INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION GUIDELINES FOR THE EVALUATION AND CARE OF CARDIAC TRANSPLANT CANDIDATES-2024.

The "International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Evaluation and Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2024" updates and replaces the "Listing Criteria for Heart Transplantation: International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Guidelines for the Care of Cardiac Transplant Candidates-2006" and the "2016 International Society for Heart Lung Transplantation Listing Criteria for Heart Transplantation: A 10-year Update." The document aims to provide tools to help integrate the numerous variables involved in evaluating patients for transplantation, emphasizing updating the collaborative treatment while waiting for a transplant. There have been significant practice-changing developments in the care of heart transplant recipients since the publication of the International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT) guidelines in 2006 and the 10-year update in 2016. The changes pertain to 3 aspects of heart transplantation: (1) patient selection criteria, (2) care of selected patient populations, and (3) durable mechanical support. To address these issues, 3 task forces were assembled. Each task force was cochaired by a pediatric heart transplant physician with the specific mandate to highlight issues unique to the pediatric heart transplant population and ensure their adequate representation. This guideline was harmonized with other ISHLT guidelines published through November 2023. The 2024 ISHLT guidelines for the evaluation and care of cardiac transplant candidates provide recommendations based on contemporary scientific evidence and patient management flow diagrams. The American College of Cardiology and American Heart Association modular knowledge chunk format has been implemented, allowing guideline information to be grouped into discrete packages (or modules) of information on a disease-specific topic or management issue. Aiming to improve the quality of care for heart transplant candidates, the recommendations present an evidence-based approach.

Optimal Medical Therapy and Outcomes Among Patients With Chronic Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.

BACKGROUND: Optimal medical therapy (OMT) scoring may stratify clinical risk in real-world chronic heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) by integrating use and dosing of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) for HFrEF. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to characterize patients and associated long-term clinical outcomes by OMT score-derived treatment groups. METHODS: CHAMP-HF (Change the Management of Patients with Heart Failure) included U.S. outpatients with chronic HFrEF receiving ≥1 GDMT. OMT subgroups were defined as suboptimal (score <3), acceptable (score = 3), and optimal (score ≥4) by baseline use and dose of GDMT, as proposed by the HF Collaboratory consortium. Cox proportional hazard analyses were used to assess for all-cause and cardiovascular death across subgroups, after adjusting for demographic and clinical covariates. RESULTS: The authors studied 4,582 participants enrolled in CHAMP-HF with available 2-year follow-up. Median age was 68 years, 1,327 (29%) were women, and 2,842 (62%) were White, non-Hispanic. Median OMT score across the population was 4 (Q1-Q3: 2-5), and 1,628 (35%) had suboptimal, 665 (14%) had acceptable, and 2,289 (50%) had optimal therapy. Participants with optimal treatment were younger, had higher annual household income, and were enrolled from practices with dedicated HF clinics (all P < 0.001) than participants with acceptable or suboptimal treatment. Participants with optimal treatment had lower all-cause death (adjusted HR: 0.77; 95% CI: 0.64-0.92) and cardiovascular death (adjusted HR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.65-0.96) than those with suboptimal treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Across a large cohort of chronic ambulatory HFrEF, OMT scores stratified risk of all-cause and cardiovascular death.

Comparing outcomes of transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement and medical therapy for symptomatic severe tricuspid regurgitation: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Impaired hospitalizations for heart failure (HHF) and mortality are associated with tricuspid regurgitation (TR). OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to investigate the benefit of transcatheter tricuspid valve replacement (TTVR) over guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in patients with symptomatic severe TR. METHODS: Between May 2020 and April 2023, 88 patients with symptomatic severe TR were treated in our center. Of these, 57 patients received GDMT alone, and 31 patients underwent combined TTVR and GDMT. We collected and analyzed baseline data, and follow-up information for both groups. The primary endpoints were all-cause mortality and the combined endpoint (including all-cause mortality and HHF). RESULTS: At a median follow-up of 20 (IQR 10-29) months, significant improvements were shown in TR severity, right ventricular function, and dimensions in TTVR group (all P < 0.001). It also resulted in superior survival rates (75.8% vs. 48.4%, P = 0.019), improved freedom from combined endpoint (61.5% vs. 45.9%, P = 0.007) and fewer major adverse events. After stratification by TRI-SCORE, the subgroup with < 6 points in the TTVR group exhibited a significant difference in the combined endpoint compared to the other subgroups (all P < 0.05), while no significant differences were observed in the GDMT subgroups (P = 0.680). CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of LuX-Valve in TTVR effectively improves TR and is associated with lower rates of major adverse events, HHF and all-cause mortality. The TRI-SCORE may help identify higher-benefit patients with TR from TTVR. Clinical trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov Protocol Registration System (NCT02917980).

