Pharmacokinetics and bioequivalence study of montelukast sodium oral soluble film and chewable tablet in healthy Chinese volunteers: randomized trials under fasting and fed conditions.

Background: The oral soluble film (OSF) is a new drug delivery system. Whether montelukast sodium OSF has similar pharmacokinetic (PK) properties and bioequivalence to chewable tablet (CT) should be investigated. Methods: This study, conducted at Haikou People's Hospital, consisted of two trials: a randomized, open-label, single-dose, 3-sequence, 3-period crossover trial under fasting conditions and a randomized, open-label, single-dose, 2-sequence, 2-period crossover trial under fed conditions. Healthy volunteers were randomized 1:1:1 to receive single-dose oral montelukast sodium OSF without water, OSF, or CT with water in the fasting trial, and 1:1 to receive OSF or CT with water in the fed trial in each period, with a 7-day washout period. Randomization was performed according to random number tables generated using computer. Blood samples were collected over a 24-h period. Plasma drug concentrations were tested using high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. The primary PK parameters were maximum plasma drug concentration (Cmax), area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve (AUC) from t=0 to the last quantifiable concentration (AUC0-t), and AUC from t=0 to infinity (AUC0-∞). The other PK parameters included time to Cmax (Tmax), terminal elimination rate constant (λz), and half-life (t1/2). Safety was also assessed. Analysis of variance on log-transformed primary PK parameters was applied to analyze the bioequivalence between the OSF and CT. The bioequivalence margin was 80-125%. Results: From November 2018 to January 2019, 30 subjects were included in each trial. The PK parameters between OSF and CT were numerically similar. All 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the geometric mean ratio (GMR) for the primary PK parameters fell within 80-125%, confirming the bioequivalence of montelukast sodium OSF and CT under fasting and fed conditions. In the fasting trial, 6 (20%) adverse events (AEs) were reported, including 3 (10%) cases after OSF administration without water and 3 (10%) after OSF administration with water, with no serious AEs. No AEs were recorded in the fed trial. Conclusions: Montelukast sodium OSF is bioequivalent to CT, with acceptable safety. The OSF is an alternative option of CT. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: NCT05528198 (the fasting trial) and NCT05531994 (the fed trial).

Comparative study on the methods to determine disintegration time of oral soluble films / 药学学报

Disintegration time is a key parameter that affects the palatability and compliance of oral soluble films. At present, there is no standard method to determine the disintegration time of oral soluble films. In this study, we compared the six methods (pharmacopoeial disintegration method, petri dish method, sponge surface method, slide frame and ball method, partially immersed into liquid (without weight attached) and partially immersed into liquid (with weight attached)) to determine the in vitro disintegration time of oral soluble films with different thickness, and evaluated the correlation with the in vivo disintegration time. The results showed that the repeatability and correlation of pharmacopoeial disintegration method and the partially immersed into liquid method (with weight attached) were excellent, with the endpoint of disintegration testing easy to determine. Partially immersed into liquid method (with weight attached), properly simulating the physiological condition in oral cavity, showed strong operability, good repeatability and in vitro-in vivo correlation, and was suitable for in vitro disintegration evaluation of oral soluble film dosage form. The adult sensory evaluation study was a research-based clinical trial conducted with informed consent from all subjects in accordance with the ethical requirements of Good Clinical Practice.

An evaluation of clobazam tablets and film (AQST-120) for the treatment of Lennox-Gastaut syndrome.

Introduction: Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (LGS) is a chronic, epileptic encephalopathy, characterized by multiple seizure types, distinctive slow spike-wave patterns in the electroencephalogram (EEG), and severe cognitive and behavioral comorbidities. Seizures are typically refractory and long-term prognosis is poor. No antiseizure drug (ASD) is fully effective as a monotherapy. Clobazam (CLB) was licensed in the United States in 2011 as an adjunctive therapy for seizures in LGS. In 2018, a new formulation, CLB oral soluble film (COSF) (AQST-120), was approved by the Federal Drug Administration (FDA) for the same indication. Areas covered: The authors summarize current pharmacological options and guidelines for the management of seizures in LGS and efficacy and safety findings from phase II and III randomized controlled trials of adjunctive CLB in patients with LGS. An open-label extension trial is also considered. A pharmacokinetic comparison of COSF and CLB tablets is also undertaken. Expert opinion: CLB is partly effective as an add-on therapy in treating seizures in LGS. Adverse effects, pharmacokinetic interactions and the potential for tolerance with long-term treatment should be weighed against the clinical benefit when considering the introduction of CLB in this population. COSF has a similar pharmacokinetic profile to CLB tablets and may help to improve adherence to treatment.

Formulation development and evaluation of zolmitriptan oral soluble films using 22 factorial designs.

