Appropriate antimicrobial prescribing for bacteriuria before urological procedures: A room for improvement.

In the presence of a positive preoperative urine culture, the prescription of a preoperative antibiotic therapy is recommended. The choice of antibiotic therapy and prescription are usually made by the urologist or the general practitioner (GP). The objective of the treatment is urinary sterilization rather than parenchymal treatment, and the treatment choice is key to reduce selective pressure and antimicrobial resistance. The objective of this study was to evaluate prescription patterns made by urologists and GPs, then to compare the antibiotics chosen by urologists or GPs to the "ideal" treatment defined by infectious diseases specialists. We retrospectively reviewed all positive preoperative urine cultures obtained between November 2022 and July 2023. Data pertaining to antibiotic prescriptions, including the duration of treatment, antibiotic class, and prescriber were collected. An infectious disease specialist conducted a blind review of each urine culture, providing recommendations for the most appropriate antibiotic based on their assessment. In cases of disagreement, a second infectious disease specialist conducted a similar evaluation. Out of 196 preoperative antibiotic prescriptions, 40 (20%) differed from the recommendations provided by the infectious disease specialist, with 39 involving the use of overly broad-spectrum antibiotics. Both infectious disease specialists yielded congruent recommendations in all cases. Notably, in 50% of these instances, the preoperative antibiotic treatment duration unduly exceeded 48hours. A statistically significant increase (4.84days vs. 2.99days) in preoperative treatment duration was observed when a GP was the prescriber (P<0.001). There is room for improvement of urologists' antibiotic prescription practices to reduce the ecological impact on the patient's microbiota and on a global scale. The delegation to GPs resulted in unjustified longer treatment durations and should be avoided without dedicated training. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Advances in Bowel Preparation and Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for Open and Laparoscopic Urologic Surgery.

Surgical site infections (SSIs) represent a major source of postoperative complications adversely impacting morbidity and mortality indices in surgical care. The discovery of antibiotics in the mid-20th century, and their ensuing use for preoperative antimicrobial bowel preparation and prophylaxis, drastically reduced the occurrence of SSIs providing a major tool to surgeons of various specialties, including urology. Because, the appropriate use of these antimicrobials is critical for their continued safety and efficacy, an understanding of the recommendations guiding their application is essential for all surgeons. Here, we comprehensively review these recommendations with a focus on open and laparoscopic urologic surgeries.

Impact of a persuasive antimicrobial stewardship programme on the appropriateness of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in a tertiary care hospital in southern Italy.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: The aim of our study was to evaluate the rate of compliance to institutional guidelines on surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) among the surgical wards of our facility and to evaluate the impact of our antimicrobial stewardship programme (ASP) on the adherence rate. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study including all 14 surgical wards of our hospital. Eight of these wards participate in a non-restrictive ASP. All patients admitted to one of the wards who had been prescribed SAP were included; the appropriateness of prophylaxis was defined according to the institutional protocols. RESULTS: During the study period, we evaluated 169 patients undergoing a surgical procedure, of whom 105 (62.1%) received SAP. Overall, 10 (10.5%) patients were prescribed unnecessary prophylaxis; among the remaining 95, 30 (31.6%) received appropriate prophylaxis, while 65 (68.4%) were prescribed SAP deemed inappropriate for one or more reasons (38.5% received a drug with a larger spectrum of activity, 9.2% a molecule with a narrower spectrum, 36.9% an incorrect dose and 76.9% a longer duration of prophylaxis). A higher number of patients in the inappropriate prophylaxis group received abdominal surgery (P = 0.001) and were admitted to a ward not participating in the ASP (P < 0.001). At multivariate analysis, being admitted to an ASP unit was the only factor independently related to having received appropriate prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: A low rate of adherence to local guidelines on SAP was observed, but a non-restrictive ASP can significantly impact the appropriateness of surgical prophylaxis.

Corrigendum: Antimicrobial stewardship program for gastrointestinal surgeries at a Vietnamese tertiary hospital.

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1345698.].