Adherence to optimal medical therapy and control of cardiovascular risk factors in patients after ST elevation myocardial infarction in Mexico.

Introduction: In developing countries, there is a notable scarcity of real-world data on adherence to optimal medical therapy (OMT) and its correlation with major cardiovascular adverse events (MACEs) after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Our study focuses on addressing this gap by evaluating adherence to OMT, examining its influence on the risk of MACEs after STEMI, and assessing subsequent cardiovascular risk factor control in Mexico. Methods: We conducted a prospective observational study of post-STEMI patients after hospital discharge. Adherence to treatment was assessed over a median of 683 days (interquartile range: 478-833) using the Simplified Medication Adherence Questionnaire (SMAQ). Patients were followed up for 4.5 years to monitor MACEs (cardiovascular death, cardiogenic shock, recurrent myocardial infarction, and heart failure). Results: We included 349 patients with a mean age of 58.08 years (±10.9), predominantly male (89.9%). Hypertension (42.4%), smoking (34.3%), type 2 diabetes mellitus (31.2%), obesity (22.92%), and dyslipidemia (21.4%) were highly prevalent. Adherence to OMT per SMAQ was 44.7%. The baseline clinical characteristics of adherent and non-adherent patients did not significantly differ. OMT prescription rates were as follows: acetylsalicylic acid, 91.1%; P2Y12 inhibitors, 76.5%; and high-intensity statins, 86.6%. While non-adherent patients had a numerically higher rate of MACEs (73 vs. 49 first events), there was no statistically significant difference (hazard ratio 1.30, 95% confidence interval 0.90-1.88). Discussion: In this real-world study of patients after STEMI, we observed low adherence to OMT, a low proportion of global cardiovascular risk factor control, and a numerically higher incidence of recurrent major adverse cardiovascular events in non-adherent patients. Strategies to improve adherence to OMT and risk factor control are needed.

Spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection: an investigative case report.

Spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection (SISMAD) is a rare cause of acute abdominal pain, but could potentially be fatal to patients, and should be recognized soon in the emergency department after excluding other common causes. Computed tomography (CT) is the modality of choice for initial diagnosis and follow-up. Currently there is no evidence-based guidelines for managing SISMAD. A 58-year-old man being suspected of a mesenteric artery dissection was referred to our emergergy department. The patient was monitored, treated conservatively with anticoagulant and discharged after 3 days. Follow-up CT scans at 6 month, 1 year and 1 year and a half post discharge showed a partially occluded false lumen, the diameter of true lumen had increased in size and no signs of bowel ischemia. SISMAD should be considered as part of differential diagnoses when patients in their fifth to seventh decades of life present with acute abdominal pain. Treatment includes conservative management, percutaneous endovascular interventions, or surgery, but most patients can be managed conservatively.

Use of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors in Hospitalized Patients.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) have noted benefits in the treatment of type 2 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, heart failure, and chronic kidney disease. Despite these benefits, the adoption of SGLT2i in clinical practice has been slow. Early initiation of SGLT2i during hospitalization has been proposed to address this gap for 2 important reasons: 1) it provides early clinical benefit in multiple disease states; and 2) hospitalization presents an opportunity for medication optimization and patient education, thereby overcoming clinical inertia. Challenges in SGLT2i adoption necessitate innovative strategies for integration into clinical practice. Ongoing trials and novel care delivery models are anticipated to further elucidate effective strategies for SGLT2i implementation and adherence. This review synthesizes the accrued evidence of SGLT2i across various chronic diseases. It emphasizes the rationale for early in-hospital initiation and discusses barriers and potential solutions for widespread implementation of SGLT2i in hospitalized patients.

County-Level Variation in Triple Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy in Heart Failure With Reduced Ejection Fraction.

Background: Current guidelines recommend simultaneous initiation of multidrug guideline-directed medical therapy classes for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate county-level variation in use of triple guideline-directed medical therapy, defined as simultaneous prescription fills for beta-blockers, renin-angiotensin system inhibitors or angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors, and mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Methods: We conducted a cohort study using Medicare Fee-for-Service claims data (parts A, B, and D between 2013 and 2019). Features of counties including area-level indicators of poverty, employment, and educational attainment and aggregated patient-level sociodemographic and medical history variables were compared by quintiles of triple therapy use. A multilevel logistic regression model was constructed to estimate the contextual effect of clustering by counties, which was expressed as a median OR. Results: 304,857 patients from 2,600 counties (83% of all U.S. counties) were included. The median for triple therapy use was 14.3% (IQR: 10.3%-18.8%) across included counties with a wide variation (range: 0%-54.5%). Compared to counties in the highest use quintile, counties in lowest triple therapy use quintile had worse area-level indicators of socioeconomic status (% unemployment 6.8% vs 6.2%). Counties in lowest quintile had higher proportion of Black patients (13.3% vs 5.7% in highest quintile) and patients with low-income subsidy (29.3% vs 25.8% in highest quintile). The median OR was 1.30 (95% CI: 1.28-1.33). Conclusions: We observed variation in triple therapy use across counties in the United States with suboptimal local use patterns correlating with indicators of socioeconomic disadvantage.

Determinants of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy Implementation During Heart Failure Hospitalization.

Background: Despite evidence that guideline-directed medical therapies (GDMTs) improve outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), implementation remains suboptimal. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to measure GDMT implementation during acute HFrEF hospitalization, evaluate the association between socioeconomic factors and GDMT implementation, and assess the association of GDMT utilization with subsequent clinical events. Methods: Retrospective determination of GDMT utilization using a modified optimal medical therapy (mOMT) score (which accounts for specific contraindications to drugs) during unplanned HF hospitalization of consecutive adult patients with new-onset or previously diagnosed HFrEF from 2017 to 2018. Outcomes included discharge mOMT score, association between socioeconomic factors and GDMT implementation (assessed using both the Mann-Whitney U test for binary variables and the Kruskall-Wallace for nonbinary variables), composite outcome 1-year all-cause mortality and 1-year HF readmission, and each component as a function of discharge mOMT score (assessed using univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models). Results: Of 391 patients fulfilling entry criteria (of which 152 [38.9%] had new-onset HFrEF), only 49 (12.5%) had a perfect or near-perfect discharge mOMT score. Black patients and those experiencing homelessness had significantly lower discharge mOMT scores. Higher discharge mOMT score is associated with a lower rate of composite endpoint events, particularly in patients with new-onset HFrEF. Overall, a 0.1-increase in the mOMT score resulted in a 9.2% reduction in the composite endpoint. Conclusions: Suboptimal implementation of GDMT during HF hospitalization is widespread and is associated with a worse outcome. Black patients and patients experiencing homelessness were less likely to have GDMT optimized.

Changes in Left Ventricular Function and Outcomes After Trancatheter Edge-to-Edge Repair for Secondary Mitral Regurgitation.

Background: Transcatheter edge-to-edge repair (TEER) improved outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF) and severe secondary mitral regurgitation (SMR) compared with guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) alone regardless of the severity of baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The study aimed to evaluate the effect of early changes in LVEF after TEER and GDMT alone in patients with HF and severe SMR. Methods: Within the COAPT trial, we evaluated outcomes according to changes in LVEF from baseline to 30 days. The primary outcome was all-cause death or HF hospitalization (HFH) between 30 days and 2 years. Results: Among 432 patients with paired echocardiographic data, 182 (42.1%) had increased LVEF (LVEF change 6.0% ± 4.9%) and 250 (57.9%) had a decrease or no change in LVEF (LVEF change -6.6% ± 5.6%) from baseline to 30 days. LVEF at 30 days increased more frequently with GDMT alone compared with TEER plus GDMT (51.4% vs 33.0%; P = .0001). Between 30 days and 2 years, there were no significant differences in death or HFH in the increase LVEF and the decrease LVEF groups (58.8% vs 51.4%; multivariable-adjusted HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.87-1.08; P = .59). TEER plus GDMT reduced the 30-day to 2-year rate of death or HFH compared with GDMT alone consistently in patients with increase LVEF and decrease LVEF (Pint = 0.75). Conclusions: Among patients with HF and severe SMR, early improvements in LVEF were more frequent with GDMT alone compared with TEER plus GDMT but were not associated with subsequent outcomes at 2 years. TEER reduced death or HFH during 2-year follow-up irrespective of early LVEF changes.

Impact of guideline directed medical therapy on myocardial function in adults with congenital heart disease.

BACKGROUND: Guideline-directed heart failure therapy with angiotensin receptor blocker/neprilysin inhibitor (ARNi) and sodium-glucose transporter inhibitors (SGLT2i) has been incrementally beneficial in improving outcomes in heart failure patients. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) in adults congenital heart disease (ACHD) patients. METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, ACHD patients with either New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II symptoms or systemic ejection fraction (EF) <45%, optimized on a combination of beta-blocker (BB), ARNi, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist (MRA) and SGLT2i were evaluated. RESULTS: Forty-six patients with a mean age 42.6 ± 12.1 years prescribed GDMT were identified. Twenty-eight (61%) were male, 20 (43%) had a systemic right ventricle (RV) and 9 (20%) had single-ventricle physiology. Over the optimization period, 20 (43%) were sustained on ARNi and 42 (91%) on SGLT2i in addition to treatment with BB and MRA. Over a period of 45 weeks, echocardiography parameters for left ventricle (LV) ejection fraction (EF) (+7.5%, p = 0.006), systemic ventricle (SV) velocity time integral (VTI) (+1.9 cm, p = 0.012) and LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) (-2.5%, p = 0.005) improved when 3-4 medications were used versus 1-2 medications alone. The use of either ARNi or SGLT2i (+8.1%, p = 0.017) or in combination (+7.0%, p = 0.043) increased LVEF compared to the use of neither medication. CONCLUSION: Combination GDMT is beneficial in improving myocardial characteristics in ACHD patients with systemic RV and LV.

Clinical Characteristics of Macroprolactinomas and Response to Medical Therapy.

Introduction: The presentation of macroprolactinomas and response to treatment may vary according to age, sex and tumour characteristics. To analyse clinical phenotype, biochemical and radiological characteristics of macroprolactinomas presenting to a tertiary care centre. A retrospective observational study from January 2018 to December 2022. Methods: Thirty diagnosed cases (18 females, 12 males) of macroprolactinomas were included and followed up for one year. Results: The most common presentation was headache (73%), visual disturbances (50%), galactorrhoea (33.3%) and loss of libido (26.6%) along with menstrual cycle disturbances (94%), and infertility (55%) in females. Duration of symptoms (2.22 ± 2.87 vs 4.61 ± 3.4 years), tumour size (4.8 ± 2.09 vs 2.75 ± 1.24 cm) and prolactin levels (5153.5 ± 4755.3 vs 1803.5 ± 3785.5 ng/ml) were different significantly between males and females. Good response to medical therapy was observed in 84% of the treatment-naive patients. Conclusion: Macroprolactinomas in males present with shorter duration of symptoms, larger size, higher prolactin levels and more resistant tumours, emphasizing the need for early diagnosis and aggressive management. Medical therapy remains the treatment of choice irrespective of gender.

Rate of dupilumab use and symptom severity of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis after Draf 3 frontal sinusotomy.

BACKGROUND: The indications for endoscopic modified Lothrop procedure (Draf 3) in patients with refractory chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) remain unclear. This study evaluates the effectiveness of Draf 3 for refractory CRSwNP focusing on improvements in disease severity and need for subsequent dupilumab rescue therapy. METHODS: Retrospective review of patients with CRSwNP undergoing Draf 3 surgery at a tertiary center between 2012 and 2022. Clinicodemographic variables were compared across those who did versus did not require rescue with postoperative dupilumab. Time to postoperative dupilumab rescue was analyzed and longitudinal disease-specific outcomes were measured using the sinonasal outcomes test (SNOT-22). RESULTS: Within 87 patients with CRSwNP, 24.1% had aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD). Significant improvement in SNOT-22 score was found in CRSwNP with AERD (p < 0.001) and without AERD (p = 0.01) up to 24 months postoperative. 14.9% eventually required rescue with a dupilumab. More specifically, of 21 patients with AERD, 24.1% eventually required rescue with dupilumab. Dupilumab rescue was associated with a greater number of prior sinus surgeries (p = 0.02), prior aspirin desensitization (p = 0.02), and worse preoperative Lund-MacKay scores (p < 0.001). No association between biologic rescue and frontal recess antero-posterior diameter was found (p = 0.20). CONCLUSIONS: Draf 3 surgery in CRSwNP was associated with significant improvement in SNOT-22 score at 24 months. Furthermore, only 14.9% of patients required dupilumab rescue. Patients with AERD were more likely to require rescue with dupilumab even though 75.1% avoided treatment with the biologic over the study period.

The 'Prostate Embolisation AS first-line therapY compAred to meDication in treatment naïVe men with prostAte eNlargement, a randomised ControllEd trial' (P-EASY ADVANCE): a randomised controlled trial of prostate embolisation vs medication for BPH.

OBJECTIVE: To compare prostate artery embolisation (PAE) to the combination of tamsulosin and dutasteride therapy as a potential first-line therapy for obstructive benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in treatment-naïve patients in the 'Prostate Embolisation AS first-line therapY compAred to meDication in treatment naïVe men with prostAte eNlargement, a randomised ControllEd trial' (P-EASY ADVANCE). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 39 men with enlarged prostates, moderate-severe lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) and obstructed/equivocal urodynamic studies (UDS), and who had no prior treatment for BPH, were randomised to receive either combined medical therapy with tamsulosin and dutasteride (medication) or PAE. Follow-up UDS, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), uroflowmetry and ultrasound were performed at short- to medium-term intervals following interventions and compared to baseline. RESULTS: The medication and PAE treatment groups had similar baseline characteristics, including prostate volumes (87.8 and 85.4 mL respectively), maximum urinary flow rate (Qmax; 6.5 and 6.6 mL/s, respectively), IPSS (19.5 and 21, respectively) and obstructed UDS (79% and 74%, respectively). Both interventions improved voiding and bladder outflow obstruction from baseline, with more patients unobstructed after PAE (63%) compared to medication (28%) (P = 0.03). PAE patients had significantly greater reductions in prostate size (P < 0.001), incomplete emptying (P = 0.002), total IPSS (P = 0.032), Qmax (P = 0.006) and quality of life (P = 0.001). Altered ejaculation, erectile dysfunction and nausea were more common in the medication group. CONCLUSION: Prostate artery embolisation was more effective than combined medical therapy at reducing urinary obstruction, decreasing prostate volume and improving LUTS in patients with BPH who had not previously been treated. This is the first randomised control study to compare PAE and combined medical therapy in exclusively treatment-naïve patients and raises the potential of PAE as an alternative early treatment option for BPH. Further randomised comparative trials are planned to further validate the role of PAE in mitigating obstructive BPH.

Impact of Catheter Ablation of Electrical Storm on Survival: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Electrical storm (ES) is a life-threatening condition, associated with substantial early and subacute mortality. Catheter ablation (CA) is a well-established therapy for ES. However, data regarding the impact of CA on the short-term and midterm survival of patients admitted for ES remain unclear. OBJECTIVES: This multicenter study aimed to investigate the impact of CA of ES on survival outcomes, while accounting for key patient characteristics associated with treatment selection. METHODS: A propensity score-matching (PSM) analysis was performed on 780 consecutive patients admitted for ES in 4 tertiary centers. PSM (1:1) based on the main characteristics associated with the use of CA or medical therapy alone was performed, resulting in 2 groups of 288 patients. RESULTS: After PSM, patients who underwent CA (n = 288) and those treated with medical therapy alone (n = 288) did not present any significant differences in the main demographic characteristics, ES presentation, and management. Compared with medical therapy alone, CA was associated with a significantly lower rate of ES recurrence at 1 year (5% vs 26%; P < 0.001). Similarly, CA was associated with a higher 1-year (91% vs 81%; P < 0.001) and 3-year (78% vs 71%; P = 0.017) survival after discharge. In subgroup analyses, effect of ablation therapy remained consistent in patients older than 70 years of age (HR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.24-0.66), with substantial efficacy in patients with a LVEF <35% (HR: 0.39; 95% CI: 0.27-0.59). CONCLUSIONS: In propensity-matched analyses, this large study shows that CA-based management of patients admitted for ES is associated with a reduction in mortality compared with medical treatment, particularly in patients with a low ejection fraction.

How to Optimize Goal-Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) in Patients with Heart Failure.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Heart failure is a clinical syndrome with signs and symptoms from underlying cardiac abnormality and evidence of pulmonary or systemic congestion on laboratory testing or other objective findings (Bozkurt et al. in Eur J Heart Fail 23:352-380, 2021). Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), when heart failure is due to underlying reduction in ejection fraction to ≤ 40. The goal of this review is to briefly describe the mechanisms and benefits of the various pharmacological interventions described in the 2022 AHA/ACC/HFSA Guidelines focusing on Stage C: Symptomatic Heart Failure HFrEF, while providing basic guidance on safe use of these medications. RECENT FINDINGS: Use of medications from each class as recommended in the 2022 Guidelines can provide significant morbidity and mortality benefits for our patients. Despite advances in therapeutics for patients with HFrEF, patients are frequently under treated and more research is needed to help optimize management of these complicated patients.

Heart Failure With Improved Ejection Fraction: Prevalence, Predictors, and Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy.

Recently, a new category of heart failure with improved ejection fraction (HFimpEF) has emerged in the classification system. This is defined as the subgroup of patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) whose left ventricular ejection fraction has recovered partially or completely, with no specific cut-off values established yet in the guidelines. In our review, we aim to provide an overview of prevalence, predictors, mechanism of remodeling, and management strategies regarding HFimpEF. These patients constitute a sizeable cohort among patients with reduced ejection fraction. Certain patient characteristics including younger age and female gender, absence of comorbid conditions, low levels of biomarkers, and non-ischemic etiology were identified as positive predictors. The heart undergoes significant maladaptive changes post failure leading to adverse remodeling influenced etiology and duration. Goal-directed medical therapy including beta-blockers, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs), and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs) have notably improved cardiac function by inducing reverse remodeling. Despite a more favorable prognosis compared to HFrEF, patients with improved ejection fraction (EF) still face clinical events and reduced quality of life, and remain at risk of adverse outcomes. Although the evidence is scarce, it is advisable to continue treatment modalities despite improvement in EF, including device therapies, to prevent relapse and clinical deterioration. It is imperative to conduct further research to understand the mechanism leading to EF amelioration and establish guidelines to identify and direct management strategies.

Effect of catheter ablation versus medical therapy on mental health and quality of life in patients with atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: The association between atrial fibrillation (AF) and mental health is well-documented, but the relative benefits of catheter ablation versus medical therapy on mental health and quality of life are not clearly understood. This study assesses the impact of these interventions on AF patients' mental health and quality of life. METHODS: Through a systematic review of PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane databases, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing catheter ablation to medical therapy for AF were analyzed. The study focused on a range of outcomes, particularly mental health and quality of life, measured by tools including the SF-36 mental component, HADS, SF-36 physical component, and AFEQT scores, among others. Analyses were stratified by AF type (paroxysmal versus persistent) and synthesized using random or fixed-effects models to calculate mean differences (MDs) or standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). RESULTS: From 24 RCTs totaling 6,353 patients (51.4% receiving catheter ablation, 71.1% male, average age 59), catheter ablation was found to significantly improve mental health (SMD 0.34; 95% CI 0.05-0.63; p = 0.02) and quality of life as indicated by PCS SF-36 (MD 2.64; 95% CI 1.06-4.26; p < 0.01) and AFEQT scores (MD 6.24; 95% CI 4.43-8.05; p < 0.01), with no significant difference in outcomes between AF subtypes. CONCLUSION: Catheter ablation offers significant improvements in mental health and quality of life over medical therapy for AF patients, demonstrating its efficacy across different types of AF.

An updated meta-analysis of optimal medical therapy with or without invasive therapy in patients with stable coronary artery disease.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of optimal medical therapy (OMT) with or without revascularization therapy in patients with stable coronary artery disease (SCAD) remains controversial. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared OMT with or without revascularization therapy for SCAD patients. METHODS: Studies were searched in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Clinical Trials from January 1, 2005, to December 30, 2023. The main efficacy outcome was a composite of all-cause death, myocadiac infarction, revascularization, and cerebrovascular accident. Results were pooled using random effects model and fixed effects model and are presented as odd ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). RESULTS: Ten studies involving 12,790 participants were included. The arm of OMT with revascularization compared with OMT alone was associated with decreased risks for MACCE (OR 0.55 [95% CI 0.38-0.80], I²=93%, P = 0.002), CV death (OR 0.84 [95% CI 0.73-0.97], I²=36%, P = 0.02), revascularization (OR 0.32 [95% CI 0.20-0.50], I²=92%, P < 0.001), and MI (OR 0.85 [95% CI 0.76-0.96], I²=45%, P = 0.007). While there was no significant difference between OMT with revascularization and OMT alone in the odds of all-cause death (OR 0.94 [95% CI 0.84-1.05], I²=0%, P = 0.30). CONCLUSIONS: The current updated meta-analysis of 10 RCTs shows that in patients with SCAD, OMT with revascularization would reduce the risk for MACCE, cardiovascular death, and MI. However, the invasive strategy does not decrease the risks for all-cause mortality when comparing with OMT alone.

Optimizing Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy During Hospitalization Improves Prognosis in Patients With Worsening Heart Failure Requiring Readmissions.

BACKGROUND: We previously demonstrated that higher simple guideline-directed medical therapy (GDMT) scores (comprising renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, ß-blockers, mineralocorticoid antagonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors) at discharge were correlated with improved prognosis in heart failure (HF) patients. HF readmissions are linked to adverse outcomes, emphasizing the need for enhanced optimization of GDMT.Methods and Results: Using the simple GDMT score, we evaluated the effect of revising and modifying in-hospital GDMT on the prognosis of patients with HF readmissions. In this retrospective analysis of 2,100 HF patients, we concentrated on 1,222 patients with HF with reduced ejection/moderately reduced ejection fraction, excluding patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction, on dialysis, or who died in hospital. A higher current GDMT score was associated with better HF prognosis. Of the 1,222 patients in the study, we analyzed 372 cases of rehospitalization, calculating the simple GDMT scores at admission and discharge. Patients were divided into groups according to score improvement. Multivariate analysis showed a significant association between improved in-hospital simple GDMT score and the composite outcome (HF readmission+all-cause mortality; hazard ratio 0.459; 95% confidence interval 0.257-0.820; P=0.008). Even after propensity score matching to adjust for background, among rehospitalized patients, those with an improved in-hospital simple GDMT score had a better prognosis. CONCLUSIONS: Our results highlight the potential of robust interventions and score elevation during hospitalization leading to improved outcomes.