Investigation of prognostic factors for non-sentinel lymph node metastasis in patients undergoing sentinel lymph node biopsy for cutaneous malignant melanoma: Experience from a reference centre in Turkey.

BACKGROUND: In the light of the results of recent randomised controlled trials regarding the role of nodal observation and completion lymph node dissection (CLND), studies from different populations are needed. The aim of our study was to present our experience with sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) and CLND and the clinical and histopathological factors associated with a positive non-sentinel node. METHODS: In this single-centre, retrospective study, we reviewed histopathological reports of patients with primary cutaneous melanoma who underwent SLNB and CLND over a period of 7 years. The primary outcomes were the positivity rates of SLNBs and CLNDs. Secondary outcomes were metastatic tumour burden in positive sentinel nodes and presence of perinodal invasion. RESULTS: Among the 110 participants who underwent SLNB (53 females, 57 males), the mean Breslow thickness of the primary tumour was 4.1 (0.3-41) mm. Ulceration appeared in 62.7% of lesions. The SLNBs were positive in 38 patients (34.5%), with 35 (92.1%) undergoing CLND, among which 9 (25.7%) showed metaNBstasis. Positive SLNB was linked to a higher Breslow thickness (p = 0.022), whereas CLND results lacked such an association (p = 0.76). Perinodal invasion (p = 0.006) and sentinel lymph node metastasis exceeding 1 mm (p = 0.017) was associated with a higher probability of non-sentinel node metastasis. CONCLUSION: To adapt the results of the new cohort study on SLNB and melanoma to different populations, studies with different patient groups highlighting the problems and suggested solutions are needed.

New Zealand patients have a higher melanoma burden in sentinel nodes and completion lymphadenectomy than patients in MSLT-II.

New Zealand has the highest rate of melanoma-related mortality in the world. Access to immunotherapy and radiology is limited and surgical treatment of regional disease remains important. A recent pilot study of a single health district observed a higher nodal melanoma burden than was reported in the second Multicentre Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial (MSLT-II). In this study, a series of regional censuses were undertaken covering the 10 years immediately prior to the publication of MSLT-II. The study population was seven District Health Boards covering 62.2% of the population of New Zealand across a 10-year period preceding MSLT-II. The primary outcomes measured were the size of sentinel lymph node metastases and non-sentinel node (NSN) positivity on completion lymph node dissection (CLND) for patients with a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). In the 2323 SLNB identified, the mean sentinel lymph node metastatic deposit size was larger compared to MSLT-II (2.55 vs. 1.07/1.11 mm). A greater proportion of New Zealand patients (44.2%) had metastatic deposits larger than 1 mm compared to MSLT-II (33.2/34.5%) and the rate of non-sentinel node involvement on CLND was also higher (22.2% vs. 11.5%). These findings indicate that New Zealand is a high-risk population for nodal melanoma metastases. Due to these differences, the conclusions of MSLT-II may not be able to be applied to melanoma patients in the 7 regions studied in New Zealand.

The Current Treatment Trends and Survival Patterns in Melanoma Patients with Positive Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy (SLNB): A Multicenter Nationwide Study.

BACKGROUND: In melanoma treatment, an approach following positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has been recently deescalated from completion lymph node dissection (CLND) to active surveillance based on phase III trials data. In this study, we aim to evaluate treatment strategies in SLNB-positive melanoma patients in real-world practice. METHODS: Five-hundred-fifty-seven melanoma SLNB-positive patients from seven comprehensive cancer centers treated between 2017 and 2021 were included. Kaplan-Meier methods and the Cox Proportional-Hazards Model were used for analysis. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 25 months. Between 2017 and 2021, the percentage of patients undergoing CLND decreased (88-41%), while the use of adjuvant treatment increased (11-51%). The 3-year OS and RFS rates were 77.9% and 59.6%, respectively. Adjuvant therapy prolonged RFS (HR:0.69, p = 0.036)), but CLND did not (HR:1.22, p = 0.272). There were no statistically significant differences in OS for either adjuvant systemic treatment or CLND. Lower progression risk was also found, and time-dependent hazard ratios estimation in patients treated with systemic adjuvant therapy was confirmed (HR:0.20, p = 0.002 for BRAF inhibitors and HR:0.50, p = 0.015 for anti-PD-1 inhibitors). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of SLNB-positive melanoma patients is constantly evolving, and the role of surgery is currently rather limited. Whether CLND has been performed or not, in a group of SLNB-positive patients, adjuvant systemic treatment should be offered to all eligible patients.

The Evolution of the Sentinel Node Biopsy in Melanoma.

The growing repertoire of approved immune-checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy has revolutionized the adjuvant treatment of melanoma. While the treatment of primary cutaneous melanoma remains wide local excision (WLE), the management of regional lymph nodes continues to evolve in light of practice-changing clinical trials and dramatically improved adjuvant therapy. With large multicenter studies reporting no benefit in overall survival for completion lymph node dissection (CLND) after a positive sentinel node biopsy (SLNB), controversy remains regarding patient selection and clinical decision-making. This review explores the evolution of the SLNB in cutaneous melanoma in the context of a rapidly changing adjuvant treatment landscape, summarizing the key clinical trials which shaped current practice guidelines.

Implementation of melanoma guidelines in the multidisciplinary setting: A qualitative analysis.

BACKGROUND: Data suggest variation in utilization of completion lymph node dissection (CLND) and adjuvant systemic therapy (AT) for sentinel lymph node-positive melanoma. We aimed to explore how clinicians consider multidisciplinary treatment options. METHODS: We conducted semi-structured interviews of surgical oncologists, medical oncologists, and otolaryngologists to produce a thematic analysis. RESULTS: Participants (n = 26) described melanoma care as inherently "multidisciplinary," noting the importance of conversations facilitated by shared clinic days or space. Despite believing that their practice mirrored other clinicians, participants revealed diverging perspectives on CLND and AT. Multidisciplinary care presented challenges for surveillance as surgeons expressed desire to retain ownership of patients but did not feel comfortable overseeing AT needs. Participants questioned the fidelity of nodal ultrasounds, noted redundancy in their roles, and described a "surveillance burden" for patients. CONCLUSION: Opportunities exist to improve multidisciplinary melanoma care through broader consensus of how to translate emerging data into patient care and delineating surveillance roles.

Patient Preferences and Satisfaction With Decisions in Stage-III Melanoma: A Mixed Methods Study.

INTRODUCTION: Rapid accumulation of data in surgical and medical oncology has changed the treatment landscape for patients with stage-III melanoma, introducing options for active surveillance and adjuvant systemic therapy; however, these options have increased the complexity of decision making. METHODS: We conducted an explanatory sequential mixed-methods study consisting of surveys and semistructured interviews among patients diagnosed with stage-III melanoma at a single institution from August 2019 to December 2021. The survey included the validated 30-point satisfaction with decision scale (SWD). The interview guide was developed using a shared decision-making framework. RESULTS: Twenty-six participants completed the survey (response rate 40%) and 17 were interviewed. In the survey, 69% of participants reported receiving a recommendation for active surveillance and 23% received a recommendation for adjuvant systemic therapy. Overall SWD for treatment of the lymph node basin and adjuvant systemic therapy was high at 27.94 and 26.21 out of 30, respectively. In the interviews, participants stressed the importance of the physician's recommendation as well as the desire to minimize intervention and avoid potential side effects in their decisions. However, they demonstrated persistent knowledge gaps in their understanding of the treatment options. CONCLUSIONS: Like other cancer types where the option for active surveillance exists, the physician's recommendation is influential in shaping decisions for patients with stage-III melanoma. Physicians can improve shared decision making in this complex treatment landscape through improved multidisciplinary collaboration and mechanisms for ensuring patients' understanding of the treatment options.

Postoperative radiation therapy improves prognoses in extramammary Paget's disease presenting with multiple lymph node metastases.

Invasive extramammary Paget's disease may cause lymph node and distant metastases. Complete lymph node dissection is generally performed for extramammary Paget's disease presenting with lymph node metastases. Patients with extramammary Paget's disease and multiple lymph node metastases typically have poor prognoses, and there is no effective postoperative treatment to prevent recurrence or further metastases in such patients to date. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of postoperative radiotherapy in patients with extramammary Paget's disease and multiple lymph node metastases. We enrolled 26 patients with extramammary Paget's disease with ≥3 lymph node metastases who were treated at the National Cancer Center Hospital in Japan between January 2000 and June 2021. The patients were divided into those who underwent complete lymph node dissection only or with postoperative radiotherapy. We evaluated recurrence-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival outcomes with Kaplan-Meier curves. Among the 26 enrolled patients, 16 underwent complete lymph node dissection only and 10 underwent complete lymph node dissection with postoperative radiotherapy. The median follow-up period was 16 months. The 5-year recurrence-free, distant metastasis-free, and overall survival values were 47.3%, 63.0%, and 90% in those with complete lymph node dissection and postoperative radiotherapy, while these outcomes were all 0% (p = 0.001, 0.004, and 0.009, respectively) in those with only complete lymph node dissection. Thus, survival was significantly prolonged with postoperative radiotherapy. Additional postoperative radiotherapy may substantially improve the prognoses of patients with extramammary Paget's disease and ≥3 lymph node metastases, and undergoing curative surgery.

The role of sentinel node tumor burden in modeling the prognosis of melanoma patients with positive sentinel node biopsy: an Italian melanoma intergroup study (N = 2,086).

BACKGROUND: The management of melanoma patients with metastatic melanoma in the sentinel nodes (SN) is evolving based on the results of trials questioning the impact of completion lymph node dissection (CLND) and demonstrating the efficacy of new adjuvant treatments. In this landscape, new prognostic tools for fine risk stratification are eagerly sought to optimize the therapeutic path of these patients. METHODS: A retrospective cohort of 2,086 patients treated with CLND after a positive SN biopsy in thirteen Italian Melanoma Centers was reviewed. Overall survival (OS) was the outcome of interest; included independent variables were the following: age, gender, primary melanoma site, Breslow thickness, ulceration, sentinel node tumor burden (SNTB), number of positive SN, non-sentinel lymph nodes (NSN) status. Univariate and multivariate survival analyses were performed using the Cox proportional hazard regression model. RESULTS: The 3-year, 5-year and 10-year OS rates were 79%, 70% and 54%, respectively. At univariate analysis, all variables, except for primary melanoma body site, were found to be statistically significant prognostic factors. Multivariate Cox regression analysis indicated that older age (P < 0.0001), male gender (P = 0.04), increasing Breslow thickness (P < 0.0001), presence of ulceration (P = 0.004), SNTB size (P < 0.0001) and metastatic NSN (P < 0.0001) were independent negative predictors of OS. CONCLUSION: The above results were utilized to build a nomogram in order to ease the practical implementation of our prognostic model, which might improve treatment personalization.

Melanoma sentinel lymph node biopsy and completion lymph node dissection: A regional hospital experience.

Completion lymph node dissection (CLND) following positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) for cutaneous melanoma is a topic of controversy. The second Multicenter Selective Lymphadenectomy Trial (MSLT-II) suggested no survival benefit with CLND over observation amongst patients with a positive SLNB. The findings of the MSLT-II may have limited applicability to our high-risk population where nodal ultrasound and non-surgical melanoma treatment is rationed. In this regional, retrospective study, we reviewed primary melanoma, SLNB and CLND histopathological reports in the Bay of Plenty District Health Board (BOPDHB) across a 10-year period. The primary outcomes measured were size of sentinel lymph node metastases and non-sentinel node (NSN) positivity on CLND for patients with a positive SLNB. In the 157 SLNB identified, the mean sentinel lymph node metastatic deposit size was larger in BOPDHB compared with MSLT-II (3.53 vs 1.07/1.11mm). A greater proportion of BOPDHB patients (54.8%) had metastatic deposits larger than 1mm compared with MSLT-II (33.2/34.5%) and the rate of NSN involvement on CLND was also higher (23.8% vs 11.5%). These findings indicate that the BOPDHB is a high-risk population for nodal melanoma metastases. Forgoing CLND in the context of a positive SLNB may place these patients at risk.

Current management of melanoma patients with nodal metastases.

