Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrer
Plus de filtres










Base de données
Gamme d'année
1.
Curr Med Imaging ; 2024 Feb 27.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38415463

RÉSUMÉ

INTRODUCTION: A recently developed deep-learning-based automatic evaluation model provides reliable and efficient Cobb angle measurements for scoliosis diagnosis. However, few studies have explored its clinical application, and external validation is lacking. Therefore, this study aimed to explore the value of automated assessment models in clinical practice by comparing deep-learning models with manual measurement methods. METHODS: The 481 spine radiographs from an open-source dataset were divided into training and validation sets, and 119 spine radiographs from a private dataset were used as the test set. The mean Cobb angle values assessed by three physicians in the hospital's PACS system served as the reference standard. The results of Seg4Reg, VFLDN, and manual measurement were statistically analyzed. The intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC) and the Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) were used to compare their reliability and correlation. The Bland-Altman method was used to compare their agreement. The Kappa statistic was used to compare the consistency of Cobb angles at different severity levels. RESULTS: The mean Cobb angle values measured were 35.89° ± 9.33° with Seg4Reg, 31.54° ± 9.78° with VFLDN, and 32.23° ± 9.28° with manual measurement. The ICCs for the reliability of Seg4Reg and VFLDN were 0.809 and 0.974, respectively. The PCC and MAD between Seg4Reg and manual measurements were 0.731 (p<0.001) and 6.51°, while those between VFLDN and manual measurements were 0.952 (p<0.001) and 2.36°. The Kappa statistic indicated VFLDN (k= 0.686, p< 0.001) was superior to Seg4Reg and manual measurements for Cobb angle severity classification. CONCLUSION: The deep-learning-based automatic scoliosis Cobb angle assessment model is feasible in clinical practice. Specifically, the keypoint-based VFLDN is more valuable in actual clinical work with higher accuracy, transparency, and interpretability.

2.
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform ; 27(6): 3002-3013, 2023 06.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37030726

RÉSUMÉ

Scoliosis diagnosis and assessment rely upon Cobb angle estimation from X-ray images of the spine. Recently, automated scoliosis assessment has been greatly improved using deep learning methods. However, in such methods, the Cobb angle is usually predicted based on regression models that don't account for information of the spine structure. Alternatively, the Cobb angle can be estimated indirectly through landmark-detection and vertebra-segmentation, but this approach is still highly sensitive to small detection and segmentation errors. This paper proposes a novel deep-learning architecture, called the vertebra localization and tilt estimation network (VLTENet). This network boosts the Cobb angle estimation accuracy through employing vertebra localization and tilt estimation as network prediction goals. In particular, the VLTENet model innovatively combines a deep high-resolution network (HRNet) and a fully-convolutional U-Net architecture for capturing long-range contextual information, the overall structure, and local details in spinal X-ray images. A feature fusion channel attention (FFCA) module is also proposed to selectively emphasize more informative features and suppress less informative ones. In addition, a joint spine loss function (JS-Loss) is designed to account for the spine shape and other spatial constraints, so that the network focuses more on spine-related regions and ignore irrelevant background regions. Finally, we propose a new Cobb angle estimation method conforms with the clinical Cobb angle calculation guidelines, and produces accurate estimates for different types of scoliosis. Extensive experiments on the publically-available AASCE challenge dataset and on an in-house dataset demonstrated the superiority of our method for the task of automatic assessment of scoliosis.


Sujet(s)
Apprentissage profond , Scoliose , Humains , Scoliose/imagerie diagnostique , Rachis/imagerie diagnostique , Radiographie
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE
...