster) vaccination among Chinese residents, as well as the disparities between urban and rural areas in China. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used a stratified random sampling approach to select representative samples from 11 communities and 10 villages in eastern (Changzhou), central (Zhengzhou), western (Xining), and northeast (Mudanjiang) Mainland China from February 1 to February 18, 2023. The questionnaires were developed by experienced epidemiologists and contained the following: sociodemographic information, health conditions, vaccine-related information, information related to the Protective Motivation Theory (PMT), and the level of trust in the health care system. Vaccination rates among the participants were evaluated based on self-reported information provided. Binary logistic regression models were performed to explore influencing factors of vaccination among urban and rural participants. Urban-rural disparities in the vaccination rate were assessed using propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS: A total of 5780 participants were included, with 53.04% (3066/5780) being female. The vaccination rate was 12.18% (704/5780; 95% CI 11.34-13.02) in the total sample, 13.76% (341/2478; 95% CI 12.40-15.12) among the rural participants, and 10.99% (363/3302; 95% CI 9.93-12.06) among the urban participants. For rural participants, self-reported health condition, self-efficacy, educational level, vaccine knowledge, susceptibility, benefits, and trust in the health care system were independent factors associated with vaccination (all P<.05). For urban participants, chronic conditions, COVID-19 infection, subjective community level, vaccine knowledge, self-efficacy, and trust in the health care system were independent factors associated with vaccination (all P<.05). PSM analysis uncovered a 3.42% difference in vaccination rates between urban and rural participants. CONCLUSIONS: The fourth COVID-19 vaccination coverage rate (second booster) among the Chinese population was extremely low, significantly lower than the previous vaccine coverage rate. Given that COVID-19 infection is still prevalent at low levels, efforts should focus on enhancing self-efficacy to expand the vaccine coverage rate among the Chinese population. For rural residents, building awareness of the vaccine's benefits and improving their overall health status should be prioritized. In urban areas, a larger proportion of people with COVID-19 and patients with chronic illness should be vaccinated.


Sujet(s)
Vaccins contre la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Population rurale , Population urbaine , Humains , Études transversales , Population rurale/statistiques et données numériques , Femelle , Chine/épidémiologie , Population urbaine/statistiques et données numériques , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Adulte , COVID-19/prévention et contrôle , COVID-19/épidémiologie , Vaccins contre la COVID-19/administration et posologie , Disparités d'accès aux soins/statistiques et données numériques , Sujet âgé , Vaccination/statistiques et données numériques , Jeune adulte , Adolescent
3.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2352914, 2024 Dec 31.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38845401

RÉSUMÉ

This study aimed to evaluate how the duration of travel affects the behavior of urban and rural residents regarding free COVID-19 vaccination, and provide scientific evidence for promoting free vaccination and building an immune barrier to cope with future epidemics. From August 3, 2022 to February,18,2023, A follow-up survey was conducted in urban and rural adults in four cities in China to collect information on socio-demographic factors, vaccination status and travel time for vaccination. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was deployed to measure the net difference of the enhanced vaccination rate between urban and rural residents in different traffic time distribution. A total of 5780 samples were included in the study. The vaccination rate of the booster dose of COVID-19 vaccine among rural residents was higher than that of urban residents with a significant P-value (69.36% VS 64.49%,p < .001). The traffic time had a significant negative impact on the COVID-19 booster vaccination behavior of urban and rural residents. There was a significant interaction between the travel time to the vaccination point and the level of trust in doctors. Travel time had a negative impact on the free vaccination behavior of both urban and rural residents. The government should optimize and expand the number of vaccination sites and enhance residents' trust in the medical system. This is crucial for promoting free vaccination and effective epidemic management in the future.


