What Do Breast Cancer Previvors Tell Us About Their Stories? To Know or Not to Know?

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to explore the (1) experiences of breast cancer previvor women during genetic testing; (2) perceptions of the impact of genetic testing on their personal, social, family, and professional lives; and (3) views on breast cancer prevention and follow-up processes. This study focused on the risk of breast cancer in persons with BRCA mutations. METHODS: Data were collected through individual in-depth semistructured interviews. The data were analyzed using the MAXQDA program based on the method suggested by Graneheim and Lundman. RESULTS: This study was conducted in Istanbul, Turkey, and included 17 participants. Five themes emerged from the data analysis-Acquaintance with BRCA, Living with BRCA, Managing the Legacy, Maternalism, and We Are Here, including a total of 12 categories. CONCLUSION: The previvors had negative experiences during genetic testing, mainly owing to a lack of information, stigma, and women's roles in society. A structured and individualized process for genetic counseling was identified as the main requirement. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: National and international policies on breast cancer previvors should be developed to prevent breast cancer and reduce mortality. Adopting a multidisciplinary approach during genetic counseling will favorably contribute to previvors' medical and psychosocial well-being. Follow-up programs before and after genetic testing should be created. Society's cultural and genetic literacy levels should be evaluated, and activities should be planned to raise social awareness.

Fear of disease progression, self-management efficacy, and family functioning in patients with breast cancer: a cross-sectional relationship study.

Introduction: Fear of disease progression (FoP) has been identified as one of the most prevalent unmet needs among breast cancer patients in recent years. The aim of this study was to examine FoP in patients with breast cancer and explore its associations with demographic and clinical characteristics, self-management efficacy, and family functioning. We also aimed to create a clinically-relevant prediction model based off of these factors (i.e., a "nomogram") to help identify patients' probability of experiencing high FoP. Methods: A cross-sectional survey of breast cancer in patients at the Affiliated Hospital of Jiangnan University was conducted from June 2023 to February 2024. The study included the Demographic and Clinical Characteristics Questionnaire, the Fear of Disease Progression Scale (FoP-Q-SF), the Chinese Self-Management Efficacy Scale for Cancer Patients (C-SUPPH), and the Family Care Index Questionnaire (APGAR). Data analysis included descriptive statistics, independent-samples t-test, one-way ANOVA, Pearson correlation analysis, and multiple regression analysis. A nomogram was constructed based on multiple regression results and the model performance was evaluated. Results: A total of 151 breast cancer patients were enrolled in the study. The mean (standard deviation) FoP score of the patients was 35.87 ± 9.24. The average score of C-SUPPH was 96.97 ± 17.29, and the average score of APGAR was 6.74 ± 2.98. Pearson correlation analysis showed that FoP was negatively correlated with self-management efficacy (r = -0.544, p < 0.01) and family functioning (r = -0.730, p < 0.01). Multiple regression analysis showed that age (B = -4.038), self-management efficacy (B = -0.085) and family functioning (B = -1.972) were significantly related to FoP, and together explained 36% of FoP variation (R 2 = 0.360, F = 20.50, p < 0.001). The nomogram of these variables showed satisfactory prediction performance [the Bootstrap Correction Consistency Index (C-index) = 0.872]. According to previous studies, a C-index of >0.70 indicates that the model is acceptable. Conclusion: We found that greater fear of cancer progression (FoP) was associated with younger age, lower self-management efficacy and poorer family functioning in breast cancer patients. Based on these variables, our exploratory prediction model should be further investigated in order to help identify breast cancer patients who may be at highest risk of experiencing high FoP.

Development and validation of a drug clinical trial participation feelings questionnaire for cancer patients.

Objective: The study was designed to develop and validate a new drug clinical trial participation feelings questionnaire (DCTPFQ) for cancer patients. Methods: Data collection and analysis involved a combination of qualitative and quantitative methods. There were two phases to this study. Phase Ⅰ involved developing a questionnaire to establish a list of items to be included in the pool: A theoretical framework was constructed based on the transitions theory and the Roper-Logan-Tierney theory. After incorporating a theoretical framework, interviewing participants, and reviewing the literature, 44 items were generated. After a Delphi consultation and a pilot test, 36 items proceeded to item analysis and exploratory factor analysis (EFA), and a four-factor structure with 21 items was formed. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), test-retest reliability, criteria-related validity, and internal consistency tests were conducted in phase II to examine the psychometric properties. Results: There were 21 items on the DCTPFQ, ranging from 1 (fully disagree) through 5 (fully agree). As a result of EFA and CFA, the four factors of DCTPFQ could be verified, including cognitive engagement, subjective experience, medical resources, and relatives and friends' support. Test-retest reliability of the DCTPFQ was 0.840, and Cronbach's alpha was 0.934. DCTPFQ is significantly correlated with the Fear of Progression Questionnaire-short form (r = 0.731, p < 0.05) and the Mishel's Uncertainty in Illness Scale (r = 0.714, p < 0.05). Conclusion: The DCTPFQ is a useful tool for measuring the drug clinical trial participation feelings among cancer patients.

Patient-caregiver dyad concordance of transition readiness assessment for adolescent with cancer: A network analysis.

AIMS: The concordance of adolescents with cancer and caregivers was examined, and the core elements of transition readiness were identified. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, 196 adolescent-caregiver dyads completed the Chinese version of Self-Management and Transition to Adulthood with Rx = Treatment Questionnaire and its parent version between March 2023 and August 2023. Intraclass correlation coefficients, paired t-tests and network analysis were used for data analysis. RESULTS: Caregivers reported slightly lower scores for transition readiness than adolescents (3.28 vs. 3.32). Healthcare engagement and provider communication were core elements in transition readiness networks. At the dyad level, agreement between adolescents' and caregivers' transition readiness ranged from poor to fair (intraclass correlation coefficients 0.103-0.486), and a significant difference in structure was found between the two networks. CONCLUSIONS: Caregivers tended to underestimate adolescents' transition readiness. Attaining better concordance between adolescents and family caregivers is critical to aligning roles and responsibilities in the transition process. IMPLICATIONS FOR PAEDIATRIC CANCER CARE: This study extends the evidence on the variation in adolescents' transition readiness, clarifying the complex associative relationships among the elements of transition readiness, which can be potential pathways for improving transition readiness. Second, this study is the first to assess transition readiness from a dyad's perspective. The findings highlighted the patient-caregiver incongruence in rating patients' transition readiness, suggesting that targeted dyadic interventions should be developed and implemented to improve patient-caregiver transition readiness concordance, facilitate effective communication and mutuality between patients and caregivers, and contribute to their collaboration during the transition of adolescents and optimization of outcomes. WHAT PROBLEM DID THE STUDY ADDRESS?: Increased long-term survival rates of survivors of paediatric cancer highlighted the significant need for care continuity. Transitional readiness is an important predictor of adolescent survivor's ability to adapt to a long-term survival period. Assessments of adolescents' transition readiness are limited and overlook the synergies between family caregivers and adolescents in the transition period. WHAT WERE THE MAIN FINDINGS?: The levels of agreement on rating transition readiness varied from poor to fair among adolescent-caregiver dyads, and caregivers tended to underestimate adolescents' transition readiness. The findings highlighted the patient-caregiver incongruence in rating patients' transition readiness. Targeted dyadic interventions should be developed and implemented to improve patient-caregiver's transition readiness concordance, and facilitate effective communication and mutuality between patients and caregivers. REPORTING METHOD: Study methods and results reported in adherence to the STROBE checklist. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patients or members of the public were involved in the study. CONTRIBUTION TO THE WIDER GLOBAL CLINICAL COMMUNITY: The main findings introduce pathways for improving transition readiness, which can enhance healthcare transition among other medical populations.

Building Career Pathways for Cancer Nurses: Ensuring Cancer Nursing's Future.

OBJECTIVES: It is well established that cancer nurses and advanced practice nurses (APN) are critical to the delivery of high-quality, accessible, safe, and affordable cancer care globally. Specialized cancer nurses and APNs with a strong foundation in the pillars of nursing practice (clinical, leadership, education, and research) are essential to optimize patient outcomes, create increased cost-efficiencies through innovative models of care delivery, and can further leverage interprofessional collaboration in cancer care. To address the existing shortcomings in cancer control, Australian cancer nurses, including APNs, and cancer nurses and APNs globally, need an evidence-informed consensus drive framework to harmonize clinical, educational and career pathways leading to specialization, advanced practice, promotion, and equitable and accessible education. METHODS: Critical perspective. RESULTS: Scoping work has begun to build on the 2009 seminal Australian EdCaN framework, with ambitions to develop a contemporary practice and career framework for all cancer nurses which details clear pathways to specialized and APN roles inclusive of navigating to and through direct clinical care, research, academia, education, and management or executive leadership. CONCLUSIONS: A revised framework that is cognizant of the changing landscape of contemporary cancer care, and the growing diversity of nursing roles is needed to address the imminent nursing workforce crisis. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: The revised framework may support the implementation of the newly released Australian Cancer Plan and provide a career pathway model that may be adopted internationally, including in low- and middle-income countries.

An Innovation in Cancer Nursing Education Across Europe: A Pilot Evaluation.

The European Oncology Nursing Society (EONS) is a pan-European not for profit society involving approximately 28,000 cancer nurses from 32 countries in the region. The European College of Cancer Nursing (ECCN) exists under the umbrella of EONS and was established in 2020 with a strategic priority to develop, promote and deliver educational opportunities for nurses across Europe. ECCN introduced a pilot on-line education programme for 20 nurses in January 2023. This study evaluated participating nurses' views and experience of learning on the pilot programme. The study adopted a mixed method approach guided by the four levels of the Kirkpatrick theoretical framework. A dominant focus on qualitative data was used with supplementary quantitative data. The Standards for Reporting Qualitative Research (SRQR) was followed. Eleven nurses completed the pre-pilot online questionnaire (response rate 65%) and seven (n = 7) completed the post-pilot questionnaire (41% response rate). Five (n = 5) nurses participated in two focus group interviews. Data analysis resulted in the development of four overarching themes: A wider world of cancer nursing; Shapeless mentorship; Impact on Practice; Learning online and what now? On commencement of online education programmes, nurses value a structured timetable and support from nursing management to maximise engagement with the learning materials.

Prevalence and assessment tools of cancer-related cognitive impairment in lung cancer survivors: a systematic review and proportional meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: Cancer-related cognitive impairment (CRCI) is a significant risk factor influencing the quality of life in lung cancer survivors. No absolute assessment tool has been confirmed to assess CRCI in lung cancer survivors. This review was undertaken to pool the overall prevalence of CRCI and to summarize the assessment tools in assessing CRCI among lung cancer survivors. METHODS: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, CINAHL, and CNKI were searched to retrieve articles reported CRCI prevalence. Summary prevalence estimates were pooled using a random effects model, along with corresponding 95% prediction intervals (PIs). The Freeman-Tukey double arcsine transformation of proportions was incorporated in the analysis. Additionally, subgroup analysis, meta-regression, and leave-one-out analysis were performed. RESULTS: A total of 12 studies, involving 1934 survivors, were included in the review. All of these studies were found to have a low risk of bias in terms of their methodological quality. Four studies (33.3%) utilized the International Cognition and Cancer Task Force (ICCTF) criteria to identify CRCI through neuropsychological tests. The pooled prevalence rate of CRCI was found to be 26% (95% PI, 16-37%), I2 = 95.97%. The region in which the studies were conducted was identified as a significant factor contributing to this heterogeneity (p = 0.013). No indication of small-study effects was found (Egger's test: p = 0.9191). CONCLUSION: This review provides an overview of CRCI prevalence and assessment tools in lung cancer survivors. The findings can serve as epidemiological evidence to enhance clinicians' and researchers' understanding of early detection and assessment.

Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice of chemotherapy management among nurses at Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospital, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.

Objective: Cancer is a leading global health challenge with increasing morbidity and mortality. In Nigeria, cancer leads to over 100,000 new cases and 70,000 deaths annually. In resource-constrained countries such as Nigeria, registered nurses (RNs) that provide oncology care lack specialty education in oncology nursing care. Nigerian nurses are the largest portion of the healthcare workforce and can play a key role in improving oncology care. This study aimed to assess RNs' knowledge, willingness, and ability to perform tasks related to chemotherapy administration and symptom management, assess current practices, identify available resources, and identify gaps in RNs' knowledge of oncology care. Methods: A descriptive, correlational, Institutional Review Board (IRB)-approved study was conducted using a modified Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practice questionnaire and a questionnaire adapted from the Organizational Readiness to Change Assessment. The principle investigator (PI) adopted the role as an observer to witness an accurate picture of nursing practice at Obafemi Awolowo University Teaching Hospital (OAUTH) and identify gaps in education and knowledge around oncology nursing care. A Research Electronic Data Capture database was developed using paper-formatted questionnaires that were exported to Excel for statistical analysis. Results: This study supports findings from literature highlighting that nurses working in oncology units lack specialized oncology training, which leads to gaps in knowledge and practice. Questionnaire responses and clinical observations at OAUTH support RNs' willingness to learn skills related to oncology nursing care. Nurses are self-aware that they have more to learn about how to prepare and administer chemotherapy, and 90% of nurses reported that an ongoing chemotherapy training program would be helpful at OAUTH. Conclusions: By identifying gaps in education and knowledge about oncology care and by identifying available resources, an oncology training program could be developed for nurses working in oncology units at OAUTH and other Nigerian hospitals, leading to improved oncology patient care and outcomes.

The application and use of artificial intelligence in cancer nursing: A systematic review.

PURPOSE: Artificial Intelligence is being applied in oncology to improve patient and service outcomes. Yet, there is a limited understanding of how these advanced computational techniques are employed in cancer nursing to inform clinical practice. This review aimed to identify and synthesise evidence on artificial intelligence in cancer nursing. METHODS: CINAHL, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and PubMed were searched using key terms between January 2010 and December 2022. Titles, abstracts, and then full texts were screened against eligibility criteria, resulting in twenty studies being included. Critical appraisal was undertaken, and relevant data extracted and analysed. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed. RESULTS: Artificial intelligence was used in numerous areas including breast, colorectal, liver, and ovarian cancer care among others. Algorithms were trained and tested on primary and secondary datasets to build predictive models of health problems related to cancer. Studies reported this led to improvements in the accuracy of predicting health outcomes or identifying variables that improved outcome prediction. While nurses led most studies, few deployed an artificial intelligence based digital tool with cancer nurses in a real-world setting as studies largely focused on developing and validating predictive models. CONCLUSION: Electronic cancer nursing datasets should be established to enable artificial intelligence techniques to be tested and if effective implemented in digital prediction and other AI-based tools. Cancer nurses need more education on machine learning and natural language processing, so they can lead and contribute to artificial intelligence developments in oncology.

Tattooing to reconstruct Nipple-Areola Complex after oncological breast surgery: a scoping review.

PURPOSE: The dermopigmentation of the Nipple-Areola Complex (NAC) is a safe non-surgical reconstruction technique that can restore psychophysical integrity, representing the final step after oncological surgery. This scoping review aims to identify and synthesize the literature focused on medical tattooing for NAC reconstruction in women who underwent breast reconstruction after cancer surgery. Competence and training, outcomes and organizational aspects were assessed as specific outcomes. METHODS: The Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology for scoping reviews was followed. MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, Clinical Key, Scopus and Cinahl databases were consulted. After title (N = 54) and abstract (N = 39) screening and full-text review (N = 18), articles that met eligibility criteria were analyzed, critically apprised and narratively synthesized. RESULTS: 13 articles were analysed, with full texts (N = 11) and only abstract (N = 2). The overall quality of the literature (N observational studies = 11; N pilot experimental studies = 2) is weak. Nurses were the professionals mostly involved (N = 6), then medical staff (N = 4) and tattoo artists (N = 2). The professional training is poorly described in 6 papers. The most frequently assessed outcome was the satisfaction rate (N = 8). One study explored aspects of quality of life with a validated questionnaire. The management of these services resulted variable. Nurse-led services were implemented in 2 studies. CONCLUSION: Despite methodological weaknesses, NAC tattooing research is relevant because it helps women redefine their identity after demolitive cancer treatments. Further research on processes and outcomes is needed.

Navigating changes: A qualitative study exploring the health-related quality of life of breast cancer survivors during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic.

AIMS: To explore the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic on the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of breast cancer survivors. DESIGN: We utilized a qualitative descriptive approach to facilitate interviews among 25 participants, all of whom are survivors of breast cancer and have received treatment in Hong Kong within the preceding 3 years. METHODS: Content analysis was performed to understand how patients' HRQoL views and experiences changed during coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. RESULTS: The results included six themes delineating the impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: (i) survivor sensitivities in pandemic times, (ii) coping and conditioning in pandemic times, (iii) transforming work and home dynamics in pandemic times, (iv) cognitive resilience and adaptation to the COVID-19 protective measures, (v) social resilience in pandemic times and (vi) healthcare adaptation and coping in pandemic times. CONCLUSION: This study provides insights into the experiences and challenges of breast cancer survivors during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Some survivors had new physical and psychological symptoms, including fear and anxiety, isolation, pain, lymphoedema and burnout, which potentially have long-term impact upon HRQoL. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND/OR PATIENT CARE: This study highlights the unique challenges faced by breast cancer survivors during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, including accessing healthcare services and the impact of social isolation. Healthcare providers should consider the holistic needs of breast cancer survivors in the provision of health care and develop supportive interventions, including telehealth services and online support groups, to address these challenges and improve their HRQoL. IMPACT: Surgery aimed at treating breast cancer or reducing its risk generally influences the appearance of breast areas and donor sites. The continuing effects of these changes on body image and HRQoL are well-reported, although studies have ineffectively examined the initial experiences of women regarding their postoperative appearance, particularly during the pandemic. REPORTING METHOD: The checklist of consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ) was utilized. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: A small selection on breast cancer survivors contributed to the design of this study, in particular the content of the semi-structured interviews.

Oncology nursing research: a global perspective.

The specialty of oncology nursing began around the 1970s when oncology as a science became a significant practice in the clinical areas. As the practice of oncology grew in health care settings, physicians focused on providing care for individuals diagnosed with cancer with treatments like surgery, radiation, and novel chemotherapy agents. Physicians treated the physical disease, while oncology nurses cared for, and became specialised in, the assessment and management of side effects and symptoms, and supporting patients and families in coping with the impacts from the disease and treatments. Thus, the oncology nursing speciality focus is on physical, psychosocial, and practical management of patients' care; education of patients and families; and co-ordination of the complex care provided. This article focuses on how the science, or the evidence base, of oncology nursing has grown globally since those early years. The aim of this paper is to illustrate the growth and development in the body of evidence underpinning the oncology nursing specialty by highlighting scientific studies, publications, and evidence-based practice. Over the years, there has been a steady growth in the research evidence supporting the specialty, yet future challenges are ahead. These challenges include demonstrating impact of nursing interventions; infrastructure support; resources for capacity building; building research-mindedness; and strengthening equality, diversity, and inclusion.

