RÉSUMÉ
Disadvantaged schoolchildren from rural and low socioeconomic backgrounds face persistent oral health inequalities, specifically dental caries, and periodontal diseases. This protocol aims to review the effectiveness of promotive and preventive oral health interventions for improving the oral health of primary schoolchildren in these areas. We will search the PubMed, MEDLINE, and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL) via EBSCOhost, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Dentistry and Oral Sciences databases for studies published from 2000-2023. The review includes randomised/nonrandomised controlled trials and community trials evaluating the effectiveness of promotive and preventive oral health interventions on at least one of these outcomes: changes in dental caries status, periodontal disease status, oral hygiene status/practices, sugar consumption, or smoking behaviours. Two reviewers will independently assess the searched articles, extract the data, and assess the risk of bias in the studies using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (ROB 2) for randomised controlled trials and Risk of Bias in Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) for non-randomised controlled trials. Both narrative and quantitative analyses will be conducted. However, only narrative synthesis will be performed if the data are substantially heterogeneous. The synthesised evidence from this review can inform policymakers on evidence-based interventions to improve the oral health outcomes of schoolchildren from rural and low socioeconomic backgrounds. Systematic Review Registration PROSPERO (Registration number: CRD42022344898).
Sujet(s)
Caries dentaires , Santé buccodentaire , Revues systématiques comme sujet , Populations vulnérables , Humains , Enfant , Caries dentaires/prévention et contrôle , Promotion de la santé/méthodes , Maladies parodontales/prévention et contrôle , Soins dentaires pour enfants/méthodes , Hygiène buccodentaireRÉSUMÉ
INTRODUCTION: Socioeconomic status and race have been found to influence patient outcomes for various cancer subtypes. In particular, minority and economically vulnerable patients present with more advanced disease and experience decreased survival compared to others. The aim of this study was to analyze the association between demographic or socioeconomic variables and rates of post-surgical follow-up after pituitary neuroendocrine tumor (PitNET) resection. METHODS: A retrospective review was completed for patients with PitNETs who underwent surgery between 2018-2021. Patient demographics and information related to post-operative appointments and MRIs were obtained. Social vulnerability index (SVI) scores were recorded from the Centers for Disease Control based on nationwide census tracts. RESULTS: One-hundred and sixteen patients were included in the analysis (57 males). In this cohort, 50% were Black, 34% Hispanic, 9% White, and 1% Asian. Mean overall SVI score was 0.81±0.23. The mean number of cancelled appointments was significantly higher in the moderate-high/high SVI group (p=0.034). Additionally, 30% of patients with moderate-high/high SVI had ≥2 cancelled follow-up visits compared to 0% among patients with low/low-moderate SVI (p=0.035). On average, White patients were less likely than non-White patients to have at least one cancelled follow-up appointment (p=0.048). CONCLUSION: Black patients and those with high social vulnerability have decreased rates of follow-up after PitNET resection. Follow-up delays can lead to failed identification of tumor recurrence, potentially resulting in more advanced disease by the time medical care is re-initiated and increasing rates of patient morbidity and mortality. As a result, further work is needed to address and bridge these care gaps.
RÉSUMÉ
Most health disparities originate in childhood and extend across the lifespan. However, studies on health disparities have been predominately focused on adults. This study evaluated the biological and psychosocial consequences of exposure to chronic adversity among 491 low-income children 8 to 12 years old (52.1% male; M age = 9.73, SD = 1.0; 68.2% Black/African American; 21.2% Latinx; 267 maltreated and 224 nonmaltreated). Latent profile analyses revealed six distinct profiles of cumulative socioeconomic risk, allostatic load, and mental health functioning. Childhood maltreatment, emotion regulation, affect, and personality characteristics were differentially associated with these latent profiles. Consistent with resilience theory, findings indicate differential effects of chronic adversity on adaptation. These findings also offer evidence that signs of physiological dysregulation emerge at earlier ages in development and suggest there may be a window of opportunity in childhood for interventions to reduce the detrimental effects of chronic adversity on health outcomes in children.
RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, youth had rising mental health needs and changes in service accessibility. Our study investigated changes in use of mental health care services for Canadian youth in Alberta before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. We also investigated how youth utilization patterns differed for subgroups based on social factors (i.e., age, gender, socioeconomic status, and geography) previously associated with health care access. METHODS: We used cross-sectional population-based data from Alberta, Canada to understand youth (15-24 year) mental health care use from 2018/19 to 2021/22. We performed interrupted time series design, segmented regression modeling on type of mental health care use (i.e., general physician, psychiatrist, emergency room, and hospitalization) and diagnosis-related use. We also investigated the characteristics of youth who utilized mental health care services and stratified diagnosis-related use patterns by youth subgroups. RESULTS: The proportion of youth using mental health care significantly increased from 15.6% in 2018/19 to 18.8% in 2021/22. Mental health care use showed an immediate drop in April 2020 when the COVID-19 pandemic was declared and public health protections were instituted, followed by a steady rise during the next 2 years. An increase was significant for general physician and psychiatrist visits. Most individual diagnoses included in this study showed significant increasing trends during the pandemic (i.e., anxiety, adjustment, ADHD, schizophrenia, and self-harm), with substance use showing an overall decrease. Mortality rates greatly increased for youth being seen for mental health reasons from 71 per 100,000 youth in 2018/19 to 163 per 100,000 in 2021/22. In addition, there were clear shifts over time in the characteristics of youth using mental health care services. Specifically, there was increased utilization for women/girls compared to men/boys and for youth from wealthier neighborhoods. Increases over time in the utilization of services for self-harm were limited to younger youth (15-16 year). CONCLUSIONS: The study provides evidence of shifts in mental health care use during the COVID-19 pandemic. Findings can be used to plan for ongoing mental health needs of youth, future pandemic responses, and other public health emergencies.
RÉSUMÉ
INTRODUCTION: To study the relationship between socioeconomic status and persistence with topical antiglaucomatous medication. METHODS: A retrospective epidemiological observational cohort study was conducted with a sample of 1563 patients. The main dependent variable was persistence (medication possession ratio), the independent variable was socioeconomic status (deprivation index). Additional independent variables were used for multivariate analysis: individual health card index, sex, age, pharmacological group, number of eye drops, preservatives, diagnosis and concurrent medications. Bivariate statistical analysis was obtained using non-parametric tests. Logistic regression was used for multivariate analysis. The level of statistical significance was set at p < 0.05. RESULTS: We obtained data showing greater persistence in the groups with a higher socioeconomic level (deprivation index 1 and 2), with medication possession ratio values of 79.97 and 75.30, respectively) as opposed to the groups at lower socioeconomic levels (deprivation index 4 and 5, with medication possession ratio values of 73.75 and 69.85, respectively. Logistic regression corroborated this difference, reaching a significant value (no persistence in deprivation index group 5 versus 1) with OR = 1.62; 95%CI: 1.13-2.31. Additionally, lower persistence was detected in males, under 60 years of age, undergoing treatment with alpha-agonists, and in patients with ocular hypertension. DISCUSSION: Low socioeconomic status of the patient was significantly associated with decreased persistence with topical antiglaucomatous therapy.
RÉSUMÉ
Studies in veterans have yet to examine interconnections between homelessness, financial debt, and suicidal ideation. We analyzed data from a nationally-representative study conducted in 2021 of low-income U.S. veterans (N = 1,004). Analyses revealed veterans who were younger, male, had a history of criminal arrests, met criteria for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), reported greater loneliness, or had both a history of homelessness and higher debt were more likely to endorse suicidal ideation. We found an interaction between a history of homelessness and current debt: 40% of veterans with both past homelessness and higher debt reported suicidal ideation, whereas only 10% of veterans with either past homelessness or higher debt reported suicidal ideation. As past homelessness and current debt interacted to increase the odds of suicidal ideation in a national sample of veterans, these results inform policy and clinical decision-making for suicide prevention and in programs serving veterans experiencing homelessness.
RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) refers to the prescription of medications that carry a higher risk of adverse outcomes, such as drug interactions, falls, and cognitive impairment. PIP is of particular concern in older adults, and is associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and healthcare costs. Socioeconomic deprivation has been identified as a potential risk factor for PIP. However, the extent of this relationship remains unclear. This review aimed to synthesize the current literature on the association between PIP and socioeconomic status (SES) in older adults. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using the databases Medline, Embase and CINAHL. A search strategy was developed to capture papers examining three key concepts: PIP, socioeconomic deprivation and older/elderly populations. Peer-reviewed quantitative research published between 1/1/2000 and 31/12/2022 was eligible for inclusion. RESULTS: Twenty articles from 3,966 hits met the inclusion criteria. The sample size of included studies ranged from 668 to 16.5million individuals, with the majority from Europe (n = 8) and North America (n = 8). Most defined older patients as being 65 or over (n = 12) and used income (n = 7) or subsidy eligibility (n = 5) to assess SES. In all, twelve studies reported a statistically significant association between socioeconomic deprivation and an increased likelihood of experiencing PIP. Several of these reported some association after adjusting for number of drugs taken, or the presence of polypharmacy. The underlying reasons for the association are unclear, although one study found that the association between deprivation and higher PIP prevalence could not be explained by poorer access to healthcare facilities or practitioners. CONCLUSION: The findings suggest some association between an older person's SES and their likelihood of being exposed to PIP. SES appears to be one of several factors that act independently and in concert to influence an older person's likelihood of experiencing PIP. This review highlights that prioritising older people living in socioeconomically-deprived circumstances may be an efficient strategy when carrying out medication reviews.
Sujet(s)
Prescription inappropriée , Humains , Prescription inappropriée/économie , Sujet âgé , Facteurs socioéconomiques , Classe sociale , Facteurs de risque , Liste de médicaments potentiellement inappropriésRÉSUMÉ
AIMS: Controlled metabolic factors and socioeconomic status (SES) was crucial for prevention of diabetic retinopathy (DR). The study aims to assess the metabolic factors control and SES among working-age adults (18-64 years) with diabetes compared to older adults (65 years and older). METHODS: Totals of 6738 participants with self-reported diagnosed diabetes from National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey were included, of whom 3482 were working-age and 3256 were elderly. The prevalence of DR, metabolic factors control, and the impact of SES and diabetic duration on DR was estimated. Subgroup analysis among working-age adults was employed across different diabetic duration and SES level. RESULTS: The prevalence of DR was 20.8% among working-age adults and 20.6% in elderly adults. Further, working-age adults possessed suboptimal control on glycemia (median HbA1c: 7.0% vs. 6.8%, p < 0.001) and lipids (Low-density lipoprotein < 100 mg/dL: 46.4% vs. 63.5%, p < 0.001), but better blood pressure control (< 130/80 mmHg: 53.5% vs. 37.5%, p < 0.001) compared to the elderly, judging based on age-specific control targets. Prolonged diabetic duration didn't improve glycemic and composite factors control. SES like education and income impacted metabolic factors control and adults with higher SES were more likely to control well. Diabetic duration was a significant risk factor (OR = 4.006, 95%CI= (2.752,5.832), p < 0.001) while higher income (OR = 0.590, 95%CI= (0.421,0.826), p = 0.002) and educational level (OR = 0.637, 95%CI= (0.457,0.889), p = 0.008) were protective against DR. CONCLUSIONS: Working-age adults with diabetes demonstrate suboptimal metabolic profile control, especially glycemia and lipids. Additional efforts are needed to improve metabolic factor control and reduce DR risk, particularly for those with longer diabetes duration, less education, and lower incomes.
RÉSUMÉ
OBJECTIVE: The COVID-19 pandemic led to a rapid expansion of telehealth utilization in medicine. However, the quality measures associated with telehealth use remain unclear, particularly among vulnerable populations. This study aims to investigate the impact of telehealth on individuals' perception of overall quality care among vulnerable patient populations. METHODS: This cross-sectional study utilized Health Information National Trends Survey data. The individuals' overall perception of healthcare quality was compared between populations that had at least one telehealth visit and non-telehealth users, who all had the option of utilizing telehealth. This comparison focused on vulnerable populations, considering differences in race and ethnicity (non-Hispanic white vs. non-Hispanic black/Hispanic individuals) and socioeconomic status (high vs. low). Multivariable logistic regressions were employed to ascertain the association between individuals' overall perceptions of quality care with and without telehealth utilization. RESULTS: A total of 2920 participants, representing an unweighted population of 114,608,302, were analyzed. The adjusted odds ratio (AOR) for at least one telehealth visit associated with individuals' overall perception of quality care among the entire survey population was 0.76 with a 95% CI of 0.51-1.13 (p = 0.173). The AOR was 0.83 (95% CI 0.39-1.77, p = 0.618) among the non-White population, and the AOR was 0.71 (95% CI 0.29-1.78, p = 0.462) among individuals with low SES. CONCLUSIONS: Although telehealth utilization has both its limitations and advantages compared to traditional clinical visits, no statistically significant differences in individuals' overall perception of quality care were identified among telehealth and non-telehealth users. These findings were also consistent across various vulnerable populations.
