Medical and Surgical Weight Loss as a Pathway to Renal Transplant Listing.

PURPOSE: Severe obesity is a barrier to listing for kidney transplantation due to concern for poor outcomes. This study aims to compare bariatric surgery with medical weight loss as a means of achieving weight loss and subsequent listing for renal transplant. We hypothesize that bariatric surgery will induce greater frequency of listing for transplant within 18 months of study initiation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a randomized study of metabolic bariatric surgery (MBS) vs medical weight loss (MM) in patients on dialysis with a body mass index (BMI) of 40-55 kg/m2. The primary outcome was suitability for renal transplant within 18 months of initiating treatment. Secondary outcomes included weight loss, mortality, and complications. RESULTS: Twenty patients enrolled, only 9 (5 MBS, 4 MM) received treatment. Treated groups did not differ in age, gender, or race (P ≥ .44). There was no statistically significant difference in the primary endpoint: 2 MBS (40%) and 1 MM (25%) listed for transplant ≤18 months (P = 1.00). With additional time, 100% MBS and 25% MM patients achieved listing status (P = .048); 100% of MBS and 0 MM received kidney transplants to date (P = .008). Weight, weight loss, and BMI trajectories differed between the groups (P ≤ .002). One death from COVID-19 occurred in the MM group, and 1 MBS patient had a myocardial infarction 3.75 years after baseline evaluation. CONCLUSION: These results suggest MBS is superior to MM in achieving weight loss prior to listing for kidney transplantation. Larger studies are needed to ensure the safety profile is acceptable in patients with ESRD undergoing bariatric surgery.

Does Medically Supervised Weight Loss Prior to Total Knee Arthroplasty Improve Patient-Reported Pain and Physical Function?

BACKGROUND: Weight loss is commonly recommended before total knee arthroplasty (TKA) despite inconsistent evidence for better outcomes. This study sought to examine the impacts of preoperative weight loss on patient-reported and adverse outcomes among TKA patients supervised by a medical weight management clinic. METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed patients who underwent medical weight management supervision within 18 months before TKA comparing patients who did and did not have clinically relevant weight loss. Preoperative body mass indices, demographics, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function and pain interference scores, pain intensity scores, and adverse outcomes were extracted. Multivariable linear regressions were performed to determine if preoperative weight loss correlated with patient-reported outcomes after controlling for confounders. RESULTS: There were 90 patients, 75.6% women, who had a mean age of 65 years (range, 42-82) and were analyzed. There were 51 (56.7%) patients who underwent clinically relevant weight loss with a mean weight loss of 10.4% and experienced no difference in adverse outcomes. Preoperative weight loss predicted significantly improved 3-month postoperative physical function (ß = 15.2 [13.0-17.3], P < .001), but not pain interference (ß = -18.9 [-57.1-19.4], P = .215) or pain intensity (ß = -1.8 [-4.9-1.2], P = .222) scores. CONCLUSION: We found that medically supervised preoperative weight loss predicted improvement in physical function 3 months after TKA. This weight loss caused no major adverse effects. Further research is needed to understand the causal relationships between preoperative weight loss, medical supervision, and outcome after TKA and to elucidate potential longer-term benefits in a larger sample.

Combined GLP-1 Receptor Agonist and Amylin Analogue Pharmacotherapy to Treat Obesity Comorbid With Type 1 Diabetes.

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) with obesity is increasingly common, prompting effective clinical interventions to induce weight loss in this population. We present 3 patients with T1DM and obesity prescribed a glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) and pramlintide. Case 1: A 32-year-old male with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) who lost -20.9 kg (-16.1% of total body weight [TBW]) over 10 months on semaglutide and pramlintide. Case 2: A 68-year-old female with diabetic retinopathy, coronary artery disease, hypertension, hypothyroidism, and depression/anxiety initially treated with topiramate, losing -8.4 kg, but experiencing weight plateau. After adding dulaglutide and pramlintide, she lost an additional -12.8 kg (-14.0% TBW) over 7 months, with total weight loss of -21.2 kg (-23.1% TBW). Case 3: A 49-year-old female with hypertension, hypothyroidism, and depression who lost -14.6 kg (-17.9% TBW) over 6 months on semaglutide and pramlintide. No significant side effects were experienced. All patients reported decreased insulin requirements on pramlintide, and hemoglobin A1c levels remained constant or decreased throughout the treatment period. Pramlintide and GLP-1RA resulted in excellent weight loss in our patients with obesity and T1DM. This combination may have a synergistic effect on the gut-brain axis. More research is required to substantiate these findings.