Sujet(s)
Vaccins contre la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Rappel de vaccin , Population rurale , Voyage , Population urbaine , Humains , Mâle , Chine , COVID-19/prévention et contrôle , Femelle , Voyage/statistiques et données numériques , Population urbaine/statistiques et données numériques , Population rurale/statistiques et données numériques , Vaccins contre la COVID-19/administration et posologie , Vaccins contre la COVID-19/immunologie , Adulte d'âge moyen , Adulte , Rappel de vaccin/statistiques et données numériques , SARS-CoV-2/immunologie , Vaccination/statistiques et données numériques , Vaccination/psychologie , Facteurs temps , Sujet âgé , Jeune adulte , Enquêtes et questionnaires , Peuples d'Asie de l'Est
4.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 627, 2024 May 14.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38745226

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: The public health service capability of primary healthcare personnel directly affects the utilization and delivery of health services, and is influenced by various factors. This study aimed to examine the status, factors, and urban-rural differences of public health service capability among primary healthcare personnel, and provided suggestions for improvement. METHODS: We used cluster sampling to survey 11,925 primary healthcare personnel in 18 regions of Henan Province from 20th to March 31, 2023. Data encompassing demographics and public health service capabilities, including health lifestyle guidance, chronic disease management, health management of special populations, and vaccination services. Multivariable regression analysis was employed to investigate influencing factors. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) quantified urban-rural differences. RESULTS: The total score of public health service capability was 80.17 points. Chronic disease management capability scored the lowest, only 19.60. Gender, education level, average monthly salary, professional title, health status, employment form, work unit type, category of practicing (assistant) physician significantly influenced the public health service capability (all P < 0.05). PSM analysis revealed rural primary healthcare personnel had higher public health service capability scores than urban ones. CONCLUSIONS: The public health service capability of primary healthcare personnel in Henan Province was relatively high, but chronic disease management required improvement. Additionally, implementing effective training methods for different subgroups, and improving the service capability of primary medical and health institutions were positive measures.


Sujet(s)
Personnel de santé , Soins de santé primaires , Humains , Chine , Mâle , Femelle , Soins de santé primaires/statistiques et données numériques , Adulte , Personnel de santé/statistiques et données numériques , Adulte d'âge moyen , Enquêtes et questionnaires , Services de santé ruraux/statistiques et données numériques , Services de santé ruraux/organisation et administration
5.
Inflammation ; 2024 Apr 11.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38602607

RÉSUMÉ

Immune cell-mediated chronic inflammation is one of the causes of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Therefore, identifying inflammatory markers in circulating immune cells is highly important for predicting insulin resistance (IR) and the occurrence of T2DM. In this study, we discovered that differentially expressed genes (DEGs) in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) from T2DM patients were associated with innate immunity and chronic inflammatory responses through bulk transcriptome sequencing (bulk RNA-seq). Gene integration analysis revealed that nine DEGs were upregulated, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis revealed that V-maf musculoaponeurotic fibrosarcoma oncogene homolog B (MAFB), a candidate biomarker, has a certain predictive value for T2DM. In population-based cohort studies, we found that MAFB expression was significantly upregulated in the PBMCs of T2DM patients and was significantly correlated with homeostasis model assessment of IR (HOMA-IR), tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), adiponectin (Adipoq), etc. We further evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of MAFB and other clinical parameters for predicting and diagnosing T2DM and found that MAFB expression in PBMCs had a positive effect on the prediction and diagnosis of T2DM. Finally, single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) analysis revealed that the increase in MAFB expression was mainly in nonclassical monocytes. Our results suggest that increased MAFB expression in circulating monocytes may mediate chronic inflammatory status in patients with T2DM. Therefore, MAFB gene expression in circulating monocytes has certain clinical significance for predicting and assisting in the diagnosis of T2DM.

6.
Risk Manag Healthc Policy ; 17: 701-713, 2024.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38549689

RÉSUMÉ

Objective: To evaluate the prevalence and influencing factors of long COVID, and measure the difference in health status between long COVID and non-long COVID cases. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was conducted from February 1 to 8, 2023, using a stratified random sampling method in four regions (eastern [Changzhou], central [Zhengzhou], western [Xining] and northeastern [Mudanjiang]) of China. The survey collected COVID-19 patients' socio-demographic characteristics and lifestyles information. The scores of lifestyles and health status range from 5 to 21 and 0 to 100 points, respectively. The criteria of "persistent health problems after 4 weeks of COVID-19 infection" issued by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention was used to assess long COVID. Multiple linear regression was used to analyze the influencing factors of the health. The bootstrap method was used to analyze the lifestyles' mediating effect. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to evaluate the net difference in health scores between long COVID and non-long COVID cases. Results: The study included 3165 COVID-19 patients, with 308 (9.73%) long COVID cases. The health score of the long COVID cases (74.79) was lower than that of the non-long COVID cases (81.06). After adjusting for potential confounding variables, we found that never focused on mental decompression was a common risk factor for the health of both groups. Lifestyles was the mediating factor on individuals' health. After PSM, the non-long COVID cases' health scores remained higher than that of long COVID cases. Conclusion: The proportion of long COVID cases was low, but they were worse off in health. Given the positive moderating effect of healthy lifestyles on improving the health of long COVID cases, healthy lifestyles including mental decompression should be considered as the core strategy of primary prevention when the epidemic of COVID-19 is still at a low level.

