Target-Driven Tissue-Agnostic Drug Approvals-A New Path of Drug Development.

The regulatory approvals of tumor-agnostic therapies have led to the re-evaluation of the drug development process. The conventional models of drug development are histology-based. On the other hand, the tumor-agnostic drug development of a new drug (or combination) focuses on targeting a common genomic biomarker in multiple cancers, regardless of histology. The basket-like clinical trials with multiple cohorts allow clinicians to evaluate pan-cancer efficacy and toxicity. There are currently eight tumor agnostic approvals granted by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA). This includes two immune checkpoint inhibitors, and five targeted therapy agents. Pembrolizumab is an anti-programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1) antibody that was the first FDA-approved tumor-agnostic treatment for unresectable or metastatic microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) solid tumors in 2017. It was later approved for tumor mutational burden-high (TMB-H) solid tumors, although the TMB cut-off used is still debated. Subsequently, in 2021, another anti-PD-1 antibody, dostarlimab, was also approved for dMMR solid tumors in the refractory setting. Patients with fusion-positive cancers are typically difficult to treat due to their rare prevalence and distribution. Gene rearrangements or fusions are present in a variety of tumors. Neurotrophic tyrosine kinase (NTRK) fusions are present in a range of pediatric and adult solid tumors in varying frequency. Larotrectinib and entrectinib were approved for neurotrophic tyrosine kinase (NTRK) fusion-positive cancers. Similarly, selpercatinib was approved for rearranged during transfection (RET) fusion-positive solid tumors. The FDA approved the first combination therapy of dabrafenib, a B-Raf proto-oncogene serine/threonine kinase (BRAF) inhibitor, plus trametinib, a mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK) inhibitor for patients 6 months or older with unresectable or metastatic tumors (except colorectal cancer) carrying a BRAFV600E mutation. The most recent FDA tumor-agnostic approval is of fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan-nxki (T-Dxd) for HER2-positive solid tumors. It is important to identify and expeditiously develop drugs that have the potential to provide clinical benefit across tumor types.

The evolving landscape of tissue-agnostic therapies in precision oncology.

Tumor-agnostic therapies represent a paradigm shift in oncology by altering the traditional means of characterizing tumors based on their origin or location. Instead, they zero in on specific genetic anomalies responsible for fueling malignant growth. The watershed moment for tumor-agnostic therapies arrived in 2017, with the US Food and Drug Administration's historic approval of pembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inhibitor. This milestone marked the marriage of genomics and immunology fields, as an immunotherapeutic agent gained approval based on genomic biomarkers, specifically, microsatellite instability-high or mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR). Subsequently, the approval of NTRK inhibitors, designed to combat NTRK gene fusions prevalent in various tumor types, including pediatric cancers and adult solid tumors, further underscored the potential of tumor-agnostic therapies. The US Food and Drug Administration approvals of targeted therapies (BRAF V600E, RET fusion), immunotherapies (tumor mutational burden ≥10 mutations per megabase, dMMR) and an antibody-drug conjugate (Her2-positive-immunohistochemistry 3+ expression) with pan-cancer efficacy have continued, offering newfound hope to patients grappling with advanced solid tumors that harbor particular biomarkers. In this comprehensive review, the authors delve into the expansive landscape of tissue-agnostic targets and drugs, shedding light on the rationale underpinning this approach, the hurdles it faces, presently approved therapies, voices from the patient advocacy perspective, and the tantalizing prospects on the horizon. This is a welcome advance in oncology that transcends the boundaries of histology and location to provide personalized options.

If it's a target, it's a pan-cancer target: Tissue is not the issue.