Combination anti-obesity medications to effectively treat bariatric surgery weight regain at an academic obesity center.

Background: Combination anti-obesity medications (AOMs) to treat postoperative bariatric surgery weight regain have limited data on their use in the clinical setting. Understanding the optimal treatment protocol in this cohort will maximize weight loss outcomes. Methods: A retrospective review of bariatric surgery patients (N = 44) presenting with weight regain at a single academic multidisciplinary obesity center who were prescribed AOM(s) plus intensive lifestyle modification for 12 months. Results: Age: 28-76 years old, 93% female, mean weight 110.2 ± 20.3 kg, BMI 39.7 ± 7.4 kg/m2, presenting 5.2 ± 1.6 years post-bariatric surgery [27 (61.4%), 14 (31.8%), and 3 (6.8%) laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), laparoscopic vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG), and open RYGB, respectively], with 15.1 ± 11.1 kg mean weight gain from nadir. Mean weight loss after medical intervention at 3-, 6-, and 12-month time points was 4.4 ± 4.6 kg, 7.3 ± 7.0 kg, and 10.7 ± 9.2 kg, respectively. At 12 months, individuals prescribed 3 or more AOMs lost more weight than those prescribed one (-14.5 ± 9.0 kg vs. -4.9 ± 5.7 kg, p < 0.05) irrespective of age, gender, number of comorbidities, initial weight or BMI, type of surgery, or GLP1 use. RYGB patients lost less weight overall (7.4% vs. 14.8% VSG respectively; p < 0.05). Conclusions: Combination AOMs may be needed to achieve optimal weight loss results to treat post-operative weight regain.

Obesity Management in Children and Adolescents.

Obesity in the pediatric population is increasing in the United States and globally. Childhood obesity is associated with cardiometabolic and psychosocial comorbidities and decreased overall life span. The cause of pediatric obesity is multifactorial and includes genetic predisposition, lifestyle, behavioral patterns, and consequences of social determinants of health. Routine screening of BMI and comorbid conditions is essential to identifying patients who require treatment. The AAP recommends immediate Intensive Health Behavior and Lifestyle Treatment for children with obesity, encompassing lifestyle changes, behavioral changes, and mental health treatments. Pharmacologic interventions and metabolic and bariatric surgery are also available when indicated.

Preoperative and early adjuvant weight loss medications in bariatric surgery patients with body mass index over 60 or suboptimal initial response to surgery.

BACKGROUND: Few studies have examined the adjuvant use of antiobesity medications with surgery, especially in the pre- and early postoperative periods. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the impact of adjuvant pharmacotherapy on bariatric surgery outcomes. SETTING: University hospital, United States. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of patients receiving adjuvant pharmacotherapy for obesity treatment and bariatric surgery. Patients received pharmacotherapy either preoperatively if their body mass index was >60, or in the first or second postoperative years for suboptimal weight loss. Outcome measures included percentage of total body weight loss as well as comparison with the expected weight loss curve as determined by the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Risk/Benefit Calculator. RESULTS: A total of 98 patients were included in the study, with 93 (94.9%) undergoing sleeve gastrectomy and 5 (5.1%) undergoing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass surgery. During the study period, patients were prescribed phentermine and/or topiramate. At postoperative year 1, patients who received pharmacotherapy preoperatively lost 31.3% of their total body weight (TBW) compared with 25.3% TBW for patients with suboptimal weight loss who received medication in the first postoperative year, and 20.8% TBW for patients who did not receive any antiobesity medication in the first postoperative year. Using the Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Accreditation and Quality Improvement Program (MBSAQIP) curve for comparison, patients receiving medication preoperatively weighed 2.4% less than expected, whereas patients receiving medication during the first postoperative year weighed 4.8% higher than expected. CONCLUSION: For patients having bariatric surgery who fall below the expected MBSAQIP weight loss curve, early initiation of antiobesity medications can improve the weight loss, with preoperative pharmacotherapy having the greatest effect.

