Systematic scoping review on moral distress among physicians.

BACKGROUND: Concepts of moral distress (MD) among physicians have evolved and extend beyond the notion of psychological distress caused by being in a situation in which one is constrained from acting on what one knows to be right. With many accounts involving complex personal, professional, legal, ethical and moral issues, we propose a review of current understanding of MD among physicians. METHODS: A systematic evidence-based approach guided systematic scoping review is proposed to map the current concepts of MD among physicians published in PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, Web of Science, SCOPUS, ERIC and Google Scholar databases. Concurrent and independent thematic and direct content analysis (split approach) was conducted on included articles to enhance the reliability and transparency of the process. The themes and categories identified were combined using the jigsaw perspective to create domains that form the framework of the discussion that follows. RESULTS: A total of 30 156 abstracts were identified, 2473 full-text articles were reviewed and 128 articles were included. The five domains identified were as follows: (1) current concepts, (2) risk factors, (3) impact, (4) tools and (5) interventions. CONCLUSIONS: Initial reviews suggest that MD involves conflicts within a physician's personal beliefs, values and principles (personal constructs) caused by personal, ethical, moral, contextual, professional and sociocultural factors. How these experiences are processed and reflected on and then integrated into the physician's personal constructs impacts their self-concepts of personhood and identity and can result in MD. The ring theory of personhood facilitates an appreciation of how new experiences create dissonance and resonance within personal constructs. These insights allow the forwarding of a new broader concept of MD and a personalised approach to assessing and treating MD. While further studies are required to test these findings, they offer a personalised means of supporting a physician's MD and preventing burn-out.

'Death rounds to support critical care nurses: a qualitative study'.

OBJECTIVE: Providing end-of-life care has a significant psychological impact on critical care nurses. Little is known about whether critical care nurses find death rounds useful as a support system. This study aimed to describe critical care nurses' perceptions of attending death rounds. METHODS: This study was conducted using a qualitative descriptive design, using one-to-one audio-recorded interviews. The study was conducted at a 20-bed medical intensive care unit in a 1200-bed public tertiary hospital in Singapore. One-to-one interviews were conducted with 14 nurses using a semi-structured interview guide. Data was analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Critical care nurses valued attending death rounds. They found death rounds to be an outlet to express themselves and remember patients, to draw and give peer support, to build nursing and interprofessional cohesiveness and to learn to improve palliative care. The death rounds were optimal when they felt safe to share, when there was a good facilitator, when the hierarchy was flat and when the audience was interdisciplinary. The barriers to a successful death round were the rounds being too formal, timing and not knowing the patients. CONCLUSION: Death rounds are a viable way to support critical care nurses in providing end-of-life care.

The importance of paternal family history in hereditary breast cancer is underappreciated by health care professionals.

OBJECTIVES: Cancer genetics clinics have been established in many major oncology centers worldwide in recent years. For such specialized clinics to fulfill their function, primary care physicians need to identify high-risk patients for referral. METHODS: We conducted a survey to evaluate the level of awareness of breast cancer risk factors and hereditary breast cancer among health care providers and patients. RESULTS: 284 health care professionals, 221 medical students, 104 breast cancer patients and 177 cancer-free women participated in the study. Less than half of the patients with breast cancer were aware of their risk for another breast cancer or of the increased breast cancer risk of their sisters and daughters. Less than one quarter of the health care professionals and medical students knew the importance of paternal family history in the evaluation for hereditary breast cancer. Only about half of the health care professionals and medical students and less than one third of the breast cancer patients and cancer-free women knew about genetic testing and prophylactic mastectomy as options for women at risk for hereditary breast cancer. CONCLUSIONS: Health care providers and medical students lack basic genetic knowledge and are not aware of emerging diagnostic and preventive options for hereditary breast cancer. Inclusion of cancer genetics in the continuing medical education of health care providers is important to promote such awareness.