Cancer is traditionally diagnosed and treated on the basis of its organ of origin (e.g., lung or colon cancer). However, organ-of-origin diagnostics does not reveal the underlying oncogenic drivers. Fortunately, molecular diagnostics have advanced at a breathtaking pace, and it is increasingly apparent that cancer is a disease of the genome. Hence, we now have multiple genomic biomarker-based, tissue-agnostic Food and Drug Administration approvals for both gene- and immune-targeted therapies (larotrectinib/entrectinib, for NTRK fusions; selpercatinib, RET fusions; dabrafenib plus trametinib, BRAFV600E mutations; pembrolizumab/dostarlimab, microsatellite instability; and pembrolizumab for high tumor mutational burden; pemigatinib is also approved for FGFR1-rearranged myeloid/lymphoid neoplasms). There are emerging targets as well, including but not limited to ALK, BRCA and/or homologous repair deficiency, ERBB2 (HER2), IDH1/2, KIT, KRASG12C, NRG1, and VHL. Many tissue-agnostic approvals center on rare/ultra-rare biomarkers (often < 1 % of cancers), necessitating screening hundreds of tumors to find a single one harboring the cognate molecular alteration. Approval has generally been based on small single-arm studies (<30-100 patients) with high response rates (>30 % to > 75 %) of remarkable durability. Because of biomarker rarity, single-gene testing is not practical; next generation sequencing of hundreds of genes must be performed to obtain timely answers. Resistance to biomarker-driven therapeutics is often due to secondary mutations or co-driver gene defects; studies are now addressing the need for customized drug combinations matched to the complex molecular alteration portfolio in each tumor. Future investigation should expand tissue-agnostic therapeutics to encompass both hematologic and solid malignancies and include biomarkers beyond those that are DNA-based.

Tissue-Agnostic Cancer Therapy Approvals.

Tumor-agnostic, or histology-agnostic, cancer therapy marks a groundbreaking evolution in the realm of precision oncology. In stark contrast to conventional cancer treatments that categorize malignancies based on their tissue of origin (eg, breast, lung, renal cell, etc), tumor-agnostic therapies transcend histologic boundaries, honing in on the genetic and molecular attributes of tumors, regardless of their location. This article offers a comprehensive review of the current landscape of tissue-agnostic cancer therapies and provides clinical insights to empower surgical oncologists with a deeper understanding of these innovative therapeutic approaches.

The significance of tissue-agnostic biomarkers in solid tumors: the more the merrier?

INTRODUCTION: To date, several emerging biomarkers have gained considerable interest in the field of predictive molecular oncology. The advent of precision medicine has led to the development of innovative drugs targeting rare molecular pathways independently from histology, defined as tissue-agnostic drugs. AREAS COVERED: Although there is a lot of promise for this new tissue-agnostic model in the oncological scenario, crucial issues from both the diagnostic and therapeutic standpoint are emerging. This review aims to critically examine the role of tissue-agnostic biomarkers in different solid tumors, focusing on the prevalence and methods of detection of agnostic biomarkers together with drug approvals to guide clinicians in this evolving landscape. EXPERT OPINION: To strengthen the framework for tissue-agnostic approvals, the dialogue between regulatory, industrial, and academic parties should be intensified. Critical questions include the development of an efficient network system that can overcome the heterogeneity of patients' inclusion criteria along with the increasingly difficult interpretation of next-generation sequencing (NGS) profiling technologies. Cost-effectiveness and risk-benefit studies are needed in the national context considering the modalities of access to diagnostic tests and reimbursement of treatments.

The Potential of Trastuzumab Deruxtecan as a Tissue Agnostic Drug.

BACKGROUND: Many modern anticancer drugs are designed to target specific molecular alterations harbored by the cancer. If a specific drug is able to target these alterations, regardless of the organ or tissue in which the cancer originates, it will often be characterized as a tissue- or tumor agnostic drug. According to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), a tissue-agnostic drug refers to a drug that targets a specific molecular alteration across multiple cancer types, as defined by organ, tissue, or tumor type. SUMMARY: Over the last 6 years, the FDA has approved seven tissue-agnostic drugs, and more are anticipated in the future. One promising candidate for a tissue-agnostic classification is the antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd). Currently, T-DXd is approved for the treatment of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and HER2-low breast cancer, HER2-positive gastric or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma, and non-small cell lung cancer with activating HER2 mutations. Ongoing clinical research is exploring the potential of T-DXd in various solid tumors that harbor specific HER2 molecular alterations, and encouraging results, including the interim data from the DESTINY-PanTumor02 trial, have been published, which suggest a tissue-agnostic potential. KEY MESSAGES: Published phase I data as well as the interim results from the phase II DESTINY-PanTumor02 trial indicates that patients with different HER2-positive advanced solid tumors may benefit from treatment with T-DXd. Based on the currently available data, it seems likely that T-DXd possesses pantumor activity. However, different clinical trials are ongoing, and it will be necessary to see the results from these trials before drawing a final conclusion. When discussing tissue-agnostic potential, it is important to add that for most of the patients enrolled in the DESTINY-PanTumor02 and other trials, few treatment alternatives seem to exist, and T-DXd might be able to cover an unmet medical need.

RET aberrant cancers and RET inhibitor therapies: Current state-of-the-art and future perspectives.

Precision oncology informed by genomic information has evolved in leaps and bounds over the last decade. Although non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has moved to center-stage as the poster child of precision oncology, multiple targetable genomic alterations have been identified in various cancer types. RET alterations occur in roughly 2% of all human cancers. The role of RET as oncogenic driver was initially identified in 1985 after the discovery that transfection with human lymphoma DNA transforms NIH-3T3 fibroblasts. Germline RET mutations are causative of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 syndrome, and RET fusions are found in 10-20% of papillary thyroid cases and are detected in most patients with advanced sporadic medullary thyroid cancer. RET fusions are oncogenic drivers in 2% of Non-small cell lung cancer. Rapid translation and regulatory approval of selective RET inhibitors, selpercatinib and pralsetinib, have opened up the field of RET precision oncology. This review provides an update on RET precision oncology from bench to bedside and back. We explore the impact of selective RET inhibitor in patients with advanced NSCLC, thyroid cancer, and other cancers in a tissue-agnostic fashion, resistance mechanisms, and future directions.

Impact of tissue-agnostic approvals for patients with gastrointestinal malignancies.

Gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies encompass a broad range of tumors with limited treatment options, particularly for advanced disease. With the development and implementation of next-generation sequencing (NGS) in routine practice, molecular-targeting therapies have been increasingly incorporated into the treatment paradigm for various cancers. Several drugs have achieved tissue-agnostic regulatory approvals, which offer promising biomarker-driven therapy options for patients with advanced GI malignancies. In this review, we focus on the clinical evidence for recent drug approvals for neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) fusion, microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) phenotype, tumor mutation burden-high (TMB-H), BRAF V600E, and rearranged during transfection (RET), in the context of GI malignancies. We also highlight the future landscape of tissue-agnostic targets, such as human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)/neu, fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), and neuregulin (NRG)-1.

Histology-Agnostic Drugs: A Paradigm Shift-A Narrative Review.

Cancer diagnosis and therapeutics have been traditionally based on pathologic classification at the organ of origin. The availability of an unprecedented amount of clinical and biologic data provides a unique window of opportunity for the development of new drugs. What was once treated as a homogeneous disease with a one-size-fits-all approach was shown to be a rather heterogeneous condition, with multiple targetable mutations that can vary during the course of the disease. Clinical trial designs have had to adapt to the exponential growth of targetable mechanisms and new agents, with ensuing challenges that are closer to those experienced with rare diseases and orphan medicines. To face these problems, precision/enrichment and other novel trial designs have been developed, and the concept of histology-agnostic targeted therapeutic agents has emerged. Patients are selected for a specific agent based on specific genomic or molecular alterations, with the same compound used to potentially treat a multiplicity of cancers, granted that the actionable driver alteration is present. There are currently approved drugs for such indications, but this approach has raised issues on multiple levels. This review aims to address the challenges of this new concept and provide insights into possible solutions and frameworks on how to tackle them.

New Genetic Technologies in Diagnosis and Treatment of Cancer of Unknown Primary.

Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) represents a rare oncological and heterogeneous disease in which one or more metastases are present, but the location of the primary site is unknown. Pathological diagnosis, using immunohistochemistry, of such metastatic materials is challenging and frequently does not allow for determining the tissue of origin (ToO). The selection of systemic therapy in patients with CUP is usually based on empiric grounds, and the prognosis is generally unfavourable. New molecular techniques could identify the tissue of origin and be used to select systemic agnostic therapies in various malignancies with specific molecular abnormalities. Targetable driver mutations or gene rearrangements in cancer cells may be identified using various molecular assays, of which particularly valuable are next-generation sequencing techniques. These assays may identify tumour sources and allow personalized treatments. However, current guidelines for CUP management do not recommend routine testing of gene expression and epigenetic factors. This is mainly due to the insufficient evidence supporting the improvement of CUP's prognosis by virtue of this approach. This review summarizes the advantages and disadvantages of new genetic techniques in CUP diagnostics and proposes updating the recommendations for CUP management.

A Comparison of Post-marketing Measures Imposed by Regulatory Agencies to Confirm the Tissue-Agnostic Approach.

There are currently four anti-cancer medicinal products approved for a tissue-agnostic indication. This is an indication based on a common biological characteristic rather than the tissue of origin. To date, the regulatory experience with tissue-agnostic approvals is limited. Therefore, we compared decision-making aspects of the first tissue-agnostic approvals between the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Medicines Agency (EMA) and Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA). Post-marketing measures (PMMs) related to the tissue-agnostic indication were of specific interest. The main data source was the publicly available review documents. The following data were collected: submission date, approval date, clinical trials and datasets, and PMMs. At the time of data collection, the FDA and PMDA approved pembrolizumab, larotrectinib, and entrectinib for a tissue-agnostic indication, while the EMA approved larotrectinib and entrectinib for a tissue-agnostic indication. There were differences in analysis sets (integrated vs. non-integrated), submission dates and requests for data updates between agencies. All agencies had outstanding issues that needed to be addressed in the post-market setting. For pembrolizumab, larotrectinib and entrectinib, the number of imposed PMMs varied between one and eight, with the FDA requesting the most PMMs compared to the other two agencies. All agencies requested at least one PMM per approval to address the remaining uncertainties related to the tissue-agnostic indication. The FDA and EMA requested data from ongoing and proposed trials, while the PMDA requested data from use-result surveys. Confirmation of benefit in the post-marketing setting is an important aspect of tissue-agnostic approvals, regardless of agency. Nonetheless, each approach to confirm benefit has its inherent limitations. Post-marketing data will be essential for the regulatory and clinical decisions-making of medicinal products with a tissue-agnostic indication.

Application of mTORC1 Inhibitors for Tissue-Agnostic Management of Standard-Therapy-Refractory Solid Tumors.

In this analysis, we examined the efficacy, feasibility, and limitations of the application of mTOR inhibitors based on the individual molecular profiles of pretreated cancer patients after the failure of all standard treatments in the palliative setting. In this single-center, real-world analysis of our platform for precision medicine, we analyzed the molecular characteristics of 71 cancer patients. The tumor samples of the patients were analyzed using next-generation sequencing panels of mutation hotspots, microsatellite stability testing, and immunohistochemistry. All profiles were reviewed by a multidisciplinary team to provide a targeted treatment recommendation after a consensus discussion. Seventy-one cancer patients with activation of the mTOR pathway were offered an mTORC1-inhibitor-based targeted therapy, and twenty-three (32.4%) of them eventually received the targeted therapy. Only three patients (4.2%) achieved stable disease, of whom one experienced progressive disease again after 9.1 months. The median time to treatment failure was 2.8 months. In total, 110 mutations were detected in 60 patients (84.5%). The three most frequent mutations were found in TP53, PTEN, and KRAS, which accounted for over 50% (56.4%) of all mutations. In sum, in selected patients with heavily pretreated solid tumors with activation of the mTOR pathway, the antitumoral activity of mTORC1 inhibition was weak.

Outcome selection for tissue-agnostic drug trials for immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: a systematic review of core outcome sets and regulatory guidance.

