Utility of Adjunctive Impella Support to Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation for a Refractory Electrical Storm.

Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) stabilizes hemodynamics in an electrical storm leading to cardiogenic shock. However, adverse effects of VA-ECMO are increased left ventricular (LV) afterload and LV end-diastolic pressure due to retrograde blood return. These adverse effects could be ameliorated by LV unloading with Impella insertion. This case illustrates the possible efficacy of adjunctive Impella insertion for a refractory electrical storm that is resistant to defibrillation under mechanical support with VA-ECMO for cardiogenic shock.

Cardiovascular Collapse Requiring Veno-Arterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Lidocaine: A Case of Massive Bupropion Overdose.

Bupropion is an antidepressant used in the treatment of major depressive disorder, seasonal affective disorder, nicotine addiction, and weight loss. It primarily functions via norepinephrine and dopamine reuptake inhibition. At toxic doses, bupropion can elicit seizures, as well as precipitate corrected QT interval (QTc) and QRS prolongation. We describe a case of an 18-year-old female who reportedly ingested 28 grams of extended-release bupropion, a dose much higher than in previously reported cases. Toxic ingestion precipitated status epilepticus, prolonged QTc, widened QRS, pulseless ventricular tachycardia (pVT), and subsequent cardiovascular collapse necessitating veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and Impella support. Historically, the cardiotoxic effects of bupropion toxicity have largely been treated with supportive care, sometimes requiring ECMO. This patient's course was complicated by a widening QRS despite aggressive bicarbonate therapy and recurrent pVT, which was ultimately aborted with lidocaine. Neurological prognostication was further complicated by a lack of brainstem reflexes on the exam. With maximal supportive care, the patient was liberated from Impella, ECMO, and the ventilator by hospital day seven. At discharge, she was neurologically intact with full recovery of cardiac function. This case emphasizes the need for early consideration of transfer to an ECMO center in the setting of a bupropion overdose and offers a potentially effective treatment option for bupropion-induced ventricular arrhythmia.

Spontaneous Coronary Artery Dissection in a Patient With Cardiogenic Shock: To Revascularize or Not to Revascularize?

Spontaneous coronary artery dissection (SCAD) is a rare cause of acute coronary syndrome in young patients. Supportive care is recommended for most uncomplicated cases. However, it is unclear if revascularization plays a role in treating SCAD, particularly in the setting of cardiogenic shock. We present a case of a 40-year-old female with no past medical history admitted for SCAD that was complicated by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions (SCAI) stage D cardiogenic shock. She was successfully managed with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device without revascularization. Repeat angiogram showed healed left anterior descending (LAD) SCAD with recovery of left ventricular (LV) systolic function. This case highlights the importance of supportive care in the treatment of SCAD, as revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) can pose a significant perioperative risk in this patient population.

Registro multicéntrico impella CP para shock cardiogénico o angioplastía de alto riesgo protegida en Chile / Use of impella CP in high risk coronary angioplasty and cardiogenic shock: a registry

Antecedentes: El Shock Cardiogénico (SC) y las Angioplastías de Alto Riesgo (AAR) están asociadas con altas tasas de mortalidad. El uso del dispositivo Impella CP podría reducir el riesgo de muerte en estos escenarios. En Chile no existen reportes evaluando el uso del dispositivo Impella CP. Objetivo: Analizar los desenlaces clínicos en pacientes que fueron sometidos al uso del dispositivo Impella CP por SC o por AAR. Métodos: Se realizó un estudio retrospectivo en 17 pacientes, los cuales representan el total de implantes realizados en el país, entre octubre 2021 y agosto 2023. Se describió las características, demográficas, procedimentales y después del implante. Se estimó la mortalidad general y se identificaron factores asociados. Resultados: La edad de los pacientes fue 69± 3,7 años y 88,2% fueron hombres. El 64,7% recibió el dispositivo por SC y 35,3% por AAR. Dentro de las comorbilidades estudiadas, la hipertensión arterial fue la más frecuente, 94,1%. Un 58,8% de los pacientes fueron revascularizados a través de la arteria radial. El 29,4% recibió el dispositivo previo a la angioplastía y 70,6% lo recibió después. El 47,1% de las angioplastías fue guiada por imágenes. En 11,8% de ellos se realizó litotricia intracoronaria y 5,9% por ablación intracoronaria. Los pacientes estuvieron 13 ±3,4 días con el soporte. La mortalidad global fue de 41,2%. Conclusiones: El uso del dispositivo Impella presentó pocas complicaciones vasculares. La mortalidad asociada con su colocación en Chile fue relativamente similar con la reportada en la literatura.

