Evaluation of swallowing in patients with T3/T4 oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Background: Follow-up of patients treated for head and neck cancer is an important part of the overall treatment. Oral cancers are one of the leading causes of dysphagia. Swallowing dysfunction occurs owing to the disease itself, its predisposing factors, and the treatment. This study aims to evaluate swallowing dysfunction in patients with oral cavity cancers. Methods: This prospective study was carried out in a tertiary care hospital institution. Thirty patients with T3, T4 oral cancers were evaluated using institutional dysphagia score and fiber optic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES) (Penetration-Aspiration Scale, Yale Pharyngeal Residue Scale) before treatment, after surgery, and after adjuvant therapy. Results: Advanced-stage tumor, larger resections, and adjuvant therapy are risk factors for dysphagia postoperatively. Although the dysphagia score is our institutional score, the results are promising, that is, 10 % of patients having symptoms at baseline evaluation, which increased to 60% and 70% after surgery and adjuvant radiotherapy respectively. Our study findings of the Penetration Aspiration Scale are 13% aspiration rate at the baseline evaluation, which increased to 57% and 73% after surgery and after adjuvant radiotherapy, respectively, and these results are consistent with those of other report studies. The Vallecular Residual Scale showed that there was a significant association between three different timelines and demonstrated dysphagia among study subjects. Conclusion: Subjective and objective assessment of swallowing dysfunction before and after the treatment of head and neck cancers is underreported and underrecognized. Most of the patients in our study had significant swallowing impairment after treatment. FEES is a very effective procedure to diagnose dysphagia and will help in incorporating better preventative and rehabilitative measures.

Pharyngeal Residue Severity and Aspiration Risk in Stroke Patient Using Fiber-Optic Endoscopic Evaluation of Swallowing.

INTRODUCTION: Pharyngeal residue, defined as the material remaining in the pharynx post-swallow, is a sign of swallowing biomechanical impairment and a clinical predictor of aspiration. This study investigates the correlation between pharyngeal residue severity using the Mansoura FEES Residue Rating Scale (MFRRS) and penetration/aspiration scores using the penetration-aspiration scale (PAS) on FEES. METHODS: Two hundred ten (210) swallows were obtained during standard FEES assessments of thirty patients with poststroke dysphagia. Residue, in both vallecula and the pyriform sinuses' locations, and penetration/aspiration were scored using MFRRS and PAS, respectively. The Spearman's rank-order correlation was used to assess the correlation between residue and PAS scores. The significance of the obtained results was judged at the (p < 0.05) level. RESULTS: Significant strong positive correlations were demonstrated between PAS scores and each vallecular residue score (rs = 0.663, p = 0.000) and pyriform residue score (rs = 0.688, p = 0.001). CONCLUSION: There is a significant strong positive correlation between residue severity and penetration/aspiration in each anatomical site evaluated (valleculae and pyriform sinuses). Our results do not designate one site as riskier than the other because either can contribute to aspiration, but rather demonstrate penetration/aspiration to better correlate with the overall severity of the residue, perhaps as a better marker for pharyngeal inefficiency. This study offers insight into the association of residue severity with swallowing safety and efficiency.

Translation and Validation of the Dysphagia Handicap Index in Hebrew-Speaking Patients.

The Dysphagia Handicap Index (DHI) is a 25-item questionnaire assessing the physical, functional, and emotional aspects of dysphagia patients' quality of life (QoL). The study goal was to translate and validate the Hebrew-DHI. 148 patients undergoing fiberoptic endoscopic examination of swallowing (FEES) in two specialized dysphagia clinics between February and August 2017 filled the Hebrew-DHI and self-reported their dysphagia severity on a scale of 1-7. 21 patients refilled the DHI during a 2-week period following their first visit. FEES were scored for residue (1 point per consistency), penetration and aspiration (1 point for penetration, 2 points for aspiration, per consistency). 51 healthy volunteers also filled the DHI. Internal consistency and test-retest reproducibility were used for reliability testing. Validity was established by comparing DHI scores of dysphagia patients and healthy controls. Concurrent validity was established by correlating the DHI score with the FEES score. Internal consistency of the Hebrew-DHI was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.96), as was the test-retest reproducibility (Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.82, p < 0.001). The Hebrew-DHI's total score, and its three subscales (physical/functional/emotional) were significantly higher in dysphagia patients compared to those in healthy controls (median 38 pts, IQR 18-56 for dysphagia patients compared to 0, IQR 0-2 for healthy controls, p < 0.0001). A strong correlation was observed between the DHI score and the self-reported dysphagia severity measure (Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.88, p < 0.0001). A moderate correlation was found between the DHI score and the FEES score (Pearson's correlation coefficient = 0.245, p = 0.003). The Hebrew-DHI is a reliable and valid questionnaire assessing dysphagia patients' QoL.

Continuum theory: presbyphagia to dysphagia? Functional assessment of swallowing in the elderly.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether disclosed symptoms (coughing, choking and throat clearing) can be used as early predictors of swallowing disorders in non-hospitalized elderly population. In addition, to determine the presence of early findings of swallowing disorders through fiber optic endoscopic evaluation of swallowing (FEES). MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred subjects older than 60 years were recruited from local community social meetings for seniors, they fulfilled inclusion criteria, and were given an oral interview and underwent FEES, with findings classified as: (1) saliva stasis; (2) pharyngeal residue; (3) penetration; (4) aspiration; (5) laryngeal sensitivity. RESULTS: Twenty-one percent of subjects declared previous choking, 10% coughing, and 7% throat clearing, 39% had pharyngeal residue; 6% saliva stasis; 9% penetration; 2% aspiration; and 92% laryngeal sensitivity present. Thirty-three percent showed pharyngeal residue without saliva stasis, while only 6% showed positivity for both (p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: Our data suggest that health care professionals should be aware that among an apparently healthy population, some subjects may have swallowing disorders without clinical complaints and that a nasolaryngoscopy exam may not be enough to predict dysphagia. We suggest that FEES should be performed to look for surrogate of dysphagia such as pharyngeal residue, laryngeal penetration, and aspiration.