7.
Hum Vaccin Immunother ; 20(1): 2297490, 2024 Dec 31.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38214317

RÉSUMÉ

During the COVID-19 pandemic, the vaccine hesitancy has significantly affected the vaccination. To evaluate the booster vaccine hesitancy and its influencing factors among urban and rural residents, as well as to estimate the net difference of booster vaccine hesitancy between urban and rural residents. We conducted a nationwide, cross-sectional Internet survey on 1-8 February 2023, and employed stratified random sampling technique to select participants (≥18 years old) from urban and rural areas. Multivariate logistic regression was used to determine the factors impacting booster vaccine hesitancy. Propensity Score Matching was used to estimate the net difference of COVID-19 booster vaccine hesitancy between urban and rural residents. The overall COVID-19 booster vaccine hesitancy rate of residents was 28.43%. The COVID-19 booster vaccine hesitancy rate among urban residents was found to be 34.70%, among rural residents was 20.25%. Chronic diseases, infection status, vaccination benefits, and trust in vaccine developers were associated with booster vaccine hesitancy among urban residents. Barriers of vaccination were associated with booster vaccine hesitancy among rural residents. PSM analysis showed that the urban residents have a higher booster vaccine hesitancy rate than rural residents, with a net difference of 6.20%. The vaccine hesitancy rate increased significantly, and the urban residents have a higher COVID-19 booster vaccine hesitancy than rural residents. It becomes crucial to enhance the dissemination of information regarding the advantages of vaccination and foster greater trust among urban residents toward the healthcare system.


Sujet(s)
COVID-19 , Population rurale , Humains , Adolescent , COVID-19/épidémiologie , COVID-19/prévention et contrôle , Études transversales , Pandémies , Score de propension , Réticence à l'égard de la vaccination , Vaccination
8.
BMC Public Health ; 23(1): 2374, 2023 11 30.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38037040

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: COVID-19 is still prevalent in most countries around the world at the low level. Residents' lifestyle behaviors and emotions are critical to prevent COVID-19 and keep healthy, but there is lacking of confirmative evidence on how residents' lifestyle behaviors and emotional expressivity affected COVID-19 infection. METHODS: Baseline study was conducted in August 2022 and follow-up study was conducted in February 2023. Baseline survey collected information on residents' basic information, as well as their lifestyle behaviors and emotions. Follow-up study was carried out to gather data on COVID-19 infection condition. Binary logistic regression was utilized to identify factors that may influence COVID-19 infection. Attributable risk (AR) was computed to determine the proportion of unhealthy lifestyle behaviors and emotional factors that could be attributed to COVID-19 infection. Sensitivity analysis was performed to test the robustness of the results. RESULTS: A total of 5776 participants (46.57% males) were included in this study, yielding an overall COVID-19 infection rate of 54.8% (95%CI: 53.5 - 56.0%). The findings revealed that higher stress levels [aOR = 1.027 (95%CI; 1.005-1.050)] and lower frequency in wearing masks, washing hands, and keeping distance [aOR = 1.615 (95%CI; 1.087-2.401)], were positively associated with an increased likelihood of COVID-19 infection (all P < 0.05). If these associations were causal, 8.1% of COVID-19 infection would have been prevented if all participants had normal stress levels [Attributable Risk Percentage: 8.1% (95%CI: 5.9-10.3%)]. A significant interaction effect between stress and the frequency in wearing masks, washing hands, and keeping distance on COVID-19 infection was observed (ß = 0.006, P < 0.001), which also was independent factor of COVID-19 infection. CONCLUSIONS: The overall COVID-19 infection rate among residents is at a medium level. Residents' increasing stress and decreasing frequency in wearing masks and washing hands and keeping distance contribute to increasing risk of infection, residents should increase the frequency of mask-wearing, practice hand hygiene, keep safe distance from others, ensure stable emotional state, minimize psychological stress, providing evidence support for future responses to emerging infectious diseases.