Adherence to Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Guidelines in Endourologic Procedures: Frequency and Related Outcomes.

Background: Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP), when used appropriately based on evidence-based guidelines, can reduce the rate of infectious complications following endourologic procedures without compromising patient outcomes. Objectives: To investigate the appropriateness of the current SAP used in endourologic surgeries based on international guidelines and report their associated outcomes (urinary tract infection [UTI] and blood stream infection [BSI]). Design: Prospective cross-sectional study. Methodology: The medical records of patients undergoing endourologic procedures were reviewed to assess healthcare providers' adherence to international guideline recommendations. Assessed parameters included indication, duration, choice, and dose of the antibiotics used in endourologic procedures in two medical centers in Amman/Jordan. Furthermore, patients were asked to conduct laboratory urine tests to determine the rate of infectious complications within one month post-procedure. Results: Three hundred and sixty-one patients were recruited for the study. The adherence rates to guidelines regarding indication, choice, and dose of pre-operative antibiotics were 90.3%, 2.8%, and 77.8%, respectively. The duration was concordant with guidelines in only 3.4% of participants. A total of 41.8% of patients completed follow-up. Among those, 4.6% developed bacterial UTIs, and 0.7% developed BSI. Conclusion: Adherence to SAP guidelines in endourologic procedures was far from optimal. Primary deviations in the implementation of guidelines' recommendations were pinpointed. These results are crucial for planning interventions that optimize SAP utilization.

Infectious diseases and infection control prevention strategies in adult and pediatric population on ECMO.

As survival after ECMO improves and use of ECMO support increases in both pediatric and adult population, there is a need to focus on both the morbidities and complications associated with ECMO and how to manage and prevent them. Infectious complications during ECMO often have a significant clinical impact, resulting in increased morbidity or mortality irrespective of the underlying etiology necessitating cardiorespiratory support. In this review article, we discuss the prevention, management, challenges, and differences of infectious complications in adult and pediatric patients receiving ECMO support.

Optimization of appropriate antimicrobial prophylaxis in general surgery: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infections (SSI) are characterized by infections occurring in the surgical incision site, organ or cavity in the postoperative period. Adherence to surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) is paramount in mitigating the occurrence of SSIs. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the appropriateness of SAP use in patients undergoing surgical procedures in the field of general surgery according to the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP) guideline and to determine the difference between the pre-training period (pre-TP) and the post-training period (post-TP) organized according to this guideline. METHODS: It is a single-center prospective study conducted in general surgery wards between January 2022 and May 2023, with 404 patients pre-TP and 406 patients post-TP. RESULTS: Cefazolin emerged as the predominant agent for SAP, favored in 86.8% (703/810) of cases. Appropriate cefazolin dosage increased significantly from 41% (129 patients) in pre-TP to 92.6% (276 patients) in post-TP (p < 0.001), along with a rise in adherence to recommended timing of administration from 42.2% (133 patients) to 62.8% (187 patients) (p < 0.001). The proportion of patients receiving antibiotics during hospitalization in the ward postoperatively decreased post-TP (21-14.3%; p = 0.012), as did antibiotic prescription at discharge (16.8-10.3%; p = 0.008). The incidence of SSI showed a slight increase from 9.9% in pre-TP to 13.3% in post-TP (p = 0.131). CONCLUSIONS: Routine training sessions for surgeons emerged as crucial strategies to optimize patient care and enhance SAP compliance rates, particularly given the burden of clinical responsibilities faced by surgical teams.

Assessment of antimicrobial prescribing patterns, guidelines compliance, and appropriateness of antimicrobial prescribing in surgical-practice units: point prevalence survey in Malaysian teaching hospitals.

