Exploring Diagnostic Complexities: A Case Report of Osteitis Condensans Ilii and Osteitis Pubis.

Osteitis condensans ilii (OCI) is a benign etiology of lumbago, characterized by its self-limiting nature. Referred to as hyperostosis triangularis ilii, this condition is a rare occurrence, primarily manifesting in the female demographic. The etiology of this ailment remains undisclosed. Predominantly observed in the vicinity of the ileum, it may be erroneously interpreted as the involvement of the sacroiliac joint. Not characterized by inflammation, this disorder commonly emerges as a postpartum sequela in females. Osteitis pubis is a constrained inflammatory disorder characterized by pain affecting the pubic bones, joints, and associated tendons. This condition has been documented following instances of trauma, pelvic surgical procedures, childbirth, excessive athletic activity, and certain rheumatic ailments. We present a case of bilateral OCI with osteitis pubis in a 21-year-old female who presented with persistent lumbago as evidenced by radiological findings. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) corroborated the diagnostic procedures, indicating the presence of OCI with osteitis pubis. Sclerotic fibrosis exhibited a distinctly delineated and compact appearance on MRI, facilitating its differentiation from other pathologies linked to back pain. Regrettably, there exists no definitive remedy for these conditions, with lifestyle adjustments representing the sole measure that may aid in preventing disease recurrence.

The exponential growth of nonsurgeons performing fusions for low-back pain.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to report changes in utilization and payment trends of low-back pain (LBP) interventions and the impact of nonsurgeon interventionalists on these changes. METHODS: Medicare Part B national summary data files were used to gather annual utilization and Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) payment data for LBP interventions from 2000 to 2021. Healthcare Common Procedure Coding System (HCPCS) codes were grouped as decompression, spinal fusion, sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion, epidural steroid injections (ESIs), physical therapy (PT), and chiropractic manipulation (Chiro). The total allowed services and payments were collected for each HCPCS group. CMS provider-level files, available from 2013 to 2021, were used to collect neurosurgeon, orthopedic surgeon, and nonsurgeon interventionalist (interventional radiology and pain management) data for each surgical HCPCS code group (decompression, spinal fusion, and SI joint fusion). The United States Consumer Price Index was used to adjust for inflation. RESULTS: From 2000 to 2021, there were 339,720,725 Medicare-approved interventions and payments of approximately $21 billion for LBP (percentage of cumulative payments: 41.8% Chiro, 16.5% ESI, 14.4% spinal fusion, 14.3% PT, 10.2% decompression, and 0.4% SI joint fusion). In a subgroup analysis, spinal fusions for Medicare patients were performed by orthopedic surgeons (59.2%), neurosurgeons (40.6%), and nonsurgeon interventionalists (< 1%) from 2013 to 2021. From 2013 to 2021, neurosurgeon and orthopedic surgeon fusion utilization each grew by < 3% and associated Medicare payments to each specialty declined by 1% each year. During the same period, nonsurgeon interventionalist utilization grew 26% each year and associated Medicare payments to nonsurgeon interventionalists for spine fusions grew 62% each year. In a subgroup analysis, SI joint fusions for Medicare patients were performed by orthopedic surgeons (50.7%), neurosurgeons (24.8%), and nonsurgeon interventionalists (24.5%) from 2018 to 2021. Neurosurgeon utilization of SI joint fusion declined by 1% each year and associated Medicare payments to this group grew 2% each year. Orthopedic surgeon utilization of SI joint fusion declined 1% and associated Medicare payments to this group grew 4% each year. Nonsurgeon interventionalist use of SI joint fusions grew 415% and payments grew 435% each year. CONCLUSIONS: The substantial growth in Medicare payments for surgical LBP interventions is disproportionally driven by nonsurgeon interventionalists. The exponential growth of nonsurgeon interventionalists performing spinal fusion surgeries, particularly SI joint fusions, largely accounts for the significant increase in Medicare expenditures.

