Carotid artery stenosis is related to cerebral small vessel disease magnetic resonance imaging burden.

Background: Cerebral small vessel disease (CSVD) encompasses conditions that affect small blood vessels of the brain, the most common being atherosclerosis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) CSVD markers include lacunar strokes (LS), white matter hyperintensities (WMH), microbleeds, enlarged perivascular spaces (EPVS), and brain atrophy. Large and small cerebral arteries share an anatomical and functional connection, but the role of large vessel atherosclerosis in atherosclerotic CSVD hasn't been established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the involvement of large vessel pathology in atherosclerotic CSVD. Methods: This cross-sectional study included 98 patients treated at the Neurology Clinic of the University Clinical Center of Serbia in Belgrade, from February 2018 to December 2023, who had atherosclerotic CSVD confirmed by neuroimaging and underwent extracranial color duplex sonography. Data on patients' gender, age, cerebrovascular risk factors (dyslipidemia, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, smoking status), ultrasonography findings (intima-media thickness - IMT, carotid and vertebral artery stenosis, and hemodynamics), and CSVD imaging markers were collected, and the CSVD MRI burden score was calculated. Results: Age correlated with LS and WMH (p < 0.05 for both). Hypertension correlated with WMH (p = 0.016), and smoking with LS (p = 0.043). Brain atrophy was more common in women (p = 0.016). The majority of patients had low-grade (<50 %) carotid stenosis. There was a strong correlation between all morphological parameters of internal carotid artery stenosis and the CSVD burden score (p < 0.05 for all). The hemodynamic parameters of internal carotid artery stenosis and morphological and hemodynamic parameters of vertebral artery stenosis didn't correlate with the CSVD burden score. Conclusions: This study shows a strong correlation between cerebral large and small vessel pathology. We recommend the use of extracranial color duplex sonography in the evaluation of patients with CSVD as a supplementary method for follow-up, as this would allow the identification of patients whose condition might progress.

Carotid ultrasound to identify head and neck cancer survivors with high cardiovascular risk after radiation therapy: rationale and design of a prospective, cross-sectional pilot study.

Background: Radiation therapy is an integral component of treatment that can predispose to carotid artery stenosis (CAS) and increase the risk of cerebrovascular events for head and neck cancer survivors. The utility of screening for CAS with carotid ultrasound in asymptomatic head and neck cancer survivors is unclear.Methods: In this prospective, cross-sectional pilot study, 60 patients who have no evidence of cancer at least 2 years from completion of RT will undergo screening carotid ultrasound to identify patients with high risk of cardiovascular events.Results: Outcomes will include clinically significant CAS, carotid intima-media thickness, acceptability/feasibility of screening, barriers to care and preliminary data on changes to medical management because of screening. Correlative multi-omics analyses will examine biomarkers of CAS after radiation therapy.Conclusion: The results of this study will provide valuable data on the prevalence of CAS and preliminary patient-centered data that will inform the design of a future large-scale, multi-site clinical trial.Clinical Trial Registration: NCT05490875 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

Patients with head and neck cancer are often treated with radiation therapy. Radiation therapy can cause damage to the blood vessels in the neck. This damage can manifest as narrowing of the blood vessels like the carotid artery, which can lead to stroke. Currently, it is not clear if screening head and neck cancer survivors with ultrasound scans of the carotid arteries is feasible or acceptable to patients. This has also not been formally assessed using a prospective clinical trial. In this study, patients with a history of head and neck cancer who have no evidence of their cancer for at least 2 years since completion of their radiation therapy will be enrolled. They will undergo blood testing and a research ultrasound of the carotid arteries to check for narrowing and other findings that may signal a high risk of stroke or another cardiovascular event. Participants will complete surveys on their experience with the process and how likely they are to accept further screening or additional treatment if something is found. They will also complete surveys on their perception of their personal risk of stroke and barriers to care that would prevent them from getting screening ultrasounds. Patients will be followed for up to 6 months after the ultrasound to check for any changes in their medical care that occurred because of the screening ultrasound.

Brazilian Angiology and Vascular Surgery Society Guidelines for the treatment of extracranial cerebrovascular disease.

Extracranial cerebrovascular disease has been the subject of intense research throughout the world, and is of paramount importance for vascular surgeons. This guideline, written by the Brazilian Society of Angiology and Vascular Surgery (SBACV), supersedes the 2015 guideline. Non-atherosclerotic carotid artery diseases were not included in this document. The purpose of this guideline is to bring together the most robust evidence in this area in order to help specialists in the treatment decision-making process. The AGREE II methodology and the European Society of Cardiology system were used for recommendations and levels of evidence. The recommendations were graded from I to III, and levels of evidence were classified as A, B, or C. This guideline is divided into 11 chapters dealing with the various aspects of extracranial cerebrovascular disease: diagnosis, treatments and complications, based on up-to-date knowledge and the recommendations proposed by SBACV.

Long-term mortality and morbidity after carotid endarterectomy for symptomatic and asymptomatic carotid stenosis.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether the occurrence of ischemic stroke due to carotid stenosis is a marker of the severity of atherosclerotic disease and of an excess risk of cardiovascular morbidity and mortality, and of all-cause mortality, after carotid endarterectomy. METHODS: Patients who had undergone a carotid endarterectomy (CEA) from June 2015 to august 2016 were included. Patients were classified into two groups, namely symptomatic and asymptomatic. Neurological event, myocardial infarction and death during early follow-up were monitored. Major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), major limb events (MALE), and all-cause mortality were compared for patients with a CEA for an asymptomatic carotid stenosis versus those with a symptomatic stenosis. RESULTS: Among the 190 patients included, 86 (51%) had a CEA for an asymptomatic stenosis and 84 (49%) for a symptomatic stenosis. During the first 30 days, the rate of all-cause death or ischemic stroke was similar in both groups (1%, p=0.986). After 30 days, there were a total of 35 MACE (21.3%) and 15 MALE (9.1%) during mean follow-up of 53 (22.6) months. Overall cardiovascular morbidity and mortality was 30.4%, and did not differ between groups (p=0.565). New ischemic stroke occurred in 11 patients (9.1%) and was significantly more frequent in the asymptomatic group (9 (14.8%) vs 2 (3.6%) in the symptomatic group, (OR: 4.96; CI 95% [1.04-23.77]; p = 0.013)). Overall all-cause mortality was 24% in both groups (p=0.93) CONCLUSION: The occurrence of ischemic stroke of carotid origin prior to revascularization does not appear to be associated with an excess risk of cardiovascular morbidity or mortality or all-cause mortality after surgery.

A case of type 2 diabetes mellitus with limb-shaking TIA.

Limb-shaking transient ischemic attack (TIA) is a rare manifestation of carotid-occlusive damage. This case report highlights the importance of accurate diagnosis and treatment of bilateral ballism as limb-shaking TIA. Superficial cephalic artery and mid-large artery anastomosis was performed after the initial acute treatment, and involuntary limb shaking disappeared.

Appropriateness of care: Asymptomatic carotid stenosis including transcarotid artery revascularization.

Carotid artery stenosis is one of the most common diagnoses treated by vascular specialists in the United States. The optimal management of carotid stenosis remains controversial, however, with notable variation surrounding diagnostic imaging modalities, longitudinal surveillance, medical therapies, and procedural interventions. Data from high-quality randomized controlled trials and observational studies form the foundation for current management paradigms and societal guidelines that inform clinical practice. Presently, a diagnosis of carotid disease is most often established with duplex ultrasound and supplemental cross-sectional imaging using computed tomography or magnetic resonance angiography as needed to provide additional anatomic information. All patients with documented occlusive disease should receive goal-directed medical therapy with antiplatelet agents and a lipid-reduction strategy, most commonly with a statin. Those with severe carotid stenosis and an acceptable life expectancy may be considered for carotid artery revascularization. The proceduralist should optimally consider a shared decision-making approach in which the tradeoffs of revascularization can be carefully considered with the patient to optimize informed therapeutic decision making. In current practice, three distinct procedure options exist to treat carotid artery stenosis, including carotid endarterectomy, transfemoral carotid artery stenting, and transcarotid artery revascularization. It should be noted that each procedure, although often used interchangeably in most clinical settings, carry technical nuances and outcome disparities. In this review, each of these topics are explored and various approaches are outlined surrounding the appropriate use of treatments for patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis.

