A single-center retrospective comparison of muscle versus cutaneous free flaps for posterior elbow defect reconstruction.

INTRODUCTION: Comparative data on free flap outcomes for elbow defect reconstruction are still lacking. This study aimed to compare complication rates of free muscle flaps (MFs) versus cutaneous flaps (CFs) for posterior elbow reconstruction. METHODS: In a single-center retrospective analysis, patients who underwent posterior elbow reconstruction with free MFs and CFs from 2000 to 2021 were analyzed. Retrospective chart review included patient demographics, operative details, and post-operative complications. Outcomes of interest that were compared included microvascular complications, partial or total flap necroses, wound dehiscence, hematoma or flap infection, and donor-site complications. RESULTS: Sixty-six free flaps (CFs: n = 42; MFs: n = 24) were included, with a trend over time toward using CFs (64%). MFs were used for larger defects (CF: 175 ± 82 vs. MF: 212 ± 146 cm2; p = 0.13). Outcome analysis revealed an equal distribution of microvascular complications (10% vs. 13%; p = 0.7), partial flap necrosis (7% vs. 8%; p > 0.9), wound dehiscence (7% vs. 4%; p > 0.9), evacuation of hematoma (10% vs. 4%; p = 0.7), and infection (0% vs. 4%; p = 0.4). Total flap necrosis requiring additional flap surgery was necessary in one CF (2%) and in no MF (0%) (p > 0.9). CONCLUSION: Surgical outcomes, flap necrosis rates, and microsurgical complications did not differ between CFs and MFs. Both flap types are safe and effective options. The free anterolateral thigh and latissimus dorsi flaps represent indispensable workhorses for the reconstruction of extensive elbow defects.

Management of Posttraumatic Posterior Elbow Defects by Nonmicrosurgical Reconstruction.

Introduction Reconstruction of posterior defects is challenging due to the quality and uniqueness of the excess skin at the elbow that is durable, thick, pliable, and without much subcutaneous tissue. The goal of reconstruction is to cover the elbow defects with a durable skin cover that will facilitate full passive range of motion. In this era of microsurgery, free tissue transfer is feasible for almost any defect. However, in this article, we discuss various locoregional and pedicled flap options and the protocol followed at our institute to tackle posttraumatic posterior elbow defects. Materials and Methods This is a retrospective analysis of 48 patients with posttraumatic posterior elbow defects admitted from January 2012 to February 2020. Posterior elbow defects were assessed according to the size and location and managed with a nonmicrosurgical reconstruction. Results Of 48 patients, 32 were managed with nonmicrosurgical flaps. Eighteen patients had large defects and 14 had small defects. Reverse lateral forearm flap was the workhorse flap for defect coverage. Of 32 flaps, nine developed complications; however, no patient had total flap necrosis. Conclusion Posterior elbow defects are a difficult problem to tackle. To achieve optimal results, all patients with elbow trauma should be attended and managed by orthopaedic and plastic surgeons in collaboration for optimal results. We believe that most of these defects can be resurfaced by nonmicrosurgical reconstruction with proper planning and execution and their utility cannot be understated.

Soft tissue coverage of the elbow.

Our discussion considers pedicled flaps about the elbow and free flaps. Local pedicle flaps are indicated in situations in which anatomic structures or implants are exposed and are absent native tissue or blood supply, or are at risk of infection.

[Reconstruction of elbow defect by perforator propeller flap of the brachial region--clinical observation]. / Reconstruction des pertes de substance du coude par lambeau perforant en hélice de la région brachial--observation clinique.

INTRODUCTION: The elbow defects can raise problem to plastic surgeon. Indeed, this region is characterized by thin and mobile tissues; its reconstruction must be long-lasting, resistant to movements, to shear forces and to external support. Perforator propeller flaps beings appear an interesting option in the reconstruction of elbow defects. In this report, we describe a patient having benefited from the excision of a melanoma of the region of the elbow. After multidisciplinary meeting and resection of new margins, a reconstruction by perforator propeller flap was realized. A perforator pedicle of the lateral brachial region was located and used. The postoperative result in term of cover and function was considered very satisfactory. The perforator propeller flaps appear a reliable and interesting solution in the coverage of elbow defect.