Objectives: This study sought to investigate the quality of antimicrobial prescribing among adult surgical inpatients besides exploring the determinants of non-compliance and inappropriate prescribing to inform stewardship activities. Methods: A cross-sectional point prevalence study employing Hospital National Antimicrobial Prescribing Survey (Hospital NAPS) was conducted in April 2019 at two teaching hospitals in Malaysia. Results: Among 566 surgical inpatients, 44.2% were receiving at least one antimicrobial, for a total of 339 prescriptions. Antimicrobials belonging to the World Health Organization's Watch group were observed in 57.8% of cases. Both hospitals exhibited similar types of antimicrobial treatments prescribed and administration routes. A significant difference in antimicrobial choice was observed between hospitals (p < 0.001). Hospital with electronic prescribing demonstrated better documentation practice (p < 0.001). Guidelines compliance, 32.8% (p = 0.952) and appropriateness, 55.2% (p = 0.561) did not significantly differ. The major contributors of inappropriateness were incorrect duration, (15%) and unnecessary broad-spectrum coverage, (15.6%). Non-compliance and inappropriate prescribing were found to be 2 to 4 times significantly higher with antimicrobial prophylaxis prescription compared to empirical therapy. Conclusion: Antimicrobial stewardship efforts to improve appropriate surgical prescribing are essential. These initiatives should prioritize surgical prophylaxis prescribing, focusing on reducing unnecessarily prolonged use and broad-spectrum antimicrobials, raising awareness among prescribers and promoting proper documentation.

Evaluation of Timing of Antimicrobial Surgical Prophylaxis on Rates of Surgical Site Infections.

Background: Surgical site infections (SSIs) are common healthcare-associated infections, and national guidelines recommend that antimicrobial prophylaxis (AP) be administered 60 min prior to incision. However, there are limited data regarding the "most optimal" time for administration within the 60-min window. Patients and Methods: This was a multicenter, retrospective study of adult (≥18-year-old) patients that underwent an abdominal hysterectomy, colorectal surgery, or craniotomy and received AP within 60 min of incision. Incidence of SSI was compared between patients who received AP 0-30 versus 31-60 min of incision. In addition, a predefined subgroup analysis evaluated incidence of SSI for 15-min intervals within the 60-min timeframe. Results: Of the 277 patients included in the primary analysis, 233 (84.1%) and 44 (15.9%) received AP 0-30 min and 31-60 min prior to incision, respectively. SSIs were documented in 6.0% (14/233) versus 4.5% (2/44) of patients in the primary analysis (p = 0.703). In the secondary analysis, 137 (49.5%), 95 (34.3%), 34 (12.3%), and 11 (4.0%) patients received AP 0-15, 16-30, 31-45, and 46-60 min prior to incision, respectively. There was no difference in incidence of SSIs among the 15-min intervals (4.4% vs. 8.4% vs. 2.9% vs. 9.1%, p = 0.487). Of the 16 patients in this study that incurred a SSI, 5 patients had positive cultures, of which 3 contained bacteria that proved to be resistant to the antibiotic used for AP. Conclusions: The results of our analysis support current national guidelines. Future investigation of different intervals (e.g., AP 15-45 min prior to incision) may be beneficial on the basis of pharmacokinetics of routinely prescribed AP.

Antimicrobial stewardship program for gastrointestinal surgeries at a Vietnamese tertiary hospital.

Background: Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs (ASP) have been applied widely in high-resource countries to prevent surgical site infections (SSI). Evidence favoring ASP interventions (ASPi) in gastrointestinal surgeries from low and middle-income countries has been limited, especially in antimicrobial prophylaxis. We aimed to investigate this gap at a Vietnamese tertiary hospital. Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study on patients undergoing clean-contaminated surgeries in 2015 who received standard of care (SoC) or SoC + ASPi. Primary outcome was 30-day SSI incidence. Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LoS) after surgery (days), cost of antibiotics, and cost of treatment (USD). Results were controlled for multiplicity and reported with treatment effect and 95% confidence interval (95%CI). A predictive model was built and cross-validated to detect patients at high risk of SSI. Results: We included 395 patients for analysis (48.1% being female, mean age 49.4 years). Compared to patients receiving SoC, those with SoC + ASPi had a lower incidence of 30-day SSI (-8.8, 95%CI: -16.0 to -1.6, p = 0.042), shorter LoS after surgery (-1.1 days, 95%CI: -1.8 to -0.4, p = 0.004), and lower cost of antibiotics (-37.3 USD, 95%CI: -59.8 to -14.8, p = 0.012) and treatment (-191.1 USD, 95%CI: -348.4 to -33.8, p = 0.042). We estimated that by detecting patients at high risk of SSI with the predictive model and providing prophylactic measures, we could save 398120.7 USD per 1,000 cases of SSI. Conclusion: We found that ASPi were associated with a reduction in risks of SSI, hospital stays, and cost of antibiotics/treatment in a Vietnamese tertiary hospital.

Patients with aggressive B-cell lymphoma receiving CAR T-cell therapy have a low rate of severe infections despite lack of universal antibacterial and antifungal prophylaxis.

OBJECTIVES: Our aim was to describe the frequency and severity of infectious complications after chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy in patients with large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed clinical records of LBCL patients treated with CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapy from July/2018 to December/2021 at our institution, and identified all infectious episodes from CAR T-cell infusion until disease progression, death or last follow-up. RESULTS: Overall, 137 patients were included. Thirty six percent had received ≥3 previous lines of therapy and 26% an autologous hematopoietic cell transplantation (auto-HCT). Cytokine release syndrome occurred in 87 (64%) patients. Antibacterial prophylaxis was not used in any patient; only 38% received antifungal prophylaxis. Sixty three infectious events were observed in 41 (30%) patients. Fifty two (83%) of the infectious events had at least one pathogen identified (bacteria [n = 38], virus [n = 11], and fungi [n = 3]). Most of the infectious events occurred during hospitalization for CAR-T treatment. Infection-related mortality was observed in two patients. Independent risk factors for infection included male gender, previous auto-HCT, ≥3 lines of treatment and pre-lymphodepletion neutropenia. CONCLUSIONS: Infections after CAR T-cell therapy in patients with lymphoma are frequent but generally not severe. A conservative and tailored antimicrobial prophylaxis seems to be a safe approach.

Effect of weight-adjusted antimicrobial antibiotic prophylaxis on postoperative dosage and surgical site infection incidence in total joint arthroplasty.

Surgical site infections (SSI) following total joint arthroplasty pose a significant concern for both providers and patients across the globe. Currently, administration of antimicrobial antibiotic prophylaxis is used throughout the world to reduce the incidence of SSI. However, the correct dosage and frequency of administration remains debatable. In this editorial, we emphasized the determination of the effect of administration of weight-adjusted antimicrobial antibiotic prophylaxis regime on the incidence of SSI and postoperative dosage reduction compared to the conventionally used regime during total joint arthroplasty. The results demonstrated similar efficacy between both regimes with respect to the incidence of SSI. In addition, weight-adjustment led to reduced postoperative dosage and has the potential to reduce chances of achieving lower therapeutic concentration, drug resistance, drug toxicity, and costs.

A Quality Improvement Project to Increase Compliance With a Facility Protocol on Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis.

Surgical site infections (SSIs) contribute to negative outcomes for patients and health care organizations. Compliance with clinical practice guidelines likely can help prevent SSIs. An interdisciplinary team at a regional referral center in Michigan sought to reduce SSIs by improving compliance with the facility's preoperative antibiotic selection, dosing, timing, and redosing protocol. The interventions for the quality improvement project included adding the preprocedural antibiotics and doses to the master OR schedule; holding an education session for all preoperative nurses, intraoperative nurses, and anesthesia professionals; and posting a reference guide in the preoperative and intraoperative areas. Compliance with the facility's protocol for antibiotic selection, dosing, and timing significantly improved. However, SSI rates and compliance with redosing recommendations did not change significantly. The team decided to add the antibiotic order information to the master OR schedule permanently. The team plans to consider providing education sessions on administering preprocedural antibiotics outside the OR.

Surgical Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Compliance in Turkey: Data from the Prospective, Observational, Multicenter Survey Including 7,978 Surgical Patients.