Evaluation of a pharmacist's impact on the use of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists for weight management in a family medicine setting.

BACKGROUND: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor (GLP-1) agonists carry benefits and risks that must be evaluated prior to use and monitored throughout weight management therapy. Pharmacists possess the accessibility and extensive medication knowledge to evaluate and monitor the use of GLP-1 therapy in weight management patients. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the clinical and financial impact of a pharmacist-directed weight management service utilizing GLP-1 receptor agonists in a family practice setting. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study including patients at 2 family practices, aged 18 and older, prescribed a weight management GLP-1 between October 1, 2021 and March 1, 2022 was performed. Patients who met inclusion and were prescribed a weight loss GLP-1 but were not managed by the clinical pharmacist were compared with the pharmacist cohort. Descriptive statistics and inferential statistics including an independent t-test were used in the data analysis. RESULTS: There were 46 and 39 patients identified in the clinical pharmacist and primary care physician cohorts respectively. Patients in the clinical pharmacist cohort achieved a mean body weight reduction of 9.32% compared to 5.11% body weight reduction for patients in the primary care physician cohort (P = 0.01). There were 63 months identified of inappropriate GLP-1 therapy deprescribed in the clinical pharmacist cohort resulting in an estimated cost savings of $101,985.66. CONCLUSIONS: The implementation of a pharmacist-led weight management clinic in 2 family medicine offices resulted in a significant reduction in body weight and reduction in total costs to the healthcare system compared to patients receiving weight management services from their primary care physician alone.

Liraglutide Overdose-Induced Acute Pancreatitis.

Liraglutide, a long-acting cardioprotective glucagon-like peptide (GLP)-1 analog, is effective for medical weight loss and glycemic control in type 2 diabetes. It is generally well tolerated with mild side effects. There are few reports on complications from Liraglutide overdose. The aim of this paper is to report the case of a 25-year-old healthy female who presented with acute pancreatitis secondary to Liraglutide overdose and to review the current literature on Liraglutide used for obesity management. The current literature examining the association between acute pancreatitis and Liraglutide use, and Liraglutide overdose are inconclusive. Further research is recommended.

Case Report: Off Label Utilization of Topiramate and Metformin in Patients With BMI ≥50 kg/m2 Prior to Bariatric Surgery.

FDA approved anti-obesity medications may not be cost effective for patients struggling with pre-operative weight loss prior to bariatric surgery. Metformin, a biguanide, and Topiramate, a carbonic anhydrase inhibitor, both cost effective medications, have demonstrated weight loss when used for the treatment of type 2 diabetes or seizures, respectively. The aim of the three cases is to demonstrate the clinical utility of topiramate and metformin for preoperative weight loss in patients with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 50 kg/m2 prior to bariatric surgery who are unable to follow the bariatric nutritional prescription due to a dysregulated appetite system Each patient was prescribed metformin and/or topiramate in an off-label manner in conjunction with lifestyle modifications and achieved >8% total body weight loss during the preoperative period.

Survey of perceptions and educational needs of primary care providers regarding management of patients with class II and III obesity in Ontario, Canada.