The management of melanoma patients with nodal metastases has undergone dramatic changes over the last decade. In the past, the standard of care for patients with a positive sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) was a completion lymph node dissection (CLND), while patients with palpable macroscopic nodal disease underwent a therapeutic lymphadenectomy in cases with no evidence of systemic spread. However, studies have shown that SLN metastases present as a spectrum of disease, with certain SLN-based factors being prognostic of and correlated with outcomes. Furthermore, the results of key clinical trials demonstrate that CLND provides no survival benefit over nodal observation in positive SLN patients, while other clinical trials have shown that adjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy or targeted therapy after CLND is associated with a recurrence-free survival benefit. Given the efficacy of these systemic therapies in the adjuvant setting, these agents are now being evaluated and utilized as neoadjuvant treatments in patients with regionally-localized or resectable metastatic melanoma. Multiple options now exist to treat melanoma patients with nodal disease, and determining the best treatment course for a particular case requires an in-depth knowledge of current data and an informed discussion with the patient. This review will provide an overview of the various options for treating melanoma patients with nodal metastases and will discuss the data that supported the development of these treatment options.

Observation policy for sentinel node metastasis of melanoma: Comparative study with completion lymph node dissection in Japanese patients.

Based on the results of international multicenter randomized trials, completion lymph node dissection for patients with sentinel lymph node-positive melanoma is no longer routinely recommended. However, clinicians should take into consideration racial and medical resource differences when applying this evidence to clinical practice in Japan. To evaluate the clinical validity of the observation policy of omitting completion lymph node dissection, we retrospectively surveyed patients with sentinel lymph node-positive melanoma between 2002 and 2020 at Niigata Cancer Center Hospital. A total of 59 patients were categorized into the observation group (n = 19) and completion lymph node dissection group (n = 40). Newly developed anticancer agents, including targeted therapy and immunotherapy, were more commonly used in the observation group than in the completion lymph node dissection group as either adjuvant therapy (31.6% vs. 5.0%) or post-recurrence therapy (100% vs. 34.8%). The median overall survival in the observation group (not reached) was significantly longer than that in the completion lymph node dissection group (95.0 months; p = 0.02), which was mainly attributed to the difference in post-recurrence overall survival. There was no significant difference in recurrence-free survival between the two groups (p = 0.63). Although the use of new anticancer agents leads to bias, this study demonstrates that observation without prompt completion lymph node dissection provides a favorable overall survival without increasing the risk of recurrence compared with completion lymph node dissection. The observation policy for patients with sentinel lymph node-positive melanoma patients is considered to be clinically valid in real-world medical practice.

Predictors of Nonsentinel Lymph Node Metastasis in Cutaneous Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Although completion lymph node dissection (CLND) is not routinely performed for a positive sentinel lymph node (SLN) anymore, adjuvant therapy depends on the risk factors available from SLN biopsy, including the risk of nonsentinel node metastases (NSNM). A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed in an attempt to identify risk factors that could be used to predict the risk of NSNM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medline, Web of Science, Embase, and Cochrane were searched for articles discussing predictive factors for NSNM. PRISMA guidelines were followed, and RevMan software was used to calculate pooled odds ratios (OR) using the Mantel-Haenszel test. RESULTS: Fifty publications were suitable for additional analysis. The clinical and primary tumor factors that were consistently identified as risk factors for NSNMs were: age >50, T stage 3 or 4, Clark level IV/V, ulceration, microsatellitosis, lymphovascular invasion, nodular histology, and extremity versus trunk primary tumor location. SLN factors that predicted NSNMs were >1 positive SLN, SLN micrometastatic tumor burden, diameter >2 mm, extracapsular extension, nonsubcapsular location (Dewar), and Rotterdam > 1 mm or ≥ 0.1 mm. CONCLUSIONS: The findings in this study support that many clinical and pathologic risk factors that can be assessed with SLN biopsy alone can be used to predict the risk of NSNMs. The factors identified in this review should be evaluated in clinical prediction models to predict the risk of NSNMS, a prediction that may be used to select patients for adjuvant therapy in high-risk melanoma.

Challenges in sentinel node pathology in the era of adjuvant treatment.

BACKGROUND: With the approval of adjuvant therapy for stage III melanoma, accurate staging is more important than ever. Sentinel node biopsy (SNB) is an accurate staging tool, yet the presence of capsular nevi (CN) can lead to a false-positive diagnosis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of the American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition stage IIIA melanoma patients who were treated at our institute between 2000 and 2015. SNB slides were reviewed for this study by an expert melanoma pathologist. RESULTS: Of 159 eligible patients, 14 originally diagnosed with metastatic melanoma merely had CN (8.8%). Another two merely had melanophages (1.3%). Thus, 10.1% of SNs were considered false positive after revision. In 12 patients, the SN tumor burden was originally reported as larger than 1 mm but turned out to be less than 1 mm. Four patients originally reported as SN tumor burden less than 1 mm before revision turned out to have larger than 1 mm. These patients might have been over- or undertreated in the current era of adjuvant therapy for stage III melanoma. CONCLUSIONS: Distinguishing metastatic melanoma from benign CN and melanophages can be a diagnostic challenge. We plead for an expert pathologists' review, especially when using the SNB + results to determine treatment consequences.

