5α-reductase inhibitors with or without alpha-blockers and risk of incident upper tract urothelial carcinoma in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia: Analysis of US insurance claims data.

BACKGROUND: Increasing data suggests that androgen receptor signaling may play an important role in the carcinogenesis of urothelial cancers. While the chemoprotective effect of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARi) on bladder cancer risk in men with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) has been explored with conflicting results, the evidence regarding 5-ARi treatment, and the risk of incident Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma (UTUC) development is lacking. Therefore, our objective was to investigate the impact of the 5-ARi administration on the incidence of new UTUC cases using a large US database. METHODS: The MerativeTM Marketscan® database was used to identify men ≥ 50 years old with a diagnosis of BPH and an active 5-ARi prescription between 2007 and 2021 and were subsequently matched with paired controls. A multivariable Cox regression model was implemented to ascertain the association of 5-ARi and/or alpha-blocker (α-B) medications on the incidence of UTUC. Additional subgroup analyses were conducted based on exposure risk (with a 2-year threshold) to investigate the relationship between 5-ARi and UTUC over time. RESULTS: Overall, n=1,103,743 men BPH without prescriptions for BPH, n=31,142 men on 5-ARi, and n=160,049 using 5-ARi + α-B were identified. Over the follow-up period, a total of n=4,761 patients were diagnosed with UTUC. After matching, UTUC incidence ranged from 0.36% to 0.41% in men without active BPH therapy vs. 0.30% and 0.52% for the 5-ARi and 5-ARi + α-B groups, respectively. In multivariable analysis, the chemoprotective effect on UTUC risk was not observed for either 5-ARi monotherapy (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.91, 95% CI: 0.58-1.44) or 5-ARi + α-B combination (aHR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.87-1.19). This remained true for both short-term (≤ 2 years) and long-term (> 2 years) follow-up periods. CONCLUSIONS: The use of 5-ARi for BPH, whether used alone or in combination with α-B, is not associated with incident UTUC.

Perioperative alpha blockers in voiding dysfunction secondary to prostate biopsy: A meta-analysis.

Introduction and Objectives: Voiding dysfunction remains a common side effect postprostate biopsy leading to significant morbidity. Alpha blockers have emerged as a potential therapeutic option to mitigate this risk, with various centres already incorporating its use in practice. Despite this, the literature regarding its efficacy remains inconclusive. Hence, a systematic review was performed to quantify the effect of perioperative alpha blockers on prostate biopsy-related voiding function. Methods: A systematic search in MEDLINE, Embase and PubMed between January 1989 and July 2023 was performed to identify relevant articles. Two independent reviewers independently screened abstracts, full texts and performed data extraction. Data including International Prostate Symptom Scores (IPSS), voiding flow rates (Qmax), postvoid residuals (PVR), rates of acute urinary retention (AUR) and quality of life (QoL) scores were extracted. Results were combined in an inverse variance random effects meta-analysis. Results: A total 808 patients from six randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing alpha blockers to controls were included. All articles excluded patients with pre-existing voiding dysfunction. Pooled outcomes demonstrated statistically significant differences favouring alpha blocker usage in all objective and subjective measures including IPSS (mean difference 4.21, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.58-5.84, p < 0.00001), PVR (mean difference 20.41 mL, 95% CI 3.44-37.39, p = 0.02), Qmax (mean difference 3.07 mL/s, 95% CI 2.55-3.59, p < 0.00001), QoL (weighted-mean difference 0.82, CI 0.17-1.48, p = 0.01) as well as overall risk of AUR (odds ratio 0.22, CI 0.09-0.55, p = 0.001). There was variable heterogeneity (I 2 = 0-86%) between outcomes. Conclusions: This review highlights the potential role of alpha blockers in improving urinary function and reducing adverse voiding outcomes postprostate biopsy. The standard practice of incorporating the usage of perioperative alpha blockers may be considered to reduce the morbidity of voiding complications secondary to prostate biopsy.

Presumed Fungal Retinitis Following Adalimumab Therapy for Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis: A Rare Case Report.

PURPOSE: To report a case of presumed fungal infection in a patient with JIA following prolong immunosuppression, and after initiation of adalimumab therapy. Method: Retrospective Chart Review. RESULT: A 20-year-old female, previously diagnosed with JIA, presented with a three-week history of blurred vision in her left eye. She had a long history of treatment with oral corticosteroids, sulfasalazine, and methotrexate, followed by tocilizumab injections and later etanercept. Recently, she was started on adalimumab injections. Fundus examination of the left eye demonstrated multifocal retinitis scattered throughout the fundus. Optical coherence tomography of the lesions showed hyperreflectivity in the inner retina with posterior shadowing and vitreous aggregates extending into the vitreous cavity. After her second adalimumab dose, she experienced blurred vision. Examination of the fundus revealed multifocal retinitis in the left eye, sparing the macula. After stopping immunomodulators and starting empirical antifungal therapy with oral fluconazole, her retinal lesions began to improve. A vitreous biopsy was performed, and intravitreal voriconazole was administered, but microbiological tests were negative. Nevertheless, her retinal lesions resolved almost completely with continued antifungal treatment. By the 6-week follow-up, her retinitis had fully resolved, maintaining excellent visual acuity. CONCLUSION: This case underscores the need for a high index of suspicion for infection in patients with long-term immunosuppression, highlighting the importance of early therapeutic intervention.

Emerging drugs for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: a 2023 update.

INTRODUCTION: Benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) is a condition that affects over 50% of men as they enter their fifth decade of life, often leading to lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Primary treatment options include alpha blockers, 5-alpha reductase inhibitors, and phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors. However, these medications can have some side effects, and there is a noticeable dearth of information addressing the long-term use of these medications. Thus, the exploration of all treatment modalities helps ensure patients receive personalized and effective care. Consequently, the primary objective of this review is to identify potential emerging medications for the treatment of BPH. AREAS COVERED: We conducted an extensive review of articles discussing pharmacotherapy for BPH spanning the last 15 years. Our information gathering process involved Scopus, PubMed-MEDLINE, Cochrane, Wiley Online Library Google Scholar, ClinicalTrials.gov, and the PharmaProjects database. This approach ensures that readers gain an in-depth knowledge of the existing therapeutic agents as well as promising avenues for managing BPH. EXPERT OPINION: BPH treatment targets a patient's specific constellation of symptoms. Therefore, a broad knowledge base encompassing various treatment options is paramount in ensuring optimal treatment. Looking forward, the emphasis on personalization promises to reshape the landscape of BPH treatment and improve patient outcomes.

Adherence to AUA guidelines for the work-up, medical management, surgical evaluation and treatment of BPH: Work from a quality improvement collaborative.

INTRODUCTION: Previous studies noted varied adherence to clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), but studies are yet to quantify adherence to American Urological Association BPH guidelines. We studied guideline adherence in the context of a new quality improvement collaborative (QIC). METHODS: Data were collected as part of a statewide QIC. Medical records for patients undergoing select CPT codes from January 2020 to May 2022 were retrospectively reviewed for adherence to selected BPH guidelines. RESULTS: Most men were treated with transurethral resection of the prostate. Notably, 53.3% of men completed an IPSS and 52.3% had a urinalysis. 4.7% were counseled on behavioral modifications, 15.0% on medical therapy, and 100% on procedural options. For management, 79.4% were taking alpha-blockers and 59.8% were taking a 5-ARI. For evaluation, 57% had a PVR, 63.6% had prostate size measurement, 37.4% had uroflowmetry, and 12.3% were counseled about treatment failure. Postoperatively, 51.6% completed an IPSS, 57% had a PVR, 6.50% had uroflowmetry, 50.6% stopped their alpha-blocker, and 75.0% stopped their 5-ARI. CONCLUSIONS: There was adherence to preoperative testing recommendations, but patient counseling was lacking in the initial work-up and preoperative evaluation. We will convey the data to key stakeholders, expand data collection to other institutions, and devise an improvement implementation plan.

Do alpha blockers reduce the risk of urinary retention post-transperineal prostate biopsy? A systematic narrative review.

BACKGROUND: Transperineal Prostate Biopsy (TPB) is a commonly used technique for the diagnosis of prostate cancer due to growing concerns related to infectious complications associated with transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUSB). TPB is associated with an infective complication rate of near zero, however, acute urinary retention (AUR) remains the leading complication causing morbidity. Previously in TRUSB, there was weak evidence that alpha-blockers reduce AUR rates, and their usage has been extrapolated to clinical practice with TPB. This review aims to explore if there is an evidence base for using alpha-blockers to prevent AUR following TPB. METHODS: A systematic approach was used to search Ovid Medline and Embase using keywords related to "Transperineal" and "Retention". Articles were then screened by applying inclusion and exclusion criteria to find studies that compared alpha-blocker recipients to no alpha-blocker use in the perioperative period and the subsequent effect on AUR in TPB. RESULTS: 361 records were identified in the initial search to produce 5 studies included in the final review. No randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were identified. One observational study showed a reduction in AUR rate from 12.5% to 5.3% with a single dose of tamsulosin. A previous systematic review of complications associated with prostate biopsy concluded there may be a potential benefit to alpha-blockers given in the TPB perioperative period. Three observational studies demonstrated a harmful effect related to alpha-blocker use; however, this was well explained by their clear limitations. CONCLUSION: Based on this review and the extrapolation from TRUSB data, perioperative alpha-blockers may offer some weak benefits in preventing AUR following TPB. However, there is significant scope and need for an RCT to further develop the evidence base further given the significant gap in the literature and lack of a standard alpha blocker protocol in TPB.

Treatment modalities for paediatric functional daytime lower urinary tract disorders: an updated review.

Paediatric functional bladder disorders especially those causing daytime symptoms are a common cause of significant psychosocial and/or physical morbidity and impaired quality of life. Despite the availability of many therapeutic modalities, a significant number of children appear to be refractory to treatment and continue to have symptoms. In this review, we aim to evaluate the current evidence in the use of existing and novel therapeutic options for the management of daytime lower urinary tract disorders in children. We also aim to highlight the controversies around the terminology and diagnosis of paediatric lower urinary tract dysfunction (LUTD) and specific conditions. The article will then provide a reasonable critique of the existing and emerging treatment modalities in functional daytime LUTD in children including their mode of action, efficacy, indications, and recent advances. These include standard urotherapy, specific urotherapy comprised of biofeedback, alarm therapy and electrical neural stimulation and pharmacotherapy involving selective and non-selective anticholinergics, ß3 adrenergic agonists, alpha blockers and botulinum toxin. A better understanding of this common clinical problem may help clinicians achieve better profiling of these children's diagnoses to further enable specific, targeted treatment.

A review article about new treatment options for otherwise healthy children with long-term urinary symptoms occurring during the daytime Management of paediatric functional daytime LUT disorders is complex and may benefit from a combination of treatment modalities. Urotherapy and anticholinergics appear to be effective in the majority however, non-responders warrant careful re-evaluation to characterize the specific type of LUTD to target appropriate treatment. Various novel therapies and adjuncts have been shown effective and range from smartphone apps, bladder alarms, neuromodulation systems and more effective drug delivery systems. Despite being effective, non-selective antimuscarinics are less favoured for long-term use in children due to the side-effect profile. Therefore, more selective anticholinergics, ß3 agonists and combination treatment options are being evaluated to improve compliance while maintaining/enhancing treatment efficacy. Use of alpha blockers and intravesical injection of botulinum toxin have shown promising results especially in refractory cases.

Medical Advancements in Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia Treatments.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review aims to identify and summarize the current literature on the most recent therapeutic agents and combination strategies for the medical management of lower urinary tract symptoms resulting from benign prostatic hyperplasia. RECENT FINDINGS: The latest advancements in BPH therapy have been in combination strategies. Alpha blockers continue to be the mainstay of treatment, but research is exploring the synergistic benefits of combining them with 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARIs), phosphodiesterase-5 (PDE5) inhibitors, and beta-3 agonists. The alpha-blocker + 5-ARI combination remains ideal for enlarged, significantly reducing clinical progression risk compared to monotherapy. Alpha-blocker + PDE5 inhibitor combinations appear safe and potentially beneficial for men with concomitant erectile dysfunction; sildenafil might hold an edge over tadalafil based on limited data. Beta-3 agonists show synergistic effects with alpha blockers for residual storage symptoms, offering similar efficacy to anticholinergics but with a better side effect profile.

No Correlation between Anti-drug Antibodies and Therapeutic Response in Tunisian Patients with Chronic Inflammatory Diseases Treated by TNF Blockers.

INTRODUCTION: Tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF alpha) blockers such as infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADA) had significantly changed the course of inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), spondyloarthritis (SpA) and Crohn's disease (CD). However, about 30% of patients do not respond to these treatments. This lack of response may be due to the formation of antibodies against these drugs (anti-drug antibodies: ADAbs). The aim of this study was to determine the prevalence of ADAbs against IFX and ADA, and the trough serum concentration of IFX and ADA in RA, SpA or CD patients and to assess their impact on the therapeutic response. METHODS: A cross sectional, multi-centric study was conducted, including patients with RA, SpA or CD treated with IFX or ADA as a first biotherapy for at least 6 months. ADAbs and trough levels were measured by an Enzyme Linked Immunosorbent assay (ELISA). RESULTS: 197 patients were included (57 RA, 73 SpA and 67 CD). ADAbs were positive in 40% of cases for IFX and 25% for ADA. They were positive in 40% of SpA, 35% of RA, and 21% of CD. The presence of ADAbs was inversely correlated to the trough levels of IFX and ADA during RA (p = 0.01 and p < 0.0001), SpA (p < 0.01 and p < 0.0001) and CD (p = 0.001 and p = 0.04). For all pathologies, the presence of ADAbs was not correlated with disease activity. Concomitant methotrexate significantly reduced immunogenicity. CONCLUSION: In our study, the presence of ADAb and low trough levels seem to not affect the therapeutic response in patients on TNF alpha antagonists. Other tracks more than immunogenicity should be investigated to explain the loss of response to these biotherapies.

Tadalafil versus tamsulosin as combination therapy with 5-alpha reductase inhibitors in benign prostatic hyperplasia, urinary and sexual outcomes.

PURPOSE: To compare the urological and sexual outcomes of using either tamsulosin/finateride or tadalafil/finasteride as combination therapies in patients with large prostate. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Selection criteria included prostate volume > 40 ml and IPSS > 7. Patients with severe erectile dysfunction (IIEF-erectile functions ≤ 10) were excluded. Patients were randomized into group I (tamsulosin/finasteride) and group II (tadalafil/finasteride). The primary endpoint was to define urinary and sexual function changes (IPSS, IPSS-quality of life, urinary flow rates and IIEF domains) within each group. The secondary endpoint was to compare the treatment induced changes between both groups. RESULTS: At 4th and 12th weeks, 131 and 127 patients were available in both groups, respectively. Both groups showed significant LUTS improvement (IPSS changes: - 4.9 ± 2.7 and - 4.3 ± 2.9 at 4th week and - 6.1 ± 3 and - 5.4 ± 2.8 points by the 12th week in both groups, respectively). Group I had better average flow rates at both follow-up visits. Meanwhile, maximum flow rates were comparable in both groups at 12th week (13.5 ± 3.9vs. 12.6 ± 3.7, p > 0.05). In group I, all IIEF domains were significantly lowered at both visits (p < 0.05). Group II showed significant increase in IIEF-erectile function scores (1.3 ± 1.1 and 1.8 ± 1.2 at the 4th and 12th weeks) with a transient significant reduction of IIEF-orgasm and sexual desire noted only by the 4th week (- 0.8 ± 0.4 and - 0.6 ± 0.4, respectively). CONCLUSION: Within three months, both combinations are comparably effective in improving BPH related LUTS. Tamsulosin/finasteride provided significantly better Qmax only at 4th week. Tadalafil/finasteride had the advantage of improving sexual performance over the other combination.

Alpha-blockers: the magic pill for endourology-The great delusion.

PURPOSE: The present paper takes a different and more critical look at the role of alpha-blockers, sometimes nicknamed as "magical pills", in particular for stone disease and medical expulsive therapy (MET). METHODS: A non-systematic narrative review was performed, synthesizing pertinent information from selected articles, and critically evaluating their conclusions. Sometimes different views on alpha-blockers were laid bare, including curiosities or other entertaining nuances suitable to the present topic, but always maintaining sharp objectivity and the foremost scientific rigor. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Alpha-blockers seem to be a panacea, being used to treat a wide variety of non-urological diseases and conditions. Urological applications include erectile dysfunction to benign prostatic hyperplasia, from incontinence to urinary retention, or even to facilitate urinary stone passage along the urinary tract. Due to its versatility, alpha-blockers appear to be the Swiss army knife of urological medications. However, the efficacy of alpha-blockers for MET, pain management, or facilitating upper tract access is very disappointing, bringing no, or in some instances, only marginal benefits. Their treatment results are far from being significant or impressive let alone magical. Regular sexual intercourse is an effective alternative to alpha-blockers, providing faster ureteral stone expulsion rates and reducing the need for pain medication. Most of the research supporting alpha-blockers has been based on single-center, underpowered, low-quality studies. These low-quality studies biased several subsequent meta-analyses, contaminating them with their low-quality data, enhancing and prolonging this delusion. These results emphasize the need for large, multi-centric, unbiased, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trials to prevent future year-long delusions that may afflict any medical field.

Unraveling the relationships between alpha- and beta-adrenergic modulation and the risk of heart failure.

Background: The effects of α and ß adrenergic receptor modulation on the risk of developing heart failure (HF) remains uncertain due to a lack of randomized controlled trials. This study aimed to estimate the effects of α and ß adrenergic receptors modulation on the risk of HF and to provide proof of principle for genetic target validation studies in HF. Methods: Genetic variants within the cis regions encoding the adrenergic receptors α1A, α2B, ß1, and ß2 associated with blood pressure in a 757,601-participant genome-wide association study (GWAS) were selected as instruments to perform a drug target Mendelian randomization study. Effects of these variants on HF risk were derived from the HERMES GWAS (542,362 controls; 40,805 HF cases). Results: Lower α1A or ß1 activity was associated with reduced HF risk: odds ratio (OR) 0.83 (95% CI 0.74-0.93, P = 0.001) and 0.95 (95% CI 0.93-0.97, P = 8 × 10-6). Conversely, lower α2B activity was associated with increased HF risk: OR 1.09 (95% CI 1.05-1.12, P = 3 × 10-7). No evidence of an effect of lower ß2 activity on HF risk was found: OR 0.99 (95% CI 0.92-1.07, P = 0.95). Complementary analyses showed that these effects were consistent with those on left ventricular dimensions and acted independently of any potential effect on coronary artery disease. Conclusions: This study provides genetic evidence that α1A or ß1 receptor inhibition will likely decrease HF risk, while lower α2B activity may increase this risk. Genetic variant analysis can assist with drug development for HF prevention.

Comparison of add-on medications for persistent storage symptoms after α-blocker treatment in BPH patients - a network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) receive α-blockers as first-line therapy to treat lower urinary tract symptoms; however, some individuals still experience residual storage symptoms. Antimuscarinics, ß3-agonists, and desmopressin are effective add-on medications. Nevertheless, there is currently no evidence for the appropriate choice of the first add-on medication. This systematic review aimed to investigate the clinical benefits of antimuscarinics, ß3-agonists, and desmopressin, in addition to α-blockers, for persistent storage symptoms in BPH patients. METHODS: A comprehensive literature search of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the efficacy of different add-on medications in BPH patients with persistent storage symptoms despite α-blocker treatment was conducted. Clinical outcomes included the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), IPSS storage subscore, nocturia, micturition, and urgency. A network meta-analysis was performed to estimate the effect size. Surface under cumulative ranking curves (SUCRAs) were used to rank the included treatments for each outcome. RESULTS: A total of 15 RCTs were identified. Add-on imidafenacin and mirabegron resulted in significant improvement in all outcomes assessed. Other add-on medications such as desmopressin, tolterodine, solifenacin, fesoterodine, and propiverine showed positive benefits for most, but not all, outcomes. Based on the SUCRA rankings, add-on desmopressin was the best-ranked treatment for IPSS and nocturia, and add-on imidafenacin was the best for the IPSS storage subscore and micturition. CONCLUSIONS: BPH patients presenting with persistent storage symptoms despite α-blocker administration are recommended to include additional treatment. Desmopressin and imidafenacin may be considered high-priority add-on treatments because of their superior efficacy compared with other medications.

Prophylactic alpha blockers fail to prevent postoperative urinary retention following orthopaedic procedures: evidence from a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis of comparative studies.

Objective: The present systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the prophylactic effect of alpha blockers against postoperative urinary retention (POUR) in orthopaedic patients. Methods: PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were searched between 1 January 1990 and 1 March 2023. The studies reporting the preventive efficacy of alpha blockers on POUR after orthopaedic procedures were identified. The pooled rates of POUR in the Intervention group (patients receiving alpha blockers) and the Control group (patients not receiving alpha blockers) were estimated and compared. The risk ratios (RRs) were calculated using the random-effects model. Subgroup analysis was performed based on surgical type. Trial sequential analysis (TSA) was conducted to confirm the robustness of pooled results. Results: Seven studies containing 1,607 patients were identified. The rates of POUR were similar between the two groups (Intervention group: 126/748 [16.8%] VS. Control group: 168/859 [19.6%]; RR = 0.75; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.51 to 1.09; p = 0.130; Heterogeneity: I2 = 67.1%; p = 0.006). No significant difference in the incidence of POUR was observed in either the Arthroplasty subgroup or Spine surgery subgroup. The result of TSA suggested that the total sample size of the existing evidence might be insufficient to draw conclusive results. Administrating alpha blockers was associated with a higher risk of complications (88/651 [13.5%] VS. 56/766 [7.3%]; RR = 1.73; 95% CI 1.27 to 2.37; p = 0.0005; Heterogeneity: I2 = 0%; p = 0.69). Conclusion: Prophylactic alpha blockers do not reduce the risk of POUR in orthopaedic procedures, and administrating these drugs was associated with a higher risk of complications. Systematic Review Registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=409388.

Impact of Duration of Catheterization on the Success Rate of Trial Without Catheter in Acute Urinary Retention Due to Benign Prostatic Enlargement.

BACKGROUND: The most common cause of acute urinary retention in men over 50 is benign prostate enlargement (BPE). Following the urethral catheterization, a trial without a catheter (TWOC) under the cover of alpha-blockers is given. The timing of TWOC varies from Day 3 to Day 7 of the retention episode. There is a need to study the improvement in the success rate of TWOC with the increasing number of days of catheterization. OBJECTIVE: To measure the success rate of TWOC in acute urinary retention due to benign prostatic enlargement with increasing days of catheterization. METHOD: The study was conducted in Social Security Teaching Hospital Lahore. Patients who presented with acute urinary retention due to benign prostatic enlargement were catheterized and given alpha-blockers. The patients were divided into two groups, one group having TWOC after three days and the other having TWOC after seven days. The success rate of TWOC was calculated and compared in the two groups. All patients included in the study had the first episode of acute retention with a moderately enlarged prostate and no element of second pathology or neurological deficit. RESULTS: A total of 48 patients were included in the study, divided into two groups of 24 patients each. In the first group who underwent TWOC after seven days of catheterization, 15 out of 24 patients had successful TWOC with a success rate of 62.5%. In the second group of 24 patients, who had TWOC after three days of catheterization, only 11 patients had successful TWOC with a success rate of 45.8%. CONCLUSION: There was a marked improvement in the success rate of TWOC with increasing days of catheterization after an acute retention episode, secondary to BPE.

5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARi) with or without alpha-blockers (α-B) for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia do NOT lower the risk of incident Bladder Cancer: United States insurance claims data.

BACKGROUND: Chemoprotective effect of 5-alpha reductase inhibitors (5-ARi) on bladder cancer (BCa) risk in men with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia (BPH) has been explored with conflicting results. We sought to examine the effect of 5-ARi on new BCa diagnoses in a large US database. METHODS: Men ≥ 50 y/o with a prescription for 5-ARi after BPH diagnosis were identified in the IBM® Marketscan® Research de-identified Databases between 2007 and 2016 and matched with paired controls. Incident BCa diagnoses were identified after BPH diagnosis and/or pharmacologic treatment. Multivariable regression modeling adjusting for relevant factors was implemented. Sub-group analyses by exposure risk were performed to explore the association between 5-ARi and BCa over time. Administration of alpha-blockers (α-B) w/o 5-ARi was also examined. RESULTS: In total, n = 24,036 men on 5-ARi, n = 107,086 on 5-ARi plus alpha-blockers, and n = 894,275 without medical therapy for BPH were identified. The percentage of men diagnosed with BCa was 0.8% for the 5-ARi, 1.4% for the 5-ARi + α-B, and 0.6% for the untreated BPH group of incident BCa (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.90, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.56 - 1.47), and 1.08, 95%CI 0.89 - 1.30, respectively). This was also true at both shorter (≤ 2 yr) and longer-term (> 2 yr) follow up. In addition, α-B alone had no change in BCa risk (HR 1.06, 0.86-1.30). CONCLUSIONS: We did not find any diminished risk of new BCa in men treated with 5-ARi (i.e., chemoprotective effect). The current report suggests that 5-ARi do not change a man's bladder cancer risk.

Prostatic artery embolisation versus medical treatment in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (PARTEM): a randomised, multicentre, open-label, phase 3, superiority trial.

Background: Prostatic artery embolisation (PAE) is a minimally invasive treatment of symptomatic benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Our aim was to compare patient's symptoms improvement after PAE and medical treatment. Methods: A randomised, open-label, superiority trial was set in 10 French hospitals. Patients with bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) defined by International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS) > 11 and quality of life (QoL) > 3, and BPH ≥50 ml resistant to alpha-blocker monotherapy were randomly assigned (1:1) to PAE or Combined Therapy ([CT], oral dutasteride 0.5 mg/tamsulosin hydrochloride 0.4 mg per day). Randomisation was stratified by centre, IPSS and prostate volume with a minimisation procedure. The primary outcome was the 9-month IPSS change. Primary and safety analysis were done according to the intention-to-treat (ITT) principle among patients with an evaluable primary outcome. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02869971. Findings: Ninety patients were randomised from September 2016 to February 2020, and 44 and 43 patients assessed for primary endpoint in PAE and CT groups, respectively. The 9-month change of IPSS was -10.0 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -11.8 to -8.3) and -5.7 (95% CI: -7.5 to -3.8) in the PAE and CT groups, respectively. This reduction was significantly greater in the PAE group than in the CT group (-4.4 [95% CI: -6.9 to -1.9], p = 0.0008). The IIEF-15 score change was 8.2 (95% CI: 2.9-13.5) and -2.8 (95% CI: -8.4 to 2.8) in the PAE and CT groups, respectively. No treatment-related AE or hospitalisation was noticed. After 9 months, 5 and 18 patients had invasive prostate re-treatment in the PAE and CT group, respectively. Interpretation: In patients with BPH ≥50 ml and bothersome LUTS resistant to alpha-blocker monotherapy, PAE provides more urinary and sexual symptoms benefit than CT up to 24 months. Funding: French Ministry of Health and a complementary grant from Merit Medical.

Prophylactic A-Blockers for Radiotherapy-Induced Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms in Men with Prostate Cancer: A Phase III Randomized Trial.

PURPOSE: The present phase III randomized trial assessed the efficacy of prophylactic versus therapeutic α-blockers at improving RI-LUTSs in prostate cancer patients receiving external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). METHODS: A total of 148 prostate cancer patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either prophylactic silodosin on day one of EBRT or the occurrence of RI-LUTSs. LUTSs were quantified using the international prostate symptom score (IPSS) at regular intervals during the study. The primary endpoint was the change in the IPSS from baseline to the last day of radiotherapy (RT). Secondary endpoints included changes in IPSS from baseline to 4 weeks and 12 weeks after the start of RT. RESULTS: Patient demographics, baseline IPSS, and prescribed radiation doses were balanced between arms. On the last day of RT, the mean IPSS was 14.8 (SD 7.6) in the experimental arm and 15.7 (SD 8.5) in the control arm (p = 0.40). There were no significant differences in IPSSs between the study arms in the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis at baseline, the last day of RT, and 4 and 12 weeks post-RT. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic α-blockers were not effective at significantly reducing RI-LUTSs in prostate cancer patients treated with EBRT. Treating patients with α-blockers at the onset of RI-LUTSs will avoid unnecessary drug exposure and toxicity.

The Cardiovascular Safety of Five-Alpha-Reductase Inhibitors Among Men with Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Five-alpha reductase inhibitors (5αRIs) are used to treat benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). However, the cardiovascular effects of 5αRIs remain poorly understood. The study objective was to compare the rate of hospitalization for heart failure among men with BPH prescribed 5αRIs to that of men with BPH not prescribed BPH medications. METHODS: Using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink linked with hospitalization and vital statistics data, we conducted a population-based cohort study among patients newly diagnosed with BPH. We defined exposure as the current use of 5αRIs, current use of alpha-blockers, and no current use of BPH medications in a time-varying approach. The primary endpoint was hospitalization for heart failure, and secondary endpoints were myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular death. We used time-dependent Cox-proportional hazards models to estimate adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: Our cohort included 94,440 men with incident BPH. A total of 3893 hospitalizations for heart failure occurred over 527,660 person-years of follow-up (incidence rate 7.38; 95% CI, 7.15-7.61, per 1000 person-years). Compared with no current use of BPH medications, current use of 5αRIs was not associated with an increased risk of hospitalization for heart failure (HR 0.94; 95% CI, 0.86-1.03), myocardial infarction (HR 0.92; 95% CI, 0.81-1.05), stroke (HR 0.94; 95% CI, 0.85-1.05), or cardiovascular death (HR 0.89; 95% CI, 0.80-0.99). CONCLUSIONS: The use of 5αRIs was not associated with an increased risk of hospitalization for heart failure, myocardial infarction, stroke, or cardiovascular death compared with non-use.

Electronic medical records-based retrospective, longitudinal, observational study to understand the patient management of benign prostatic hyperplasia with alpha-blockers monotherapy in Indian population.

Objective: The present retrospective study evaluates the effectiveness and tolerability of alpha-blockers as monotherapy in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia associated with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). Materials and Methods: A total of 335 male patients >50 years were categorized into four groups (Alfuzosin: 166, Silodosin: 67, Tamsulosin: 70, Prazosin: 32). The efficacy evaluated as a change in International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), peak flow rate (Qmax), residual urine volume, and relief from LUTS, and tolerability of the various alpha-blockers was assessed across the study group. Results: At baseline, most of the patients in alfuzosin (60%), silodosin (77%), and tamsulosin (90%) groups presented with severe IPSS (20-35), whereas patients in the prazosin group (69%) presented with a moderate score. At the end of the study, the mean IPSS gradually improved to moderate (41%, 62%, 66%, and 28%) and mild (59%, 38%, 28%, and 72%) in the alfuzosin, silodosin, tamsulosin, and prazosin groups, respectively (P = 0.004), with improvement in mean change in residual urine volume and complete relief from LUTS symptoms with no surgical or radiological interventions. Overall, 194 adverse events (AEs) were observed in 38.8% of patients. Of the total AEs, patients in the alfuzosin, silodosin, tamsulosin, and prazosin groups experienced 21%, 22%, 39%, and 18% of AEs, respectively. Conclusion: The nonselective alpha-adrenergic receptor antagonist, alfuzosin, emerged as noninferior in effectiveness and superior in tolerability than other selective alpha-blockers, silodosin, tamsulosin, and prazosin.