BACKGROUND: Tissue-agnostic drug development provides a paradigm shift in precision medicine and requires innovative trial designs. However, outcome selection for such trials can prove challenging. The objectives of this review were to: (i) Identify and map core outcome sets (COS), across 11 immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) in order to facilitate the selection of relevant outcomes across the conditions for innovative trials of tissue-agnostic drug therapies. (ii) Compare outcomes or endpoints recommended by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) to identify and highlight similarities and differences. METHODS: The Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials (COMET), International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement (ICHOM), FDA and EMA databases were searched from inception to 28th December 2019. Two reviewers independently screened titles and abstracts of retrieved entries and conducted the subsequent full text screening. Hand searching of the reference lists and citation searching of the selected publications was conducted. The methodological quality of the included peer-reviewed articles was independently assessed by the reviewers based on the items of the COS-Standards for Development recommendations (COS-STAD) checklist. Core outcomes from the included publications were extracted and mapped across studies and conditions. Regulatory guidance from FDA and EMA, where available for clinical trials for the IMIDs, were obtained from their databases and recommendations on outcomes to measure directly compared. RESULTS: Forty-four COS publications were included in the final analysis. Outcomes such as disease activity, pain, fatigue, quality of life, physical function, work limitation/productivity, steroid use and biomarkers were recommended across majority of the conditions. There were significant similarities and differences in FDA and EMA recommendations. The only instance where either regulatory body directly referenced a COS was for jSLE-both referenced the Paediatric Rheumatology International Trials Organization (PRINTO) COS. CONCLUSIONS: The findings from this systematic review provide valuable information to inform outcome selection in tissue-agnostic trials for IMIDs. There is a need for increased collaboration between regulators and COS developers and inclusion of regulators as key stakeholders in COS development to enhance the quality of COS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Not registered.

Impact of tissue-agnostic approvals for patients with sarcoma.

Tissue-agnostic drug development is a major step forward in offering treatment options for rare tumors. Sarcomas are heterogeneous rare malignancies with more than 100 subtypes. Recent failure of Phase III trials, nonbiomarker-driven clinical trials, and rarity hamper developmental therapeutics in sarcomas. Since a 'one-size-fits-all' approach continues to be the standard of care, tissue-agnostic approvals assume significance in sarcomas. In this review, we focus on the clinical evidence of recent drug approvals for neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase (NTRK) fusion, microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) or mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) phenotype, and tumor mutation burden-high (TMB-H) status in the context of sarcomas, and the future landscape of tissue-agnostic targets, such as rearranged during transfection (RET), fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR), and neuregulin-1 (NRG1).

Analysis of histology-agnostic targets among soft tissue and bone sarcomas in the AACR GENIE database.

Background: The development of novel therapies for patients with sarcoma is challenging due to the rarity and diversity of these mesenchymal neoplasms. Hence, histology-agnostic approvals can be of particular interest for the treatment of patients with soft tissue and bone sarcoma. Methods: We queried the American Association for Cancer Research (AACR) Project Genomics Evidence Neoplasia Information Exchange (GENIE) database Cohort v12.0-Public to investigate the prevalence of currently Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved and other potentially actionable histology-agnostic alterations in patients with soft tissue and bone sarcoma. Targets were identified by a literature review by the authors. Results are presented for each cohort identified in the GENIE database, namely: (1) soft tissue sarcoma (STS), (2) gastrointestinal stromal tumor (GIST), (3) bone sarcoma, (4) uterine sarcoma, and (5) breast sarcoma. Results: We identified 7,512 samples of 6,955 patients with sarcoma in the AAACR GENIE database v12.0-Public. Molecular alterations that could lead to the clinical use of a currently approved histology-agnostic therapy were identified in 2.1% of sarcomas (2.6% STS, 1.3% GIST, 1.4% bone, 2.7% uterine, and 0% breast). In addition, 2.9% of patients could be eligible for future histology-agnostic approvals. These specific mutations, fusions, and amplifications occurred in multiple histotypes in all cohorts. Discussion: Exploring a public large-scale genomic database, we identified that 5% of patients with sarcoma could be eligible for current histology-agnostic FDA-approved drugs or future potential histology-agnostic indications. These actionable alterations were present in a wide variety of histologies in soft tissue and bone sarcomas, highlighting that next-generation sequencing can be considered for patients with advanced sarcoma to guide treatment strategies.

TRK Inhibitors: Tissue-Agnostic Anti-Cancer Drugs.