Assessments of arterial and venous phase radiodensity does not improve carotid near-occlusion diagnostics.

The hypothesis of this study was that evaluation of radiodensity assessment beyond a carotid stenosis in arterial and/or venous phase can be used to separate near-occlusion and conventional ≥ 50% stenosis. We prospectively included participants with ≥ 50% carotid stenosis with inclusion preference for cases with extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) asymmetry. All participants were examined with a research biphasic computed tomography angiography (CTA) protocol (arterial and venous phase). Reference diagnosis was set by interpretation on CTA and radiodensity difference between ipsilateral and contralateral ICA (c-corrected) or vertebral (v-corrected) was compared. We included 93 participants, 62 with near-occlusion and 31 with conventional ≥ 50% stenosis. Just beyond the stenosis, median c-corrected radiodensity was - 20 Hounsfield units (HU) among near-occlusions and - 1 HU among conventional ≥ 50% stenoses (p < 0.001) in the arterial phase. For the venous phase, these findings were + 17 HU and + 3 HU (p = 0.007). Similar group differences were seen for v-correction. No parameter had good diagnostic performance, area under the curve ≤ 0.82. With specificity set at ≥ 95%, detected near-occlusions were foremost those with large side-to-side differences in distal ICA-diameter. Carotid near-occlusions can have reduced radiodensity beyond the stenosis in arterial phases and increased radiodensity in venous phases compared to a reference artery-which was not clearly seen for conventional stenoses. However, these radiodensity findings are best seen in near-occlusion cases that are not diagnostically challenging, while they work poorly as additional diagnostic aids.

Association of Centre Quality Certification with Characteristics of Patients, Management, and Outcomes Following Carotid Endarterectomy or Carotid Artery Stenting.

Background: The aim of this study was to analyze the association between center quality certifications and patients' characteristics, clinical management, and outcomes after carotid revascularization. Methods: This study is a pre-planned sub-study of the ISAR-IQ project, which analyzes data from the Bavarian subset of the nationwide German statutory quality assurance carotid database. Hospitals were classified as to whether a certified vascular center (cVC) or a certified stroke unit (cSU) was present on-site or not. The primary outcome event was any stroke or death until discharge from the hospital. Results: In total, 31,793 cases were included between 2012 and 2018. The primary outcome rate in asymptomatic patients treated by CEA ranged from 0.7% to 1.5%, with the highest rate in hospitals with cVC but without cSU. The multivariable regression analysis revealed a significantly lower primary outcome rate in centers with cSU in asymptomatic patients (aOR 0.69; 95% CI 0.56-0.86; p < 0.001). In symptomatic patients needing emergency treatment, the on-site availability of a cSU was associated with a significantly lower primary outcome rate (aOR 0.56; 95% CI 0.40-0.80; p < 0.001), whereas the presence of a cVC was associated with higher risk (aOR 3.07; 95% CI 1.65-5.72). Conclusions: This study provides evidence of statistically significant better results in some sub-cohorts in certified centers. In centers with cSU, the risk of any stroke or death was significantly lower in asymptomatic patients receiving CEA or symptomatic patients treated by emergency CEA.

Diagnostic accuracy of carotid plaque magnetic resonance imaging compared to histopathology in symptomatic carotid artery stenosis.

INTRODUCTION: Vulnerable plaques have been shown to predict ipsilateral cerebral ischemic events and identifying them leads to appropriate secondary stroke prevention strategies. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of MR carotid plaque imaging in identifying plaque vulnerability when compared with histopathological findings in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis who underwent carotid endarterectomy (CEA). METHODS: A prospective cohort of forty-five consecutive patients with moderate to severe symptomatic carotid stenosis who underwent CEA at a tertiary Indian hospital had 3 T MRI plaque imaging with multi-parametric protocol between November 2021 and December 2022. Images were analyzed by a vascular radiologist blinded to histopathological data. High-risk plaque characteristics such as lipid rich necrotic core (LRNC), intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH), thin fibrous cap and ulceration were assessed and correlated with histopathological findings as per American Heart Association (AHA) classification using Cohen's kappa statistics to obtain diagnostic accuracies. RESULTS: Of the 45 patients, 38(84 %) were males. The mean age was 65 ± 7.7 years and mean duration to CEA from the most recent event was 57 days (57 ± 46 days). A significant correlation between MR plaque imaging and histopathology was noted for IPH (sensitivity-91 %, specificity-86 %, κ = 0.774, p < 0.001), LRNC (sensitivity-92.1 %, specificity-85.7 %, κ = 0.697, p < 0.001), and plaque ulceration (sensitivity-84.6 %, specificity-78.1 %, κ = 0.563, p < 0.001). MRI had an overall sensitivity and specificity of 92.3 % and 84.2 % respectively (κ = 0.77, p < 0.001) in discriminating high risk plaques. CONCLUSION: MR plaque imaging shows a very good correlation with histopathology and can identify unstable high-risk plaques with high accuracy. This may have implication in selection of patients for carotid revascularization in symptomatic carotid stenosis.

Transcarotid Artery Revascularization for Symptomatic Retropharyngeal Internal Carotid Artery Stenosis.

Retropharyngeal internal carotid artery (ICA) is a rare, yet well-described anatomical variant that poses significant challenges to the management of carotid artery stenosis. In this case report, we discuss the treatment of symptomatic ICA stenosis with a retropharyngeal ICA using the transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) technique. A 70-year-old female with comorbidities presented with neurological symptoms and severe ICA stenosis. After diagnostic evaluation, TCAR was chosen for surgical intervention. The patient did well postoperatively. This case emphasizes the importance of considering TCAR when treating ICA stenosis in patients with anatomic variation of ICA location. It also supports adding anatomic variants such as retropharyngeal ICA to the list of indications for TCAR.

Two or More Ischaemic Events Within Seven Days Before Carotid Endarterectomy Increases the Risk of Peri-operative Stroke or Death.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine how many pre-operative ischaemic events occurring within a specific timeframe before carotid endarterectomy (CEA) are needed to increase the peri-operative 30 day risk of stroke or death. METHODS: This was a secondary exploratory analysis based on pooled data from three observational studies sourced from a single centre. Patients with recently symptomatic conventional ≥ 50% carotid stenosis were included. The principal analysis was limited to patients presenting with stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA). The primary outcome was 30 day risk of peri-operative stroke or death. Whether one, two, three, or four or more ipsilateral pre-operative ischaemic events within three, seven, 14, or 30 days before CEA were associated with the primary outcome was assessed. RESULTS: The study included 382 patients who underwent CEA with symptomatic conventional ≥ 50% carotid stenosis with stroke or TIA as the presenting event. Mean patient age ± standard deviation was 72 ± 7 years, 117 (30.6%) were female, and 5% were treated with dual antiplatelet therapy. The primary outcome occurred in 21 patients (5.5%). Two or more events within 7 days before CEA was the most discriminative definition of repeated events, with a 14.3% (8/56) risk of the primary outcome. Those who fell outside this definition of two or more events within seven days before CEA had a 4.0% (13/326; p = .006) risk of experiencing the primary outcome (adjusted odds ratio 4.1, 95% confidence interval 1.6 - 10.5). Several alternative definitions were assessed, but patients with two or more events within seven days before CEA and negative for these alternatives still had a > 10% risk of the primary outcome. CONCLUSION: Two or more ipsilateral ischaemic events within seven days before CEA is associated with an increased risk of peri-operative stroke or death in cases with symptomatic conventional ≥ 50% carotid stenosis and TIA or stroke as the presenting event. Studies assessing whether delayed or immediate CEA is preferable for this patient group are warranted.

Assessment of Voice Quality and Vocal Cord Paralysis After Endarterectomy.

Introduction: Recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy is a rare but important complication after endarterectomy (CEA). The impact on voice quality after this procedure is also important. The aim of the study was to assess voice quality and vocal cord function after CEA. Material and Methods: 200 patients were enrolled in the study. Inclusion criteria were indications for CEA and patient consent to the procedure. Endoscopic examination of the larynx was performed before the procedure, immediately after the procedure, on the 2nd day after the procedure, then 3 month and 6 months after the procedure. Voice was assessed by maximum phonation time (MPT), GRBAS scale, Voice Handicap Index (VHI) and the Voice-Related Quality of Life (V-RQOL) questionnaire. Results: In the study group, the results on the GRBAS scale were significantly worse and the average MPT was shorter compared to the control group. In the V-RQOL assessment, patients rated their voice as fair or good, significantly more often noticed that they had difficulty speaking loudly and being heard, and that they felt short of air when speaking. In VHI-30, the total score was significantly higher in the study group compared to the control group. Voice disorders after the procedure were reported by 68 patients, while a disorder of the recurrent laryngeal nerve was observed immediately after the procedure in 32 patients. Most vocal cord disorders were transient. Ultimately, 3% of patients were diagnosed with vocal cord paralysis. Conclusion: Cranial nerves paralysis, including the recurrent laryngeal nerve, are a common complication after CEA. Majority the paralysis is transient, but requires appropriate diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. Vocal cord evaluation is a non-invasive and widely available examination and should be performed pre- and postoperatively after all neck surgeries. The incidence of voice disorders after CEA significantly affects the quality of life of patients and requires voice rehabilitation and patient care with psychological support.

Sex as a Predictor of Outcomes for Symptomatic Carotid Stenosis: A Comparative Analysis between CAS and CEA.

PURPOSE: Reporting gender-related outcomes for symptomatic carotid lesion revascularization after both endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) procedures in an unselected group of patients treated by Italian Vascular Specialists. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted on patients presenting with recently symptomatic carotid stenosis treated by CAS and by CEA. The primary endpoint was the 30 days any stroke occurrence rate; secondary endpoints were technical success, occurrence of transient ischemic attack (TIA), acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and death. Demographic, clinical and procedural data were all noted in order to identify the outcome's determining factor. RESULTS: A total of 265 patients (193 males and 72 females) were enrolled, and of these 134 (50.5%) underwent CEA and 131 CAS (49.5%). At 30 days, the overall new stroke rate was 3.4% (one fatal), and no TIA, AMI or deaths were observed. Among strokes, seven major and two minor strokes were reported, with six after CEA and three after CAS (p = 0.32; OR: 2; CI95%: 0.48-8.17). The timing of revascularization has been found to be slightly associated with new stroke occurrence: seven out nine strokes were observed in patients treated within 14 days from symptom onset (5.5% vs. 1.4%; p = 0.08, OR: 3.8, CI95%: 0.77-18.56). Lastly, female patients presented a significantly higher risk of post-operative stroke compared to male patients: 6.9% vs. 2.1% (p: 0.05; OR: 3.52; CI95%: 0.91-13.52). CONCLUSIONS: Our experience seems to suggest that both CEA and CAS provide safe and effective results in treating patients presenting with symptomatic carotid stenosis. Regardless of the type of revascularization, female sex is an independent risk factor for stroke recurrence after treatment.

Imaging of Carotid Stenosis: Where Are We Standing? Comparison of Multiparametric Ultrasound, CT Angiography, and MRI Angiography, with Recent Developments.

Atherosclerotic disease of the carotid arteries is a crucial risk factor in predicting the likelihood of future stroke events. In addition, emerging studies suggest that carotid stenosis may also be an indicator of plaque load on coronary arteries and thus have a correlation with the risk of acute cardiovascular events. Furthermore, although in symptomatic patients the degree of stenosis is the main morphological parameter studied, recent evidence suggests, especially in asymptomatic patients, that plaque vulnerability should also be evaluated as an emerging and significant imaging parameter. The reference diagnostic methods for the evaluation of carotid stenosis are currently ultrasonography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and computed tomography angiography (CTA). In addition, other more invasive methods such as 123I-metaiodobenzylguanidine (MIBG) scintigraphy and PET-CT, as well as digital subtraction angiography, can be used. Each method has advantages and disadvantages, and there is often some confusion in their use. For example, the usefulness of MRI is often underestimated. In addition, implementations for each method have been developed over the years and are already enabling a significant increase in diagnostic accuracy. The purpose of our study is to make an in-depth analysis of all the methods in use and in particular their role in the diagnostic procedure of carotid stenosis, also discussing new technologies.

Exploring the contribution of carotid artery disease to the onset of non-arteritic ischemic optic neuropathies: A systematic review.

