Preservatives and ocular surface disease: a review.

Ocular surface disease (OSD) is a complex condition that can cause a range of symptoms (eg, dryness, irritation, and pain) and can significantly impact the quality of life of affected individuals. Iatrogenic OSD, a common finding in patients with glaucoma who receive chronic therapy with topical ocular antihypertensive drugs containing preservatives such as benzalkonium chloride (BAK), has been linked to damage to the ocular surface barrier, corneal epithelial cells, nerves, conjunctival goblet cells, and trabecular meshwork. Chronic BAK exposure activates inflammatory pathways and worsens symptoms, compromising the success of subsequent filtration surgery in an exposure-dependent manner. In eyes being treated for glaucoma, symptomatic treatment of OSD may provide some relief, but addressing the root cause of the OSD often necessitates reducing or, ideally, eliminating BAK toxicity. Strategies to decrease BAK exposure in patients with glaucoma encompass the use of preservative-free formulations or drugs with alternative and less toxic preservatives such as SofZia®, Polyquad, potassium sorbate, or Purite®. Though the benefits of these alternative preservatives are largely unproven, they might be considered when financial constraints prevent the use of preservative-free versions. For patients receiving multiple topical preserved drugs, the best practice is to switch to nonpreserved equivalents wherever feasible, regardless of OSD severity. Furthermore, nonpharmacological approaches, including laser or incisional procedures, should be considered. This review explores the effects of BAK on the ocular surface and reviews strategies for minimizing or eliminating BAK exposure in patients with glaucoma in order to significantly improve their quality of life and prevent complications associated with chronic exposure to BAK.

Cardiac Effects of Renin-Angiotensin System Inhibitors in Nonproteinuric CKD.

BACKGROUND: In contrast to proteinuric chronic kidney disease (CKD), the relative cardioprotective benefits of antihypertensive medications in nonproteinuric CKD are unknown. We examined long-term cardiovascular outcomes and mortality in patients with nonproteinuric CKD treated with renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (RASIs) versus other antihypertensive medications. METHODS: Among participants of the CRIC study (Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort) without proteinuria, we used intention-to-treat analyses with inverse probability of treatment weighting and Cox proportional hazards modeling to determine the association of RASIs versus other antihypertensive medications with a composite cardiovascular outcome (myocardial infarction, stroke, heart failure hospitalization, and death) and mortality. Secondary analyses included per-protocol analyses accounting for continuous adherence and time-updated analyses accounting for the proportion of time using RASIs during follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 2806 participants met the inclusion criteria. In the intention-to-treat analyses, RASIs versus other antihypertensive medications were not associated with an appreciable difference in cardiovascular events (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.94 [95% CI, 0.80-1.11]) or mortality (aHR, 1.06 [95% CI, 0.88-1.28]). In the per-protocol analyses, RASIs were associated with a lower risk of adverse cardiovascular events (aHR, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.63-0.97]) and mortality (aHR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.48-0.85]). Similarly, in the time-updated analyses, a higher proportion of RASI use over time was associated with a lower mortality risk (aHR, 0.33 [95% CI, 0.14-0.86]). CONCLUSIONS: Among individuals with nonproteinuric CKD, after accounting for time-updated use, RASIs are associated with fewer cardiovascular events and a lower mortality risk compared with other antihypertensive medications. Patients with nonproteinuric CKD may benefit from prioritizing RASIs for hypertension management.

Predictors of prolonged supratherapeutic serum lithium concentrations: a retrospective chart review.

INTRODUCTION: The Extracorporeal Treatments in Poisoning (EXTRIP) workgroup suggests hemodialysis in severe lithium poisoning if specific criteria are met. One criterion is if the expected time to obtain a lithium concentration <1.0 mEq/L with optimal management is >36 h. There are a lack of data regarding which patient characteristics are associated with the rate at which patients achieve a lithium concentration <1.0 mEq/L. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review analyzing hospital electronic medical records. Inclusion criteria consisted of a lithium concentration >1.2 mEq/L during hospitalization. We excluded patients who received extracorporeal treatment before 36 h elapsed from time of initial lithium concentration >1.2 mEq/L. The primary analysis consisted of a Cox regression and a secondary analysis evaluated the nomogram method described by Buckley and colleagues for predicting prolonged supratherapeutic lithium concentration. RESULTS: One hundred and one patients were included in the study. The median time to reach a lithium concentration <1.0 mEq/L was 42.5 h (IQR: 33.8-51.1). Older patients, patients taking a thiazide, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker, patients with a higher initial lithium concentration, and patients with higher sodium concentrations achieved a lithium concentration <1 mEq/L at a slower rate. For the nomogram analysis, sensitivity (61.5%) and specificity (54.5%) were moderate, the positive predictive value (16.7%) was poor, and the negative predictive value (90.6%) was excellent. DISCUSSION: The results from our primary analysis suggest that identifying higher serum sodium concentration and use of certain antihypertensives that decrease glomerular filtration rate as predictors of an increased time to reach a therapeutic lithium concentration may help identify patients who meet the Extracorporeal Treatments in Poisoning criteria for hemodialysis. The nomogram method performed similarly to prior validation studies. CONCLUSIONS: In this retrospective chart review of patients with supratherapeutic lithium concentrations, we identified several risk factors for prolonged supratherapeutic lithium concentrations.

Treatment of hypertension during pregnancy: a cohort of pregnancy episodes from the SIDIAP database, Catalonia, Spain.

Introduction: Hypertension during pregnancy is one of the most frequent causes of maternal and fetal morbimortality. Perinatal and maternal death and disability rates have decreased by 30%, but hypertension during pregnancy has increased by approximately 10% in the last 30 years. This research aimed to describe the pharmacological treatment and pregnancy outcomes of pregnancies with hypertension. Methods: We carried out an observational cohort study from the Information System for the Development of Research in Primary Care (SIDIAP) database. Pregnancy episodes with hypertension (ICD-10 codes for hypertension, I10-I15 and O10-O16) were identified. Antihypertensives were classified according to the ATC WHO classification: ß-blocking agents (BBs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), agents acting on the renin-angiotensin system (RAS agents), diuretics, and antiadrenergic agents. Exposure was defined for hypertension in pregnancies with ≥2 prescriptions during the pregnancy episode. Descriptive statistics for diagnoses and treatments were calculated. Results: In total, 4,839 pregnancies with hypertension diagnosis formed the study cohort. There were 1,944 (40.2%) pregnancies exposed to an antihypertensive medication. There were differences in mother's age, BMI, and alcohol intake between pregnancies exposed to antihypertensive medications and those not exposed. BBs were the most used (n = 1,160 pregnancy episodes; 59.7%), followed by RAS agents (n = 825, 42.4%), and CCBs were the least used (n = 347, 17.8%). Discussion: Pregnancies involving hypertension were exposed to antihypertensive medications, mostly BBs. We conduct a study focused on RAS agent use during pregnancy and its outcomes in the offspring.

Diabetes in residential aged care: Pharmacological management and concordance with clinical guidelines.

OBJECTIVE: Existing studies have highlighted suboptimal diabetes management in residential aged care facilities (RACFs). However, understanding of diabetes management in Australian metropolitan RACFs has been limited. This retrospective cohort study aimed to explore the pharmacological management of diabetes in 25 RACFs in Sydney Australia and assess concordance with clinical practice guidelines (CPGs). METHODS: Data from 231 permanent RACF residents aged ≥65 years and over with type 2 diabetes mellitus over the period from 1 July 2016 to 31 December 2019 were used. Concordance was measured by assessing the medications and medical history data for each individual resident for concordance with evidence-based CPGs. Multivariable logistic regression was used to estimate the effect of resident characteristics on concordance with CPGs. RESULTS: Of the 231 residents with diabetes, 87 (38%) were not taking any antidiabetic medication. Pharmacological management inconsistent with CPG recommendations was observed for 73 (32%) residents, with the most common reason for non-concordance being the use of medications with significant adverse effects in older adults (47, 2%). Residents with hypertension or other heart diseases in addition to their diabetes had greater odds of their diabetes management being non-concordant with CPGs (OR = 2.84 95% CI = 1.54, 5.3 and OR = 2.64, 95% CI = 1.07, 6.41, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Pharmacological diabetes management in metropolitan Australian RACFs is suboptimal, with a high prevalence of inconsistency with CPGs (32%) observed. Additionally, having hypertension or heart diseases significantly increased the possibility of non-concordance among diabetic RACF residents. Further investigation into the underlying relationships with comorbidities is required to develop better strategies.

Premorbid Blood Pressure Control Modifies Risk of DWI Lesions With Acute Blood Pressure Reduction in Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: Hypoperfusion due to blood pressure (BP) reduction is a potential mechanism of cerebral ischemia after intracerebral hemorrhage. However, prior evaluations of the relationship between BP reduction and ischemia have been conflicting. Untreated chronic hypertension is common in intracerebral hemorrhage and alters cerebral autoregulation. We hypothesized that the risk of diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) hyperintensities from acute BP reduction is modified by premorbid BP control. METHODS: Individuals enrolled in the ERICH study (Ethnic/Racial Variations of Intracerebral Hemorrhage) from 2010 to 2015 were categorized as untreated, treated, or nonhypertensive based on preintracerebral hemorrhage diagnosis and antihypertensive medication use. The percent reduction of systolic BP (SBP) was calculated between presentation and 24 hours from admission. The primary outcome was the presence of DWI lesions. Using logistic regression, we tested the association between chronic hypertension status, SBP reduction, and their interaction with DWI lesion presence. RESULTS: From 3000 participants, 877 with available magnetic resonance imaging met inclusion (mean age, 60.5±13.3 years; 42.5% women). DWI lesions were detected in 25.9%. Untreated, treated, and no hypertension accounted for 32.6%, 47.9%, and 19.5% of cases, respectively. SBP reduction was not directly associated with DWI lesions; however, an interaction effect was observed between SBP reduction and chronic hypertension status (P=0.036). Nonhypertensive subjects demonstrated a linear risk of DWI lesion presence with greater SBP reduction, whereas untreated hypertension demonstrated a stable risk across a wide range of SBP reduction (P=0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Premorbid BP control, especially untreated hypertension, may influence the relationship between DWI lesions and acute BP reduction after intracerebral hemorrhage. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT01202864.

Trends in Black-White Differences of Antihypertensive Treatment in Individuals With and Without History of Stroke.

BACKGROUND: Recent hypertension guidelines for the general population have included race-specific recommendations for antihypertensives, whereas current stroke-specific recommendations for antihypertensives do not vary by race. The impact of these guidelines on antihypertensive regimen changes over time, and if this has varied by prevalent stroke status, is unclear. METHODS: The use of antihypertensive medications was studied cross-sectionally among self-identified Black and White participants, aged ≥45 years, with and without history of stroke, from the REGARDS study (Reasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke). Participants completed an in-home examination in 2003-2007 (visit 1) with/without an examination in 2013-2016 (visit 2). Stratified by prevalent stroke status, logistic regression mixed models examined associations between antihypertensive class use for visit 2 versus visit 1 and Black versus White individuals with an interaction adjusted for demographics, socioeconomic status, and vascular risk factors/vital signs. RESULTS: Of 17 244 stroke-free participants at visit 1, Black participants had greater adjusted odds of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor usage than White participants (odds ratio [OR], 1.51 [95% CI, 1.30-1.77]). This difference was smaller in the 7476 stroke-free participants at visit 2 (OR, 1.16 [95% CI, 1.08-1.25]). In stroke-free participants at visit 1, Black participants had lower odds of calcium channel blocker (CCB) usage than White participants (OR, 0.47 [95% CI, 0.41-0.55]), but CCB usage did not differ significantly between Black and White stroke-free participants at visit 2 (OR, 1.02 [95% CI, 0.95-1.09]). Among 1437 stroke survivor participants at visit 1, Black participants had lower odds of CCB use than White participants (OR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.26-0.45]). In 689 stroke survivor participants at visit 2, CCB use did not differ between Black and White participants (OR, 0.80 [95% CI, 0.61-1.06]). CONCLUSIONS: Racial differences in the use of guideline-recommended antihypertensives decreased between 2003-2007 and 2013-2016 in stroke-free individuals. In stroke survivors, racial differences in CCB usage narrowed over the time periods. These findings suggest there is still a mismatch between race-specific hypertension guidelines and recent clinical practice.

Steroidomics-Based Screening for Primary Aldosteronism: Impact of antihypertensive Drugs.

BACKGROUND: Diagnosis of primary aldosteronism (PA) is complicated by the need to withdraw antihypertensive medications that interfere with test results, particularly renin. This study examined whether machine learning-based steroid-probability scores offer a renin measurement-independent approach for testing less prone to interference than the aldosterone-to-renin ratio (ARR). METHODS: This prospective multicenter cohort study involved the use of plasma steroidomics and the ARR in 839 patients tested for PA, including 190 with and 578 without PA (71 indeterminate). Receiver operating characteristic curves for steroid-probability scores and the ARR were examined with and without interfering medications. Impacts of individual medications on plasma aldosterone, 18-oxocortisol, 18-hydroxycortisol, steroid-probability scores, renin, and ARRs were examined by multivariable and paired analyses in patients with and without PA. RESULTS: Receiver operating characteristic curves indicated a significant impact of interfering antihypertensive medications on the diagnostic performance of the ARR and minimal impact on steroid-probability scores. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists increased plasma aldosterone, 18-oxocortisol, and 18-hydroxycortisol in patients without PA and resulted in false-positive test results for steroid-probability scores and false-negative results for the ARR. Diuretics increased aldosterone, 18-oxocortisol, and steroid-probability scores in patients without PA, whereas angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors decreased aldosterone, steroid-probability scores, and ARRs. Beta-adrenoceptor blockers, dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers, and angiotensin receptor blockers had negligible impact on mineralocorticoids and steroid-probability scores. CONCLUSIONS: Among antihypertensive drugs that impact plasma aldosterone, 18-oxocortisol, and 18-hydroxycortisol, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists stood out as a cause of false-positive results for derived steroid-probability scores. Other antihypertensives have minimal or no impact, an advantage for use of steroid-probability scores over the ARR when those medications cannot be withdrawn. REGISTRATION: URL: https://drks.de/; Unique identifier: DRKS00017084.

Predicted Cardiovascular Risk by the PREVENT Equations in US Adults With Stage 1 Hypertension.

BACKGROUND: The 2017 American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association blood pressure guideline recommends initiation of antihypertensive medication for adults with stage 1 hypertension (systolic blood pressure, 130-139 mm Hg, or diastolic blood pressure, 80-89 mm Hg) and 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk ≥10% estimated by the pooled cohort equations (PCEs). In 2023, the American Heart Association published the predicting risk of cardiovascular disease events (PREVENT) equations to estimate ASCVD and total cardiovascular disease risk. METHODS: We analyzed US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data from 2013 to 2020 for 1703 adults aged 30 to 79 years without self-reported cardiovascular disease with stage 1 hypertension. We estimated 10-year ASCVD risk by the PCEs and 10-year ASCVD and total cardiovascular disease risk by the base PREVENT equations. Analyses were weighted to represent noninstitutionalized US adults with stage 1 hypertension. RESULTS: Mean 10-year ASCVD risk was 5.4% (95% CI, 5.0%-5.9%) and 2.9% (95% CI, 2.7%-3.1%) using the PCEs and PREVENT equations, respectively. The proportion with 10-year ASCVD risk of 10% to <15% and ≥15% was 8.1% and 7.8% estimated by the PCEs, respectively, and 3.0% and 0.3% estimated by the PREVENT equations, respectively. No participants had a 10-year ASCVD risk ≥10% on the PREVENT equations and <10% on the PCEs, while 12.5% had a 10-year ASCVD risk ≥10% on the PCEs and <10% on the PREVENT equations. The mean 10-year total cardiovascular disease risk estimated by the PREVENT equations was lower than the mean 10-year ASCVD risk on the PCEs. CONCLUSIONS: Among US adults with stage 1 hypertension, the 10-year predicted ASCVD risk estimated by the PREVENT equations was approximately half the risk estimated by the PCEs.

Antihypertensive Drugs for the Prevention of Atrial Fibrillation: A Drug Target Mendelian Randomization Study.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the potential impact of antihypertensive drugs for atrial fibrillation (AF) prevention through a drug target Mendelian randomization study to avoid the potential limitations of clinical studies. METHODS: Validated published single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) that mimic the action of 12 antihypertensive drug classes, including alpha-adrenoceptor blockers, adrenergic neuron blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin-II receptor blockers, beta-adrenoceptor blockers, centrally acting antihypertensive drugs, calcium channel blockers, loop diuretics, potassium-sparing diuretics and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, renin inhibitors, thiazides and related diuretic agents, and vasodilators were used. We estimated, via their corresponding gene and protein targets, the downstream effect of these drug classes to prevent AF via systolic blood pressure using 2-sample Mendelian randomization analyses. The SNPs were extracted from 2 European genome-wide association studies for the drug classes (n=317 754; n=757 601) and 1 European genome-wide association study for AF (n=1 030 836). RESULTS: Drug target Mendelian randomization analyses supported the significant preventive causal effects of lowering systolic blood pressure per 10 mm Hg via alpha-adrenoceptor blockers (n=11 SNPs; odds ratio [OR], 0.34 [95% CI, 0.21-0.56]; P=2.74×10-05), beta-adrenoceptor blockers (n=17 SNPs; OR, 0.52 [95% CI, 0.35-0.78]; P=1.62×10-03), calcium channel blockers (n=49 SNPs; OR, 0.50 [95% CI, 0.36-0.70]; P=4.51×10-05), vasodilators (n=19 SNPs; OR, 0.53 [95% CI, 0.34-0.84]; P=7.03×10-03), and all 12 antihypertensive drug classes combined (n=158 SNPs; OR, 0.64 [95% CI, 0.54-0.77]; P=8.50×10-07) on AF risk. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that lowering systolic blood pressure via protein targets of various antihypertensive drugs seems promising for AF prevention. Our findings inform future clinical trials and have implications for repurposing antihypertensive drugs for AF prevention.

Cardiac response to hypertension treatment: an advanced echocardiographic evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Hypertension is the most common reversible cause of cardiovascular disease worldwide and more than one billion individuals suffer from the disease. Constant heart exposure to increased afterload progresses to maladaptive remodeling, leading to cardiac dysfunction. In this study, we aimed to evaluate cardiac function in response to hypertension treatment. METHODS: One hundred patients diagnosed with hypertension were evaluated two times, with 3 to 6 months intervals, before and after antihypertensive therapy. Patients underwent clinical and echocardiographic evaluation in both visits and the interest effect of antihypertensive therapy on cardiac function was studied. RESULTS: 58 men and 42 women with a mean age of 60.81 ± 11.8 years were studied. Mean systolic and diastolic pressure in the first visit was 163.05 ± 20.6 and 95.40 ± 10.4, respectively. On the second visit, mean systolic and diastolic pressure was 129.95 ± 10.4 and 82.35 ± 7.2 respectively (P value for both < 0.001). The mean value of Global Longitudinal Strain as the main parameter for evaluating left ventricular systolic function was -15.54% on the first visit and changed to -16.95% on the second visit (P value 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: According to the results of this study, changes in parameters, indicator of systolic and diastolic function, after 3-6 months of antihypertensive therapy are significant. The most important point is that maladaptive remodeling of the heart is reversible if hypertension is diagnosed timely. To follow-up patients under antihypertensive therapy, GLS and parameters indicator of diastolic dysfunction, have the best diagnostic value in terms of detecting early stages of cardiac injury.

Adherence to Antihypertensive Therapy and Its Determinants: A Systematic Review.

Hypertension is a globally prevalent condition, and low adherence to antihypertensive therapy is considered one of the main causes of poor blood pressure (BP) control. Non-adherence to antihypertensive treatment is a complex issue that can arise from various factors; however, gaining an understanding of this provides key targets for intervention strategies. This study aimed to provide an overview of the current status and recent developments regarding our understanding of the determinants of patients' adherence to antihypertensives. A systematic review was performed using the electronic databases MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO), and "Índex das Revistas Médicas Portuguesas", which included studies published between 2017 and 2021 following the PICOS model: (P) Adult patients with the diagnosis of primary hypertension, using at least one antihypertensive agent; (I) all interventions on both pharmacological and non-pharmacological level; (C) patient's adherence against their non-adherence; (O) changes in adherence to the therapeutic plan; and (S) any study design (except review articles) written in English, French, Spanish or Portuguese. Articles were reviewed by two researchers and their quality was assessed. Subsequently, determinants were classified according to their consistent or inconsistent association with adherence or non-adherence. Only 45 of the 635 reports identified met the inclusion criteria. Adherence was consistently associated with patient satisfaction with communication, patient-provider relationship, their treatment, and use of eHealth and mHealth strategies; a patient's mental and physical health, including depression, cognitive impairment, frailty, and disability, previous hospitalization, occurrence of vital events; drug treatment type and appearance; and unwillingness due to health literacy, self-efficacy, and both implicit and explicit attitudes towards treatment. There were discrepancies regarding the association of other factors to adherence, but these inconsistent factors should also be taken into account. In conclusion, the barriers to adherence are varied and often interconnected between socioeconomic, patient, therapy, condition, and healthcare system levels. Healthcare teams should invest in studying patients' non-adherence motives and tailoring interventions to individual levels, by using a multifaceted approach to assess adherence. Further research is needed to analyze the impact of implicit attitudes, the use of new technological approaches, and the influence of factors that are inconsistently associated with non-adherence, to understand their potential in implementing adherence strategies.

Antihypertensive Medication Use Trajectories After Bariatric Surgery: A Matched Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is the most effective and durable treatment for obesity. We aimed to compare the trajectories of antihypertensive medication (AHM) use among obese individuals treated and not treated with MBS. METHODS: Adults with a body mass index of ≥35 kg/m2 were identified in the Merative Database (US employer-based claims database). Individuals treated with versus without MBS were matched 1:1 using baseline demographic and clinical characteristics as well as AHM utilization. Monthly AHM use was examined in the 3 years after the index date using generalized estimating equations. Subanalyses investigated rates of AHM discontinuation, AHM initiation, and apparent treatment-resistant hypertension. RESULTS: The primary cohort included 43 206 adults who underwent MBS matched with 43 206 who did not. Compared with no MBS, those treated with MBS had sustained, markedly lower rates of AHM use (31% versus 15% at 12 months; 32% versus 17% at 36 months). Among patients on AHM at baseline, 42% of patients treated with MBS versus 7% treated medically discontinued AHM use (P<0.01). The risk of apparent treatment-resistant hypertension was 3.41× higher (95% CI, 2.91-4.01; P<0.01) 2 years after the index date in patients who did not undergo MBS. Among those without hypertension treated with MBS versus no MBS, 7% versus 21% required AHM at 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: MBS is associated with lower rates of AHM use, higher rates of AHM discontinuation, and lower rates of AHM initiation among patients not taking AHM. These findings suggest that MBS is both an effective treatment and a preventative measure for hypertension.

Chronic Hypertension During Pregnancy: Prevalence and Treatment in the United States, 2008-2021.

BACKGROUND: Treatment of chronic hypertension during pregnancy has been shown to reduce the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes. In this study, we examined the prevalence and treatment of chronic hypertension during pregnancy and assessed changes in these outcomes following the release of the updated 2017 hypertension guidelines of the American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association. METHODS: We analyzed the MerativeTM Marketscan® Research Database of United States commercial insurance claims from 2007 to 2021. We assessed the prevalence of chronic hypertension during pregnancy and oral antihypertensive medication use over time. We then performed interrupted time series analyses to evaluate changes in these outcomes. RESULTS: The prevalence of chronic hypertension steadily increased from 1.8% to 3.7% among 1 900 196 pregnancies between 2008 and 2021. Antihypertensive medication use among pregnant individuals with chronic hypertension was relatively stable (57%-60%) over the study period. The proportion of pregnant individuals with chronic hypertension treated with methyldopa or hydrochlorothiazide decreased (from 29% to 2% and from 11% to 5%, respectively), while the proportion treated with labetalol or nifedipine increased (from 19% to 42% and from 9% to 17%, respectively). The prevalence or treatment of chronic hypertension during pregnancy did not change following the 2017 American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association hypertension guidelines. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of chronic hypertension during pregnancy doubled between 2008 and 2021 in a nationwide cohort of individuals with commercial insurance. Labetalol replaced methyldopa as the most commonly used antihypertensive during pregnancy. However, only about 60% of individuals with chronic hypertension in pregnancy were treated with antihypertensive medications.

Comparative efficacy and safety of six angiotensin II receptor blockers in hypertensive patients: a network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The antihypertensive effects of angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) are well recognized. However, conventional meta-analyses have reported inconsistent results on their efficacy and safety. AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of six ARBs (losartan, valsartan, irbesartan, telmisartan, candesartan, and olmesartan) commonly used to treat hypertension, using a network meta-analysis. METHOD: We retrieved randomized controlled trials on hypertension treatment using ARBs from the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, CNKI, and Wanfang databases. The efficacy outcomes included absolute changes in office systolic and diastolic blood pressure from baseline, and 24-h ambulatory blood pressure. Safety outcomes were assessed by the total number of adverse events (AEs) during treatment. We conducted the network meta-analysis using the 'bugsnet' and 'gemtc' packages in R. RESULTS: A total of 193 studies were included. Olmesartan had the highest surface under the cumulative ranking in reducing office systolic (91.4%) and diastolic blood pressure (87.2%). Candesartan has the highest ranking in lowering 24 h ambulatory systolic blood pressure (95.4%), while telmisartan reduced 24 h ambulatory diastolic blood pressure (83.4%). Olmesartan also ranked highest in safety (70.8%). CONCLUSION: Valsartan and losartan were less effective in lowering blood pressure than other drugs, with no significant differences. Olmesartan and telmisartan were associated with fewer AEs than losartan, although the incidence of adverse events was similar between the other blockers. Olmesartan and telmisartan demonstrated the best balance of antihypertensive efficacy and minimal adverse events. More research is needed to confirm whether telmisartan and olmesartan are optimal choices for controlling blood pressure in patients.

The trends of antihypertensive drug prescription based on the Japanese national data throughout the COVID-19 pandemic period.

In 2020, concerns arose about the potential adverse effects of angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs) and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) on patients with the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, there is no national data on antihypertensive prescriptions during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan. This study aimed to explore the trends in antihypertensive drug prescriptions in Japan throughout COVID-19 pandemic period. This study used data from the National Database (NDB) Open Data in Japan, an annual publication by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. To capture changes before and after social activity restrictions, the present study focused on extracting the number of prescribed oral medicine tablets for outpatients from the NDB Open Data from 2018 to 2021. The fiscal year 2020 exhibited the lowest for both outpatient claims and prescribed drugs. In contrast, all categories of antihypertensive drug prescription showed annual increases, and no specific changes in the prescription patterns of ARBs and ACEIs around fiscal year 2020 were observed. This study implies that antihypertensive drug prescriptions were adequately maintained throughout the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan.

Blood Pressure Management in Intracerebral Haemorrhage: when, how much, and for how long?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: When compared to ischaemic stroke, there have been limited advances in acute management of intracerebral haemorrhage. Blood pressure control in the acute period is an intervention commonly implemented and recommended in guidelines, as elevated systolic blood pressure is common and associated with haematoma expansion, poor functional outcomes, and mortality. This review addresses the uncertainty around the optimal blood pressure intervention, specifically timing and length of intervention, intensity of blood pressure reduction and agent used. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent pivotal trials have shown that acute blood pressure intervention, to a systolic target of 140mmHg, does appear to be beneficial in ICH, particularly when bundled with other therapies such as neurosurgery in selected cases, access to critical care units, blood glucose control, temperature management and reversal of coagulopathy. Systolic blood pressure should be lowered acutely in intracerebral haemorrhage to a target of approximately 140mmHg, and that this intervention is generally safe in the ICH population.

Physicians' attitudes toward beta-blockers for the treatment of hypertension in Italy, Poland, and Turkey.

Despite substantial progress in understanding the complex pathophysiology, hypertension remains a serious public health challenge affecting over 1.2 billion adults aged 30-79 years worldwide. Appropriate knowledge of the different pharmaceutical classes of antihypertensive agents and an understanding of the characteristics of individual molecules are essential to optimize clinical outcomes in patients with hypertension. We conducted a computer-assisted web interviewing (CAWI) quantitative survey in Italy, Poland, and Turkey to investigate physicians' prescriptions, knowledge, and perceptions of antihypertensive drugs with a focus on ß-blockers, to assess antihypertensive usage patterns and the reasons underlying prescription choices. The survey findings show that ß-blockers retain a pivotal role in the management of hypertension and are prescribed more often for patients with cardiovascular comorbidities than for patients with diabetic comorbidities. In all three countries, nebivolol is the only ß-blocker among the ones analyzed which is consistently prescribed to 20% or more of patients and is overall the most prescribed one for the population with comorbid diabetes. In terms of specific ß-blockers' features, this study revealed knowledge gaps that underline the need for educational activities focused on the differences among ß-blockers, which are important in choosing the most suitable agent for individualized antihypertensive therapy.

Approaches in Managing Resistant Hypertension: A Review.

In India, around 234 million adults (one in three) suffer from hypertension (HTN). An average of 10% of these cases are likely to be resistant hypertension (RH). This load of 23 million patients is expected to expand further with revisions in diagnostic criteria. The treatment and control rates of hypertension in India average around 30% and 15%, respectively. Pharmacological management involves a stepwise approach starting with optimizing the A-C-D (angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs), calcium channel blockers (CCBs), and thiazide-like diuretics) triple-drug combination, followed by substitution with a thiazide-like diuretic and use of spironolactone as a next step (fourth drug). The subsequent steps are suggestions based on expert input and must be individualized. These include using a ß-blocker as the fifth drug and an α1-blocker or a peripheral vasodilator as a final option when target blood pressure (BP) values are not achieved. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are likely to be helpful in managing RH due to their renal and cardiovascular protection as well as mortality benefits. SGLT2i lowers BP independent of the dosage and concomitant anti-hypertensive medications. Patient education and tools to monitor BP and treatment compliance will improve outcomes with these medications. In addition to therapeutic intervention, a preventive approach for RH mandates a need to identify patients at risk and use appropriate preventive and optimal therapy to prevent uncontrolled hypertension in patients with cardiovascular disorders.