BACKGROUND: Primary care providers (PCPs) are typically the primary contact for patients with obesity seeking medical and surgical weight loss interventions; however, previous studies suggest that fewer than 7% of eligible adult patients are referred to publically funded medical and surgical weight loss interventions (MSWLI). METHODS: We performed an anonymous survey study between October 2017 and June 2018 to explore the knowledge, experiences, perceptions, and educational needs of PCPs in Southeastern Ontario in managing patients with class II and III obesity. RESULTS: Surveys were distributed to 591 PCPs (n = 538 family physicians; n = 53 nurse practitioners) identified as practicing in the Southeastern Ontario and 92 (15.6%) participated. PCPs serving a rural population estimated that 14.2 ± 10.9% of patients would qualify for MSWLI compared to 9.9 ± 8.5% of patients of PCPs serving an urban population (p = .049). Overall, 57.5% of respondents did not feel competent prescribing MSWLI to patients with class II/III obesity, while 69.8% stated they had 'good' knowledge of the referral criteria for MSWLI. 22.2% of respondents were hesitant to refer patients for bariatric surgery (BS) due to concerns about postoperative surgical complications and risks associated with surgery. Only 25% of respondents were comfortable providing long-term follow up after BS, and only 39.1% had participated in continuing education on management of patients with class II/III obesity in the past 5 years. CONCLUSION: The majority of PCPs believe there is a need for additional education about MSWLI for patients with class II/III obesity. Future studies are needed to develop and compare the effectiveness of additional education and professional development around risks of contemporary BS, indications to consider referral for MSWLI, management and long-term follow-up of patients after BS.

The effect of a primary care-based Medical Weight Loss Program on weight loss and anthropomorphic metrics.

BACKGROUND: Diet and lifestyle intervention programs have been shown to be effective in decreasing obesity/overweight and many associated comorbidities in specialty research settings. There is very little information however as to the efficacy of such programs conducted in usual/typical primary care practices. We analysed effectiveness of the Medical Weight Loss Program (MWLP) designed to specifically address overweight/obesity in the setting of an urban academic primary care practice. OBJECTIVE: To determine whether participation in the MWLP within a general primary care setting can result in weight loss. METHODS: A retrospective medical chart review of patients treated in MWLP and a control group of patients with obesity receiving regular care in the general primary care setting. From the practice database (1 April 2015-31 March 2016), 209 patients (≥18 years old) who participated in the MWLP were identified; 265 controls were selected from the remaining population based on the presence of the obesity-related diagnoses. RESULTS: MWLP patients lost on average 2.35 ± 5.88 kg in 6 months compared to their baseline weight (P < 0.0001). In contrast, the control group demonstrated a trend of gaining on average 0.37 ± 6.03 kg. Having three or more visits with the MWLP provider within 6 months after program initiation was the most important factor associated with successful loss of at least 5% of the baseline weight. Weight loss also correlated with a decrease in abdominal girth. CONCLUSION: MWLP integrated into the general primary care practice may potentially be an effective model for managing obesity and related morbidities.

Vitamin D supplementation in obesity and during weight loss: A review of randomized controlled trials.

Vitamin D deficiency is common in obese individuals and during weight loss. The recommended vitamin D doses in this specific population are higher than for healthy adults. We reviewed vitamin D supplementation trials in obesity, and during medical or surgical weight loss, and report the effects on 25-hydroxyvitamin D [25(OH)D] concentrations and other relevant outcomes. We conducted a systematic search in PubMed, Medline, Embase and the Cochrane library for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of oral vitamin D supplementation for at least 3 months in obese individuals without weight loss (OB), and those on medical weight loss (MWL) (2010-2018), and following bariatric surgery (Bar S) (without time restriction). Two reviewers screened the identified citations in duplicate and independently and performed full text screening. One reviewer completed data extraction. We identified 13 RCTs in OB, 6 in MWL and 7 in Bar S. Mean baseline 25(OH)D concentrations ranged between 7 and 27 ng/ml in OB, 15-29 ng/ml in MWL and 15-24 ng/ml in Bar S. In OB (Total N 2036 participants), vitamin D doses of 1600-4000 IU/d increased mean 25(OH)D concentrations to ≥30 ng/ml. Based on three trials during MWL (Total N 359 participants), vitamin D doses of 1200-4600 IU/d for 12 months increased 25(OH)D concentration to ≥30 ng/ml. In Bar S (Total N 615 participants), doses ≥2000 IU/d were needed to reach 30 ng/ml. The change in 25(OH)D concentration was inversely proportional to the administered dose, and to BMI and baseline level with doses of 600-3000 IU/day. With these doses, the change in 25(OH)D concentration [Δ25(OH)D] per 100 IU/d was 0.5-1.2 ng/ml. Three trials assessed bone mineral density as a primary outcome, but only one of them showed a protective effect of vitamin D against bone loss at all sites post-Bar S. There was no effect of vitamin D on weight loss. Data on extra-skeletal parameters, namely glycemic and vascular indices were mostly identified in OB, and findings were inconsistent. In conclusion, Vitamin D doses ≥1600-2000 IU/d may be needed to reach a 25(OH)D concentration of 30 ng/ml in obese individuals and following bariatric surgery. The optimal concentration in this population is unknown, and whether the above doses protect against weight loss induced bone loss and fractures still needs to be confirmed. There is no clear evidence for a beneficial effect of vitamin D supplementation on cardio-metabolic parameters in obese individuals, and data on such parameters with weight loss are very scarce. Well-designed long term RCTs assessing the effect of vitamin D supplementation during weight loss on patient important outcomes are needed.