The relationship between moral distress, individual and professional values in oncology nurses: A structural equation study.

OBJECTIVES: This study examined the relationship between moral distress, individual and professional values in oncology nurses. METHODS: Employing structural equation modeling, a descriptive-correlational study was conducted among 116 oncology nurses. Data were collected using the Moral Distress Scale-Revised Adult Nurses, the Nursing Professional Values Scale, and the Values Scale. RESULTS: The mean moral distress frequency was evaluated as low (1.6 ± 0.7) and the intensity as moderate (1.9 ± 0.8). Both the Nursing Professional Values Scale and Values Scale subdimension mean scores were at levels evaluated as high. There was no specific value that stood out from the others. Structural equation modeling analysis showed that individual values were found to have a direct and negative significant effect on moral distress intensity (ß = -0.70, p < 0.01) and frequency (ß = -0.58, p <0.01) and professional values had a direct positive and significant effect on moral distress intensity (ß = 0.37, p < 0.05) and frequency (ß = 0.25, p < 0.05). SIGNIFICANCE OF RESULTS: It is believed that more national and international studies need to be conducted to examine the relationship between the moral distress concept and values. While individual values were found to have a direct and negative significant effect on moral distress, professional values had a direct positive and significant effect on moral distress.

Exploring fear of cancer recurrence and related factors among breast cancer patients: A cross-sectional study.

AIMS: Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) is a multifaceted concept influenced by individual characteristics, social support, psychological factors. This study aims to identify distinct FCR profiles among breast cancer patients and explore the associated variables with these patterns. DESIGN: A cross-sectional study was conducted from April 2022 to March 2023. METHODS: A convenience sample of 339 patients completed a questionnaire that assessed general and disease-related data, including the Fear of Progression Questionnaire-Short Form, Social Support Rating Scale, Medical Coping Modes Questionnaire. Statistical analysis involved latent profile analysis (LPA) and multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS: Three latent patterns of FCR were found: the low fear (28.9%), the moderate fear (51.3%), and the high fear (18.0%). The study identified the social support, family monthly income, employment status, utilization of confrontation coping mode and avoidance coping mode, as factors that impacted the FCR. CONCLUSIONS: Social support, family monthly income, employment status, and medical coping modes have been found to impact the FCR among newly diagnosed breast cancer patients. Healthcare professionals should focus on addressing FCR at diagnosis and implement effective interventions, such as promoting social support and encouraging adaptive coping, to alleviate this concern. IMPACT: Urgently addressing the FCR in Chinese breast cancer patients is imperative due to its profound influence on their holistic health. Through advanced LPA, we categorized the FCR progression, highlighting risks. These findings have implications for healthcare strategies, offering new insights to manage the FCR and improve patient well-being. Our study adds a fresh perspective to the factors underlying the FCR in breast cancer patients, contributing to the broader comprehension and management of this complex survivorship issue. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: No patient or public contribution.

Clinical Utility Assessment of a Nursing Checklist Identifying Complex Care Needs Due to Inequities Among Ambulatory Patients With Cancer: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Study.

BACKGROUND: Disparities in cancer incidence, complex care needs, and poor health outcomes are largely driven by structural inequities stemming from social determinants of health. To date, no evidence-based clinical tool has been developed to identify newly diagnosed patients at risk of poorer outcomes. Specialist cancer nurses are well-positioned to ameliorate inequity of opportunity for optimal care, treatment, and outcomes through timely screening, assessment, and intervention. We designed a nursing complexity checklist (the "Checklist") to support these activities, with the ultimate goal of improving equitable experiences and outcomes of care. This study aims to generate evidence regarding the clinical utility of the Checklist. OBJECTIVE: The primary objectives of this study are to provide qualitative evidence regarding key aspects of the Checklist's clinical utility (appropriateness, acceptability, and practicability), informed by Smart's multidimensional model of clinical utility. Secondary objectives explore the predictive value of the Checklist and concordance between specific checklist items and patient-reported outcome measures. METHODS: This prospective mixed methods case series study will recruit up to 60 newly diagnosed patients with cancer and 10 specialist nurses from a specialist cancer center. Nurses will complete the Checklist with patient participants. Within 2 weeks of Checklist completion, patients will complete 5 patient-reported outcome measures with established psychometric properties that correspond to specific checklist items and an individual semistructured interview to explore Checklist clinical utility. Interviews with nurses will occur 12 and 24 weeks after they first complete a checklist, exploring perceptions of the Checklist's clinical utility including barriers and facilitators to implementation. Data describing planned and unplanned patient service use will be collected from patient follow-up interviews at 12 weeks and the electronic medical record at 24 weeks after Checklist completion. Descriptive statistics will summarize operational, checklist, and electronic medical record data. The predictive value of the Checklist and the relationship between specific checklist items and relevant patient-reported outcome measures will be examined using descriptive statistics, contingency tables, measures of association, and plots as appropriate. Qualitative data will be analyzed using a content analysis approach. RESULTS: This study was approved by the institution's ethics committee. The enrollment period commenced in May 2022 and ended in November 2022. In total, 37 patients with cancer and 7 specialist cancer nurses were recruited at this time. Data collection is scheduled for completion at the end of May 2023. CONCLUSIONS: This study will evaluate key clinical utility dimensions of a nursing complexity checklist. It will also provide preliminary evidence on its predictive value and information to support its seamless implementation into everyday practice including, but not limited to, possible revisions to the Checklist, instructions, and training for relevant personnel. Future implementation of this Checklist may improve equity of opportunity of access to care for patients with cancer. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID): DERR1-10.2196/48432.

[Comprehensive nursing intervention for advanced prostate cancer patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy].

OBJECTIVE: To explore the effect of comprehensive nursing intervention in advanced PCa patients receiving chemoradiotherapy. METHODS: This study included 70 patients with advanced PCa undergoing chemoradiotherapy in our department from January 2020 to April 2022, who were randomly divided into a control (n = 35) and an intervention group (n = 35), the former receiving routine nursing care while the latter comprehensive nursing intervention, including such measures as health education, psychological care, radiotherapy care, chemotherapy care, and complication care. After intervention, comparisons were made between the two groups of patients in the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) scores and incidence of adverse reactions to chemoradiotherapy. RESULTS: The scores on all the dimensions of EPIC were significantly higher in the intervention than in the control group (P < 0.05) and the incidence rate of radiation-induced proctitis and cystitis remarkably lower in the former than in the latter (36.11% vs 71.43%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Comprehensive nursing intervention can improve the quality of life of the PCa patients undergoing chemoradiotherapy, increase their compliance with treatment and reduce their adverse reactions, and therefore deserves clinical promotion.

Personalising care for patients: implementing a treatment summary folder following cytoreductive surgery.

BACKGROUND: A patient survey highlighted that patients treated with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) at one NHS trust lacked confidence with the transition of care between teams. A personalised folder of treatment information was designed and given to patients prior to discharge. AIMS: To obtain patient feedback on the implementation and content of the folder. METHODS: 30 consecutive patients were given the folder at discharge. Participants completed an online questionnaire to determine whether the information in the folder was appropriate, given at the right time in the pathway and enhanced confidence on discharge. FINDINGS: 90% response rate was achieved. Of the respondents, 96% strongly agreed/agreed that the folder was helpful, 4% disagreed; 92% strongly agreed/agreed that the amount of information was right, 8% preferred more information, none less; 74% agreed/strongly agreed that the folder was provided at the right time; 96% said that the content met their expectations. CONCLUSION: Patients treated with CRS and HIPEC have specific needs related to their treatment. Implementation of the patient information folder at discharge increases patient confidence.