Sujet(s)
COVID-19 , Comportement en matière de santé , Femelle , Humains , Mâle , COVID-19/épidémiologie , COVID-19/prévention et contrôle , Peuples d'Asie de l'Est , Études de suivi , Mode de vie sain , Masques , SARS-CoV-2
9.
Front Public Health ; 10: 918743, 2022.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36304239

RÉSUMÉ

Objective: To assess lifestyles, COVID-19 vaccination coverage rates, and the relationships between lifestyles and COVID-19 vaccination among Chinese population. Methods: We collected data on sociodemographics, perception of the COVID-19 pandemic, lifestyles, and self-reported COVID-19 vaccination via an online survey in China. The chi-square goodness-of-fit test was used to monitor sample saturation throughout the formal online survey. The binary logistic regression analyses were conducted to examine the association between COVID-19 vaccination rate and lifestyle score. We assigned values to 12 lifestyles ranging from positive to negative, with positive lifestyles receiving a higher score and negative lifestyles receiving a lower score, ranging from 1 to 5. For each participant, the total lifestyle scored from 12 to 56. Restricted cubic spline (RCS) was used to visualize the trends and correlations between lifestyle score and COVID-19 vaccination coverage. Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to explore the association between specific lifestyles and COVID-19 vaccination. Results: A total of 29,925 participants (51.4% females) responded. The lifestyle score of the sample was 44.60 ± 6.13 (scoring range: 12-56). COVID-19 vaccination rate was found to be 89.4% (89.1-89.8%). Female participants reported a higher vaccination rate than male participants (91.5 vs. 87.1%). Compared to Q1, COVID-19 vaccination coverage rates increased with lifestyle total scores [OR Q2 = 1.901 (1.718-2.103), P < 0.001; OR Q3 = 2.373 (2.099-2.684), P < 0.001; and OR Q4 = 3.765 (3.209-4.417), P < 0.001]. After applying PSM, it was determined that all the 12 specific healthy lifestyles analyzed, including maintaining a healthy body weight, a healthy diet, regular physical exercises, adequate sleep, regular physical examination, and others, were found to be positive factors for COVID-19 vaccination. Conclusion: The majority of mainland Chinese lived a healthy lifestyle throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, and the rate of COVID-19 vaccination was high. Specific healthy lifestyles contributed to COVID-19 vaccination coverage rates significantly. According to the study's findings, global efforts to achieve herd immunity should be prioritized by continually promoting healthy lifestyles and improving public perception of COVID-19 vaccines.


Sujet(s)
Vaccins contre la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Humains , Mâle , Femelle , Études transversales , COVID-19/épidémiologie , COVID-19/prévention et contrôle , Pandémies , Mode de vie , Vaccination
10.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35564859

RÉSUMÉ

The purpose of this study was to assess the psychological experience of COVID-19 basic vaccination, the willingness to receive booster vaccines, and to determine their relationships among Chinese people. Between 6 August 2021 and 9 August 2021, a research firm performed a national cross-sectional online survey among Chinese individuals (aged over 18), using the snowball sampling approach, with 26,755 participants. Factor analysis and binary logistic regression were used to evaluate the existing associations. The overall COVID-19 vaccination psychological experience score of the participants was 25.83 (25.78~25.89; scores ranged from 7-35). A total of 93.83% (95%CI = 93.54~94.12) of respondents indicated a willingness to receive booster vaccines. After classifying psychological experiences associated with COVID-19 vaccination into positive and negative experiences and adjusting for confounding factors, for the former, the willingness to receive booster vaccines for participants with the highest scores of 13-15 was 3.933 times higher (OR = 3.933, 95%CI = 3.176~4.871) than participants who obtained scores of 3-9, and for the latter, the willingness to receive booster vaccines for participants with the highest scores of 19-20 was 8.871 times higher (OR = 8.871, 95%CI = 6.240~12.612) than participants who obtained scores of 4-13. Our study suggests that a good psychological experience with vaccination is positively associated with an increased willingness to receive booster vaccines.


Sujet(s)
Vaccins contre la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Sujet âgé , COVID-19/prévention et contrôle , Vaccins contre la COVID-19/usage thérapeutique , Chine , Études transversales , Humains , SARS-CoV-2 , Vaccination
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE