Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrer
Plus de filtres











Gamme d'année
1.
Diabetes Metab Syndr ; 18(7): 103095, 2024 Jul.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39098208

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Asprosin is a promising candidate for novel treatments for metabolic-endocrine disorders. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to consolidate the existing evidence regarding asprosin levels in patients diagnosed with type 2 diabetes (T2D), metabolic syndrome (MetS), and obesity. METHODS: Scopus, Embase, PubMed, Ovid/Medline, and Web of Science were systematically searched without restrictions. We only used the standardized mean differences (SMD) with their 95 % confidence intervals (95 % CI) as the effect measure. A random-effects model (DerSimonian and Laird method) was used for the meta-analysis. Risk of bias was assessed with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale for Cross-Sectional Studies. RESULTS: Twenty-six studies (n = 3,787) were included in the meta-analysis. Participants with T2D had higher asprosin values than those without T2D (SMD: 1.64; 95 % CI: 1.08-2.21; I2 = 97 %). Patients with MetS had higher asprosin levels compared to those without MetS (SMD: 0.99; 95 % CI: 0.34-1.64; I2 = 96 %). Patients with obesity had higher asprosin levels than participants without obesity (SMD: 1.49; 95 % CI: 0.23-2.76; I2 = 98 %). CONCLUSIONS: Asprosin is significantly higher in patients with either T2D, MetS, or obesity, compared with controls.


Sujet(s)
Diabète de type 2 , Fibrilline-1 , Syndrome métabolique X , Obésité , Humains , Syndrome métabolique X/sang , Diabète de type 2/sang , Obésité/complications , Obésité/sang , Marqueurs biologiques/analyse , Marqueurs biologiques/sang , Pronostic , Adipokines
2.
Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc ; Rev. bras. cir. cardiovasc;37(4): 493-500, Jul.-Aug. 2022. tab, graf
Article de Anglais | LILACS-Express | LILACS | ID: biblio-1394720

RÉSUMÉ

Abstract Introduction: The goal of this study is to investigate the association between diagnosis and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) and Asprosin level. Methods: Patients diagnosed with CAD who underwent conventional coronary angiography for the first time were included in the present study. The patients were divided into four groups, each consisting of 20 individuals, as medical group, single coronary lesion group, double coronary lesion group, and multiple coronary lesions group. Serum Asprosin values and Gensini scores of the groups were compared in terms of compliance. Results: In this study, Asprosin values were found to be significantly higher in the multiple coronary lesions group than in the medical, single coronary, and double coronary lesion groups (P<0.05). In the double coronary lesion group, Asprosin values were significantly higher (P<0.05) than the in the medical and single coronary lesion groups. It was also found that Asprosin values did not differ at significant levels in the medical and single coronary lesion groups (P>0.05). It was determined that the increases in Asprosin values and Gensini scores were compatible with each other. Conclusion: The present study showed that the increases in serum Asprosin levels, along with the increases in the number of coronary arteries with critical stenosis, might be a marker in diagnosing and determining the severity of CAD.

3.
Braz J Cardiovasc Surg ; 37(4): 493-500, 2022 08 16.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35072406

RÉSUMÉ

INTRODUCTION: The goal of this study is to investigate the association between diagnosis and severity of coronary artery disease (CAD) and Asprosin level. METHODS: Patients diagnosed with CAD who underwent conventional coronary angiography for the first time were included in the present study. The patients were divided into four groups, each consisting of 20 individuals, as medical group, single coronary lesion group, double coronary lesion group, and multiple coronary lesions group. Serum Asprosin values and Gensini scores of the groups were compared in terms of compliance. RESULTS: In this study, Asprosin values were found to be significantly higher in the multiple coronary lesions group than in the medical, single coronary, and double coronary lesion groups (P<0.05). In the double coronary lesion group, Asprosin values were significantly higher (P<0.05) than the in the medical and single coronary lesion groups. It was also found that Asprosin values did not differ at significant levels in the medical and single coronary lesion groups (P>0.05). It was determined that the increases in Asprosin values and Gensini scores were compatible with each other. CONCLUSION: The present study showed that the increases in serum Asprosin levels, along with the increases in the number of coronary arteries with critical stenosis, might be a marker in diagnosing and determining the severity of CAD.


Sujet(s)
Maladie des artères coronaires , Marqueurs biologiques , Coronarographie , Maladie des artères coronaires/imagerie diagnostique , Humains , Facteurs de risque , Indice de gravité de la maladie
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE