Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Montrer: 20 | 50 | 100
Résultats 1 - 20 de 370
Filtrer
1.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39356042

RÉSUMÉ

INTRODUCTION: Our objective was to evaluate the efficacy of expanded non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) that includes both trisomies and copy number variants (CNVs) in high-risk twin pregnancies. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective, double-blinded cohort study was conducted, enrolling 73 high-risk twin pregnancies characterized by increased risk of genetic disorders due to factors such as increased nuchal translucency, structural anomalies, fetal growth restriction, and other factors associated with chromosomal abnormality. Participants underwent invasive karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis, alongside separate expanded NIPT for research purposes. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of expanded NIPT were calculated. RESULTS: The cohort included 24 monochorionic and 49 dichorionic twin pregnancies. The median cell-free fetal DNA concentration in expanded NIPT was 16.7% (range 3.86%-49.1%), with a test failure rate of 1.4% (1/73). High-risk findings for trisomy 21/13/18 were identified in five cases (6.8%), Turner syndrome in one case (1.4%), and CNVs indicative of high risk for clinically significant microdeletion/microduplication syndromes (MMS) in ten cases (13.7%). Of these, 56 cases (76.7%) tested NIPT negative, revealing one false-negative for 45, X and five false-negatives for CNVs. Expanded NIPT achieved a detection rate of 100% (5/5) for trisomy 21/13/18 with a false-positive rate of 0% (0/5), a detection rate of 33.3% (1/3) for sex chromosome abnormalities with a false-positive rate of 0% (0/3), and a detection rate of 66.7% (4/6) for MMS with a false-positive rate of 3.0% (2/67). The positive predictive values for trisomy T21/13/18, sex chromosome abnormalities, and known MMS were 100% (5/5), 100% (1/1), and 66.7% (4/6) in the expanded NIPT, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The expanded NIPT demonstrated high detection rates for common trisomies and moderate detection rates for prenatal MMS in high-risk twin pregnancies. Further studies with large sample sizes in low-risk populations are needed.

2.
BJOG ; 2024 Oct 02.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39358906

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVE: To assess the added value of fetal fraction of cell-free DNA in the maternal circulation in the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Nationwide implementation study on non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT; TRIDENT-2 study). POPULATION: Pregnant women in the Netherlands opting for NIPT between June 2018 and June 2019. METHODS: Two logistic regression prediction models were constructed for each adverse pregnancy outcome. The first model (base model) included prognostic clinical parameters that were selected from existing first-trimester prediction models for adverse pregnancy outcomes. The second model (fetal fraction model) included fetal fraction as a predictor on top of the prognostic clinical parameters included in the base model. The added prognostic value of fetal fraction was assessed by comparing the base and fetal fraction models in terms of goodness of fit and predictive performance. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Likelihood ratio test (LRT), area under the curve (AUC) and Integrated Discrimination Improvement (IDI) index. RESULTS: The study cohort consisted of 56 110 pregnancies. The incidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes was 5.7% for hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP; n = 3207), 10.2% for birthweight < p10 (n = 5726), 3.2% for birthweight < p2.3 (n = 1796), 3.4% for spontaneous preterm birth (sPTB; n = 1891), 3.4% for diabetes (n = 1902) and 1.3% for congenital anomalies (n = 741). Adding fetal fraction to the base model improved model fit for HDP, birthweight < p10, birthweight < p2.3, all sPTB, and diabetes, but not for congenital anomalies (LRT p < 0.05). For HDP, the AUC improved from 0.67 to 0.68 by adding fetal fraction to the base model (p = 0.14) with an IDI of 0.0018 (p < 0.0001). For birthweight < p10, the AUC improved from 0.65 to 0.66 (p < 0.0001) with an IDI of 0.0023 (p < 0.0001). For birthweight < p2.3, the AUC improved from 0.67 to 0.69 (p < 0.0001) with an IDI of 0.0011 (p < 0.0001). For all sPTB, the AUC was similar for both models (AUC 0.63, p = 0.021) with an IDI of 0.00028 (p = 0.0023). For diabetes, the AUC was similar (AUC 0.72, p = 0.35) with an IDI of 0.00055 (p = 0.00015). CONCLUSIONS: Fetal fraction has statistically significant but limited prognostic value in the prediction of adverse pregnancy outcomes in addition to known prognostic clinical parameters.

3.
Cell Genom ; 4(10): 100668, 2024 Oct 09.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39389019

RÉSUMÉ

Genetic factors significantly influence the concentration of metabolites in adults. Nevertheless, the genetic influence on neonatal metabolites remains uncertain. To bridge this gap, we employed genotype imputation techniques on large-scale low-pass genome data obtained from non-invasive prenatal testing. Subsequently, we conducted association studies on a total of 75 metabolic components in neonates. The study identified 19 previously reported associations and 11 novel associations between single-nucleotide polymorphisms and metabolic components. These associations were initially found in the discovery cohort (8,744 participants) and subsequently confirmed in a replication cohort (19,041 participants). The average heritability of metabolic components was estimated to be 76.2%, with a range of 69%-78.8%. These findings offer valuable insights into the genetic architecture of neonatal metabolism.


Sujet(s)
Étude d'association pangénomique , Polymorphisme de nucléotide simple , Humains , Nouveau-né , Femelle , Mâle , Études de cohortes , Génotype , Métabolome/génétique
4.
Cell Genom ; 4(10): 100632, 2024 Oct 09.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39389020

RÉSUMÉ

Phenome-wide association studies (PheWAS) have been less focused on maternal diseases and maternal-newborn comorbidities, especially in the Chinese population. To enhance our understanding of the genetic basis of these related diseases, we conducted a PheWAS on 25,639 pregnant women and 14,151 newborns in the Chinese Han population using ultra-low-coverage whole-genome sequence (ulcWGS). We identified 2,883 maternal trait-associated SNPs associated with 26 phenotypes, among which 99.5% were near established genome-wide association study (GWAS) loci. Further refinement delineated these SNPs to 442 unique trait-associated loci (TALs) predicated on linkage disequilibrium R2 > 0.8, revealing that 75.6% demonstrated pleiotropy and 50.9% were located in genes implicated in analogous phenotypes. Notably, we discovered 21 maternal SNPs associated with 35 neonatal phenotypes, including two SNPs associated with identical complications in both mothers and children. These findings underscore the importance of integrating ulcWGS data to enrich the discoveries derived from traditional PheWAS approaches.


Sujet(s)
Étude d'association pangénomique , Phénotype , Polymorphisme de nucléotide simple , Humains , Femelle , Grossesse , Adulte , Santé de l'enfant , Comorbidité , Déséquilibre de liaison , Chine/épidémiologie , Nouveau-né , Asiatiques/génétique , Complications de la grossesse/génétique , Complications de la grossesse/épidémiologie , Peuples d'Asie de l'Est
5.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 302: 370-374, 2024 Oct 06.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39393256

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVE: We report data of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) at Uppsala University Hospital between 2017-2022. Furthermore, we illustrate the potential capacity of massive parallel sequencing-based NIPT beyond identification of common trisomies. METHODS: Maternal blood samples were analyzed using the Verifi NIPT or VeriSeq NIPT assays. Diagnostic testing, performed on amniotic fluid samples, included QF-PCR, microarray (SNP-array) and metaphase FISH. RESULTS: Among 4532 NIPT tests performed between 2017-2022, 125 samples (2.76%) showed increased risk for trisomies 13, 18, 21 and sex chromosome aneuploidy. For three patients with normal NIPT result further microarray indicated other types of chromosomal rearrangement which were not analyzed by NIPT. For another patient (case 1) the Verifi NIPT indicated trisomy 13. Fetal fraction (FF) was estimated to be 10%. Confirmatory microarray detected a segmental duplication on chromosome 13, as well as a terminal duplication and a terminal deletion on chromosome 10. A complex karyotype was observed in the fetus with metaphase FISH. In the second case the VeriSeq NIPT indicated trisomy 13. FF was estimated to be 11%. Confirmatory microarray detected a mosaicism of trisomy 13 in 30 % of cells. CONCLUSION: This study illustrates detection of peculiar abnormalities of chromosome 13 and supports potential to screen copy number variations with genome-wide NIPT.

6.
Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol ; 97: 102547, 2024 Sep 07.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39278051

RÉSUMÉ

Prenatal detection of copy number variants (CNVs) plays an important role in the diagnosis of fetal genetic abnormalities. Understanding the methods used for prenatal CNV detection and their clinical significance contributes to the implementation of advanced genetic screening techniques in prenatal care; facilitating early identification and management of genetic disorders in fetuses. Some CNVs impose significant genetic counselling challenges; especially those which are associated with uncertain clinical significance, in the context of variable penetrance and/or expressivity or when identified incidentally. This chapter focuses on the different techniques used for detecting CNVs, including Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) arrays, comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) arrays, Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT), Whole Exome Sequencing (WES) and Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) as well as their advantages and limitations. The tools needed for the classification of CNVs and their clinical relevance are also explored, emphasising the importance of accurate interpretation for appropriate clinical management and genetic counselling.

7.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol ; 302: 149-154, 2024 Sep 11.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39276565

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVE: While non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been widely adopted throughout Europe, Australia, and the USA, population level access to NIPT varies considerably. Ireland has no national screening programme for fetal anomalies, although NIPT is available from out-of-country providers. We aimed to describe the availability of NIPT in Ireland and the quality of information available online from NIPT providers. METHODS: Information available online from NIPT providers in the Republic of Ireland was analysed by examining all healthcare facilities websites and reviewing private health insurance directories. Data on information provided by NIPT providers was collected by two independent researchers from April to May 2023. RESULTS: Four of the 19 maternity hospitals/units in Ireland had information on NIPT on their websites, with three including an explanation of NIPT, testing accuracy, and associated fees (€380-480). Twenty private clinics led by obstetric consultants advertised NIPT online, of which seventeen clinics included an explanation of NIPT, testing accuracy, and associated fees (€380-€650). Twenty-nine other providers, which included ultrasound clinics, direct-to-consumer laboratory testing, and General Practitioners, advertised NIPT with 18 of these providers including an explanation of NIPT, testing accuracy, and associated fees (€179-€630). CONCLUSION: While there is apparent demand for NIPT and it is available in Ireland, there is disparity between providers on the type and quality of information available. Difficulty obtaining accessible information, the associated financial costs and location of providers advertising NIPT are likely to be barriers to accessing NIPT. A national screening programme for aneuploidy should be considered to ensure both equitable access to and reliable information about prenatal screening.

8.
J Clin Med ; 13(16)2024 Aug 19.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39201029

RÉSUMÉ

Background/Objectives: Cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is a non-invasive prenatal test used to screen for common trisomies (target cfDNA) that can be expanded to assess all autosomal chromosomes (genome-wide cfDNA). As cfDNA testing gains popularity, it is crucial to examine the factors influencing the decision-making process of pregnant individuals when choosing between these two approaches. Methods: In this prospective cohort study, 190 individuals undergoing cfDNA testing for aneuploidy screening, according to the current screening protocol, were allowed to make their own choice between target and genome-wide cfDNA testing. They were asked to complete a first survey at 11-13 weeks, designed to explore their characteristics, preferences, and satisfaction with the prenatal genetic counseling session, as well as a Decisional Conflict Scale. A postnatal survey was administered three months after delivery, including the Decisional Regret Scale and two open questions. Results: 84% of participants opted for genome-wide cfDNA. However, 17% found the decision challenging, and 14% felt that the results might increase anxiety. No significant differences in participant characteristics were found when comparing decisions between genome-wide and target cfDNA. However, significant differences were observed regarding ethnicity (p = <0.001), educational level (p = 0.029), previous cfDNA experience (p = 0.004), and having sufficient information when comparing termination options (p = 0.002). After delivery, only 4% would have changed their decision. Conclusions: Individuals, regardless of their characteristics, prefer genome-wide cfDNA; however, the complexity of the results necessitates enhanced genetic education for prenatal care clinicians.

9.
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol X ; 23: 100327, 2024 Sep.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39130210

RÉSUMÉ

Introduction: Pregnant women can choose from different prenatal genetic tests throughout their maternity journey. We aim to investigate the clinical, societal, and economic determinants influencing the selection of different options (non-invasive, invasive, or both). Methods: A systematic survey focusing on maternity pathways was launched by the Region of Tuscany, Italy, to collect data on pregnant women's experience, outcomes and satisfaction levels. Drawing from this survey, we retrospectively analyzed data on women who filled out the second-trimester questionnaire between March 2019 and February 2023 (n = 27,337), providing complete data on relevant variables. Logistic regression models were applied to identify the factors contributing to a higher likelihood of opting for non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and invasive testing. Results: Among the participants, 42.7 % chose only NIPT, 3.8 % opted for invasive tests exclusively, 1.3 % underwent both tests, and 52.2 % did not pursue any genetic testing. NIPT was more often chosen by older, Italian, highly educated, nulliparous women, who perceived better health, were employed (versus unemployed), had higher economic status, planned pregnancy, received hospital-based care (versus counseling center), under gynecologist supervision (versus midwife), not opted for combined testing and received pregnancy vaccinations. Conversely, invasive testing was more prevalent among older women but less common among those who were nulliparous, had Italian nationality, and had a perceived better health status. This group also tended to experience unplanned and high-risk pregnancy, did not take folate during pregnancy, received public hospital-based assistance, less frequently chose combined tests or NIPT, and had frequent delays in examinations. Conclusions: Various factors beyond clinical considerations influence the selection of a prenatal test. Therefore, NIPT pathways should include balanced, high-quality information about benefits and limitations, ensuring laboratory specialists' active and integrated involvement in decision-making.

10.
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) ; 15: 1391296, 2024.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39165511

RÉSUMÉ

Background: Polygenic risk scores (PRS) serve as valuable tools for connecting initial genetic discoveries with clinical applications in disease risk estimation. However, limited studies have explored the association between PRS and gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), particularly in predicting GDM risk among Chinese populations. Aim: To evaluate the relationship between PRS and GDM and explore the predictive capability of PRS for GDM risk in a Chinese population. Methods: A prospective cohort study was conducted, which included 283 GDM and 2,258 non-GDM cases based on demographic information on pregnancies. GDM was diagnosed using the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 24-28 weeks. The strength of the association between PRS and GDM odds was assessed employing odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) derived from logistic regression. Receiver operating characteristic curves, net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were employed to evaluate the improvement in prediction achieved by the new model. Results: Women who developed GDM exhibited significantly higher PRS compared to control individuals (OR = 2.01, 95% CI = 1.33-3.07). The PRS value remained positively associated with fasting plasma glucose (FPG), 1-hour post-glucose load (1-h OGTT), and 2-hour post-glucose load (2-h OGTT) (all p < 0.05). The incorporation of PRS led to a statistically significant improvement in the area under the curve (0.71, 95% CI: 0.66-0.75, p = 0.024) and improved discrimination and classification (IDI: 0.007, 95% CI: 0.003-0.012, p < 0.001; NRI: 0.258, 95% CI: 0.135-0.382, p < 0.001). Conclusions: This study highlights the increased odds of GDM associated with higher PRS values and modest improvements in predictive capability for GDM.


Sujet(s)
Diabète gestationnel , Hyperglycémie provoquée , Hérédité multifactorielle , Humains , Diabète gestationnel/génétique , Diabète gestationnel/épidémiologie , Diabète gestationnel/diagnostic , Femelle , Grossesse , Chine/épidémiologie , Adulte , Études prospectives , Facteurs de risque , Prédisposition génétique à une maladie , Glycémie/analyse , Appréciation des risques/méthodes , Études cas-témoins , Genetic Risk Score
11.
Front Med (Lausanne) ; 11: 1390693, 2024.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39161410

RÉSUMÉ

Cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) screening is a valuable tool in clinical practice for detecting chromosomal abnormalities and autosomal dominant (AD) conditions. This study introduces a novel proof-of-concept assay designed for autosomal recessive (AR) cffDNA screening, focusing on cases involving the NPC1 gene. We aim to illustrate the significant benefits of AR cffDNA screening in managing high-risk pregnancies, specifically where biallelic pathogenic variants in NPC1 cause Niemann-Pick disease, type C1 (NPC), a disorder marked by progressive neurodegeneration. Three participants for this study were recruited and gave consent to a hospital in Saudi Arabia. These participants were either carriers of NPC or had a first- or second-degree relative affected by the disorder. No specific criteria were set for the age of the participants. All were between 15 and 18 weeks of gestation. Using amplicon-based next-generation sequencing (NGS), we analyzed the zygosity and variants in cffDNA extracted from maternal peripheral blood. After amplicon NGS, analysis was completed by a custom data analysis pipeline that included in-house-built data processing scripts and commonly used software packages. Importantly, the results were not disclosed to the patients. Our findings showed that in all three cases, AR cffDNA screening results were consistent with standard invasive diagnostic testing. This screening method offers several advantages: it provides critical information to families earlier in the pregnancy compared to invasive diagnostic tests, and it helps to alleviate parental anxiety. Moreover, this non-invasive method can determine pregnancy status in the first trimester for known familial variants. Future research may extend this approach to screen for known disease-causing variants in common AR conditions.

12.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol ; 64(4): 463-469, 2024 Oct.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39177335

RÉSUMÉ

OBJECTIVE: Uterine fibroids are monoclonal tumors, which are often genetically abnormal and associated with false-positive genome-wide cell-free DNA (cfDNA) screening results, particularly when large. It is plausible that fibroids may also increase the risk of cfDNA failure by affecting fetal fraction or due to their genetic anomalies confounding cfDNA algorithms. We aimed to investigate a possible association between fibroids and cfDNA non-informative results. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of women undergoing cfDNA screening for fetal chromosomal abnormalities between 2013 and 2020, comparing pregnancies with vs without uterine fibroids recorded on any obstetric ultrasound before 24 weeks' gestation. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression models were used to investigate the association between fibroids and cfDNA failure, adjusting for gestational age, maternal age, weight and height at blood sampling, mode of conception, multiple gestation and test platform (chromosome-selective or genome-wide). Analyses were stratified according to the number of fibroids and total fibroid volume. The impact of fibroids on fetal fraction was assessed using linear regression, adjusting for the same covariates. RESULTS: Among 19 818 pregnancies undergoing cfDNA screening, fibroids were reported in 2038 (10.28%) and cfDNA failure at the first screening attempt occurred in 228 (1.15%) pregnancies. Non-informative results occurred in 1.96% of pregnancies with fibroids and 1.06% of pregnancies without fibroids (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 2.40 (95% CI, 1.65-3.48)). The risk of failure in the first screening attempt increased progressively with the number of fibroids (aOR, 5.05 (95% CI, 2.29-11.13) in women with four or more fibroids) and total fibroid volume, with greater than a 5-fold and 14-fold increase in risk among women with fibroid volumes of 100.1-400 mL (aOR, 5.52 (95% CI, 2.30-13.25)) and > 400 mL (aOR, 14.80 (95% CI, 4.50-48.69)), respectively. Although test failure was more common with chromosome-selective than genome-wide screening, fibroids similarly increased the risk of failure of both screening platforms. Compared to pregnancies without fibroids, those with fibroids had a fetal fraction on average 0.61% lower (adjusted mean difference, -0.61% (95% CI, -0.77% to -0.45%)). CONCLUSION: Uterine fibroids are associated with lower fetal fraction and an increased risk of cfDNA screening failure. The strength of this association increases with increasing fibroid number and volume. © 2024 The Author(s). Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.


Sujet(s)
Acides nucléiques acellulaires , Léiomyome , Tumeurs de l'utérus , Humains , Femelle , Léiomyome/génétique , Léiomyome/imagerie diagnostique , Léiomyome/diagnostic , Léiomyome/sang , Grossesse , Acides nucléiques acellulaires/sang , Études rétrospectives , Adulte , Tumeurs de l'utérus/génétique , Tumeurs de l'utérus/imagerie diagnostique , Tumeurs de l'utérus/diagnostic , Tumeurs de l'utérus/sang , Dépistage prénatal non invasif/statistiques et données numériques , Dépistage prénatal non invasif/méthodes , Échographie prénatale , Complications tumorales de la grossesse/génétique , Complications tumorales de la grossesse/diagnostic , Complications tumorales de la grossesse/imagerie diagnostique , Complications tumorales de la grossesse/sang , Âge gestationnel
13.
J Obstet Gynaecol Res ; 50(9): 1737-1741, 2024 Sep.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39106876

RÉSUMÉ

A 31-year-old primiparous woman underwent non-invasive prenatal testing. The result was trisomy 13 (T13) positive. The chromosome 13 t-statistics (Z-score) was significantly high. The result of amniocentesis was normal karyotype (46,XX). Detailed ultrasound showed no fetal structural abnormalities. We suspected T13 confined placental mosaicism (CPM) and observed the course naturally. From the late second trimester, severe fetal growth restriction manifested followed by proteinuria and hypertension, diagnosing her with preeclampsia (PE). At 35 + 5 weeks, emergent cesarean section was required, yielding a 1480 g female infant. We sampled five locations of chorionic villi in the placenta. T13 cells dominated cells with normal karyotypes in all parts and the rate of trisomic cells ranged from 57% to 96%, which were generally high rate. None developed PE in reported T13 CPM cases and this is the first case of PE. The dominancy of T13 cells can be associated with PE development.


Sujet(s)
Mosaïcisme , Pré-éclampsie , Syndrome de Patau , Humains , Femelle , Grossesse , Adulte , Pré-éclampsie/génétique , Syndrome de Patau/diagnostic , Placenta/anatomopathologie
14.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39001651

RÉSUMÉ

INTRODUCTION: Ongoing advances in genetic technology may soon provide prenatal screening for multiple genetic conditions. AIMS: The aims were to investigate what prenatal screening test characteristics women prioritise and their willingness to pay for these tests. METHODS: We designed an online survey incorporating a series of discrete choice scenarios. Dimensions and levels were selected based on existing prenatal tests and a hypothetical prenatal test that could non-invasively detect multiple genetic disorders in pregnancy. Participants were recruited from social media platforms. Data were analysed using conditional logistic regression and latent class analysis (LCA). RESULTS: A total of 219 women completed the survey. Women with higher incomes and those with a tertiary education were willing to pay more than other groups. The maximum willingness to pay was AUD1870 (95% confidence interval: 1630, 2112) for a hypothetical non-invasive test to detect multiple genetic conditions in early pregnancy. An LCA demonstrated considerable heterogeneity in preferences, differing in both overall preference for testing and test characteristics considered most attractive. Among the participants, decision factors cited by 14.5% of participants were the risk of pregnancy loss, making them less likely to undergo testing; for 32.1% participants, accuracy was a major factor, and they were very likely to have testing; for 12.9%, test availability early in pregnancy was a decision factor. CONCLUSIONS: If a non-invasive test that could detect the greatest number of genetic disorders in pregnancy was available, the priorities were test accuracy, risk of pregnancy loss and a test available early in pregnancy.

15.
Cureus ; 16(6): e61654, 2024 Jun.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38841293

RÉSUMÉ

Aim This study aims to assess the effect of implementing an enhanced prenatal genetic checklist to guide the provider's discussion on both screening and diagnostic options for fetal aneuploidy testing at the initial prenatal visit. Methods A retrospective quality improvement (QI) project was performed at a single, large, urban academic medical center. The implementation of this project was prospective; however, data was examined retrospectively after the QI initiative was implemented for three months. Patients were included if they were less than 24 weeks gestational age with a live intrauterine gestation at their initial obstetric (OB) visit. Patients less than 18 years old at the initial OB visit were excluded. The results were analyzed using the statistical software R. Chi-squared tests were used to examine proportional differences between the pre- and post-intervention groups with respect to demographic and clinical characteristics and documented genetic counseling discussions. Results A total of 416 patients were included in the final cohort. As measured by documentation, the rate of discussion of diagnostic prenatal genetic testing increased significantly from the pre-intervention proportion of 54% to the post-intervention proportion of 72% (p < 0.001). In the subgroup analysis of patients with advanced maternal age, the rate of discussion of diagnostic prenatal genetic testing increased significantly from the pre-intervention proportion of 53% to the post-intervention proportion of 83% (p = 0.003), and the rate of genetics counseling referrals made at the initial prenatal visit increased significantly from 4% pre-intervention to 38% post-intervention (p < 0.001). Conclusions The use of an enhanced prenatal genetic checklist led to increased discussion of diagnostic fetal aneuploidy testing and increased rates of referral to genetics counseling.

16.
Health Care Anal ; 2024 Jun 17.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38884685

RÉSUMÉ

The inherent normativity of HTA can be conceptualized as a result of normative commitments, a concept that we further specify to encompass moral, epistemological and ontological commitments at play in the practice of HTA. Based on examples from literature, and an analysis of the example of assessing Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT), we will show that inevitable normative decisions in conducting an assessment commits the HTA practitioner to moral (regarding what makes a health technology desirable), ontological (regarding which effects of health technology are conceivable), and epistemological (regarding how to obtain reliable information about health technology) norms. This highlights and supports the need for integrating normative analysis and stakeholder participation, providing guidance to HTA practitioners when making normative choices. This will foster a shared understanding between those who conduct, use, or are impacted by assessments regarding what are conceivable and desirable outcomes of using health technology, and how to collect reliable information to assess whether these outcomes are (going to be) realized. It also provides more insight into the implications of different normative choices.

17.
Brief Bioinform ; 25(4)2024 May 23.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38836702

RÉSUMÉ

Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is a quite popular approach for detecting fetal genomic aneuploidies. However, due to the limitations on sequencing read length and coverage, NIPT suffers a bottleneck on further improving performance and conducting earlier detection. The errors mainly come from reference biases and population polymorphism. To break this bottleneck, we proposed NIPT-PG, which enables the NIPT algorithm to learn from population data. A pan-genome model is introduced to incorporate variant and polymorphic loci information from tested population. Subsequently, we proposed a sequence-to-graph alignment method, which considers the read mis-match rates during the mapping process, and an indexing method using hash indexing and adjacency lists to accelerate the read alignment process. Finally, by integrating multi-source aligned read and polymorphic sites across the pan-genome, NIPT-PG obtains a more accurate z-score, thereby improving the accuracy of chromosomal aneuploidy detection. We tested NIPT-PG on two simulated datasets and 745 real-world cell-free DNA sequencing data sets from pregnant women. Results demonstrate that NIPT-PG outperforms the standard z-score test. Furthermore, combining experimental and theoretical analyses, we demonstrate the probably approximately correct learnability of NIPT-PG. In summary, NIPT-PG provides a new perspective for fetal chromosomal aneuploidies detection. NIPT-PG may have broad applications in clinical testing, and its detection results can serve as a reference for false positive samples approaching the critical threshold.


Sujet(s)
Aneuploïdie , Dépistage prénatal non invasif , Humains , Femelle , Grossesse , Dépistage prénatal non invasif/méthodes , Algorithmes , Génomique/méthodes , Diagnostic prénatal/méthodes , Analyse de séquence d'ADN/méthodes
18.
Arch Gynecol Obstet ; 310(3): 1517-1523, 2024 09.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38922412

RÉSUMÉ

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to examine whether there is a correlation between different types of ventricular septal defects (VSD) and chromosomal abnormalities in the low-risk setting of non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and to evaluate the prognosis of fetuses with varying types of VSD. METHODS: Cases of pregnant women who underwent amniocentesis due to fetal VSD were collected by Tianjin Central Hospital of Obstetrics and Gynecology from May 2017 to May 2022. Exclusions were made for those without NIPT, with high-risk NIPT results, genetic disorders, and those lost to follow-up. Data collected included ultrasound classification of VSD, prenatal NIPT results, copy-number variations (CNVs) results, and neonatal outcomes. RESULTS: The prevalence of pathogenic CNVs was investigated in 74 cases of VSDs. Of these cases, 45 were isolated VSDs (9 muscular and 36 non-muscular) and 29 were non-isolated VSDs (10 with intracardiac and 19 with extra-cardiac structural anomalies). The results revealed that the incidence of pathogenic CNVs was lower in isolated VSDs compared to non-isolated VSDs in a low-risk NIPT condition (χ2 = 9.344, P = 0.002). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of pathogenic CNVs between VSDs with intracardiac and extra-cardiac structural anomalies (P = 0.541). Moreover, VSDs associated with intracardiac structural anomalies had the highest rate of surgical intervention. CONCLUSION: When NIPT is low-risk and VSD is isolated, the likelihood of fetal chromosomal defects is not increased. However, if there are intra- or extra-cardiac structural abnormalities present alongside VSD, the possibility of pathogenic CNV is considerably greater, necessitating invasive prenatal diagnosis. Isolated muscular VSDs usually do not require surgery, which can be used as a basis for prenatal counseling regarding fetal VSD.


Sujet(s)
Aberrations des chromosomes , Variations de nombre de copies de segment d'ADN , Communications interventriculaires , Humains , Femelle , Communications interventriculaires/génétique , Communications interventriculaires/imagerie diagnostique , Communications interventriculaires/épidémiologie , Grossesse , Aberrations des chromosomes/statistiques et données numériques , Adulte , Dépistage prénatal non invasif , Amniocentèse , Échographie prénatale
19.
Diagnostics (Basel) ; 14(10)2024 May 15.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38786318

RÉSUMÉ

(1) Background: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) is a screening test for fetal aneuploidy using cell-free fetal DNA. The fetal fragments (FF) of cell-free DNA (cfDNA) are derived from apoptotic trophoblast of the placenta. The level of fetal cfDNA is known to be influenced by gestational age, multiple pregnancies, maternal weight, and height. (2) Methods: This study is a single-center retrospective observational study which examines the relationship between the fetal fraction (FF) of cell-free DNA in non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) and adverse pregnancy outcomes in singleton pregnancies. A total of 1393 samples were collected between 10 weeks and 6 days, and 25 weeks and 3 days of gestation. (3) Results: Hypertensive disease of pregnancy (HDP) occurred more frequently in the low FF group than the normal FF group (5.17% vs. 1.91%, p = 0.001). Although the rates of small for gestational age (SGA) and placental abruption did not significantly differ between groups, the composite outcome was significantly higher in the low FF group (7.76% vs. 3.64%, p = 0.002). Furthermore, women who later experienced complications such as HDP or gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) had significantly lower plasma FF levels compared to those without complications (p < 0.001). After adjustments, the low FF group exhibited a significantly higher likelihood of placental compromise (adjusted odds ratio: 1.946). (4) Conclusions: Low FF in NIPT during the first and early second trimesters is associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes, particularly HDP, suggesting its potential as a predictive marker for such outcomes.

20.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 24(1): 355, 2024 May 14.
Article de Anglais | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38745131

RÉSUMÉ

BACKGROUND: Non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT) has been clinically available in Australia on a user-pays basis since 2012. There are numerous providers, with available tests ranging from targeted NIPT (only trisomies 21, 18, and 13 +/- sex chromosome aneuploidy) to genome-wide NIPT. While NIPT is being implemented in the public health care systems of other countries, in Australia, the implementation of NIPT has proceeded without public funding. The aim of this study was to investigate how NIPT has been integrated into antenatal care across Australia and reveal the successes and challenges in its implementation in this context. METHODS: An anonymous online survey was conducted from September to October 2022. Invitations to participate were sent to healthcare professionals (HCPs) involved in the provision of NIPT in Australia through professional society mailing lists and networks. Participants were asked questions on their knowledge of NIPT, delivery of NIPT, and post-test management of results. RESULTS: A total of 475 HCPs responded, comprising 232 (48.8%) obstetricians, 167 (35.2%) general practitioners, 32 (6.7%) midwives, and 44 (9.3%) genetic specialists. NIPT was most commonly offered as a first-tier test, with most HCPs (n = 279; 60.3%) offering it to patients as a choice between NIPT and combined first-trimester screening. Fifty-three percent (n = 245) of respondents always offered patients a choice between NIPT for the common autosomal trisomies and expanded (including genome-wide) NIPT. This choice was understood as supporting patient autonomy and informed consent. Cost was seen as a major barrier to access to NIPT, for both targeted and expanded tests. Equitable access, increasing time demands on HCPs, and staying up to date with advances were frequently reported as major challenges in delivering NIPT. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate substantial variation in the clinical implementation of NIPT in Australia, including in the offers of expanded screening options. After a decade of clinical use, Australian clinicians still report ongoing challenges in the clinical and equitable provision of NIPT.


Sujet(s)
Personnel de santé , Dépistage prénatal non invasif , Humains , Femelle , Australie , Grossesse , Dépistage prénatal non invasif/méthodes , Dépistage prénatal non invasif/statistiques et données numériques , Enquêtes et questionnaires , Prise en charge prénatale/statistiques et données numériques , Prise en charge prénatale/méthodes , Adulte , Disparités d'accès aux soins/statistiques et données numériques , Mâle
SÉLECTION CITATIONS
DÉTAIL DE RECHERCHE