Background: Cardiogenic shock and high-risk Angioplasty are associated with a high mortality rate. Using the Impella CP device could reduce the risk of death in these scenarios. In Chile, there are no studies evaluating the use of the Impella CP device. Objective: To analyse the clinical outcomes in patients who have undergone placement of the Impella CP device for cardiogenic shock and high-risk angioplasties. Methods: A retrospective study was carried out on 17 patients, which represent the total number of implants performed in the country, between October 2021 and August 2023. The demographic, procedural and post-implant characteristics were described. Overall mortality and associated factors were identified. Results: The age was 69± 3.7 years, where 88.2% were men. 64.7% of patients received the device by SC and 35.3% by AAR. Among the comorbidities studied, arterial hypertension was the most frequent with 94.1%. 58.8% of patients were revascularized through the radial artery. 29.4% of patients received the device before angioplasty and 70.6% received it afterwards. 47.1% of angioplasties were image-guided, 11.8% had intracoronary lithotripsy, and 5.9% had intracoronary ablation. The patients spent 13 ±3.4 days with the support. Overall mortality was 41.2%. Conclusion: use of the Impella device was associated with few vascular complications. Mortality associated with use of the Impella device in Chile was similar to that previously reported in other studies.

Percutaneous Axillary Left Ventricular Support as a Lifesaving Measure for Peripartum Cardiomyopathy Shock: A Case Report.

Peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) affects women at the end of pregnancy or after delivery. Symptoms overlapping with pregnancy decrease the diagnostic yield of PPCM and can increase the rate of maternal mortality. As clinicians manage high-risk patients, it is crucial to understand the variable maternal physiology both during and after childbirth. Effective management of high-risk patients necessitates a comprehensive understanding of the variable maternal physiology during and after childbirth. The importance of prompt intervention with Impella CP (Cardiac Power) to treat acute cardiogenic shock stemming from PPCM after cesarean should be considered. Clinical outcomes can be improved by emphasizing the need for timely intervention and incorporating a comprehensive understanding of maternal physiology. The authors present a case of Impella CP use in PPCM shock as a means for emergent support after cesarean.

Percutaneous Transaxillary Impella Device Placement Resulting in Iatrogenic Subclavian Artery Pseudoaneurysm.

Subclavian artery pseudoaneurysm (PSA) is a rare complication arising from transaxillary Impella device placement during high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Despite the increasing prevalence of Impella use, literature addressing this complication is scarce. This case emphasizes the limited existing evidence on subclavian artery PSA and highlights the importance of recognizing it as a potential risk. With high-risk PCI and Impella use gaining popularity, understanding this complication is crucial for early detection and appropriate management. A 62-year-old male with a past medical history of type II diabetes mellitus, peripheral artery disease, hypertension, and chronic tobacco use presents with recurrent episodes of exertional chest pain and dyspnea. Initial workup with an electrocardiogram showed ST-segment elevations in the anteroseptal leads. The patient underwent right- and left-sided cardiac catheterization, which revealed severe stenosis of the left anterior descending artery and findings of cardiogenic shock. The patient required mechanical circulatory support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device during the procedure; this was placed via transaxillary approach due to the patient having peripheral artery disease in bilateral femoral arteries. The patient had a complicated clinical course, but the patient's clinical picture slowly improved, and the percutaneous left ventricular assist device was removed. Roughly six weeks after the removal of the device, the patient developed a large fluid collection in the chest wall anterior to the left shoulder. Imaging revealed a ruptured left distal subclavian artery PSA. The patient was promptly taken to the catheterization laboratory and a covered stent was deployed over the site of the PSA. Repeat angiography revealed brisk flow through the left subclavian artery into the axillary artery with no extravasation into the chest wall.

COVID-19 fulminant myocarditis recovered with veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation and Impella CP.

A 38-year-old man without a history of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination presented with dyspnea and fever. Polymerase chain reaction nasopharyngeal swab for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 was positive. Electrocardiogram showed diffuse ST-segment elevation, and chest radiography showed mild pulmonary congestion. The left ventricular (LV) function was markedly impaired. Vital signs were unstable, and serum lactate level was elevated. The patient was diagnosed with cardiogenic shock due to COVID-19 fulminant myocarditis and received veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) and Impella CP (Abiomed, Inc., Danvers, MA, USA). Remdesivir and intravenous immunoglobulin were also administered. Corticosteroids were not administered because of the absence of pneumonia. On admission, endomyocardial biopsy showed a small direct inflammatory infiltrate of the myocardium. During mechanical support, the cardiac function improved, the patient was weaned off VA-ECMO on day 6, and Impella CP on day 7. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging implied recent myocardial damage. The patient was discharged on day 30, and the LV function fully recovered. Since the treatment and prognosis of COVID-19 fulminant myocarditis remain unclear, we report the course of COVID-19 fulminant myocarditis with favorable outcomes. Mechanical circulatory support might be an important factor in determining the prognosis of COVID-19 fulminant myocarditis. Learning objective: Coronavirus disease 2019 fulminant myocarditis sometimes requires mechanical circulatory support. The prognosis and treatment have not yet been adequately established. The prognosis is favorable if adequate hemodynamic support is provided.

Handling high-risk patients in the catheterization laboratory.

Protected percutaneous coronary intervention is considered a life-saving procedure for high-risk patients. Therefore it is important that the interventional cardiology team is prepared, the procedure is planned, and potential complications, as well as bail out strategies are considered. Throughout the procedure, it is critical to monitor the patient to identify any early signs of deterioration or changes in patient well-being to avoid any potential complications.

Complex High-Risk Indicated Percutaneous Coronary Intervention With Prophylactic Use of the Impella CP Ventricular Assist Device.

OBJECTIVES: Patients with complex coronary artery disease, concomitant cardiac disease, and multiple comorbidities are addressed as complex higher-risk indicated patients (CHIPs). Selecting a revascularization strategy in this population remains challenging. If coronary artery bypass grafting is deemed high risk or patients are considered inoperable, high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with the support of the Impella CP ventricular assist device (Abiomed) may be an attractive alternative. METHODS: In this retrospective, multicenter study, we included consecutive patients undergoing Impella CP-facilitated complex high-risk PCI. All patients were discussed by the heart team and were declined for surgery. Additionally, periprocedural mechanical circulatory support was deemed necessary. We collected demographic, clinical, and procedural characteristics. Major adverse cardiac event (MACE) and mortality rates up to 30 days were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 27 patients (median age, 73 ± 9.7 years; 74.1% men) were included in our study. The median SYNTAX score was 32 (range, 8-57) and EuroSCORE was 7.25% (range, 1.33-49.66; ± 12.76%). Periprocedural hemodynamic instability was observed in 1 patient (3.7%). In-hospital combined with 30-day mortality was 7.4% (2/27). No repeat revascularization was necessary. MACE was observed in 10 patients (37.0%). Six patients (22.2%) had a major bleeding complication, of which 2 were related to Impella access site. Median Impella run time was 1.22 hours and there was no significant decrease in kidney function. Median admission time after PCI was 3 days (range, 1-23; ± 4.76). CONCLUSIONS: The Impella CP system showed good feasibility and provided adequate hemodynamic support during high-risk PCI in this CHIP population.

Data for validation and adjustment of APACHE II score in cardiogenic shock patients treated with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device.

A precise prognosis is of imminent importance in intensive care medicine. This article provides data showing the overestimation of intrahospital mortality by APACHE II score in various subgroups of cardiogenic shock patients treated with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device. The data set includes additional baseline characteristics regarding age, pre-existing diseases, characteristics of coronary artery disease, characteristics of cardiopulmonary resuscitation, and hemodynamic parameter not included in the APACHE II score. Further data were provided which characterize derivation and validation group. Both groups were used for adjustment of the APACHE II approach. The data are supplemental to our original research article titled "Predictive value of the APACHE II score in cardiogenic shock patients treated with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device" (Mierke et al., IJC Heart & Vasculature. 40 (2022) 101013. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcha.2022.101013).

Acute myocardial infarction with simultaneous total occlusion of the left anterior descending artery and right coronary artery successfully treated with percutaneous coronary intervention.

BACKGROUND: Simultaneous thrombosis in more than one coronary artery is an uncommon angiographic finding in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. It is difficult to identify using 12-lead electrocardiography and usually leads to cardiogenic shock and fatal outcomes, including sudden cardiac death. Therefore, immediate revascularization and adequate mechanical circulatory support are required. CASE PRESENTATION: We report the case of a 58-year-old man who presented with vomiting and chest pain complicated by cardiogenic shock and complete atrioventricular block. Electrocardiography revealed ST-segment elevation in leads II, III, aVF, and V1-V6. Emergency coronary angiography revealed total occlusion of the proximal left anterior descending artery and right coronary artery. The patient successfully underwent primary percutaneous coronary intervention with ballooning and stenting for both arteries. An Impella CP was inserted during the procedure. Fifty-seven days after admission, he had New York Heart Association class II heart failure and was transferred to a rehabilitation hospital. CONCLUSIONS: Acute double-vessel coronary thrombosis, a serious event with a high mortality rate, requires prompt diagnosis and management to prevent complications such as cardiogenic shock and ventricular arrhythmias. A combination of judicious medical treatment, efficient primary percutaneous coronary intervention, and early mechanical support device insertion is crucial to improve the survival rate of patients with this disease.

Predictive value of the APACHE II score in cardiogenic shock patients treated with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device.

Background: The APACHE II score assesses patient prognosis in intensive care units. Different disease entities are predictable by using a specific factor called Diagnostic Category Weight (DCW). We aimed to validate the prognostic value of the APACHE II score in patients treated with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device because of refractory cardiogenic shock (CS). Methods: From the Dresden Impella Registry, we analyzed 180 patients receiving an Impella CP®. The main outcome was the observed intrahospital mortality ( S ^ ( t h o s p ) ), which was compared to the predicted mortality estimated by the APACHE II score. Results: The APACHE II score, which was 33.5 ± 0.6, significantly overestimated intrahospital mortality ( S ^ ( t h o s p ) 54.4 ± 3.7% vs. APACHE II 74.6 ± 1.6%; p < 0.001). Nevertheless, the APACHE II score showed an acceptable accuracy to predict intrahospital mortality (ROC AUC 0.70; 95% CI 0.62-0.78). Thus, we adapted the formula for calculation of predicted mortality by adjusting DCW. The total registry cohort was randomly divided into derivation group for calculation of adjusted DCW and validation group for testing. Intrahospital mortality was much more precisely predicted using the adjusted DCW compared to the conventional DCW (difference of predicted and observed mortality: -4.7 ± 2.4% vs. -23.2 ± 2.3%; p < 0.001). The new calculated DCW was -1.183 for the total cohort. Conclusion: The APACHE II score has an acceptable accuracy for the prediction of intrahospital mortality but overestimates its total amount in CS patients. Adjustment of the DCW can lead to a much more precise prediction of prognosis.

Budget Impact Analysis of Impella CP® Utilization in the Management of Cardiogenic Shock in France: A Health Economic Analysis.

INTRODUCTION: Early detection and treatment of cardiogenic shock (CS) is crucial to avoid irreparable multiorgan damage and mortality. Impella CP® is a novel temporary mechanical circulatory support (MCS) device associated with greater hemodynamic support and significantly fewer device-related complications compared with other MCS devices, e.g., intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP) and venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO). The present study evaluated the budget impact of introducing Impella CP versus IABP and VA-ECMO in patients with CS following an acute myocardial infarction (MI) in France. METHODS: A budget impact model was developed to compare the cost of introducing Impella CP with continuing IABP and VA-ECMO treatment from a Mandatory Health Insurance (MHI) perspective in France over a 5-year time horizon, with 700 patients with refractory CS assumed to be eligible for treatment per year. Costs associated with Impella CP and device-related complications for all interventions were captured and clinical input data were based on published sources. Scenario analyses were performed around key parameters. RESULTS: Introducing Impella CP was associated with cumulative cost savings of EUR 2.7 million over 5 years, versus continuing current clinical practice with IABP and VA-ECMO. Cost savings were achieved in every year of the analysis and driven by the lower incidence of device-related complications with Impella CP, with estimated 5-year cost savings of EUR 22.4 million due to avoidance of complications. Total cost savings of more than EUR 250,000 were projected in the first year of the analysis, which increased as the market share of Impella CP was increased. Scenario analyses indicated that the findings of the analysis were robust. CONCLUSION: Treatment with Impella CP in adult patients aged less than 75 years in a state of refractory CS following an MI was projected to lead to substantial cost savings from an MHI perspective in France, compared with continuing current clinical practice.

Feasibility and Safety of an 8 F Angioseal® Vascular Closure Device for Closure of Large Bore Impella CP® Access.

PURPOSE: Percutaneous mechanical circulatory support (pMCS) with the Impella® device is routinely used in cardiogenic shock and high risk percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). However, safety and feasibility to close the large bore access (LBA) post-hoc remain a challenge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In patients with planned termination of Impella therapy, corresponding LBA closure was attempted using an undersized AngioSeal® device, which was deployed after insertion of a 0.035 in J-wire through the guidewire access port. Cross-over angiographic visualization before and after deployment as well as in-hospital follow up were performed to assess closure success and screening for short-term adverse events. RESULTS: We evaluated 17 patients (68 year old, IQR 58-76, 71% male) in whom 14 F LBA closure after pMCS using the Impella CP® was achieved with an undersized AngioSeal® device. Clinical indication for pMCS was cardiogenic shock in 94% and protected PCI in 6%. Impella CP® devices were withdrawn after a median of 4 days (IQR 3-6 days). Primary hemostasis was achieved in the majority of patients (14/17; 82%) while single cross-over balloon inflation led to hemostasis in the remaining patients. One patient suffered acute ischemia later in the course of the disease, but this was not directly related to the closure device. In this study, no major bleeding or other device-related adverse events were observed. CONCLUSION: The 8 F AngioSeal® vascular closure device has been safely used for removal of the Impella CP® microaxial pump in most cases of predominantly normal weight patients. This technique may be considered feasible for post-hoc LBA closure in the context of pMCS, especially when preclosure options are not suitable or unavailable.

Tolerance of Sustained Ventricular Fibrillation During Left Ventricular Assist Device Support With IMPELLA CP®.

A 64-year-old man was admitted with subacute anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction treated with implantation of four drug-eluting stents in proximal left anterior descending artery. Despite successful percutaneous coronary intervention, the patient developed a significant worsening of left ventricular ejection fraction because of late diagnosis. A percutaneous mechanical circulatory support device (Impella CP; Abiomed) was then required in order to preserve adequate systemic perfusion. Twelve hours later, the patient developed rapid ventricular tachycardia degenerated in ventricular fibrillation, without loss of consciousness. During the arrhythmia, lasting for 10 min, the patient was alert, with preserved mental status. After adequate sedation, a single unsynchronized 200 J DC shock converted the patient to sinus rhythm.

Post-Closure Technique to Reduce Vascular Complications Related to Impella CP.

BACKGROUND: Use of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support has grown exponentially. Vascular complications remain a growing concern and best practices for device removal do not exist. We describe a novel post-closure technique for the next generation Impella CP removal and immediate hemostasis. METHODS: This study is a single center, retrospective, exploratory analysis of 11 consecutive patients receiving an Impella CP for either high-risk PCI or cardiogenic shock and then referred for post-closure compared to 20 patients receiving manual compression for Impella CP removal between 2017 and 2019. RESULTS: Mean age range was 62.7-65.4 years and 50-65% male between groups. Average duration of Impella CP treatment ranged from 3.4 to 5.2 days. Patients referred for post-closure had significantly lower rates of all-cause adverse vascular events (0% versus 40%; n = 0/11 versus n = 8/20; p = 0.01). There was no significant difference in BARC 3 or greater bleeding, transfusion requirement, hospitalization duration or intensive care duration between removal strategies. CONCLUSION: The novel post-closure technique may significantly reduce vascular complications associated with device removal and may improve clinical outcomes for these critically ill patients.

A new iteration for the single-access large-bore technique during Impella supported complex and high-risk coronary intervention: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Complex and high-risk coronary intervention (CHIP-PCI) and PCI in cardiogenic shock complicating acute coronary syndrome (ACS) are increasingly performed under mechanical circulatory support-so-called protected PCI. Among the available options, Impella Cardiac Power (CP) heart pump (Abiomed) is percutaneously inserted over the femoral artery and typically requires a second arterial access to perform PCI, which further enhances the risk of vascular and bleeding complications. The single-access technique allows Impella CP placement and PCI performance through the same vascular access. When a 7 Fr system is desirable, only a long and entirely hydrophilic coated sheath has been previously used, which is not available in Europe. CASE SUMMARY: A 85-year-old patient admitted with non ST-elevation - acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS), severely reduced left ventricular function and three-vessel coronary artery disease underwent single-access CHIP-PCI under Impella CP support. After a failed attempt to insert a standard 7 Fr long femoral sheath alongside the Impella catheter, we successfully introduced a 7.5 Fr sheathless guiding catheter and delivered the planned percutaneous treatment with the benefits conferred by a 7 Fr-rather than 6-lumen catheter, without the need for an additional arterial access. DISCUSSION: This is, to the best of our knowledge, the first case of CHIP-PCI performed under Impella support utilizing the single-access technique with a 7.5 Fr sheathless guiding catheter. Beyond advantages of the single-access technique in sparing time and avoiding vascular complications associated with gaining a second arterial access, the lower outer diameter of the sheathless catheter compared with standard 7 Fr sheaths may allow improved limb perfusion and lower chance of interference with the Impella CP catheter.

Prolonged Use of an Impella Assist Device in a Sepsis-Induced Cardiomyopathy: A Case Report.

The inflammatory response triggered by sepsis can frequently cause reversible myocardial depression termed sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy. The resulting pathologic changes are often self-limiting and cardiac function returns to baseline following resolution of the underlying exacerbating factors. The following case examines a patient with septic shock and sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy that, despite maximal medical therapy, required mechanical support with an Impella assist device for seven days. To the best of our knowledge and research, this represents the longest documented use of an Impella heart pump in septic shock and associated sepsis-induced cardiomyopathy. Utilization of mechanical support in the setting of septic shock has seen growing interest in recent years, but more structured studies need to be conducted for better understanding of their overall effect on morbidity and mortality.