Incidence and risk factors of new-onset sacroiliac joint pain after spinal surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Purpose: A systematic review and meta-analysis for incidence and risk factors of new-onset sacroiliac joint pain (SIJP) after spinal surgery aimed to provide evidence-based medical references for its early prevention, timely intervention, and appropriate treatment. Methodology: The protocol of the systematic review and meta-analysis was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Review (PROSPERO) with the PROSPERO ID (CRD42023463177). Relevant studies were searched to January 2024 from the databases of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, and the types of studies were cohort studies, case-control studies, and cross-sectional studies. Study quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) and the Cross-Sectional/Prevalence Study Quality recommended by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Two authors conducted studies search, data extraction, and quality assessment independently. Meta-analyses were done using Stata 14.0 software. Results: Twelve observational studies with 3,570 spinal surgery patients were included. Ten were case-control studies, one was a cross-sectional study, and another was a cohort study, all of which were of moderate quality and above. The results of the meta-analysis showed that the incidence of new-onset SIJP after spinal surgery was 9.40%; females, no. of surgical segments, fusion to the sacrum, and postoperative pelvic tilt (PT) were significantly associated with the new-onset SIJP after spinal surgery. Meta-analyses for preoperative and postoperative controls of spondylopelvic parameters showed that postoperative lumbar lordosis (LL) in the SIJP group and postoperative LL and sacral slope (SS) of patients in the NoSIJP group had significant differences from preoperative. Conclusion: Available evidence suggests that an increased risk of new-onset SIJP after spinal surgery is associated with sex, multi-segmental surgery, fusion to the sacrum, and greater postoperative PT.

Successful use of a 3D-printed surgical guide to facilitate transiliosacral fixation in a cat with bilateral sacroiliac luxation.

Case summary: A 7-year-old male castrated domestic shorthair cat was presented for treatment of a bilateral sacroiliac luxation (SIL). CT was performed and the data were extracted in a stereolithography (STL) file, after which a 3D-printed drill guide (3DPDG) was devised, using computer-aided design (CAD) software, and printed. Using an open surgical approach, the guide was used as an aid for drilling the sacrum. The ilial wings were drilled free-hand later and a transiliosacral pin (TP) was inserted to realign and stabilise the SIL. The cat exhibited an early return to normal limb function and a CT scan performed at the postoperative follow-up showed early signs of bone remodelling at the sacroiliac joint. Relevance and novel information: To the authors' knowledge, this is the first report using a 3DPDG for implant placement in the feline sacrum without intraoperative imaging.

Biomechanical assessment and comparison of fixation methods for bilateral sacroiliac joint luxation in 3D-printed feline pelvic bone models.

Background and Aim: Bilateral sacroiliac joint luxation, a condition primarily observed in cats, can significantly impact their quality of life. This study aimed to compare a control with three distinct fixation methods to identify the most robust fixation method capable of withstanding significant tensile stress. Materials and Methods: Twenty pelvic bone models of cats were made using a 3D printer with polylactic acid plastic. Each model was assembled by cutting the sacroiliac joints and pelvic girdle symphysis with a handsaw, then bonded with cyanoacrylate glue. 3D feline pelvic bone models were categorized into four significant groups, each consisting of five models. The study discovered that the three groups used distinct fixation methods: Two lag screws (DS), K-wires at the ilium wing and sacroiliac joints (TK), and K-wires at the sacroiliac joints (DK). The final group, not fixed, was the control. Results: The results were characterized further through a mechanical compression force test using a universal testing machine. The most robust method at the sacroiliac joints, the DK technique, sustained a maximum force of up to 183.86 N while maintaining the correct bone alignment. The fixation method is more accessible and faster to implement in comparison to the DS method. Conclusions: The DK group exhibited the greatest maximum load capacity among all groups. Sacroiliac joint luxation treatment can effectively be addressed using the K-wires fixation method. However, the DK need space of sacral body same as DS for fixation. Further clinical study should be performed.

Serratia Sacroiliitis Secondary to Intravenous Drug Use: A Case Report.