Background: Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) is the peri-operative administration of antimicrobial agents. Compliance rates vary worldwide from 15% to 84.3%, with studies in Turkey not exceeding 35%. The aim of this multicenter study was to determine the rate of appropriate antibiotic class, timing, and duration as well as discharge prescriptions in Turkey. Thus, we aimed to determine the rate of full compliance with SAP procedures in our country Patients and Methods: This multicenter, prospective, observational, descriptive study was conducted in 47 hospitals from 28 provinces in seven different regions of Turkey. Patients over 18 years of age in all surgical units between June 6, 2022, and June 10, 2022, were included in the study. Results: Of the 7,978 patients included in the study, 332 were excluded from further analyses because of pre-existing infection, and SAP compliance analyses were performed on the remaining 7,646 cases. The antibiotic most commonly used for SAP was cefazolin (n = 4,701; 61.5%), followed by third-generation cephalosporins (n = 596; 7.8%). The most common time to start SAP was within 30 minutes before surgery (n = 2,252; 32.5%), followed by 30 to 60 minutes before surgery (n = 1,638; 23.6%). Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis duration was <24 hours in 3,516 (50.7%) patients and prolonged until discharge in 1,505 (21.7%) patients. Finally, the actual proportion of patients compliant with SAP was 19% (n = 1,452) after omitting 4,458 (58.3%) patients who were prescribed oral antibiotic agents at discharge as part of a prolonged SAP. Conclusions: Surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis compliance rates are still very low in Turkey. Prolonged duration of SAP and especially high rate of antibiotic prescription at discharge are the main reasons for non-compliance with SAP.

Dose regimen optimization of cephalothin for surgical prophylaxis against Staphylococcus aureus and coagulase negative staphylococci in dogs by pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling.

First generation cephalosporins such cephalothin of cefazolin are indicated for antimicrobial prophylaxis for clean and clean contaminated surgical procedures because its antimicrobial spectrum, relative low toxicity and cost. Anesthesia and surgery could alter the pharmacokinetic behavior of different drugs administered perioperative by many mechanisms that affect distribution, metabolism or excretion processes. Intravenous administration of the antimicrobial within 30 and 60 min before incision is recommended in order to reach therapeutic serum and tissue concentrations and redosing is recommended if the duration of the procedure exceeds two half-life of the antimicrobial. To the author's knowledge there are no pharmacokinetic studies of cephalothin in dogs under anesthesia/surgery conditions. The aim of this study was (1) to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of cephalothin in anesthetized dogs undergoing ovariohysterectomy by a nonlinear mixed-effects model and to determine the effect of anesthesia/surgery and other individual covariates on its pharmacokinetic behavior; (2) to determine the MIC and conduct a pharmacodynamic modeling of time kill curves assay of cephalothin against isolates of Staphylococcus spp. isolated from the skin of dogs; (3) to conduct a PK/PD analysis by integration of the obtained nonlinear mixed-effects models in order to evaluate the antimicrobial effect of changing concentrations on simulated bacterial count; and (4) to determine the PK/PD endpoints and PK/PDco values in order to predict the optimal dose regimen of cephalothin for antimicrobial prophylaxis in dogs. Anesthesia/surgery significantly reduced cephalothin clearance by 18.78%. Based on the results of this study, a cephalothin dose regimen of 25 mg/kg q6h by intravenous administration showed to be effective against Staphylococcus spp. isolates with MIC values ≤2 µg/mL and could be recommended for antimicrobial prophylaxis for clean surgery in healthy dogs.

Development of an Evaluation System for the Prophylactic Use of Antimicrobial Drugs in the Perioperative Period of Class I Surgical Incisions in Neurosurgery.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to establish a precise preoperative high-risk factor scoring system and algorithm for antibiotic prophylaxis decision-making, provide guidance for the judicious use of AMP, refine interventions, and ensure the appropriate application of AMP for class I incisions in neurosurgery. METHODS: According to PRISMA guidelines, literature searches, study selection, methodology development, and quality appraisal were performed. The quality of evidence across the study population was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A two-round Delphi expert consultation method involved 15 experts from leading tertiary hospitals in China. Establishing an algorithm of SOPs for perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis in Class I neurosurgical incisions. RESULTS: Thirteen studies, encompassing 11,936 patients undergoing clean neurosurgical procedures, were included. 791 patients experienced SSI, resulting in an average incidence of 6.62%. Identified risk factors significantly associated with an increased incidence of postoperative SSI (P < 0.05) included emergency surgery, preoperative hospitalization ≥7 days, intraoperative blood loss ≥300 mL, operation time ≥4 hours, diabetes mellitus, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and repeat surgery. Sensitivity analysis demonstrated robust results for emergency surgery, intraoperative blood loss ≥300 mL, operation time ≥4 hours, cerebrospinal fluid leakage, and repeat surgery. Established a risk assessment system for Class I neurosurgical incisions by the Delphi method. Additionally, we have formulated an algorithm of SOPs for perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis in Class I neurosurgical incisions. CONCLUSIONS: The established index for AMP utilization and SOPs in the preoperative period of class I neurosurgical incisions proves valuable, contributing to improved patient outcomes in neurosurgical procedures.

Optimal time window for initiating cefuroxime surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis in spinal fusion surgery: a nested case-control study.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Surgical site infections (SSI) are one of the common complications following spinal fusion surgery. Unfortunately, several studies had shown conflicting results regarding optimal timing of surgical antimicrobial prophylaxis (SAP) administration. Due to limitations in population homogeneity and sample size, these studies have not provided significant statistical correlations or clear practical recommendations. PURPOSE: The purpose of the study was to investigate the impact of timing of cefuroxime SAP on the risk of SSI in patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery, and to determine the optimal timing of administration. DESIGN: Retrospective nested case-control study. PATIENT SAMPLE: We retrospectively analyzed consecutive patients who underwent spinal fusion surgery at our institution between October 2011 and October 2021. OUTCOME MEASURE: In the current study, the primary outcome measure was SSI. METHODS: This was a retrospective nested case-control study. All consecutive patients who underwent spinal fusion surgery at our institution between October 2011 and October 2021 formed a retrospective cohort. For each SSI case, 2 controls free of SSI at the time of the index date of their corresponding case were selected, matched by age, sex, and calendar year. Electronic record and radiographic data were reviewed retrospectively in electronic database. SAP related data included timing of administration, preoperative dose, intraoperative second dose, and postoperative use. To examine the effects of mismatched variables, we further adjusted for possible confounding factors using conditional logistic regression models. Subsequently, subgroup analyses were conducted to assess the robustness of the statistical associations. RESULTS: According to the preplanned statistical scheme and matching factors, we matched 236 controls for these SSI cases, and the subsequent statistical analysis was performed on these 354 patients. After adjusting for confounding factors, the results indicated that the risk of SSI was 70% higher in the group receiving SAP 31 to 60 minutes before incision compared to the group receiving SAP 0 to 30 minutes before incision (OR=1.732, 95%CI 1.031-2.910, p=.038). Additionally, the risk of SSI was 150% higher in the group receiving SAP 61 to 120 minutes before incision compared to the group receiving SAP 0 to 30 minutes before incision (OR=2.532, 95%CI 1.250-5.128, p=.010). In subgroup analysis, this statistical trend persisted for both deformity surgeries and different SSI classifications. CONCLUSION: Administering cefuroxime SAP within 30 minutes before skin incision significantly reduces the risk of SSI, whether they are deep or superficial, in spinal fusion surgery. This pattern remains consistent among spinal deformity patients.