OBJECTIVE: The present investigation involves the development of zolmitriptan oral soluble film (OSF) formulations and optimization with quality by design (QBD) using natural polymers and evaluation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Initially, various natural polymers such as sodium alginate, pectin, and gelatin were screened by casting films using solvent casting technique and the prepared films were evaluated. Based on the physical and mechanical properties, sodium alginate was selected as best film former and zolmitriptan-loaded films were casted. The formulation was optimized with the help of 22 factorial experimental designs (QBD) in which sodium alginate concentration and plasticizer concentrations were used as factors and at two levels. The drug-loaded films were evaluated for various mechanical, physicochemical properties, and in vitro drug release properties. Factor effects were interpreted by calculating the main factor effects and by plotting the interaction plots. RESULTS: Thickness of the films, disintegration time, and percent drug loading efficiency were in the range of 0.698 ± 0.13-1.318 ± 0.22 mm, 175 ± 3.1-280 ± 1.7 s, and 68.34 ± 0.5-94.70 ± 0.7% w/v, respectively. Cumulative percent drug released was 61.8 ± 2.6-94.7 ± 4.1% after 30 min. Polymer concentration at two levels of plasticizer had statistically significant effect on drug loading efficiency and in vitro drug release rate. X2 formulation was found to be excellent in drug loading efficiency and in vitro drug release profiles; hence, drug excipient compatibility studies using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy and stability studies for 60 days were carried out for X2 formulation and found to be stable. CONCLUSION: Sodium alginate OSFs containing zolmitriptan was successfully prepared, optimized, and evaluated.

Oromucosal film preparations: points to consider for patient centricity and manufacturing processes.

INTRODUCTION: According to the European Pharmacopoeia, oromucosal films comprise mucoadhesive buccal films and orodispersible films. Both oral dosage forms receive considerable interest in the recent years as commercially available pharmaceutical products and as small scale personalized extemporaneous preparations. AREAS COVERED: In this review, technological issues such as viscosity of the casting liquid, mechanical properties of the film, upscaling and the stability of the casting solution and produced films will be discussed. Furthermore, patient-related problems like appearance, mucosal irritation, taste, drug load, safety and biopharmaceutics are described. Current knowledge and directions for solutions are summarized. EXPERT OPINION: The viscosity of the casting solution is a key factor for producing suitable films. This parameter is amongst others dependent on the polymer and active pharmaceutical ingredient, and the further excipients that are used. For optimal patient compliance, an acceptable taste and palatability are desirable. Safe and inert excipients should be used and appropriate packaging should be provided to produced films. Absorption through the oral mucosa will vary for each active compound, formulation and patient, which gives rise to pharmacokinetic questions. Finally, the European Pharmacopoeia needs to specify methods, requirement and definitions for oromucosal film preparations based on bio-relevant data.

Pharmacokinetics and bioavailability study of two ondansetron oral soluble film formulations in fasting healthy male Chinese volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Ondansetron oral soluble film is designed to be applied on top of the tongue without requiring water to aid dissolution or swallowing, which is especially fitting for nausea and vomiting patients. PURPOSE: This study was conducted to compare the bioavailability of two 8 mg ondansetron oral soluble film formulations. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This randomized, open-label, two-period crossover study was performed under fasting conditions. A total of ten eligible subjects were randomly assigned at a 1:1 ratio to receive a single 8 mg dose of the test and reference ondansetron oral soluble film formulations, followed by a 1-week washout period and administration of the alternate formulation. The concentrations of ondansetron were assayed using an liquid chromatograph-mass spectrometer/mass spectrometer (LC-MS/MS) method. For analysis of pharmacokinetic properties, including the peak concentration of T max (C max), AUC from time 0 (baseline) to t hours (AUC0- t ), and AUC from baseline to infinity (AUC0-∞), blood samples were obtained at intervals over the 24-hour period after studying drug administration. Tolerability was assessed by monitoring vital signs and laboratory tests (hematology, blood biochemistry, hepatic function, and urinalysis) and by questioning subjects about adverse events. RESULTS: The mean (standard derivation [SD]) relative bioavailability was 96.5 (23.7%). The 90% confidence intervals (CIs) for the log-transformed ratios of C max and AUC0- t were 84.71%-103.28% and 91.38%-108.60%, respectively (P>0.05). Similar results were found for the data without log-transformation. No statistically significant differences were found based on analysis of variance. No significant adverse events occurred or were reported during the study. CONCLUSION: As the 90% CIs based on the differences between the test and reference formulation were within the 80%-125% range for both the C max and AUC0- t , we concluded that the two formulations were bioequivalent with respect to the rate or the extent of absorption. Both formulations are well tolerated.

Mechanical strength test for orodispersible and buccal films.

There are no test procedures, definitions and specifications available how to determine mechanical strength of orodispersible or buccal films. Aim of the study was to develop an appropriate and discriminating method to feature the evaluation of marketed and newly developed film products covering well-known and new approaches. The limits for mechanical strength were set starting from a puncture strength of 0.06 N/mm(2) according to the obtained results from marketed products. Furthermore, elongation to break of the marketed films (1.03-6.54%) and prepared film samples (4.51-33.17%) offered information on the film properties. The developed mechanical strength test method was suitable for all film types without the need of a pre-defined specimen. A mechanical strength threshold could be specified for future orodispersible film development.