Diagnosis of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux: Past, Present, and Future-A Mini-Review.

Laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR) is a variant of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in which gastric refluxate irritates the lining of the aerodigestive tract and causes troublesome airway symptoms or complications. LPR is a prevalent disease that creates a significant socioeconomic burden due to its negative impact on quality of life, tremendous medical expense, and possible cancer risk. Although treatment modalities are similar between LPR and GERD, the diagnosis of LPR is more challenging than GERD due to its non-specific symptoms/signs. Due to the lack of pathognomonic features of endoscopy, mounting evidence focused on physiological diagnostic testing. Two decades ago, a dual pH probe was considered the gold standard for detecting pharyngeal acidic reflux episodes. Despite an association with LPR, the dual pH was unable to predict the treatment response in clinical practice, presumably due to frequently encountered artifacts. Currently, hypopharygneal multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH catheters incorporating two trans-upper esophageal sphincter impedance sensors enable to differentiate pharyngeal refluxes from swallows. The validation of pharyngeal acid reflux episodes that are relevant to anti-reflux treatment is, therefore, crucial. Given no diagnostic gold standard of LPR, this review article aimed to discuss the evolution of objective diagnostic testing and its predictive role of treatment response.

Application of Artificial Intelligence in Measuring Novel pH-Impedance Metrics for Optimal Diagnosis of GERD.

Novel metrics extracted from pH-impedance monitoring can augment the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). Artificial intelligence (AI) is being widely used to improve the diagnostic capabilities of various diseases. In this review, we update the current literature regarding applications of artificial intelligence in measuring novel pH-impedance metrics. AI demonstrates high performance in the measurement of impedance metrics, including numbers of reflux episodes and post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index and, furthermore, extracts baseline impedance from the entire pH-impedance study. AI is expected to play a reliable role in facilitating measuring novel impedance metrics in patients with GERD in the near future.

Artificial intelligence facilitates measuring reflux episodes and postreflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index from impedance-pH studies in patients with reflux disease.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Reflux episodes and postreflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave (PSPW) index are useful impedance parameters that can augment the diagnosis of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, manual analysis of pH-impedance tracings is time consuming, resulting in limited use of these novel impedance metrics. This study aims to evaluate whether a supervised learning artificial intelligence (AI) model is useful to identify reflux episodes and PSPW index. METHODS: Consecutive patients underwent 24-h impedance-pH monitoring were enrolled for analysis. Multiple AI and machine learning with a deep residual net model for image recognition were explored based on manual interpretation of reflux episodes and PSPW according to criteria from the Wingate Consensus. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were used to measure the strength of inter-rater agreement of data between manual and AI interpretations. RESULTS: We analyzed 106 eligible patients with 7939 impedance events, of whom 38 patients with pathological acid exposure time (AET) and 68 patients with physiological AET. On the manual interpretation, patients with pathological AET had more reflux episodes and lower PSPW index than those with physiological AET. Overall accuracy of AI identification for reflux episodes and PSPW achieved 87% and 82%, respectively. Inter-rater agreements between AI and manual interpretations achieved excellent for individual numbers of reflux episodes and PSPW index (ICC = 0.965 and ICC = 0.921). CONCLUSIONS: AI has the potential to accurately and efficiently measure impedance metrics including reflux episodes and PSPW index. AI can be a reliable adjunct for measuring novel impedance metrics for GERD in the near future.

Episode-level reflux characteristics: How experienced reviewers differentiate true reflux from artifact on pH-impedance studies.

BACKGROUND: Accurate reflux episode identification is crucial for pH-impedance interpretation. Individual reflux episode characteristics associated with inter-reviewer concordance are incompletely understood. METHODS: Ambulatory pH-impedance studies from 19 GERD patients (median age 52 years, 78.9% F) were analyzed by 5 reviewers. Metadata from pH-impedance studies were exported to a dedicated software tool designed to compare episode-by-episode identification between reviewers within a ±7.5 s window. Patient position, acidic vs. nonacidic episodes, acid clearance time (ACT), bolus clearance time (BCT), and proximal extent of reflux episodes were compared between episodes identified by all reviewers against those identified by automated analysis, and one to four reviewers, respectively. RESULTS: Automated analysis identified 1644 episodes (median 78 episodes per patient, IQR 64-108), of which 84.9% were identified by ≥3 reviewers and 57.1% by all reviewers; 339 unique episodes were added by at least 1 reviewer. Characteristics defining 5 reviewer concordance included acid reflux episodes (88.9%), upright episodes (88.4%), high proximal extent (median 17 cm, IQR 15-17 cm), and longer acid clearance times (67.0 s, IQR 29.0-146.0 s) (P < 0.001 compared to 1-4 reviewer concordance for each). In contrast, 1 reviewer-identified episodes were 69.8% acidic, 76.9% upright, and limited to the distal esophagus. Using 5-reviewer concordance, designation of GERD evidence changed from automated analysis in 16%-19% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Acidic episodes with high proximal extent in the upright position and longer acid clearance times on pH-impedance studies have the highest concordance for identification by expert reviewers. Reflux episode identification may be influenced by reviewer opinion despite availability of established criteria.

Value of pH Impedance Monitoring While on Twice-Daily Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy to Identify Need for Escalation of Reflux Management.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Acid exposure time (AET) and reflux episode thresholds from the Lyon Consensus may not apply for pH impedance studies performed while on proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy. We aimed to determine metrics from "on PPI" pH impedance studies predicting need for escalation of therapy. METHODS: De-identified pH impedance studies performed while on twice-daily PPI (Diversatek, Boulder, CO) in healthy volunteers (n = 66, median age 37.5 years, 43.9% female), and patients with proven gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (European heartburn-predominant cohort: n = 43, median age 57.0 years, 55.8% female; North American regurgitation-predominant cohort: n = 42, median age 41.6 years, 42.9% female) were analyzed. Median values and interquartile ranges for pH impedance metrics in healthy volunteers were compared with proven GERD patients with and without 50% symptom improvement on validated measures. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses identified optimal thresholds predicting symptom response. RESULTS: Both conventional and novel reflux metrics were similar between PPI responders and nonresponders (P ≥ .1 for each) despite differences from healthy volunteers. Combinations of metrics associated with conclusively abnormal reflux burden (AET >4%, >80 reflux episodes) were seen in 32.6% and 40.5% of heartburn and regurgitation-predominant patients, respectively, 57.1% and 82.4% of whom reported nonresponse; and 85% with these metrics improved with invasive GERD management. On ROC analysis, AET threshold of 0.5% modestly predicted nonresponse (sensitivity, 0.62; specificity, 0.51; P = .22), and 40 reflux episodes had better performance characteristics (sensitivity, 0.80; specificity, 0.51; P = .002); 79% with these metrics improved with invasive GERD management. CONCLUSION: Combinations of abnormal "on PPI" pH impedance metrics are associated with PPI nonresponse in proven GERD patients, and can be targeted for treatment escalation, including surgery, particularly in regurgitation-predominant GERD.

Pharyngeal reflux episodes in patients with suspected laryngopharyngeal reflux versus healthy subjects: a prospective cohort study.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to analyze pharyngeal reflux episodes in patients with suspected LPR versus healthy subjects using 24-h MII-pH monitoring. METHODS: One hundred twenty-one patients who visited our clinic with a chief complaint of LPR-related symptoms and underwent 24-h MII-pH monitoring were enrolled prospectively. Also, 27 healthy subjects were enrolled and underwent 24-h MII-pH monitoring during the same period. We analyzed sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy comprehensively to determine appropriate cut-off values of pharyngeal reflux episodes in 24-h MII-pH monitoring to diagnose patients with LPR. RESULTS: Twenty-nine of 121 patients with suspected LPR showed no pharyngeal reflux episodes, while 92 showed more than one pharyngeal reflux event. In contrast, the 22 healthy subjects showed no pharyngeal reflux episodes, three showed one reflux event, and two showed two reflux events. A cut-off value of ≥ 1 showed best accuracy reflected by combined sensitivity and specificity values, while ≥ 2 demonstrated better specificity with slight loss of sensitivity and slightly lower overall accuracy, suggesting cut-off value of ≥ 1 pharyngeal reflux episodes is a good clinical indicator. CONCLUSION: A cut-off value of ≥ 1 in pharyngeal reflux episodes on 24-h MII-pH monitoring in patients with suspected LPR might be an acceptable diagnostic tool for LPR.

Normal values and regional differences in oesophageal impedance-pH metrics: a consensus analysis of impedance-pH studies from around the world.

OBJECTIVE: Limitations of existing impedance-pH thresholds include small sample size of normative studies, inclusion of artefactual pH drops and incorrect identification of impedance reflux events. We aimed to obtain new impedance-pH thresholds from expert consensus analysis of tracings from a large number of healthy subjects. DESIGN: Of 541 studies performed worldwide using two different systems (Diversatek, USA, and Laborie, Netherlands), 150 tracings with oesophageal diagnoses, behavioural disorders and study-related artefacts were excluded. The remainder studies were subject to two reviewer consensus analysis, in-person or through video conference, consisting of editing meals and pH drops, identification of impedance reflux and postreflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave (PSPW) using strict pre-established criteria and measurement of distal mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI). RESULTS: Consensus analysis was performed in 391 tracings (age 32.7 years, range 18-71, 54.2% female). Normative thresholds were significantly different between Diversatek and Laborie (total acid exposure time: 2.8% and 5%; reflux episodes: 55 and 78; MNBI at 3 cm: 1400 and 1500 ohms, at 5 cm: 1400 and 1800 ohms). Males had higher acid exposure, more reflux episodes and lower MNBI. Significant regional differences were identified, including higher PSPW scores in Western countries, and higher MNBI in Asia using Diversatek, and higher acid exposure in the Netherlands, higher MNBI in Asia and South Africa, and lower MNBI in Turkey using Laborie. CONCLUSION: Normal impedance-pH monitoring thresholds have regional and system-related differences. Clinical interpretation needs to use normal thresholds valid for the system used and world region, following careful editing of the tracings.