PURPOSE: The role of carotid artery disease (CAD) in the development of various types of ocular arterial occlusive disorders has often been reported. This systematic review aims to evaluate and review the current evidence regarding the role of CAD and the subsequent carotid artery hemodynamic alterations in the development of non-arteritic anterior (NA-AION) and posterior (NA-PION) ischemic optic neuropathy. METHODS: We systematically reviewed studies following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guidelines. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases for relevant studies that clearly assessed the role of CAD and the subsequent carotid artery hemodynamic alterations in the development of NA-AION and NA-PION. All studies that examined the associations between CAD and the development of NA-AION and NA-PION in adults aged 18 years or older were synthesized. Quality assessment using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), and Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Critical Appraisal Checklist for Case Reports and Case-Series were also conducted. RESULTS: Our search identified 1933 manuscripts published in the English language. The number of participants with non-arteritic ischemic optic neuropathy (NA-ION) ranged from 1 to 191, with a total of 478 patients experiencing either NA-AION (410 out of 478), NA-PION (13 out of 478), or a combination of thereof (1 out of 478). The number of participants with NA-ION due to atherosclerosis ranged from 1 to 191, with a total of 376 patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although carotid artery disease may rarely contribute to the development of NA-ION, it should be considered as a possible cause of NA-ION.

Outcomes Following Carotid Revascularization in Patients with Prior Ipsilateral Carotid Artery Stenting in the Vascular Quality Initiative.

OBJECTIVES: The outcomes of carotid revascularization in patients with prior carotid artery stenting remain understudied. Prior research has not reported the outcomes after Transcarotid artery revascularization (TCAR) in patients with previous carotid artery stenting. In this study, we compared the peri-operative outcomes of TCAR, tfCAS and CEA in patients with prior ipsilateral CAS using the VQI. METHODS: Using the Vascular Quality Initiative data from 2016 to 2023, we identified patients who underwent TCAR, tfCAS, or CEA following prior ipsilateral carotid artery stenting. We included covariates such as age, race, sex, BMI, comorbidities (hypertension, diabetes, prior CAD, prior CABG/PCI, CHF, renal dysfunction, smoking, COPD, anemia), symptom status, urgency, ipsilateral stenosis, and contralateral occlusion into a regression model to compute propensity scores for treatment assignment. We then used the propensity scores for inverse probability-weighting and weighted logistic regression to compare in-hospital stroke, in-hospital death, stroke/death, postoperative myocardial infarction (MI), stroke/death/MI, 30-day mortality and cranial nerve injury (CNI) following TCAR, tfCAS, and CEA. We also analyzed trends in the proportions of patients undergoing the three revascularization procedures over time using Cochrane-Armitage trend testing. RESULTS: We identified 2,137 patients undergoing revascularization following prior ipsilateral carotid stenting: 668 TCAR patients (31%), 1128 tfCAS patients (53%) and 341 CEA patients (16%). In asymptomatic patients, TCAR was associated with a lower yet not statistically significant in-hospital stroke/death than tfCAS (TCAR vs tfCAS: 0.7% vs 2.0%,aOR:0.33[0.11-1.05]; p=0.06), and similar odds of stroke/death with CEA (TCAR vs CEA: 0.7% vs 0.9%,aOR:0.80[0.16-3.98]; p=0.8). Compared with CEA, TCAR was associated with lower odds of post-operative MI (0.1% vs 14%,aOR:0.02[0.00-0.10]; p<0.001), stroke/death/MI (0.8% vs 15%,aOR:0.05[0.01-0.25]; p<0.001), and CNI (0.1% vs 3.8%,aOR:0.04[0.00-0.30]; p=0.002) in this patient population. In symptomatic patients, TCAR had an unacceptably elevated in-hospital stroke/death rate of 5.1% with lower rates of CNI than CEA. We also found an increasing trend in the proportion of patients undergoing TCAR following prior ipsilateral carotid stenting (2016 to 2023: 14% to 41%), with a relative decrease in proportions of tfCAS (61% to 45%) and CEA (25% to 14%) (p<.001). CONCLUSIONS: In asymptomatic patients with prior ipsilateral carotid artery stenting, TCAR was associated with lower odds of in-hospital stroke/death compared with tfCAS, with comparable stroke/death but lower postoperative MI and CNI rates compared with CEA. In symptomatic patients, TCAR was associated with unacceptably elevated in-hospital stroke/death rates. In line with the post-procedure outcomes, there has been a steady increase in the proportion of patients with prior ipsilateral stenting undergoing TCAR over time.