Interpretation of ESCMID/EUCIC Clinical Practice Guidelines on Perioperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Patients Colonized by Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative Bacteria / 医药导报

In December 2022,ESCMID/EUCIC jointly issued the Clinical Practice Guidelines for perioperative antimi-crobial prophylaxis in patients colonized with multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria(MDR-GNB).The guideline was based on systematically evaluating of published studies on perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis in patients colonized with MDR-GNB.The guideline elaborated on the necessity and timing of screening for MDR-GNB colonization,perioperative antimicrobial prophy-laxis selection,and the timing of dosing,and it provided evidence-based recommendations based on existing studies.This paper in-terpreted the guidelines based on the latest research progress at home and abroad,aiming to reduce the occurrence of surgical site infections in patients colonized with MDR-GNB and benefit patients.

Effects and changes of intrapartum antimicrobial prophylaxis on antibiotic resistance genes in gut microbiota of infants within 6 months of age / 中国儿童保健杂志

【Objective】 To explore the impact of intrapartum antibiotic prophylaxis (IAP) on antibiotic resistance genes (ARGs) in the gut microbiota of infants up to 6 months of age and their longitudinal changes, in order to provide theoretical basis for the rational use of antibiotics and antibiotic resistance control. 【Methods】 Fecal samples were collected within 3 days, 2 months, and 6 months from a maternal and birth cohort conducted between January 2018 and June 2019. A panel of 6 common ARGs (aac(6′)-Ib, qnrS, blaTEM, ermB, mecA, tetM) were tested, the absolute abundance and positive detection rate by qPCR were calculated. Nonparametric and linear mixed model (LMM) analysis were used to assess the influence of IAP on the absolute abundance of antibiotic resistance genes and the longitudinal changes in their abundance at the three time points. 【Results】 A total of 157 samples from 65 singleton infants were analyzed, including 15 mothers (23.1%) who received IAP. The detection rate of ARGs was high in infants up to six months of age, and the abundance of ARGs tended to increase over time. IAP significantly increased the abundance of the mecA gene in the gut microbiota of vaginally delivered infants at 6 months of age (6.1±1.1 in the VDIAP group vs. 3.8±4.6 in the VDno-IAP group, P=0.046). Additionally, in cesarean section infants, there was a significant increase in the abundance of aac(6′)-Ib genes at 2 months (β=3.81, ,P<0.05), P<0.05] and 6 months of age (β=4.89, ,P<0.001), P<0.001) compared to 3 days of age. 【Conclusions】 The findings suggest that IAP can increase the abundance of ARGs in 6-month-old infants, and this effect is still significant after stratifying by delivery mode. Therefore, the rational and standardized use of intrapartum antibiotics may help reduce the development of antibiotic resistance.

Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review.

It remains unclear whether antibiotic prophylaxis (AP) should be recommended or discouraged in robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP) for prostate cancer (PCa). The development of microbial resistance and side effects are risks of antibiotic use. This systematic review (SR) investigates the evidence base for AP in RALP. A systematic literature search was conducted until 12 January 2023, using Embase, MEDLINE, Cochrane CENTRAL, Cochrane CDSR (via Ovid) and CINAHL for studies reporting the effect of AP on postoperative infectious complications in RALP. Of 436 screened publications, 8 studies comprising 6378 RALP procedures met the inclusion criteria. There was no evidence of a difference in the rate and severity of infective complications within 30 days after RALP surgery between different AP protocols. No studies omitted AP. For patients who received AP, the overall occurrence of postoperative infectious complications varied between 0.6% and 6.6%. The reported urinary tract infection (UTI) rates varied from 0.16% (4/2500) to 8.9% (15/169). Wound infections were reported in 0.46% (4/865) to 1.12% (1/89). Sepsis/bacteraemia and hyperpyrexia were registered in 0.1% (1/1084) and 1.6% (5/317), respectively. Infected lymphoceles (iLC) rates were 0.9% (3 of 317) in a RALP cohort that included 88.6% pelvic lymph node dissections (PLND), and 3% (26 of 865) in a RALP cohort where all patients underwent PLND. Our findings underscore that AP is being administered in RALP procedures without scientifically proven evidence. Prospective studies that apply consistent and uniform criteria for measuring infectious complications and antibiotic-related side effects are needed to ensure the comparability of results and guidance on AP in RALP.