Completion lymph node dissection in patients with sentinel lymph node positive cutaneous head and neck melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Relatively few cutaneous head and neck melanoma (CHNM) patients with were included in the multicenter selective lymphadenectomy trial II (MSLT-II). Our objective was to investigate whether immediate completion lymph node dissection completion of lymph node dissection (CLND) was associated with survival benefit for sentinel lymph node (SLN) positive CHNM using the National Cancer Database. METHODS: SLN positive patients with CHNM from 2012 to 2014 were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: those who underwent SLN biopsy (SLNB) only versus those who underwent SLNB followed by CLND (SLNB + CLND). The primary outcome was 5-year overall survival (OS). RESULTS: Among 530 SLNB + patients, 342 patients underwent SLNB followed by CLND (SLNB + CLND). The SLNB only group had fewer positive SLN, less advanced pathologic stage, and a lower rate of adjuvant immunotherapy. There was no significant difference in 5-year OS between the two groups (51.0% vs 67%; P = .56). After adjusting for pathologic stage, there remained no difference in 5-year OS among patients with stage IIIA (63.0% vs. 73.6%, P = 0.22) or IIIB/IIIC disease (39.1% vs 57.8%; P = .52). Conclusions Using a large nationwide database, CLND was not shown to be associated with improved OS for patients with SLNB positive CHNM, validating the results of MSLT-II.

Performance of models predicting residual lymph node disease in melanoma patients following sentinel lymph node biopsy.

BACKGROUND: Among melanoma patients with a tumor-positive sentinel node biopsy (SNB), approximately 20% harbor disease in non-sentinel nodes (nSN), as determined by a completion lymph node dissection (CLND). CLND lacks a survival benefit and has high morbidity. This study assesses predictive factors for nSN metastasis and validates five models predicting nSN metastasis. METHODS: Patients with invasive melanoma were identified from the BC Cancer Agency (2005-2015). Clinicopathological data were collected from 296 patients who underwent a CLND after a positive SNB. Multivariate analysis was completed to assess predictive variables in the study population. Five models were externally validated using overall model performance (Brier score [calibration and discrimination]) and discrimination (area under the ROC curve [AUC]). RESULTS: Seventy-three patients had nSN metastasis at the time of CLND. The variable most predictive of nSN involvement was lymphovascular invasion (odds ratio [OR] 3.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.67-9.54; p = 0.002). The highest discrimination was Lee et al. (2004) (AUC 0.68 [95% CI 0.61-0.75]), Rossi et al. (2018) (AUC 0.68 [95% CI 0.57-0.77]), and Bertolli et al. (2019) (AUC 0.68 [95% CI 0.60-0.75]). Rossi et al. (2018) had the lowest overall model performance (Brier score 0.44). Rossi et al. (2018) and Bertolli et al. (2019) had the ability to stratify patients to a risk of nSN involvement up to 99% and 95%, respectively. CONCLUSION: Bertolli et al. (2019) had amongst the highest overall model performance, was the most clinically meaningful and is recommended as the preferred model for predicting nSN metastasis.

Completion lymph node dissection for merkel cell carcinoma.

BACKGROUND: Sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is widely used for Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), however in SLNB positive MCC the role of completion lymph node dissection (CLND) with or without adjuvant radiation therapy is unclear. OBJECTIVE: Our goal was to determine the impact of CLND and adjuvant radiation therapy on survival in SLNB positive MCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined 447 patients with MCC with a positive SLNB in the National Cancer Data Base from 2012 to 2015. We compared patients who underwent CLND versus observation with or without adjuvant radiation. RESULTS: Compared with CLND and adjuvant radiation (reference) treatment with observation (HR 3.54, CI 1.36-9.18) or CLND alone (HR 2.54, CI 1.03-6.27) were associated with worse overall survival after adjusting for clinicopathologic differences. In contrast treatment with adjuvant radiation alone without CLND was not associated with worse overall survival (HR 1.70, CI 0.74-3.92) compared with CLND and adjuvant radiation (reference). CONCLUSIONS: In SLNB positive MCC, CLND alone is associated with worse survival compared with treatment with adjuvant radiation or both CLND and adjuvant radiation.