Discussion Surrounding Theory, Knowledge, and Practical Applications for Clinical Nurse Specialists to Aid Them in Caring for Parents with Cancer Who Have Young Children.

PURPOSE: To identify the theory, knowledge, and practical applications that clinical nurse specialists should consider adding to their "toolkit" to support them in caring for people affected by cancer with young children. DATA SOURCES: Expert opinion and relevant studies on the topic formed the basis of this article. CONCLUSION: A conversation with experts identified five key areas of knowledge important to supporting clinical nurse specialists in caring for people affected by cancer with young children: family-centered and systemic practice, nursing responsibilities and competencies, trauma-informed practice, adult life stages, and stages of child development. Key areas identified have relevance to all healthcare professionals working in cancer care. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: This article provides a useful overview of psychological theories important to supporting healthcare professionals in caring for people affected by cancer. A discussion on the boundaries and competencies of the nursing role led to agreement about practical advice rooted in theory and knowledge that could benefit clinical practice. Concepts of emotional labor and the wounded healer were identified as important to inform reflection and supervision when caring for a parent affected by cancer who has a young family.

Patient and public involvement in research: Reflections and experiences of doctoral cancer nurse researchers in Europe.

PURPOSE: Early career researchers lack guidance about patient and public involvement (PPI). The overall aim of the study was to explore the knowledge and experiences of using PPI in research among doctoral students who are registered nurses. METHODS: This qualitative study included findings generated from reflective essays and focus groups involving ten registered cancer nurses who are undertaking doctoral research. The study has two stages of data collection. Participants initially wrote a reflective essay using a set of guiding questions to structure a response which was subsequently analysed. Two focus groups were then conducted to provide further insight into the themes identified in the reflective essays. Reflective thematic analysis was used to identify, name, and define the final themes. RESULTS: There were ten participants from seven countries and were at various stages of their doctoral study. Analysis of data from reflective essays (n = 10) and focus groups (n = 2) identified four themes namely, (a) evolving recognition and appreciation of PPI, (b) embracing PPI and impact on doctoral studies, (c) the influence of the research environment, and (d) the need to empower doctoral students to integrate PPI in their research journey. CONCLUSION: Participants reported differing experiences of PPI awareness showing disparity in guidance about PPI for junior researchers across Europe. We recommend provision of early PPI training for doctoral students to support and encourage involvement of patients and the public in their research. Opportunities for sharing PPI experiences to help improve PPI culture in research environments that support doctoral students should be explored.

Should I call psycho-oncology? Training nurses on psycho-oncological screening reduces uncertainties.

PURPOSE: Psycho-oncological screening is required to identify distressed patients and direct them to psycho-oncological care. In practice, screening procedure and related communication are still insufficient due to various barriers on the side of the medical team. The aim of this study is to evaluate the specifically developed training (OptiScreen training) on screening from nurses' perspective. METHODS: N = 72 nurses from visceral-oncological care at Hanover Medical School received the 6-h training, which consisted of three modules and targeted topics around screening, psycho-oncology and communication. The training was evaluated using a pre- and post-questionnaire assessing screening knowledge, uncertainties and further satisfaction outcomes. RESULTS: Personal uncertainties were significantly reduced by the training (t(63) = - 13.32, p < .001, d = 1.67). General satisfaction with the training was achieved (62.0-98.6% satisfied with the training elements). Feasibility (69%) and general acceptance (94.3%) for the training were rated positively. CONCLUSION: The nurses rated the training as useful to reduce personal uncertainties regarding the screening process. Acceptability, feasibility and satisfaction with the training from the nursing perspective were achieved. The training contributes to minimizing barriers to inform about psycho-oncology and to recommend appropriate support services to patients.