Serratia spp. are ubiquitous, opportunistic, and infectious organisms that have historically been known to infect the upper respiratory, urinary, and circulatory systems. This manuscript presents the case of a 35-year-old White female with a past medical history of polysubstance abuse, intravenous drug use (IVDU), and poor dentition who was admitted to a community hospital with complaints of lower back pain for 10 days following the recent completion of treatment for a suspected epidural abscess. Per her report, her last IVDU with fentanyl was 11 days prior, and she admitted to using various sources of water to inject her drugs. Magnetic resonance imaging with contrast was significant for possible infectious sacroiliitis, and blood cultures grew Serratia marcescens. Due to this patient's extensive IVDU history, in-patient ceftriaxone was chosen over discharging the patient with a peripherally inserted central catheter line. Serratia spp.bacteremia with concomitant septic sacroiliitis in the setting of IVDU is an extremely rare presentation. Due to the nonspecific presentation of sacroiliitis, multidrug resistance profile of Serratia spp., and high mortality rate associated with S. marcescens sepsis, early detection and diagnosis is paramount in similar patients with extensive risk factors.

Risk Factors for Sacroiliac Joint Fusion after Instrumented Spinal Fusion.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort Study. OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for sacroiliac (SI) joint fusion after instrumented spinal fusion. METHODS: Patients were identified from the PearlDiver BiscayneBay database. Patients who underwent 1 level (CPT: 22840), 3-6 vertebral segment (22842), and 7+ vertebral segment spinal fusions (22843 and 22844) were identified. Patients were separated based on whether they received an SI joint fusion (27280 and 27279) after their spinal fusion. A univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression was performed to evaluate the associations between patient factors and incidence of SI joint fusion. RESULTS: 549,625 patients who underwent posterior spinal fusions were identified, 6068 of whom underwent subsequent SI joint fusion (1.1%). Factors associated with future SI joint fusion included female gender, patients with obesity, fibromyalgia, diabetes, tobacco use, increased construct length, and prior SI joint injection. Prior SI joint injection had the highest odds ratio (OR: 8.70; 95% CI: 8.25-9.16; P < 0.001), followed by 7+ vertebral segment (OR: 2.17; 95% CI: 2.03-2.33; P < 0.001) and 3-6 vertebral segment fusion (OR: 1.49; 95% CI: 1.42-1.57; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The highest predictor of requiring subsequent SI joint fusion is a prior SI joint injection. We also found that longer fusion constructs are associated with increased risk for future SI joint fusion.

Sacroiliac joint fusion guided by intraoperatively superimposed virtual surgical planning using simulated fluoroscopic images.

Introduction: Sacroiliac joint fusion (SIJF) is a minimally invasive treatment for sacroiliac (SI) dysfunction. It involves placing implants through the SI joint under fluoroscopic guidance, requiring precise implant positioning to avoid nerve injury. Preoperative virtual surgical planning (VSP) aids in optimal positioning, but replicating it accurately in the operating room is challenging. Research question: This study aims to assess the feasibility of superimposing VSP onto intraoperative fluoroscopic images to aid in optimal implant placement. Material and methods: A method for intraoperative guidance using 3D/2D registration was developed and tested during SIJF as an available and potentially efficient alternative for costly and more invasive navigation systems. Preoperatively, a VSP is performed and simulated fluoroscopic images are generated from a preoperative CT scan. During surgery, the simulated image that visually best matches the intraoperative fluoroscopic image is selected. Subsequently, the VSP is superimposed onto the intraoperative fluoroscopic image using a developed script-based workflow. The surgeon then places the implants accordingly. Postoperative implant placement accuracy was evaluated. Results: Five interventions were performed on five patients, resulting in a total of 15 placed implants. Minor complications without clinical consequences occurred in one case, primarily attributable to the patient's anatomy and pathological manifestations. Mean deviations at implant apex and 3D angle were 4.7 ± 1.6 mm and 3.5 ± 1.3°, respectively. Discussion and conclusions: The developed intraoperative workflow was feasible and resulted in implants placed with low deviations from the VSP. Further research is needed to automate and validate this method in a larger cohort.

Sacroiliac and spine imaging in spondyloarthritis: Does phenotype or sex matter?

BACKGROUND: Spondyloarthritis (SpA) encompasses a spectrum of immune-mediated inflammatory conditions primarily affecting the axial skeleton, including sacroiliitis and spondylitis, each with distinct features. This study aimed to investigate imaging disparities, focusing on sacroiliac magnetic resonance and spine radiography, across phenotypes and between males and females in axial SpA. METHOD: A cross-sectional study was conducted to assess clinical data, laboratory findings, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scores of sacroiliac joints using the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada (SPARCC) and Sacroiliac Joint Structural Score (SSS), and cervical and lumbar spine radiographs utilizing the Modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score (mSASSS). The study aimed to compare these parameters between two groups: axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA, radiographic and non-radiographic) and axial psoriatic arthritis (axPsA), as well as between males and females. RESULTS: Ninety-four patients were included, with 62 patients in the axSpA group and 32 patients in the axPsA group. There were no differences in disease activity, mobility, radiographic damage in the spine (Modified Stoke Ankylosing Spondylitis Spine Score- mSASSS), or sacroiliac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scores (Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada Magnetic Resonance Imaging Index - SPARCC and Sacroiliac Joint Structural Score - SSS) between the two phenotypes. Regarding sex, in imaging exams, men had higher mSASSS (p = 0.008), SSS (p = 0.001), and fat metaplasia (MG) score based on SSS (p = 0.001), while women had significantly higher SPARCC scores (p = 0.039). In the male group, the presence of HLA-B27 allele had an impact on more structural lesions on MRI (SSS), p = 0.013. CONCLUSION: In this study, imaging of sacroiliac joints and spine in patients with axial SpA did not show differences in phenotypes but did reveal differences based on sex, which may have an impact on future diagnostic recommendations. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Accelerometer-based daily physical activity monitoring in patients with postpartum sacroiliac joint dysfunction: a case-control study.

Patients with low back pain caused by sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction have an impaired quality of life, due to reported pain, disability and activity limitations. There is increasing evidence that minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion (MISJF) results in improvement in pain, disability and quality of life in these patients. Some studies have reported improvements in daily physical activity following MISJF but based on bias-prone self-reports. Our aim was to provide objective data on daily physical activity in patients with SIJ dysfunction. Daily physical activity in daily life of participants was measured using a triaxial accelerometer for seven consecutive days, before surgery and 3 months after surgery. Recorded daily activities were the daily number of events and total time spent sitting or lying, standing, walking, cycling, high-activity and number of steps and sit-to-stand transfers. The quality of life was assessed by the validated Dutch EQ-5D-5 L-questionnaire. No statistical differences were observed between daily physical activity in patients with SIJ dysfunction before and 3 months after MISJF. As compared to matched controls, high-intensity physical activity was lower in both the pre- and postoperative period (p = 0.007) for patients with SIJ dysfunction. The quality of life improved significantly in patients after MSIJF, from 0.418 to 0.797 (p = 0.021) but did not reach the level of controls (1.000). Daily physical activity in patients with postpartum SIJ dysfunction does not improve 3 months following MISJF, while quality of life does improve significantly. The discrepancy between these two observations is food for new research.

Sacroiliac joint pain: what treatment and when.

INTRODUCTION: Spinal and non-spinal pathologies can cause low back pain. Non-spinal sources of low back pain include the sacroiliac joint (SIJ) and the hip. SIJ pain can be treated either conservatively or surgically. Current strategies for managing sacroiliac joint pain are debated, and limited evidence exists. AREAS COVERED: The present expert opinion updates current evidence on conservative and surgical modalities for SIJ pain. EXPERT OPINION: Surgical management for SIJ pain is effective. However, it exposes patients to surgery and, therefore, related complications. Conservative management may be implemented in patients with moderate SIJ pain, with less than six months of symptoms, or not eligible for surgery. Several noninvasive modalities are available, mostly centered on intra-articular injections. Corticosteroids, platelet-rich plasma, and stem cells have only midterm lasting effects, at most for nine months. Radiofrequency ablation is another methodology for pain relief. Both continuous and pulsatile radiofrequency ablation are associated with good outcomes. SIJ fusion can be performed using different techniques; however, a clear recommendation on the most appropriate modality for the management of SIJ pain is still debated.

Radiofrequency vs Steroid Injections for Spinal Facet and Sacroiliac Joint Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Purpose: Pain management for spinal facet joint (SFJ) and sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pain is challenging, often requiring interventions like radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or corticosteroid injections (CI). This study aims to assess and compare the effectiveness of CI and RFA in treating SFJ and SIJ pain. We combine these treatments due to their shared pathophysiology, similar therapeutic interventions, and the necessity for an integrated approach to spinal pain management. Patients and methods: Literature search from PubMed, Scopus, CENTRAL and Google Scholar for published studies upto 31st December 2023, and reporting data of patients who were treated using CI of RFA for SFJ and SIJ pain. Pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was calculated. Results: Our meta-analysis incorporated thirteen studies. Overall, patients, treated with CI had a higher pain intensity score compared to patients treated with RFA (SMD=0.92; 95% CI: 0.19 to 1.65) at 3 months, and at 6 months (SMD=1.53; 95% CI: 0.66 to 2.40) after the treatment. No significant association was reported at 12 months (SMD=1.47; 95% CI: -0.03 to 2.97). Subgroup analysis based on joint types revealed increased pain intensity scores in patients who were treated with CI for SIJ (SMD=1.25; 95% CI: 0.39 to 2.11) and SFJ (SMD=1.33; 95% CI: 0.09 to 2.57) pain. A negative but not significant effect was detected in patients, treated with CI for cervical joint pain (SMD=-0.40; 95% CI: -0.90 to 0.10). Patients treated with CI exhibited higher functional disability score compared to patients treated with RFA at 3 months (SMD=1.28; 95% CI: 0.20 to 2.35) post-treatment. Conclusion: This study suggests that RFA may offer superior pain relief with longer duration compared to steroid injections for spinal facet and sacroiliac joint pain. Decision regarding specific interventions should be individualized and consider patient preferences, clinical context, and potential risks.

Catamaran SI Joint Fusion System(R) MAINSAILTM Study: a prospective, single-arm, multi-center, post-market study of six-month clinical outcomes and twelve-month radiographic findings.

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgical techniques for sacroiliac joint (SIJ) fixation have the potential to reduce risk and improve patient outcomes, but evidence remains limited. This interim analysis presents initial findings from an ongoing prospective study evaluating the safety and efficacy of the Catamaran System. METHODS: The primary endpoint of success at 6 months was defined as a ≥20 mm improvement in SIJ pain (Visual Analog Scale, VAS), no neurologic worsening, absence of device-related serious adverse events (SAEs), and no surgical reintervention. Secondary endpoints included 6 month evaluation of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), patient satisfaction, and 12 month radiographic CT fusion, performed by an indpendent radiologist. RESULTS: Thirty-three consecutive patients (mean age: 58.9 years; %-females: 76%; Body Mass Index: 30.5) were treated across six U.S. clinical sites. At the primary endpoint of 6 months, 80% of patients met the criteria for success, with no device-related SAEs and no surgical reintervention reported. VASSIJ-Pain significantly decreased from preoperative levels (mean: 80.9 mm) to 6 months postoperatively (31.1 mm; p < 0.001). Mean ODI scores also showed a significant improvement from preoperative values (51.9%) to 6 months postoperatively (29.6%, p < 0.01). Patients reported high satisfaction rates throughout all follow-ups, with 93.3% of patients being satisfied at 6 months. CONCLUSION: In patients diagnosed with chronic SIJ pain, minimally invasive inferior-posterior delivery of the Catamaran implant was safe and effective in relieving pain and reducing disability.

Sacroiliac pain after total hip arthroplasty: a combined analysis of clinical data and three-dimensional imaging in standing and sitting positions.

PURPOSE: Patients frequently complain of low back pain and sacroiliac joint pain (SIP) following total hip arthroplasty (THA). We hypothesized that patients with SIP would display different pelvic incidence (PI) values between standing and relaxed sitting positions, indicative of increased motion in the sacroiliac joints. METHODS: In this retrospective case-control study, 94 patients who underwent unilateral THA and experienced SIP were compared with 94 control patients without SIP. SIP was confirmed through clinical tests and investigated using biplanar imaging in both standing and sitting positions. The key parameters analyzed included PI, sacral slope (SS), lumbar lordosis (LL), and limb length discrepancy (LLD). RESULTS: Patients without SIP showed a mean difference in PI of -1.5° (-8°-5°) between standing-to-sitting positions, whereas those with SIP showed a difference of -3.3° (-12°-0°)(P < 0.0001), indicating more motion in the sacroiliac joint during daily activities in the latter group. Patients with SIP showed smaller change in LL between standing-to-sitting positions (mean:6.3°; range:-8°-27°) compared with those without SIP (mean:9.5°; range:-12°-28°)(P = 0.006). No significant differences were noted in functional leg length between patients with (mean:7 mm; range:0-12 mm) and without SIP (mean:7 mm; range:0-11 mm)(P = 0.973). CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed significant sacroiliac joint motion in patients with SIP post-THA, as indicated by PI changes, increased posterior pelvic tilt, and reduced change in the LL. Contrary to common belief, SIP did not correlate with LLD.

Posterior Sacroiliac Fusion Surgery: A Retrospective Single Center Study.

BACKGROUND: Chronic sacroiliitis has variable etiologies with numerous treatments of varying efficacy. In recent years, a novel posterior approach utilizing bone matrix has been developed although to date, there is limited data in the literature regarding efficacy and safety through this approach. Benefits described include reduced adverse outcomes and quicker recovery when compared to the lateral approach. OBJECTIVE: The present investigation focused on sacroiliac joint fusion through the posterior approach and outcomes including disability, pain, and use of analgesics post-surgery. STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective, single-center study was conducted evaluating safety and efficacy of sacroiliac fusion allograft implants (LinQ Implant System from PainTEQ; PsiF System from Omnia Medical). METHODS: A total of 72 posterior approach sacroiliac joint fusions were performed. Fifty-three individuals were enrolled and followed at LSU Health Shreveport as the sole investigational site between August 2020 and June 2024. Selected participant age ranged between 28 and 79 years, with a mean age of 53.4 years. The LinQ Implant System was the primary surgical hardware selected for implantation (83.0%), with the PsiF System chosen in the remaining cases. OUTCOME MEASURES: VAS Scores, disability changes, adverse outcomes, and analgesic use were compared after sacroiliac joint fusion via the posterior approach. RESULTS: Mean VAS Scores for SIJ Pain Intensity significantly decreased by 3.6 cm from a baseline score of 9.5 cm by the Specified End (June 1st, 2024). In this regard, 65.4% of patients experienced a 20% or greater improvement in pain, 38.5% of patients experienced a 50% or greater improvement in pain, and 26.9% of patients experienced a 70% or greater improvement in pain.  Zero (0) procedure-related adverse events nor intra- or post-operative complications occurred throughout the duration of the investigation. LIMITATIONS: Retrospective nature of the study without a control group. Fifty-four percent (39 of 72) completed minimum one year follow up. Further, the withdrawal rate was 26%. CONCLUSION: The results of the present investigation demonstrated effective outcomes with minimal adverse effects and improvements in disability over a three-year period in the largest single center study to date involving posterior approach sacroiliac joint fusion.

Do we need another screw? Sacroiliac screw fixation in open-book pelvic ring injuries (APC type II).

Purpose: To compare anterior plate fixation (SP fixation) both alone and in combination with an additional posterior sacroiliac screw (SP+SIS fixation) as a treatment for pelvic ring injuries with widening of the pubic symphysis and disruption to the anterior sacroiliac ligaments. Methods: To find studies with pelvic ring injuries (APC II; B2.3d) and SP or SP+SIS fixation, a systematic literature review was conducted by searching four databases. A protocol was published a priori at Open Science Framework (https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/3YHAV). Exclusion criteria included perineal injuries, chronic instability of the symphysis, complete sacroiliac separation, and pediatric patients (age <18 years). Primary outcomes of interest were defined as implant failure, health-related quality of life, and revision rate. Results: Altogether, 1861 studies were screened, and 40 studies qualified for full-text analysis. In total, 14 studies (two surveys, six biomechanical studies, and six retrospective clinical studies) were included. The surveys revealed that surgeons who had more recently begun practicing were more likely to use posterior fixation (SP+ISS). The biomechanical studies were heterogenous and did not yield a uniform pattern. In clinical studies, 117 patients (45%) received SP fixation, and 142 patients (55%) received SP+SIS fixation. Complications occurred in 31 SP patients (30%) and in five SP+SIS patients (3.5%). Conclusion: A high risk of bias was uncovered, and reporting was found to be incomplete. SP+SIS may have the potential to improve outcomes, but the evidence remains too inconclusive to draw reliable recommendations.

Sacroiliac Joint Degeneration After Lumbar or Lumbosacral Fusion Surgery-A Comparative Study of the Number of Fused Segments and Sacral Fusion.

OBJECTIVE: In this study, we aimed to investigate whether multi-segment fusion or fusion-to-sacrum increases sacroiliac joint (SIJ) pathology compared with single-segment fusion or a non-fused sacrum. METHODS: This study included 116 patients who underwent lumbar or lumbosacral fusion and were followed up for 2 years. The patients were classified into single-segment fusion (n = 46) and multi-segment fusion (more than two levels, n = 70) groups and then reclassified into the non-fused sacrum (n = 68) and fusion-to-sacrum groups (n = 48). Preoperative and postoperative radiographs were used to evaluate radiographic parameters, and computed tomography (CT) was used to evaluate SIJ degeneration. Low back pain (LBP) was assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS, 0-10). Baseline and postoperative values were compared using a paired sample t-test. RESULTS: LBP VAS scores significantly differed at 6 months (single-segment fusion, 3.04±1.88; multi-segment fusion, 4.83±2.33; P < 0.001) and 2 years postoperatively (single-segment fusion, 3.3±2.2; multi-segment fusion, 4.78±2.59; P = 0.094). There was no significant difference in SIJ degeneration, as assessed by CT scan, between the 2 surgical groups: 14 (30%) and 19 (27%) patients in the single-segment and multi-segment (P = 0.701) fusion groups, respectively. The LBP VAS scale showed comparable differences at 1 (non-fused sacrum, 3±2.18; fusion-to-sacrum, 3.74±2.28; P = 0.090) and 2 years postoperatively (non-fused sacrum, 3.29±2.01; fusion-to-sacrum, 4.66±2.71; P = 0.095). CT scan revealed that 18 (26%) and 15 (31%) patients in the non-fused sacrum and fusion-to-sacrum groups, respectively, developed SIJ arthritis; however, there was no significant intergroup difference (P = 0.574). CONCLUSIONS: SIJ degeneration occurs independent of the number of fused segments or sacrum involvement.

Clinical outcomes for minimally invasive sacroiliac joint fusion with allograft using a posterior approach.

BACKGROUND: Sacroiliac joint (SIJ) dysfunction can occur as a result of injury, degeneration, or inflammation. This dysfunction presents symptoms of pain at various locations, including the low back, hips, buttocks, and legs. The diagnosis of SIJ dysfunction is challenging and cannot be achieved solely with imaging studies such as X-rays, MRI, or CT. The current gold standard diagnostic modality is intra-articular SIJ blocks using two differing local anesthetics. Current treatments for SIJ dysfunction may be beneficial for short-term relief but lack long-term efficacy. The purpose of our study was to examine the outcomes of patients who underwent minimally invasive, posterior SIJ fusion using allograft at a single center. METHODS: This was a retrospective study which received exemption from the WCG IRB. Data regarding preoperative and postoperative pain levels, surgical time, complications, and medication usage were obtained retrospectively from patient electronic medical records and prescription drug monitoring program reports. No mapping was completed prior to the procedure. Pain was assessed with the 11-point (0-10) Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and medication usage was assessed using Morphine Milligram Equivalents (MME). Patients were included if they had been diagnosed with SIJ dysfunction using two intra-articular diagnostic blocks that resulted in at least an 80% decrease in pain and had failed conservative management. Patients with sacral insufficiency fractures were excluded. RESULTS: VAS scores reduced from 8.26 (SD = 1.09) at baseline to 2.59 (SD = 2.57), 2.55 (SD = 2.56), 2.71 (SD = 2.88), and 2.71 (SD = 2.88) at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively. MME reduced from 78.21 mg (SD = 51.33) to 58.95 mg (SD = 48.64), 57.61 mg (SD = 47.92), 61.71 mg (SD = 45.64), and 66.29 mg (SD = 51.65) at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, respectively. All reductions in VAS scores and MME were statistically significant. No adverse events occurred, and the average operating room time was 40.16 min (SD = 6.27). CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive, posterior SIJ fusion using allograft is a safe and efficacious method for managing SIJ dysfunction.

Identifying enthesitis in the sacroiliac joints in patients with axial spondyloarthritis by readers of varying experience: impact of the learning progress.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the accuracy of identifying enthesitis along with other inflammatory lesions and structural lesions on the MRI of the sacroiliac joints (SIJ) by readers of varying experience and how training sessions and workshops could help improve the accuracy. METHODS: A total of 224 patients with clinical diagnosis of axial spondyloarthritis who underwent SIJ MRI examinations were retrospectively included in this study. Three readers with 5 years, 3 years and 1 year of experience in musculoskeletal imaging were invited to review the SIJ MRI images independently, while the imaging reports of a senior radiologist (> 10 years' experience) were used as reference. After the first round of image review, a training session and a workshop on the imaging of SIJ in spondyloarthritis were held and the three readers were asked to review the images in the second round. We calculated the accuracy of identifying inflammatory and structural lesions of the three readers as well as the intra-reader agreement. RESULTS: Enthesitis could be observed in 52.23% of the axial spondyloarthritis patients, while 81.58% of the patients with enthesitis were accompanied with bone marrow edema. All the three readers showed better accuracy at identifying structural lesions than inflammatory lesions. In the first round of image review, the three readers only correctly identified 15.07%, 2.94% and 0.74% of the enthesitis sites. After the training session and workshop, the accuracy rose to 61.03%, 39.34% and 20.22%. The intra-reader agreement of enthesitis calculated as Cohen's kappa was 0.23, 0.034 and 0.014, respectively. CONCLUSION: Readers with less experience in musculoskeletal imaging showed lower accuracy of identifying inflammatory lesions, notably enthesitis. Training sessions and workshops could help improve the diagnostic accuracy of the junior readers.

Biomechanical Effects of Multi-segment Fixation on Lumbar Spine and Sacroiliac Joints: A Finite Element Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Spine fixation surgery affects the biomechanical environment in the sacroiliac joint (SIJ), which may lead to the SIJ pain or degeneration after surgery. The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of the number and position of fixed segments on the SIJs and provide references for surgeons to plan fixation levels and enhance surgical outcomes. METHODS: The intact lumbar-pelvis finite element (FE) models and 11 fixation FE models with different number and position of fixed segments were developed based on CT images. A 400N follower load and 10° range of motion (ROM) of the spine were applied to the superior endplate of L1 to simulate the flexion, extension, bending and torsion motion after surgery. The peak stress on the SIJs, lumbar intervertebral discs, screws and rods were calculated to evaluate the biomechanical effects of fixation procedures. RESULTS: With the lowermost instrumented vertebra (LIV) of L5 or S1, the peak stress on SIJs increased with the number of fixed segments increasing. The flexion motion led to the greater von Mises stress on SIJ compared with other load conditions. Compared with the intact model, peak stress on all fixed intervertebral discs was reduced in the models with less than three fixed segments, and it increased in the models with more than three fixed segments. The stress on the SIJ was extremely high in the models with all segments from L1 to L5 fixed, including L1-L5, L1-S1 and L1-S2 fixation models. The stress on the segment adjacent to the fixed segments was significant higher compared to that in the intact model. The peak stress on rods and screws also increased with the number of fixed segments increasing in the flexion, extension and bending motion, and the bending and flexion motions led to the greater von Mises stress on SIJs. CONCLUSION: Short-term fixation (≤2 segments) did not increase the stress on the SIJs significantly, while long-term segment fixation (≥4 segments) led to greater stress on the SIJs especially when all the L1-L5 segments were fixed. Unfixed lumbar segments compensated the ROM loss of the fixed segments, and the preservation of lumbar spine mobility would reduce the risks of SIJ degeneration.