A qualitative study on determinants of the use of malaria rapid diagnostic test and anti-malarial drug prescription practices by primary healthcare workers in Ebonyi state, Nigeria.

BACKGROUND: The increased availability and use of malaria rapid diagnostic test (RDT) by primary healthcare (PHC) workers has made universal diagnostic testing before malaria treatment more feasible. However, to meaningfully resolve the problem of over-treatment with artemisinin-based combination therapy and the heightened risk of selection pressure and drug resistance, there should be appropriate response (non-prescription of anti-malarial drugs) following a negative RDT result by PHC workers. This study explored the determinants of the use of RDT and anti-malarial drug prescription practices by PHC workers in Ebonyi state, Nigeria. METHODS: Between March 2 and 10, 2020, three focus group discussions were conducted in English with 23 purposively-selected consenting PHC workers involved in the diagnosis and treatment of malaria. Data was analysed thematically as informed by the method by Braun and Clarke. RESULTS: The determinants of the use of RDT for malaria diagnosis were systemic (RDT availability and patient load), provider related (confidence in RDT and the desire to make correct diagnosis, PHC worker's knowledge and training, and fear to prick a patient), client related (fear of needle prick and refusal to receive RDT, and self-diagnosis of malaria, based on symptoms, and insistence on not receiving RDT), and RDT-related (the ease of conducting and interpreting RDT). The determinants of anti-malarial drug prescription practices were systemic (drug availability and cost) and drug related (effectiveness and side-effects of the drugs). The determinants of the prescription of anti-malarial drugs following negative RDT were provider related (the desire to make more money and limited confidence in RDT) and clients' demand while unnecessary co-prescription of antibiotics with anti-malarial drugs following positive RDT was determined by the desire to make more money. CONCLUSIONS: This evidence highlights many systemic, provider, client, and RDT/drug related determinants of PHC workers' use of RDT and anti-malarial drug prescription practices that should provide tailored guidance for relevant health policy actions in Ebonyi state, Nigeria, and similar settings.

Price, quality, and market dynamics of malaria rapid diagnostic tests: analysis of Global Fund 2009-2018 data.

BACKGROUND: Rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) for malaria are a vital part of global malaria control. Over the past decade, RDT prices have declined, and quality has improved. However, the relationship between price and product quality and their larger implications on the market have yet to be characterized. This analysis used purchase data from the Global Fund together with product quality data from the World Health Organization (WHO) and Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND) Malaria RDT Product Testing Programme to understand three unanswered questions: (1) Has the market share by quality of RDTs in the Global Fund's procurement orders changed over time? (2) What is the relationship between unit price and RDT quality? (3) Has the market for RDTs financed by the Global Fund become more concentrated over time? METHODS: Data from 10,075 procurement transactions in the Global Fund's database, which includes year, product, volume, and price, was merged with product quality data from all eight rounds of the WHO-FIND programme, which evaluated 227 unique RDT products. To describe trends in market share by quality level of RDT, descriptive statistics were used to analyse trends in market share from 2009 to 2018. A generalized linear regression model was then applied to characterize the relationship between price and panel detection score (PDS), adjusting for order volume, year purchased, product type, and manufacturer. Third, a Herfindahl-Hirschman Index (HHI) score was calculated to characterize the degree of market concentration. RESULTS: Lower-quality RDTs have lost market share between 2009 and 2018, as have the highest-quality RDTs. No statistically significant relationship between price per test and PDS was found when adjusting for order volume, product type, and year of purchase. The HHI was 3,570, indicating a highly concentrated market. CONCLUSIONS: Advancements in RDT affordability, quality, and access over the past decade risk stagnation if health of the RDT market as a whole is neglected. These results suggest that from 2009 to 2018, this market was highly concentrated and that quality was not a distinguishing feature between RDTs. This information adds to previous reports noting concerns about the long-term sustainability of this market. Further research is needed to understand the causes and implications of these trends.

Comparative analysis of four malaria diagnostic tools and implications for malaria treatment in southwestern Nigeria.

OBJECTIVES: One of the problems encountered in malaria control and elimination is inaccurate diagnosis, resulting from the degree of sensitivity of the different malaria diagnostic tools. Even though microscopy remains the gold standard for malaria diagnosis, more sensitive and robust diagnostic tools such as polymerase chain reactions (PCR) are used in research settings to monitor interventions and track sub-microscopic infections due to some of the drawbacks of microscopy. Since diagnosis is a critical determinant for rational malaria treatment, it is imperative that accurate diagnosis must be assured for an effective treatment plan. Therefore, this study compared two routinely used point of care malaria diagnostic tools with two molecular tools and discussed their implication for malaria treatment. DESIGN: In this study, 436 individuals with suspected malaria were sampled and systematically tested using four methods, namely rapid diagnostic test (henceforth referred to as malaria RDT- mRDT), microscopy, nested PCR (nPCR), and quantitative PCR (qPCR). Test sensitivities and specificities were compared, and their level of concordance was determined. RESULTS: With nPCR as the gold standard, a false positivity rate of 42.2%, 8.9%, and 57.8% was obtained for mRDT, microscopy, and qPCR. Similarly, false negativity rates of 12.5%, 62.5%, and 0.8% were obtained for each of the methods mentioned above, respectively. Of all the tools assessed, qPCR gave the highest sensitivity (99.2%) and moderate specificity (42.2%), followed by the mRDT kit used (87.5%). CONCLUSIONS: With the detection of a high false positivity rate based on mRDT and a substantial proportion of sub-microscopic carriers in this study area by nested/quantitative PCR, we recommend that these molecular tools should be in specialized laboratories within the region to (i) track and treat sub-microscopic carriers to prevent their contribution to malaria transmission; (ii) provide reliable epidemiological data using high throughput testing tools for evaluating malaria interventions.

Consequences of restricting antimalarial drugs to rapid diagnostic test-positive febrile children in south-west Nigeria.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the consequence of restricting antimalarial treatment to febrile children that test positive to a malaria rapid diagnostic test (MRDT) only in an area of intense malaria transmission. METHODS: Febrile children aged 3-59 months were screened with an MRDT at health facilities in south-west Nigeria. MRDT-positive children received artesunate-amodiaquine (ASAQ), while MRDT-negative children were treated based on the clinical diagnosis of non-malaria febrile illness. The primary endpoint was the risk of developing microscopy-positive malaria within 28 days post-treatment. RESULTS: 309 (60.5%) of 511 children were MRDT-positive while 202 (39.5%) were MRDT-negative at enrolment. 18.5% (50/275) of MRDT-positive children and 7.6% (14/184) of MRDT-negative children developed microscopy-positive malaria by day 28 post-treatment (ρ = 0.001). The risk of developing clinical malaria by day 28 post-treatment was higher among the MRDT-positive group than the MRDT-negative group (adjusted OR 2.74; 95% CI, 1.4, 5.4). A higher proportion of children who were MRDT-positive at enrolment were anaemic on day 28 compared with the MRDT-negative group (12.6% vs. 3.1%; ρ = 0.001). Children in the MRDT-negative group made more unscheduled visits because of febrile illness than those in MRDT-positive group (23.2% vs. 12.0%; ρ = 0.001). CONCLUSION: Restricting ACT treatment to MRDT-positive febrile children only did not result in significant adverse outcomes. However, the risk of re-infection within 28 days was significantly higher among MRDT-positive children despite ASAQ treatment. A longer-acting ACT may be needed as the first-line drug of choice for treating uncomplicated malaria in high-transmission settings to prevent frequent re-infections.

CONSÉQUENCES DE LA RESTRICTION DES ANTIPALUDIQUES AUX ENFANTS FÉBRILES POSITIFS AU TEST DE DIAGNOSTIC RAPIDE DANS LE SUD-OUEST DU NIGÉRIA: OBJECTIFS: Investiguer la conséquence de restreindre le traitement antipaludéen uniquement à des enfants fébriles avec un résultat positif à un test de diagnostic rapide (TDR) du paludisme dans une zone de forte transmission du paludisme. MÉTHODES: Les enfants fébriles âgés de 3 à 59 mois ont été dépistés avec un TDR du paludisme dans des établissements de santé du sud-ouest du Nigéria. Les enfants avec un TDR positif ont reçu de l'artésunate-amodiaquine (ASAQ), tandis que ceux avec un TDR négatif ont été traités sur la base du diagnostic clinique de maladie fébrile non liée au paludisme. Le critère d'évaluation principal était le risque de développer un paludisme positif au microscope dans les 28 jours suivant le traitement. RÉSULTATS: 309 (60,5%) des 511 enfants étaient positifs au TDR du paludisme tandis que 202 (39,5%) étaient négatifs au moment de leur inscription. 18,5% (50/275) des enfants TDR-positifs et 7,6% (14/184) des enfants TDR-négatifs ont développé un paludisme positif au microscope endéans le jour 28 après le traitement (ρ = 0,001). Le risque de développer un paludisme clinique endéans le 28è jour après le traitement était plus élevé dans le groupe TDR-positif que dans le groupe TDR-négatif (OR ajusté = 2,74; IC95%: 1,4 - 5,4). Une proportion plus élevée d'enfants TDR-positifs au moment de l'inscription étaient anémiques au 28è jour par rapport au groupe TDR-négatif (12,6% contre 3,1%; ρ = 0,001). Les enfants du groupe TDR-négatif ont effectué plus de visites non planifiées en raison d'une maladie fébrile que ceux du groupe TDR-positif (23,2% contre 12,0%; ρ = 0,001). CONCLUSION: Le fait de limiter le traitement de combinaison à l'artémisinine (TCA) aux seuls enfants fébriles présentant un résultat positif au TDR n'a pas eu d'effet indésirable significatif. Cependant, le risque de réinfection dans les 28 jours était significativement plus élevé chez les enfants TDR-positifs malgré le traitement par ASAQ. Un TCA à action prolongée pourrait être nécessaire en tant que médicament de choix en première ligne pour traiter le paludisme sans complications dans les régions à forte transmission afin de prévenir les réinfections fréquentes.

Improving the first-line treatment of febrile illnesses in Ghana: willingness to pay for malaria rapid diagnostic tests at licensed chemical shops in the Kintampo area.

BACKGROUND: Use of malaria rapid diagnostic test (mRDT) enhances patient management and reduces costs associated with the inappropriate use of antimalarials. Despite its proven clinical effectiveness, mRDT is not readily available at licensed chemical shops in Ghana. Therefore, in order to improve the use of mRDT, there is the need to understand the willingness to pay for and sell mRDT. This study assessed patients' willingness to pay and licensed chemical operators' (LCS) willingness to sell mRDTs. METHODS: The study was a cross-sectional survey conducted in Kintampo North Municipality and Kintampo South District of Ghana. Contingent valuation method using the dichotomous approach was applied to explore patient's willingness to pay. In-depth interviews (IDIs) were used to obtain information from licensed chemical operators' willingness to sell. RESULTS: Majority 161 (97%) of the customers were willing to pay for mRDT while 100% of licensed chemical operators were also willing to sell mRDT. The average lowest amount respondents were willing to pay was Ghana cedis (GH¢) 1.1 (US$ 0.26) and an average highest amount of GH¢ 2.1 (US$ 0.49). LCS operators were willing to sell the test kit at an average lowest price of GH¢1 (US$ 0.23) and average highest price of GH¢2 (US$ 0.47). CONCLUSION: Community members were willing to pay for mRDT and LCS operators are willing to sell mRDTs. However, the high cost of the mRDT is likely to prevent the widespread use of mRDT. There is a clear need to find system-compatible ways to subsidize the use of mRDT via National Health Insurance scheme.

Reliability of rapid diagnostic tests in diagnosing pregnancy and infant-associated malaria in Nigeria.

BACKGROUND: The effective management of maternal and infant malaria requires rational and prompt diagnosis. This study aims to determine the diagnostic efficiency of malaria RDT in infants and pregnant women. METHODS: The study was conducted on infants (n=200), pregnant women (n=80) and non-pregnant women (n=100) who were recruited from two hospitals in Lagos, Nigeria. Plasmodium falciparum infections were assessed in the febrile subjects by microscopic examinations of blood smears and by RDT. RESULTS: The lowest (44.3%) and the highest (83.3%) sensitivity (SS) values were recorded in the infants and pregnant women, respectively. Other diagnostic parameters, including the specificity (SP, 97.5%), positive predictive value (PPV, 92.1%) and negative predictive value (NPV, 72.8%), in the infants were greater than the values recorded in non-pregnant (SP=77.5%, PPV=83.9%, NPV=70.5%) and pregnant women populations (SP=65.6%, PPV=78.4%, NPV=72.4%). The diagnostic efficiency of malaria RDT exhibited higher sensitivity in women in early gestational stages (1st trimester=78.6% and 2nd trimester=88.0%) compared with those in the 3rd trimester (71.4%). The sensitivity of malaria RDT (100.0%) was significantly higher in the multigravid women than in the primigravida (78.6%) and secundigravida women (77.8%, P<0.05). The sensitivity of the RDT significantly increased with the intensity of the malarial parasites (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Malaria is endemic in the study populations. Malaria RDT can serve as a first-line of diagnosis for pregnant women in early gestational stages and multigravid women and can aid the differential diagnoses of other diseases due to its high specificity in infants.