Completely resected stage III melanoma controversy - 15 years of national tertiary centre experience.

BACKGROUND: Two prospective randomized studies analysing cutaneous melanoma (CM) patients with sentinel lymph node (SLN) metastases and rapid development of systemic adjuvant therapy have changed our approach to stage III CM treatment. The aim of this study was to compare results of retrospective survival analysis of stage III CM patients' treatment from Slovenian national CM register to leading international clinical guidelines. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Since 2000, all Slovenian CM patients with primary tumour ≥ TIb are treated at the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana and data are prospectively collected into a national CM registry. A retrospective analysis of 2426 sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsies and 789 lymphadenectomies performed until 2015 was conducted using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank tests. RESULTS: Positive SLN was found in 519/2426 (21.4%) of patients and completion dissection (CLND) was performed in 455 patients. The 5-year overall survival (OS) of CLND group was 58% vs. 47% of metachronous metastases group (MLNM) (p = 0.003). The 5-year OS of patients with lymph node (LN) metastases and unknown primary site (UPM) was 45% vs. 21% of patients with synchronous LN metastasis. Patients with SLN tumour burden < 0.3 mm had 5-year OS similar to SLN negative patients (86% vs. 85%; p = 0.926). The 5-year OS of patients with burden > 1.0 mm was similar to the MLNM group (49% vs. 47%; p = 0.280). CONCLUSIONS: Stage III melanoma patients is a heterogeneous group with significant OS differences. CLND after positive SLNB might still remain a method of treatment for selected patients with stage III.

Surgical Management of Lymph Nodes in Melanoma.

This article provides a comprehensive evaluation of surgical management of the lymph node basin in melanoma, with historical, anatomic, and evidence-based recommendations for practice.

Nonsurgical Management of Lymph Node Basins in Melanoma.

In this article we provide a critical review of the evidence available for surgical management of the nodal basin in melanoma, with an aim to ensure an understanding of risks and benefits for all lymph node surgery offered to patients, and alternatives to surgical management where appropriate.

[Stage III melanoma: Sentinel node biopsy, completion lymph node dissection and prospects of adjuvant therapy. A French national survey on current and envisaged practices]. / Mélanome au stade ganglionnaire : analyse du ganglion sentinelle, curage ganglionnaire, perspective des traitements adjuvants. Enquête nationale française sur les pratiques actuelles et envisagées.

BACKGROUND: The recent publication of randomized trials investigating the efficacy of adjuvant therapy and completion lymph node dissection at microscopic stage III melanoma calls for a reappraisal of melanoma management from different angles: indications for sentinel lymph node biopsy, indications for completion lymph node dissection in microscopic-stage disease, and adjuvant therapies. Our objective was to evaluate current practices and to question French onco-dermatologists about any changes they envisaged in their practices in the light of recent publications. METHODS: We conducted a national survey among members of the Cutaneous Oncology Group of the French Society of Dermatology in October 2017. RESULTS: Forty French health centers were included, and 53 individual responses were collected. Sentinel lymph node biopsy for melanoma was performed at 75 % of the centers. Before the summer of 2017 and the publication of MSLT-II (proving the absence of any therapeutic benefits for complete lymph node dissection in microscopic stage III melanoma), when a positive sentinel lymph node was diagnosed, immediate completion lymph node dissection was performed at 90 % of the centers. After the publication of MSLT-II, 45 % of the respondents considered stopping this practice. The risk-benefit ratio prompted prescription of nivolumab and of combined dabrafenib+trametinib as adjuvant therapy by respectively 96 % and 79 % of respondents, while the corresponding rates for interferon and ipilimumab were only 21 % and 15 %. CONCLUSION: Early melanoma management stands on the verge of major changes thanks to the arrival of efficient adjuvant therapies and a decrease in immediate completion lymph node dissections for patients with microscopic stage III is also anticipated.