Recently, two tropomycin receptor kinase (Trk) inhibitors, larotrectinib and entrectinib, have been approved for Trk fusion-positive cancer patients. Clinical trials for larotrectinib and entrectinib were performed with patients selected based on the presence of Trk fusion, regardless of cancer type. This unique approach, called tissue-agnostic development, expedited the process of Trk inhibitor development. In the present review, the development processes of larotrectinib and entrectinib have been described, along with discussion on other Trk inhibitors currently in clinical trials. The on-target effects of Trk inhibitors in Trk signaling exhibit adverse effects on the central nervous system, such as withdrawal pain, weight gain, and dizziness. A next generation sequencing-based method has been approved for companion diagnostics of larotrectinib, which can detect various types of Trk fusions in tumor samples. With the adoption of the tissue-agnostic approach, the development of Trk inhibitors has been accelerated.

Carcinoma of Unknown Primary in a Patient With Lynch Syndrome.

Lynch syndrome is the most common form of hereditary colorectal cancer and is associated with an increased incidence of endometrial cancer, small bowel cancer, and other malignancies. The advent of immune checkpoint blockade, next-generation sequencing, and precision medicine molecular tumor boards have revolutionized the current treatment landscape for many cancers and allowed for more creative approaches to treating patients. In addition, tissue agnostic approvals have also served as valid treatment options for patients with otherwise untreatable cancers. In this report, we discuss the case of a 70-year-old woman with Lynch syndrome found to have retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy with p16-negative squamous cell carcinoma, diagnosed as carcinoma of unknown primary (CUP). To our knowledge, this is the first report of Lynch syndrome-associated squamous cell CUP. More research is needed on newly emerging cancer presentations in Lynch syndrome patients as they achieve longer lifespans.

Optimal Bayesian hierarchical model to accelerate the development of tissue-agnostic drugs and basket trials.

Tissue-agnostic trials and basket trials enroll patients based on their genetic biomarkers, not tumor type, in an attempt to determine if a new drug can successfully treat disease conditions based on biomarkers. The Bayesian hierarchical model (BHM) provides an attractive approach to design phase II tissue-agnostic trials by allowing information borrowing across multiple disease types. In this article, we elucidate two intrinsic and inevitable issues that may limit the use of BHM to tissue-agnostic trials: sensitivity to the prior specification of the shrinkage parameter and the competing "interest" among disease types in increasing power and controlling type I error. To address these issues, we propose the optimal BHM (OBHM) and clustered OBHM (COBHM) approaches. In these approach, we first specify a flexible utility function to quantify the tradeoff between type I error and power across disease types based on the study objectives, and then we select the prior of the shrinkage parameter to optimize the utility function of clinical and regulatory interest. COBHM further utilizes a simple Bayesian rule to cluster tumor types into sensitive and insensitive subgroups to achieve more accurate information borrowing. Simulation study shows that the OBHM and especially COBHM have desirable operating characteristics, outperforming some existing methods. COBHM effectively balances power and type I error, addresses the sensitivity of the prior selection, and reduces the "unwarranted" subjectivity in the prior selection. It provides a systematic, rigorous way to apply BHM and solve the common problem of blindingly using a non-informative inverse-gamma prior (with a large variance) or priors arbitrarily chosen that may lead to problematic statistical properties.

Review and Prospect of Tissue-agnostic Targeted Strategies in Anticancer Therapies.

Due to the increasing prevalence of cancer year by year, and the complexity and refractory nature of the disease itself, it is required to constantly innovate the development of new cancer treatment schemes. At the same time, the understanding of cancers has deepened, from the use of chemotherapy regimens with high toxicity and side effects, to the popularity of targeted drugs with specific targets, to precise treatments based on tumor characteristics rather than traditional anatomical location classification. In precision medicine, in the view of the specific cancer diseases and their biological characteristics, there is a great potential to develop tissue-agnostic targeted therapy with broad-spectrum anticancer significance. The present review has discussed tissue-agnostic targeted therapy based on the biological and genetic characteristics of cancers, expounded its theoretical basis and strategies for drug development. In addition, the feasible drug targets, FDA-approved drugs, as well as drug candidates in clinical trials have also been summarized. In conclusion, the "tissue-agnostic targeted therapy" is a breakthrough in anticancer therapies.