A Specialized Medical Management Program to Address Post-operative Weight Regain in Bariatric Patients.

INTRODUCTION: Although bariatric surgery results in massive weight loss, weight regain over time up to as much as 25% is not uncommon. Weight regain in this population often leads to long-term weight loss failure and non-compliance in clinical follow-up and program recommendations. METHODS: We analyzed early weight outcomes at 3 and 6 months of 48 bariatric patients referred to an individualized, multidisciplinary medical management program at the Center for Obesity Medicine (COM) to address weight regain in 2015 and compared to a group of matched non-bariatric patients. The medical management center, under the direction of a medical obesity specialist and complementary to the surgical program and multidisciplinary team, addressed weight regain with intensive lifestyle (diet, activity, anti-stress therapy, behavioral counseling, sleep) and with medical intervention (one or more anti-obesity medications). RESULTS: According to early findings, the average percentage post-operative weight regain of patients entering the weight management program was 20% above nadir and time since surgery averaged 6 years (range = 1 to 20 years) with a mean weight loss of - 2.3 kg after 3 months and - 4.4 kg at 6 months into the program. Individuals most successful with weight loss were those treated with anorexigenic pharmaceuticals. Weight and percent weight loss were significantly greater for the non-surgical than the surgical patients at 3 and 6 months (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: A medically supervised weight management program complementary to surgery is beneficial for the treatment of weight regain and may prove important in assisting the surgical patient achieve long-term weight loss success.

Predictors of a successful medical weight loss program.

BACKGROUND: Many practices are creating weight loss programs, in preparation for bariatric surgery or for patients who wish to lose weight without surgery. Preoperative weight loss may be associated with improved postoperative weight loss and resolution of co-morbidities. The aim of this study is to investigate the success of a preoperative weight loss program at a single institution and the variables associated with success in weight loss. METHODS: We enrolled patients in a once monthly multidisciplinary preoperative weight loss program and evaluated % total weight lost over the 6-month program for primary and for revisional bariatric surgical patients. Demographic characteristics, weight, program related factors, and co-morbidities were recorded. One-way ANOVA and multiple linear regression models were carried out to assess variables. Parameter estimates of multiple linear regression models were reported. Statistical significance was set at .05 and analysis was done using SAS 9.3. RESULTS: A total of 133 patients enrolled and completed the program over a period of 14 months. Only 50.8% of the patients lost weight with average weight loss of .1±4.0 lbs. Patient׳s sex, insurance, psychiatric history, co-morbidities, referral status, or type of counseling had no significant effect on weight loss (P>.05). Patients between 30 and 50 years old on average were more successful in losing weight (P = .018). Patients considering revisional surgery were less successful preoperatively compared to first time candidates (P = .0007). CONCLUSION: Patients between 30 and 50 years of age, first time surgical candidates, and those with higher weights may be more successful in losing weight in a preoperative bariatric weight loss program.