Risk factors of in-stent restenosis after carotid angioplasty and stenting: long-term follow-up study.

Background: After carotid artery angioplasty with stenting (CAS), it is unclear which risk factors are related to long-term outcomes, including in-stent restenosis (ISR). This study aimed to assess the factors associated with restenosis after CAS with a median follow-up of 35.7 months. Materials and methods: Patients who underwent CAS from January 2013 to December 2018 were included if they had symptomatic or asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. The carotid Doppler ultrasonography (CDU) was followed up after the procedure. We defined at least 50% restenosis using the criteria that the internal carotid artery (ICA) peak systolic velocity (PSV) was greater than 224 cm/s or the ICA to common carotid artery PSV ratio was higher than 3.4. The risk factors for ISR were also assessed. Results: Of the 189 patients, 122 had symptomatic carotid artery stenosis, and 67 had asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis. Patients were evaluated by CDU for a median of 35.7 months (interquartile range 19.5 to 70.0). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the longest time to ISR was 39 months, and ISR-free was better in the asymptomatic CAS group. In all groups, ISR was independently associated with current smoker [adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 3.425; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.086 to 10.801] and elevated ICA PSV at baseline (aOR, 1.004; 95% CI, 1.001 to 1.007). Conclusion: Independent risk factors for ISR in the CAS group included current smoking and elevated ICA PSV at baseline. In the symptomatic CAS group, alcohol was independently associated with the ISR. ISR did not occur after 39 months from the CAS procedure in our study patients. Future studies with extended follow-up are necessary to fully understand the long-term outcomes of CAS.

[Treatment of tandem occlusions of the common and internal carotid arteries]. / Behandlung von Tandemstenosen der A. carotis communis und A. carotis interna.

BACKGROUND: Proximal carotid tandem lesions are defined as multilevel lesions with significant (> 50%) atherosclerotic disease involving the internal carotid artery (ICA) in combination with the proximal ipsilateral common carotid artery (CCA) or innominate artery (IA). It is a relatively rare disease with an incidence of less than 5% in all patients with carotid stenosis at the level of the bifurcation. METHODS: These patients are at high surgical risk and were, therefore, excluded from current randomized controlled trials. Although the effectiveness of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid stenting (CAS) in stroke prevention for patients is established, the optimal treatment approach for the subgroup of patients with a proximal tandem lesion is still controversial. Treatment of this condition is not well understood because it is difficult to determine the risk of each individual lesion becoming symptomatic. Therefore, concurrent treatment of severe (> 70% stenosis) proximal lesions is recommended when treating severe stenosis at the carotid bifurcation. CONCLUSION: This disease can lead to embolic ischemic strokes or hemodynamic compromise. It is not possible to determine diagnostically which lesion led to the clinical symptoms, which is why both lesions should be corrected.

Subclavian-Carotid Bypass as a Solution to Recurrent Carotid Artery Stenosis Post Endarterectomy and Transfemoral Stenting.

We present the case of an 80-year-old man who underwent a subclavian-to-distal internal carotid artery bypass with a reversed saphenous vein due to symptomatic in-stent restenosis, following a carotid endarterectomy 20 years ago and carotid artery stenting 10 years ago. The patient presented with right-sided hemiparesis and dysarthria. Imaging suggested in-stent restenosis of the internal carotid artery stent. He was also found to have stenosis of the common carotid artery origin stent. An initial transfemoral attempt by interventional radiology was unsuccessful. Due to the stenosed common carotid artery origin stent, a common carotid-to-internal carotid artery bypass was not feasible. Therefore, a subclavian-distal carotid artery bypass with a reversed saphenous vein was performed. He did well in the postoperative period and has been seen in the clinic since. Surveillance ultrasound demonstrated a patent graft with non-stenotic proximal and distal anastomoses. We include an in-depth review of the management of recurrent carotid artery stenosis as well.