RÉSUMÉ
Using proteomics and complexome profiling, we evaluated in a year-long study longitudinal variations in the plasma proteome of kidney failure patients, prior to and after a kidney transplantation. The post-transplant period was complicated by bacterial infections, resulting in dramatic changes in the proteome, attributed to an acute phase response (APR). As positive acute phase proteins (APPs), being elevated upon inflammation, we observed the well-described C-reactive protein and Serum Amyloid A (SAA), but also Fibrinogen, Haptoglobin, Leucine-rich alpha-2-glycoprotein, Lipopolysaccharide-binding protein, Alpha-1-antitrypsin, Alpha-1-antichymotrypsin, S100, and CD14. As negative APPs, being downregulated upon inflammation, we identified the well-documented Serotransferrin and Transthyretin, but added Kallistatin, Heparin cofactor 2, and interalpha-trypsin inhibitor heavy chain H1 and H2 (ITIH1, ITIH2). For the patient with the most severe APR, we performed plasma complexome profiling by SEC-LC-MS on all longitudinal samples. We observed that several plasma proteins displaying alike concentration patterns coelute and form macromolecular complexes. By complexome profiling, we expose how SAA1 and SAA2 become incorporated into high-density lipid particles, replacing largely Apolipoprotein (APO)A1 and APOA4. Overall, our data highlight that the combination of in-depth longitudinal plasma proteome and complexome profiling can shed further light on correlated variations in the abundance of several plasma proteins upon inflammatory events.
Sujet(s)
Protéines du sang , Transplantation rénale , Protéome , Humains , Transplantation rénale/effets indésirables , Protéome/analyse , Protéome/métabolisme , Études longitudinales , Protéines du sang/analyse , Protéines du sang/métabolisme , Protéine de la phase aigüe/métabolisme , Adulte d'âge moyen , Mâle , Protéomique/méthodes , Femelle , Insuffisance rénale/sang , Réaction inflammatoire aigüe/sang , AdulteRÉSUMÉ
In kidney transplantation, donor HLA antibodies are a risk factor for graft loss. Accessibility of donor eplets for HLA antibodies is predicted by the ElliPro score. The clinical usefulness of those scores in relation to transplant outcome is unknown. In a large Dutch kidney transplant cohort, Ellipro scores of pretransplant donor antibodies that can be assigned to known eplets (donor epitope specific HLA antibodies [DESAs]) were compared between early graft failure and long surviving deceased donor transplants. We did not observe a significant Ellipro score difference between the two cohorts, nor significant differences in graft survival between transplants with DESAs having high versus low total Ellipro scores. We conclude that Ellipro scores cannot be used to identify DESAs associated with early versus late kidney graft loss in deceased donor transplants.
Sujet(s)
Maladies du rein , Transplantation rénale , Humains , Survie du greffon , Allèles , Anticorps , Rein , Épitopes , Rejet du greffon , Antigènes HLA , Donneurs de tissusRÉSUMÉ
In kidney transplantation, survival rates are still partly impaired due to the deleterious effects of donor specific HLA antibodies (DSA). However, not all luminex-defined DSA appear to be clinically relevant. Further analysis of DSA recognizing polymorphic amino acid configurations, called eplets or functional epitopes, might improve the discrimination between clinically relevant vs. irrelevant HLA antibodies. To evaluate which donor epitope-specific HLA antibodies (DESAs) are clinically important in kidney graft survival, relevant and irrelevant DESAs were discerned in a Dutch cohort of 4690 patients using Kaplan-Meier analysis and tested in a cox proportional hazard (CPH) model including nonimmunological variables. Pre-transplant DESAs were detected in 439 patients (9.4%). The presence of certain clinically relevant DESAs was significantly associated with increased risk on graft loss in deceased donor transplantations (p < 0.0001). The antibodies recognized six epitopes of HLA Class I, 3 of HLA-DR, and 1 of HLA-DQ, and most antibodies were directed to HLA-B (47%). Fifty-three patients (69.7%) had DESA against one donor epitope (range 1-5). Long-term graft survival rate in patients with clinically relevant DESA was 32%, rendering DESA a superior parameter to classical DSA (60%). In the CPH model, the hazard ratio (95% CI) of clinically relevant DESAs was 2.45 (1.84-3.25) in deceased donation, and 2.22 (1.25-3.95) in living donation. In conclusion, the developed model shows the deleterious effect of clinically relevant DESAs on graft outcome which outperformed traditional DSA-based risk analysis on antigen level.
Sujet(s)
Transplantation rénale , Humains , Transplantation rénale/effets indésirables , Épitopes , Antigènes HLA/génétique , Pertinence clinique , Alloanticorps , Allèles , Donneurs de tissus , Rejet du greffonRÉSUMÉ
Introduction: Atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) is a rare kidney disease caused by dysregulation of the complement alternative pathway. The complement dysregulation specifically leads to damage to the glomerular endothelium. To further understand aHUS pathophysiology, we validated an ex vivo model for measuring complement deposition on both control and patient human glomerular microvascular endothelial cells (GMVECs). Methods: Endothelial cells were incubated with human test sera and stained with an anti-C5b-9 antibody to visualize and quantify complement depositions on the cells with immunofluorescence microscopy. Results: First, we showed that zymosan-activated sera resulted in increased endothelial C5b-9 depositions compared to normal human serum (NHS). The levels of C5b-9 depositions were similar between conditionally immortalized (ci)GMVECs and primary control GMVECs. The protocol with ciGMVECs was further validated and we additionally generated ciGMVECs from an aHUS patient. The increased C5b-9 deposition on control ciGMVECs by zymosan-activated serum could be dose-dependently inhibited by adding the C5 inhibitor eculizumab. Next, sera from five aHUS patients were tested on control ciGMVECs. Sera from acute disease phases of all patients showed increased endothelial C5b-9 deposition levels compared to NHS. The remission samples showed normalized C5b-9 depositions, whether remission was reached with or without complement blockage by eculizumab. We also monitored the glomerular endothelial complement deposition of an aHUS patient with a hybrid complement factor H (CFH)/CFH-related 1 gene during follow-up. This patient had already chronic kidney failure and an ongoing deterioration of kidney function despite absence of markers indicating an aHUS flare. Increased C5b-9 depositions on ciGMVECs were observed in all samples obtained throughout different diseases phases, except for the samples with eculizumab levels above target. We then tested the samples on the patient's own ciGMVECs. The C5b-9 deposition pattern was comparable and these aHUS patient ciGMVECs also responded similar to NHS as control ciGMVECs. Discussion: In conclusion, we demonstrate a robust and reliable model to adequately measure C5b-9-based complement deposition on human control and patient ciGMVECs. This model can be used to study the pathophysiological mechanisms of aHUS or other diseases associated with endothelial complement activation ex vivo.
Sujet(s)
Syndrome hémolytique et urémique atypique , Complexe d'attaque membranaire du complément , Humains , Complexe d'attaque membranaire du complément/métabolisme , Cellules endothéliales/métabolisme , Zymosan/métabolisme , Activation du complément/génétique , Syndrome hémolytique et urémique atypique/génétique , Protéines du système du complément/métabolismeRÉSUMÉ
Introduction: Transplant clinicians may disagree on whether or not to accept a deceased donor kidney offer. We investigated the interobserver variability between transplant nephrologists regarding organ acceptance and whether the use of a prediction model impacted their decisions. Methods: We developed an observational online survey with 6 real-life cases of deceased donor kidneys offered to a waitlisted recipient. Per case, nephrologists were asked to estimate the risk of adverse outcome and whether they would accept the offer for this patient, or for a patient of their own choice, and how certain they felt. These questions were repeated after revealing the risk of adverse outcome, calculated by a validated prediction model. Results: Sixty Dutch nephrologists completed the survey. The intraclass correlation coefficient of their estimated risk of adverse outcome was poor (0.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08-0.62). Interobserver agreement of the decision on whether or not to accept the kidney offer was also poor (Fleiss kappa 0.13, 95% CI 0.129-0.130). The acceptance rate before and after providing the outcome of the prediction model was significantly influenced in 2 of 6 cases. Acceptance rates varied considerably among transplant centers. Conclusion: In this study, the estimated risk of adverse outcome and subsequent decision to accept a suboptimal donor kidney varied greatly among transplant nephrologists. The use of a prediction model could influence this decision and may enhance nephrologists' certainty about their decision.
RÉSUMÉ
Monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance (MGUS) is a plasma cell disorder characterized by the presence of a predominant monoclonal antibody (i.e., M-protein) in serum, without clinical symptoms. Here we present a case study in which we detect MGUS by liquid-chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry (LC-MS) profiling of IgG1 in human serum. We detected a Fab-glycosylated M-protein and determined the full heavy and light chain sequences by bottom-up proteomics techniques using multiple proteases, further validated by top-down LC-MS. Moreover, the composition and location of the Fab-glycan could be determined in CDR1 of the heavy chain. The outlined approach adds to an expanding mass spectrometry-based toolkit to characterize monoclonal gammopathies such as MGUS and multiple myeloma, with fine molecular detail. The ability to detect monoclonal gammopathies and determine M-protein sequences straight from blood samples by mass spectrometry provides new opportunities to understand the molecular mechanisms of such diseases.
Sujet(s)
Gammapathie monoclonale de signification indéterminée , Myélome multiple , Paraprotéinémies , Humains , Gammapathie monoclonale de signification indéterminée/diagnostic , Paraprotéinémies/diagnostic , Myélome multiple/diagnostic , Myélome multiple/génétique , Spectrométrie de masse , Immunoglobuline GRÉSUMÉ
INTRODUCTION: Iron deficiency (ID) is common and has been associated with an excess mortality risk in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs). In patients with chronic heart failure and ID, intravenous iron improves exercise capacity and quality of life. Whether these beneficial effects also occur in KTRs is unknown. The main objective of this trial is to address whether intravenous iron improves exercise tolerance in iron-deficient KTRs. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: The Effect of Ferric Carboxymaltose on Exercise Capacity after Kidney Transplantation study is a multicentre, double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled clinical trial that will include 158 iron-deficient KTRs. ID is defined as plasma ferritin <100 µg/L or plasma ferritin 100-299 µg/L with transferrin saturation <20%. Patients are randomised to receive 10 mL of ferric carboxymaltose (50 mg Fe3+/mL, intravenously) or placebo (0.9% sodium chloride solution) every 6 weeks, four dosages in total. The primary endpoint is change in exercise capacity, as quantified by the 6 min walk test, between the first study visit and the end of follow-up, 24 weeks later. Secondary endpoints include changes in haemoglobin levels and iron status, quality of life, systolic and diastolic heart function, skeletal muscle strength, bone and mineral parameters, neurocognitive function and safety endpoints. Tertiary (explorative) outcomes are changes in gut microbiota and lymphocyte proliferation and function. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol of this study has been approved by the medical ethical committee of the University Medical Centre Groningen (METc 2018/482;) and is being conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki, the Standard Protocol Items: Recommendations for Interventional Trials checklist and the Good Clinical Practice guidelines provided by the International Council for Harmonization of Technical Requirements for Pharmaceuticals for Human Use. Study results will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT03769441.
Sujet(s)
Carences en fer , Transplantation rénale , Humains , Tolérance à l'effort , Qualité de vie , Fer , Méthode en double aveugle , Ferritines , Résultat thérapeutique , Essais contrôlés randomisés comme sujet , Études multicentriques comme sujetRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Cytomegalovirus causes morbidity and mortality, especially in immunocompromised patients, and is treated with (val)ganciclovir. Therapeutic drug monitoring of ganciclovir is often performed; however, clinically established target trough levels corresponding to efficacy are lacking. In 2021, our clinic increased the target trough level for ganciclovir from 1 to 2 mg/L to 2-4 mg/L. This study aims to compare both target trough levels in efficacy, toxicity, and occurrence of resistance. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed in adult solid organ recipients treated for cytomegalovirus infection with (val)ganciclovir. Clinical efficacy was defined as the absence of treatment failure, defined as > 1 log 10 increase in viral load within 2 weeks of treatment initiation, therapy switch to foscarnet, and/or request for resistance analysis. RESULTS: A total of 46 patients were involved in the study, with 200 ganciclovir trough levels obtained. The composite endpoint was recorded in 23 (69.7%) and 10 (76.9%) patients in the 1-2 mg/L and the 2-4 mg/L group, respectively ( P = 0.18). No association was found between ganciclovir trough levels and the composite endpoint ( P = 1.0). However, a correlation was found between ganciclovir trough levels and the occurrence of lymphopenia ( P = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Our study could not establish a difference in clinical efficacy or toxicity between target trough levels of 1-2 mg/L or 2-4 mg/L because of the lack of clinical differences between the compared groups. However, a correlation was found between ganciclovir trough levels and lymphopenia, which warrants further investigation.
Sujet(s)
Infections à cytomégalovirus , Lymphopénie , Transplantation d'organe , Adulte , Humains , Ganciclovir/usage thérapeutique , Cytomegalovirus , Antiviraux/effets indésirables , Études rétrospectives , Surveillance des médicaments , Infections à cytomégalovirus/traitement médicamenteux , Lymphopénie/complications , Lymphopénie/traitement médicamenteuxRÉSUMÉ
Introduction: The introduction of eculizumab has improved the outcome in patients with atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS). The optimal treatment strategy is debated. Here, we report the results of the CUREiHUS study, a 4-year prospective, observational study monitoring unbiased eculizumab discontinuation in Dutch patients with aHUS after 3 months of therapy. Methods: All pediatric and adult patients with aHUS in native kidneys and a first-time eculizumab treatment were evaluated. In addition, an extensive cost-consequence analysis was conducted. Results: A total of 21 patients were included in the study from January 2016 to October 2020. In 17 patients (81%), a complement genetic variant or antibodies against factor H were identified. All patients showed full recovery of hematological thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) parameters after the start of eculizumab. A renal response was noted in 18 patients. After a median treatment duration of 13.6 weeks (range 2.1-43.9), eculizumab was withdrawn in all patients. During follow-up (80.7 weeks [0.0-236.9]), relapses occurred in 4 patients. Median time to first relapse was 19.5 (14.3-53.6) weeks. Eculizumab was reinitiated within 24 hours in all relapsing patients. At last follow-up, there were no chronic sequelae, i.e., no clinically relevant increase in serum creatinine (sCr), proteinuria, and/or hypertension in relapsing patients. The low sample size and event rate did not allow to determine predictors of relapse. However, relapses only occurred in patients with a likely pathogenic variant. The cost-effectiveness analysis revealed that the total medical expenses of our population were only 30% of the fictive expenses that would have been made when patients received eculizumab every fortnight. Conclusion: It is safe and cost-effective to discontinue eculizumab after 3 months of therapy in patients with aHUS in native kidneys. Larger data registries are needed to determine factors associated with suboptimal kidney function recovery during eculizumab treatment, factors to predict relapses, and long-term outcomes of eculizumab discontinuation.
RÉSUMÉ
Antibodies against Rho GDP-dissociation inhibitor 2 (RhoGDI2) are associated with inferior graft survival in transplant patients receiving a kidney from deceased donors. Although this suggests that these antibodies contribute to graft injury because of ischemia, it remains unknown whether they are also pathogenically involved in the process of graft loss. To study this, we firstly analyzed the IgG subclass profile of anti-RhoGDI2 antibodies in kidney transplant recipients, and whether antibody titers change over time or because of acute rejection. Next, we investigated the expression of RhoGDI2 on primary kidney and lung endothelial cells (ECs) upon hypoxia reperfusion. In addition, the complement-fixing properties of anti-RhoGDI2 antibodies were studied using imaging flow cytometry. Anti-RhoGDI2 antibodies in patients are mainly IgG1, and titers remained stable and seemed not be changed because of rejection. Antibodies against RhoGDI2, which surface expression seemed to increase upon hypoxia reperfusion, co-localized with C3 on ECs. Binding of human IgG1 monoclonal anti-RhoGDI2 antibodies as well as patient derived antibodies, resulted in complement activation, suggesting that these antibodies are complement fixing. This study suggested a potential pathogenic role of anti-RhoGDI2 antibodies in kidney graft loss. During ischemia reperfusion, the ability of these antibodies to fix complement could be one of the mechanisms resulting in tissue injury.
Sujet(s)
Complexe d'attaque membranaire du complément , Inhibiteur bêta de la dissociation des nucléotides guanylés spécifique des protéines rho , Humains , Allèles , Protéines du système du complément , Cellules endothéliales , Rejet du greffon , Antigènes HLA , Immunoglobuline G , Inhibiteur bêta de la dissociation des nucléotides guanylés spécifique des protéines rho/génétique , Complément C3RÉSUMÉ
Introduction: COVID-19 vaccination has been associated with rare but severe complications characterized by thrombosis and thrombocytopenia. Methods and Results: Here we present three patients who developed de novo or relapse atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) in native kidneys, a median of 3 days (range 2-15) after mRNA-based (Pfizer/BioNTech's, BNT162b2) or adenoviral (AstraZeneca, ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) COVID-19 vaccination. All three patients presented with evident hematological signs of TMA and AKI, and other aHUS triggering or explanatory events were absent. After eculizumab treatment, kidney function fully recovered in 2/3 patients. In addition, we describe two patients with dubious aHUS relapse after COVID-19 vaccination. To assess the risks of vaccination, we retrospectively evaluated 29 aHUS patients (n=8 with native kidneys) without complement-inhibitory treatment, who received a total of 73 COVID-19 vaccinations. None developed aHUS relapse after vaccination. Conclusion: In conclusion, aHUS should be included in the differential diagnosis of patients with vaccine-induced thrombocytopenia, especially if co-occuring with mechanical hemolytic anemia (MAHA) and acute kidney injury (AKI). Still, the overall risk is limited and we clearly advise continuation of COVID-19 vaccination in patients with a previous episode of aHUS, yet conditional upon clear patient instruction on how to recognize symptoms of recurrence. At last, we suggest monitoring serum creatinine (sCr), proteinuria, MAHA parameters, and blood pressure days after vaccination.
Sujet(s)
Atteinte rénale aigüe , Anémie hémolytique , Syndrome hémolytique et urémique atypique , Vaccins contre la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Humains , Atteinte rénale aigüe/induit chimiquement , Syndrome hémolytique et urémique atypique/étiologie , Syndrome hémolytique et urémique atypique/thérapie , Vaccin BNT162 , Vaccin ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 , COVID-19/prévention et contrôle , COVID-19/complications , Vaccins contre la COVID-19/effets indésirables , Récidive , Études rétrospectives , Vaccination/effets indésirablesRÉSUMÉ
Background: Donor-characteristics and donor characteristics-based decision algorithms are being progressively used in the decision process whether or not to accept an available donor kidney graft for transplantation. While this may improve outcomes, the performance characteristics of the algorithms remains moderate. To estimate the impact of donor factors of grafts accepted for transplantation on transplant outcomes, and to test whether implementation of donor-characteristics-based algorithms in clinical decision-making is justified, we applied an instrumental variable analysis to outcomes for kidney donor pairs transplanted in different individuals. Methods: This analysis used (dis)congruent outcomes of kidney donor pairs as an instrument and was based on national transplantation registry data for all donor kidney pairs transplanted in separate individuals in the Netherlands (1990-2018, 2,845 donor pairs), and the United Kingdom (UK, 2000-2018, 11,450 pairs). Incident early graft loss (EGL) was used as the primary discriminatory factor. It was reasoned that a scenario with a dominant impact of donor variables on transplantation outcomes would result in high concordance of EGL in both recipients, whilst dominance of asymmetrical outcomes could indicate a more complex scenario, involving an interaction of donor, procedural and recipient factors. Findings: Incidences of congruent EGL (Netherlands: 1·2%, UK: 0·7%) were slightly lower than the arithmetical (stochastic) incidences, suggesting that once a graft has been accepted for transplantation, donor factors minimally contribute to incident EGL. A long-term impact of donor factors was explored by comparing outcomes for functional grafts from donor pairs with asymmetrical vs. symmetrical outcomes. Recipient survival was similar for both groups, but a slightly compromised graft survival was observed for grafts with asymmetrical outcomes in the UK cohort: (10-years Hazard Ratio for graft loss: 1·18 [1·03-1·35] p<0·018); and 5 years eGFR (48·6 [48·3-49·0] vs. 46·0 [44·5-47·6] ml/min in the symmetrical outcome group, p<0·001). Interpretation: Our results suggest that donor factors for kidney grafts deemed acceptable for transplantation impact minimally on transplantation outcomes. A strong reliance on donor factors and/or donor-characteristics-based decision algorithms could result in unjustified rejection of grafts. Future efforts to optimize transplant outcomes should focus on a better understanding of the recipient factors underlying transplant outcomes. Funding: None.
RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Histopathological assessment of transplant biopsies is currently the standard method to diagnose allograft rejection and can help guide patient management, but it is one of the most challenging areas of pathology, requiring considerable expertise, time, and effort. We aimed to analyse the utility of deep learning to preclassify histology of kidney allograft biopsies into three main broad categories (ie, normal, rejection, and other diseases) as a potential biopsy triage system focusing on transplant rejection. METHODS: We performed a retrospective, multicentre, proof-of-concept study using 5844 digital whole slide images of kidney allograft biopsies from 1948 patients. Kidney allograft biopsy samples were identified by a database search in the Departments of Pathology of the Amsterdam UMC, Amsterdam, Netherlands (1130 patients) and the University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands (717 patients). 101 consecutive kidney transplant biopsies were identified in the archive of the Institute of Pathology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany. Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) were trained to classify allograft biopsies as normal, rejection, or other diseases. Three times cross-validation (1847 patients) and deployment on an external real-world cohort (101 patients) were used for validation. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was used as the main performance metric (the primary endpoint to assess CNN performance). FINDINGS: Serial CNNs, first classifying kidney allograft biopsies as normal (AUROC 0·87 [ten times bootstrapped CI 0·85-0·88]) and disease (0·87 [0·86-0·88]), followed by a second CNN classifying biopsies classified as disease into rejection (0·75 [0·73-0·76]) and other diseases (0·75 [0·72-0·77]), showed similar AUROC in cross-validation and deployment on independent real-world data (first CNN normal AUROC 0·83 [0·80-0·85], disease 0·83 [0·73-0·91]; second CNN rejection 0·61 [0·51-0·70], other diseases 0·61 [0·50-0·74]). A single CNN classifying biopsies as normal, rejection, or other diseases showed similar performance in cross-validation (normal AUROC 0·80 [0·73-0·84], rejection 0·76 [0·66-0·80], other diseases 0·50 [0·36-0·57]) and generalised well for normal and rejection classes in the real-world data. Visualisation techniques highlighted rejection-relevant areas of biopsies in the tubulointerstitium. INTERPRETATION: This study showed that deep learning-based classification of transplant biopsies could support pathological diagnostics of kidney allograft rejection. FUNDING: European Research Council; German Research Foundation; German Federal Ministries of Education and Research, Health, and Economic Affairs and Energy; Dutch Kidney Foundation; Human(e) AI Research Priority Area of the University of Amsterdam; and Max-Eder Programme of German Cancer Aid.
Sujet(s)
Apprentissage profond , Rejet du greffon/diagnostic , Transplantation rénale/classification , Biopsie , Humains , Étude de validation de principe , Études rétrospectivesRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Recently, continuous nonoxygenated hypothermic machine perfusion (HMP) has been implemented as standard preservation method for deceased donor kidneys in the Netherlands. This study was designed to assess the effect of the implementation of HMP on early outcomes after transplantation. METHODS: Kidneys donated in the Netherlands in 2016 and 2017 were intended to be preserved by HMP. A historical cohort (2010-2014) preserved by static cold storage was chosen as the control group. Primary outcome was delayed graft function (DGF). Additional analyses were performed on safety, graft function, and survival up until 2 y after transplantation. RESULTS: Data were collected on 2493 kidneys. Analyses showed significantly more donation after circulatory death, preemptive transplantation, and retransplants in the project cohort. Of the 681 kidneys that were transplanted during the project, 81% were preserved by HMP. No kidneys were discarded due to HMP-related complications. DGF occurred in 38.2% of the project cohort versus 43.7% of the historical cohort (P < 0.001), with a significantly shorter duration within the project cohort (7 versus 9 d, P = 0.003). Multivariate regression analysis showed an odds ratio of 0.69 (95% confidence interval, 0.553-0.855) for the risk of DGF when using HMP compared with cold storage (P = 0.001). There was no significant difference in kidney function, graft survival, and recipient survival up until 2 y posttransplantation. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that HMP as a standard preservation method for deceased donor kidneys is safe and feasible. HMP was associated with a significant reduction of DGF.
Sujet(s)
Reprise retardée de fonction du greffon , Transplantation rénale , Reprise retardée de fonction du greffon/étiologie , Reprise retardée de fonction du greffon/prévention et contrôle , Humains , Rein , Transplantation rénale/méthodes , Conservation d'organe/effets indésirables , Conservation d'organe/méthodes , Perfusion/effets indésirables , Perfusion/méthodes , Donneurs de tissusRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: At Eurotransplant (ET), kidneys are transferred to "rescue allocation" (RA), whenever the standard allocation (SA) algorithms Eurotransplant Kidney Allocation System (ETKAS) and Eurotransplant Senior Program (ESP) fail. We analyzed the outcome of RA. METHODS: Retrospective patient clinical and demographic characteristics association analyses were performed with graft outcomes for 2422 recipients of a deceased donor renal transplantation (DDRT) after RA versus 25 481 after SA from 71 centers across all ET countries from 2006 to 2018. RESULTS: Numbers of DDRTs after RA increased over the time, especially in Germany. RA played a minor role in ESP versus ETKAS (2.7% versus 10.4%). RA recipients and donors were older compared with SA recipients and donors, cold ischemia times were longer, waiting times were shorter, and the incidence of primary nonfunction was comparable. Among ETKAS recipients, HLA matching was more favorable in SA (mean 3.7 versus 2.5). In multivariate modeling, the incidence of graft loss in ETKAS recipients was reduced in RA compared with SA (subdistribution hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% confidence interval [0.70-0.91], P < 0.001), whereas other outcomes (mortality, death with functioning graft (DwFG)) were not significantly different. None of the 3 outcomes were significantly different when comparing RA with SA within the ESP program. CONCLUSIONS: Facing increased waiting times and mortality on dialysis due to donor shortage, this study reveals encouragingly positive DDRT outcomes following RA. This supports the extension of RA to more patients and as an alternative tool to enable transplantation in patients in countries with prohibitively long waiting times or at risk of deterioration.
Sujet(s)
Transplantation rénale , Acquisition d'organes et de tissus , Survie du greffon , Humains , Transplantation rénale/effets indésirables , Études rétrospectives , Donneurs de tissus , Résultat thérapeutiqueRÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Often only chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients with high likelihood of genetic disease are offered genetic testing. Early genetic testing could obviate the need for kidney biopsies, allowing for adequate prognostication and treatment. To test the viability of a 'genetics-first' approach for CKD, we performed genetic testing in a group of kidney transplant recipients aged <50 years, irrespective of cause of transplant. METHODS: From a cohort of 273 transplant patients, we selected 110 that were in care in the University Medical Center Utrecht, had DNA available and were without clear-cut non-genetic disease. Forty patients had been diagnosed with a genetic disease prior to enrollment; in 70 patients, we performed a whole-exome sequencing-based 379 gene panel analysis. RESULTS: Genetic analysis yielded a diagnosis in 51%. Extrapolated to the 273 patient cohort, who did not all fit the inclusion criteria, the diagnostic yield was still 21%. Retrospectively, in 43% of biopsied patients, the kidney biopsy would not have had added diagnostic value if genetic testing had been performed as a first-tier diagnostic. CONCLUSIONS: The burden of monogenic disease in transplant patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) of any cause prior to the age of 50 years is between 21% and 51%. Early genetic testing can provide a non-invasive diagnostic, impacting prognostication and treatment, and obviating the need for an invasive biopsy. We conclude that in patients who expect to develop ESKD prior to the age of 50 years, genetic testing should be considered as first mode of diagnostics.
Sujet(s)
Défaillance rénale chronique , Insuffisance rénale chronique , Études de cohortes , Dépistage génétique , Humains , Défaillance rénale chronique/diagnostic , Défaillance rénale chronique/génétique , Adulte d'âge moyen , Insuffisance rénale chronique/complications , Études rétrospectivesRÉSUMÉ
INTRODUCTION: eConsultation in nephrology is an innovative way for general practitioners (GPs) to consult a nephrologist. Studies have shown that questions from GPs can be answered and intended referrals can be avoided by eConsultation. However, follow-up data are lacking. The primary aim of this study was therefore to assess whether patients for whom a referral to the outpatient clinic of a medical specialist was avoided in the short term were not then referred for the same problem within one year after the eConsultation. METHODS: All eConsultations sent between June 2017 and April 2018 to seven nephrologists in three different hospitals in The Netherlands were included. Exclusion criteria were duplications and missing data on follow-up. Data were obtained from the eConsultation application forms and from GP medical records. RESULTS: A total of 173 eConsultations were included. Of the 32 patients for whom a referral was initially prevented, 91% (95% confidence interval 75-98) had not been referred to a specialist for the same problem within one year after the eConsultation. DISCUSSION: eConsultation in the field of nephrology can prevent referrals in the long term. It can therefore contribute to a more modern and efficient health-care system in which chronic care is provided by GPs in close proximity to patients, while specialist support is easily available and accessible through eConsultation when necessary.
Sujet(s)
Médecins généralistes , Néphrologie , Établissements de soins ambulatoires , Prestations des soins de santé , Humains , Orientation vers un spécialisteRÉSUMÉ
CD4+ T-helper cells play an important role in alloimmune reactions following transplantation by stimulating humoral as well as cellular responses, which might lead to failure of the allograft. CD4+ memory T-helper cells from a previous immunizing event can potentially be reactivated by exposure to HLA mismatches that share T-cell epitopes with the initial immunizing HLA. Consequently, reactivity of CD4+ memory T-helper cells toward T-cell epitopes that are shared between immunizing HLA and donor HLA could increase the risk of alloimmunity following transplantation, thus affecting transplant outcome. In this study, the amount of T-cell epitopes shared between immunizing and donor HLA was used as a surrogate marker to evaluate the effect of donor-reactive CD4+ memory T-helper cells on the 10-year risk of death-censored kidney graft failure in 190 donor/recipient combinations using the PIRCHE-II algorithm. The T-cell epitopes of the initial theoretical immunizing HLA and the donor HLA were estimated and the number of shared PIRCHE-II epitopes was calculated. We show that the natural logarithm-transformed PIRCHE-II overlap score, or Shared T-cell EPitopes (STEP) score, significantly associates with the 10-year risk of death-censored kidney graft failure, suggesting that the presence of pre-transplant donor-reactive CD4+ memory T-helper cells might be a strong indicator for the risk of graft failure following kidney transplantation.
Sujet(s)
Déterminants antigéniques des lymphocytes T/immunologie , Rejet du greffon/immunologie , Survie du greffon/immunologie , Antigènes HLA/immunologie , Transplantation rénale , Lymphocytes T/immunologie , Adulte , Sujet âgé , Déterminants antigéniques des lymphocytes T/génétique , Femelle , Rejet du greffon/génétique , Maladie du greffon contre l'hôte/diagnostic , Maladie du greffon contre l'hôte/étiologie , Maladie du greffon contre l'hôte/mortalité , Antigènes HLA/génétique , Humains , Transplantation rénale/effets indésirables , Transplantation rénale/méthodes , Mâle , Adulte d'âge moyen , Études rétrospectives , Lymphocytes T/métabolisme , Donneurs de tissus , Receveurs de transplantation , Transplantation homologue , Échec thérapeutique , Jeune adulteRÉSUMÉ
Kidney transplant candidates are blood group incompatible with roughly one out of three potential living donors. We compared outcomes after ABO-incompatible (ABOi) kidney transplantation with matched ABO-compatible (ABOc) living and deceased donor transplantation and analyzed different induction regimens. We performed a retrospective study with propensity matching and compared patient and death-censored graft survival after ABOi versus ABOc living donor and deceased donor kidney transplantation in a nationwide registry from 2006 till 2019. 296 ABOi were compared with 1184 center and propensity-matched ABOc living donor and 1184 deceased donor recipients (matching: recipient age, sex, blood group, and PRA). Patient survival was better compared with deceased donor [hazard ratio (HR) for death of HR 0.69 (0.49-0.96)] and non-significantly different from ABOc living donor recipients [HR 1.28 (0.90-1.81)]. Rate of graft failure was higher compared with ABOc living donor transplantation [HR 2.63 (1.72-4.01)]. Rejection occurred in 47% of 140 rituximab versus 22% of 50 rituximab/basiliximab, and 4% of 92 alemtuzumab-treated recipients (P < 0.001). ABOi kidney transplantation is superior to deceased donor transplantation. Rejection rate and graft failure are higher compared with matched ABOc living donor transplantation, underscoring the need for further studies into risk stratification and induction therapy [NTR7587, www.trialregister.nl].
Sujet(s)
Transplantation rénale , Système ABO de groupes sanguins , Incompatibilité sanguine , Rejet du greffon , Survie du greffon , Humains , Donneur vivant , Études rétrospectivesRÉSUMÉ
Kidney transplant recipients (KTR) may be at increased risk of adverse COVID-19 outcomes, due to prevalent comorbidities and immunosuppressed status. Given the global differences in COVID-19 policies and treatments, a robust assessment of all evidence is necessary to evaluate the clinical course of COVID-19 in KTR. Studies on mortality and acute kidney injury (AKI) in KTR in the World Health Organization COVID-19 database were systematically reviewed. We selected studies published between March 2020 and January 18th 2021, including at least five KTR with COVID-19. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to calculate overall proportions, including 95% confidence intervals (95% CI). Subgroup analyses were performed on time of submission, geographical region, sex, age, time after transplantation, comorbidities, and treatments. We included 74 studies with 5559 KTR with COVID-19 (64.0% males, mean age 58.2 years, mean 73 months after transplantation) in total. The risk of mortality, 23% (95% CI: 21%-27%), and AKI, 50% (95% CI: 44%-56%), is high among KTR with COVID-19, regardless of sex, age and comorbidities, underlining the call to accelerate vaccination programs for KTR. Given the suboptimal reporting across the identified studies, we urge researchers to consistently report anthropometrics, kidney function at baseline and discharge, (changes in) immunosuppressive therapy, AKI, and renal outcome among KTR.