RÉSUMÉ
Persons in socioeconomically disadvantaged situations are more susceptible and disproportionally exposed to unhealthy food environments, which results in limited access to healthy foods and poorer dietary outcomes. This qualitative paper examines the various dimensions of perceived food access to healthy and unhealthy foods (i.e., availability, affordability, accessibility, accommodation, desirability, convenience and acceptability) within the local food environment among persons in socioeconomically disadvantaged situations. A total of 23 participants in socioeconomically disadvantaged situations expressed their perceptions of food access within their local food environment and its role in their eating behaviour through participant-driven photo-elicitation in a focus group context (n=7) and researcher-driven photo-elicitation interviews (n=16). Reflexive thematic analysis has been used to analyse our data through an access framework. Four overarching themes were constructed. The first two themes concern barriers to perceived food access in respectively the home and community food environment - including the importance of kitchen infrastructure, household composition and transport options. The third theme encompasses the interaction of perceived food access with the sociocultural environment, highlighting its dual role as facilitator (e.g., through food sharing practices) and barrier (e.g., through social stigma and shame). The fourth theme concerns awareness and the ability to navigate within the information food environment, which has also been proposed as a novel dimension of food access. This study emphasizes the complexity of food access and the need for a multifaceted approach that integrates perceptions to ensure equitable access to healthy foods.
RÉSUMÉ
This study aimed to evaluate healthcare professionals' (HCPs') willingness to recommend health apps presented with versus without the CEN-ISO/TS 82304-2 health app quality label. The study was an experimental vignette study describing 12 short hypothetical scenarios, with Label (absent vs present) as a between and Type of App (prevention vs self-monitoring vs healthcare) and Patient Socioeconomic Status (low vs high) as within-subjects factors. The main outcome measure was HCPs' willingness to recommend apps. A total of 116 HCPs took part in the study. A significant main effect of the label was found. Further, HCPs were most willing to recommend self-management apps and more willing to recommend apps to high as opposed to low SES patients. However, the effect of the label did not differ between apps or according to patients' SES. Results confirm that the quality label has potential for increasing willingness to changing HCPs' recommendation behavior.
RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease (CVD) and diabetic kidney disease (DKD) are major burdens of type 1 diabetes (T1D). Predicting people at high risk of developing comorbidities would enable early intervention. This study aimed to develop models incorporating socioeconomic status (SES) to predict CVD, DKD, and mortality in adults with T1D to improve early identification of comorbidities. METHODS: Nationwide Danish registry data were used. Logistic regression models were developed to predict the development of CVD, DKD, and mortality within five years of T1D diagnosis. Features included age, sex, personal income, and education. Performance was evaluated by five-fold cross-validation with area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) and the precision-recall area under the curve (PR-AUC). The importance of SES was assessed from feature importance plots. RESULTS: Of the 6572 included adults (≥21 years) with T1D, 379 (6%) developed CVD, 668 (10%) developed DKD, and 921 (14%) died within the five-year follow-up. The AUROC (±SD) was 0.79 (±0.03) for CVD, 0.61 (±0.03) for DKD, and 0.87 (±0.01) for mortality. The PR-AUC was 0.18 (±0.01), 0.15 (±0.03), and 0.49 (±0.02), respectively. Based on feature importance plots, SES was the most important feature in the DKD model but had minimal impact on models for CVD and mortality. CONCLUSIONS: The developed models showed good performance for predicting CVD and mortality, suggesting they could help in the early identification of these outcomes in individuals with T1D. The importance of SES in individual prediction within diabetes remains uncertain.
RÉSUMÉ
CONTEXT: Withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies (WDLST) in young individuals with traumatic brain injury (TBI) is an overwhelming situation often made more stressful by socioeconomic factors that shape health outcomes. Identifying these factors is crucial to developing equitable and goal-concordant care for patients and families. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to identify predictors of WDLST in young patients with TBI. We hypothesized uninsured payment method, race, and co-morbid status are associated with WDLST. METHODS: We queried the 2021 Trauma Quality Improvement Program database for patients <45 years with TBI. Patients with WDLST were compared to patients without WDLST. Multivariable logistic regression (MLR) was performed. RESULTS: 61,115 patients were included, of whom 2,487 (4.1%) underwent WDLST. Patients in the WDLST cohort were older (29 vs 27,p<0.001), more likely to suffer from a penetrating mechanism (29% vs 11%,p<.0001), and have uninsured (22% vs 18%) or other payment method (5% vs 3%) when compared to the non-WDLST cohort. MLR identified age (AOR:1.019, 95%CI 1.014-1.024, p<.0001), non-Hispanic ethnicity (AOR:1.590, 95%CI 1.373-1.841,p<.0001), penetrating mechanism (AOR:3.075, 95%CI 2.727-3.467,p<.0001), systolic blood pressure (AOR: 0.992, 95%CI 0.990-0.993,p<0.0001), advanced directive (AOR:4.987, 95%CI 2.823-8.812,p<.0001), cirrhosis (AOR:3.854, 95%CI 2.641-5.625,p<.0001), disseminated cancer (AOR:6.595, 95%CI 2.370-18.357,p=0.0003), and interfacility transfer (AOR:1.457, 95%CI 1.295-1.640,p<0.0001) as factors associated with WDLST. Black patients were less likely to undergo WDLST when compared to white patients (AOR:0.687, 95%CI 0.603-0.782,p<.0001). CONCLUSION: The decision for WDLST in young patients with severe TBI may be influenced by cultural and socioeconomic factors in addition to clinical considerations.
RÉSUMÉ
BACKGROUND: Mental illness is a global concern and the leading cause of years lived with disability. Research on help-seeking behaviour has focused on individual factors, but there is still much unexplained variance. Suggesting complex interactions between determinants of human behaviour a new framework called Self-Milieux is proposed to represent a person's sociocultural background. The article introduces a statistical approach to determine Self-Milieux and exemplarily examines its predictive validity for health-related research. METHODS: Self-Milieux are determined through a two-stage clustering method based on the determinants socioeconomic status and self-construal profile. Descriptive analyses are used to compare Self-Milieux characteristics. Hierarchical binary logistic regression models test the association between Self-Milieux and help-seeking behaviour, while controlling for socioeconomic status as an established predictor. RESULTS: The sample size was N = 1535 (Mage = 43.17 and 64.89% female participants). Average depression severity was M = 12.22, indicating mild to moderate symptoms. Six Self-Milieux were determined and named. Participants from privileged (aOR = 0.38) and self-sufficient (aOR = 0.37) milieux were less likely to seek help from a general practitioner than those from the entitled milieu. Participants from privileged (aOR = 0.30), collaborators (aOR = 0.50), disadvantaged (aOR = 0.33), and self-sufficient (aOR = 0.21) milieux were less likely to seek help from family members than those from the entitled and family-bound milieux. DISCUSSION: The study's strengths and limitations, as well as the cluster methodology, are discussed. The comparative results for the six Self-Milieux are interpreted based on current research. For example, participants from some milieux follow a help-seeking process proposed in previous research, while participants from other milieux seem to show a different process, one that ends in informal help-seeking.
RÉSUMÉ
Background: Family socioeconomic status (FSES) serves as a significant determinant for subjective well-being. However, extant research has provided conflicting evidence on the correlation between FSES and adolescent students' subjective well-being (SSWB). Methods: Data were collected from 12,058 adolescent students (16 years of age) by the Programme for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2018. Multivariate canonical correlation and Mantel test were utilized to investigate the specific connection between FSES and SSWB. Furthermore, a Gaussian EBICglasso graph-theoretical model was used to capture the topological properties of the FSES-SSWB network and reveal the interplay among multifarious components of FSES and SSWB. Results: FSES was positively correlated with SSWB. In the FSES-SSWB network, parental educational attainment and occupation status demonstrated the highest centrality values, thereby contributing significantly to the relationship between FSES and SSWB. However, family wealth, along with educational and cultural resources, displayed lower centrality values, signifying their weaker roles in this relationship. Conclusion: Our findings suggest that symbolic capital, rather than family affluence, exerts a dominant influence on adolescent SSWB. In other words, SSWB may not be detrimentally influenced by a deficiency in monetary resources. However, it is more susceptible to being unfavorably impacted by inferior parental educational attainment and occupational standing.
RÉSUMÉ
Epigenetic studies have provided new opportunities to better understand the biological effects of poverty and racial/ethnic minority status. However, little is known about sex differences in these processes. Methods: We used 15 years of follow up of 854 racially and ethnically diverse birth cohort who were followed from birth to age 15. Structural equation modeling (SEM) was used to examine the effects of race/ethnicity, maternal education, and family structure on poverty at birth, as well as the effects of poverty at birth on epigenetic changes at age 15. We also explored variations by sex. Results: Our findings indicate that Black and Latino families had lower maternal education and married family structure which in turn predicted poverty at birth. Poverty at birth then was predictive of epigenetic changes 15 years later when the index child was 15. This suggested that poverty at birth partially mediates the effects of race/ethnicity, maternal education, and family structure on epigenetic changes of youth at age 15. There was an effect of poverty status at birth on DNA methylation of male but not female youth at age 15. Thus, poverty at birth may have a more salient effect on long term epigenetic changes of male than female youth. Conclusions: Further studies are needed to understand the mechanisms underlying the observed sex differences in the effects of poverty as a mechanism that connects race/ethnicity, maternal education, and family structure to epigenetic changes later in life.
RÉSUMÉ
Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and periodontitis share common risk factors such as obesity, insulin resistance (IR), and dyslipidemia, which contribute to systemic inflammation. It has been suggested that a bidirectional relationship exists between NAFLD and periodontitis, indicating that one condition may exacerbate the other. NAFLD is characterized by excessive fat deposition in the liver and is associated with low-grade chronic inflammation. There are several risk factors for the development of NAFLD, including gender, geriatric community, race, ethnicity, poor sleep quality and sleep deprivation, physical activity, nutritional status, dysbiosis gut microbiota, increased oxidative stress, overweight, obesity, higher body mass index (BMI), IR, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), metabolic syndrome (MetS), dyslipidemia (hypercholesterolemia), and sarcopenia (decreased skeletal muscle mass). This systemic inflammation can contribute to the progression of periodontitis by impairing immune responses and exacerbating the inflammatory processes in the periodontal tissues. Furthermore, individuals with NAFLD often exhibit altered lipid metabolism, which may affect oral microbiota composition, leading to dysbiosis and increased susceptibility to periodontal disease. Conversely, periodontitis has been linked to the progression of NAFLD through mechanisms involving systemic inflammation and oxidative stress. Chronic periodontal inflammation can release pro-inflammatory cytokines and bacterial toxins into the bloodstream, contributing to liver inflammation and exacerbating hepatic steatosis. Moreover, periodontitis-induced oxidative stress may promote hepatic lipid accumulation and IR, further aggravating NAFLD. The interplay between NAFLD and periodontitis underscores the importance of comprehensive management strategies targeting both conditions. Lifestyle modifications such as regular exercise, a healthy diet, and proper oral hygiene practices are crucial for preventing and managing these interconnected diseases. Additionally, interdisciplinary collaboration between hepatologists and periodontists is essential for optimizing patient care and improving outcomes in individuals with NAFLD and periodontitis.
RÉSUMÉ
Background: Social inequalities in colorectal cancer screening participation are evident. Barriers to screening participation include discomfort from diagnostic modalities. We aimed to describe the discomfort experienced from colonoscopy and colon capsule endoscopy (CCE) and investigate the discrepancy between expected and experienced discomfort stratified by socioeconomic status. Methods: A randomised controlled trial was conducted offering half of the colorectal cancer screening invitees the choice between CCE and colonoscopy after a positive faecal immunochemical test. This paper includes those who elected to undergo CCE. A positive CCE elicited referral for a therapeutic colonoscopy. Participants reported their discomfort from CCE and from any following colonoscopies in electronically distributed questionnaires. Discomfort was measured using visual analogue scales and compared between socioeconomic subgroups determined by educational level and income. Results: The experienced discomfort from CCE and colonoscopy differed significantly between educational levels but not income levels. The bowel preparation contributed the most to the experienced discomfort in both CCE and colonoscopy. The discrepancy between expected and experienced discomfort from colonoscopy increased with increasing educational and income levels. A similar trend was seen in CCE between educational levels but not income levels. Conclusions: None of the results indicated a higher discomfort in lower socioeconomic subgroups. Regardless of the investigation modality, the bowel preparation was the main contributor to experienced discomfort. The discrepancy between expected and experienced discomfort did not seem to be larger in lower socioeconomic subgroups, indicating that this is not a major barrier causing inequalities in screening uptake. This is the first study investigating individual discomfort discrepancy in both CCE and colonoscopy, while being able to stratify by socioeconomic status.
RÉSUMÉ
Background: Beyond clinical risk factors, little is known about the impact of social determinants on respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) burden. Our study aimed to estimate RSV-related hospitalization rates across sociodemographic and housing characteristics. Methods: We conducted a population-based study of all RSV-related hospitalizations in Ontario, Canada, between September 1, 2016, and August 31, 2019, using validated hospital discharge codes and census data. Crude and age-standardized annualized RSV incidence rates and rate ratios (RRs) were estimated for a range of individual-level demographics and neighborhood-level measures of marginalization and housing characteristics. Results: Overall, the annual RSV-related hospitalization rate was 27 per 100 000, with the highest rates observed in children age <12 months (1049 per 100 000) and 12-23 months (294 per 100 000) and adults age ≥85 years (155 per 100 000). Higher RSV-related hospitalization rates were associated with increasing marginalization quintile (Q) of material resources (RR, 1.4; Q5: 33 per 100 000 vs Q1: 24 per 100 000) and household instability (RR, 1.5; Q5: 31 per 100 000 vs Q1: 22 per 100 000). Conclusions: The burden of RSV-related hospitalization was greatest in young children and older adults, with variation by sociodemographic and housing factors. Understanding the role of these social factors is crucial for informing equitable preventive program delivery.
RÉSUMÉ
Background: Studies have linked socioeconomic factors including lower income and minority race with worse functional outcomes following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Arthrofibrosis is a common complication following TKA, and manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is an effective treatment option for arthrofibrosis. This study aimed to determine if neighborhood-level socioeconomic disadvantage predicts need for MUA and postoperative range of motion (ROM) among patients undergoing primary elective TKA. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study of primary TKAs performed at a single institution over a three-year duration. Area Deprivation Index (ADI) was used to determine each patient's level of socioeconomic disadvantage based on their home address. Patients were allocated into three groups based on ADI: least socioeconomic disadvantage (ADI 1-3), middle socioeconomic disadvantage (ADI 4-6), and most socioeconomic disadvantage (ADI 7-10). Demographic factors and comorbid conditions were recorded. Bivariate analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between degree of socioeconomic disadvantage and need for MUA and postoperative ROM. Results: In total, 600 patients were included and 26.7 % were categorized as most disadvantaged. In comparison to the middle and least disadvantaged groups, these patients were more likely to be Women (71.2 vs. 67.9 and 58.6 %; p = 0.027), younger (60.7 vs. 62.9 and 66.3 years; p < 0.001) and have higher BMI (34.9 vs. 33 and 31.7; p < 0.001) (most disadvantaged vs. middle and least). Analysis revealed no difference in rate of MUA (6.3 vs. 2.5 vs. 4 %; p = 0.179) or postoperative ROM (98 vs. 98 vs. 100°; p = 0.753) between the three groups (most, middle, and least disadvantaged, respectively). Conclusion: Neighborhood socioeconomic disadvantage does not predict rate of MUA or postoperative ROM following TKA. Patients residing in neighborhoods with higher ADI who underwent TKA were more likely to be younger, Women, and have higher BMI, consistent with previous literature. Our results support efforts to improve access to orthopaedic care, including TKA, to patients of all socioeconomic levels.