Results of 24-hour esophageal impedance-pH monitoring in 141 patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease / 中华消化杂志

Objective To analyze the relationship between body type,age,gender,esophageal motility function,lower esophageal sphincter pressure (LESP) and clinical classification and type of reflux contents of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).Methods From September 2015 to July 2016,at Beijing Tongren Hospital of China Capital Medical University,the results of 24-hour esophageal impedance-pH monitoring of 141 patients with GERD were retrospectively analyzed.The differences of reflux contents were compared in patients with GERD among different body type,age,gender,esophageal motility function,LESP and clinical classification.Mann-Whitney test was performed for comparison between groups.Results Acid reflux was more common in obese patients (body mass index more than 23.9 kg/m2) compared with patients with normal body type (body mass index from 18.5 to 23.9 kg/m2) (18.5,7.0 to 45.3 vs.10.0,2.0 to 32.0),and the difference was statistically significant (Z =-2.320,P =0.020).Patients under 65 years old had more numbers of weak acid reflux,non-acid reflux and gas reflux than patients over 65 years old (58.5,32.8 to95.0 vs.40.0,24.0to71.0;19.5,6.0to47.5 vs.8.0,3.0 to19.0;46.0,23.8to79.3 vs.35.0,11.0 to 56.0),and the differences were statistically significant (Z =-2.690,-3.286 and-2.091,all P＜0.05).Male patients had more gas and mixed reflux compared with female patients (53.5,24.0 to 122.8 vs.36.0,19.0 to 67.0;34.0,20.8 to 50.0 vs.27.0,14.0 to 43.0),and the differences were statistically significant (Z =-2.424 and-1.961,both P ＜ 0.05).There was no statistically significant difference in reflux contents between patients with normal esophageal motility and patients with esophageal motility disorder (weak or interrupted peristalsis) (all P ＞ 0.05).Patients with reflux esophagitis(RE) and/or Barrett's esophagus (BE) had more weak acid reflux,non-acid reflux and gas reflux compared with patients with non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) (61.0,31.3 to 102.5 vs.44.0,24.5 to 66.5;18.0,8.0 to 36.5 vs.8.0,2.0 to 22.0;49.5,27.5 to 86.5 vs.26.0,11.0 to 47.0),and the differences were statistically significant (Z =-2.585,-2.942 and-3.278,all P ＜ 0.05).Patients with lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation were more likely to have weak acid reflux than patients with normal LES function (57.0,32.3 to 87.0 vs.40.0,21.0 to 73.0),the difference was statistically significant (Z =-2.065,P =0.039).Conclusion Body type,age,gender,LESP and clinical classification are related to type of reflux contents in GERD patients,while esophageal peristalsis is irrelevant.

Analyses of the relationship between a 'number of reflux episodes' exceeding 70 and the pH index in neurologically impaired children by evaluating esophageal combined pH-multichannel intraluminal impedance measurements.

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to evaluate the characteristics associated with a number of reflux episodes (NoRE) of 70 by comparing the clinical and multichannel intraluminal impedance pH measurements (pH/MII) and pH index (pHI) in neurologically impaired (NI) children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: NI children (1-16 years of age) in whom pH/MII had been measured for GERD study were enrolled in this study. All children were divided into NoRE >70 or ≤70 and pHI >4.0 or ≤4.0, >5.0 or ≤5.0 or >7.0 or ≤7.0. In addition, the NI children with pHI >4.0, >5.0 and >7.0 were subdivided into NoRE >70 and ≤70 groups. The clinical and pH/MII measurements were compared between each of the two groups. The cutoff values of pHI and baseline impedance (BI) (Z6) were calculated to discriminate NoRE >70 and ≤70. RESULTS: A total of 61 NI children were enrolled in this study. There was a significant difference in the acid-related parameters, the NoRE (nonacid) and BI between NoRE >70 and ≤70, acid-related parameters and BI between pHI >4.0 and ≤4.0, >5.0 and ≤5.0 and >7.0 and ≤7.0 groups. Furthermore, a significant difference was still observed in the BI between NoRE >70 and ≤70 groups among patients with pHI >4.0, >5.0 or >7.0. The cutoff values of pHI and BI (Z6) for discriminating NoRE >70 and ≤70 were 9.2 and 1049Ω, respectively. CONCLUSION: The present study indicates that NoRE 70 corresponds to GERD in which patients suffer severe acid exposure with pH of around 9% and esophageal mucosal damage with low BI value in NI children.

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Children with Interstitial Lung Disease.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is common in adult patients with interstitial lung disease. However, no data currently exist regarding the prevalence and characteristics of the disease in pediatric patients with interstitial lung disease. The aim of the present study was to prospectively assess the incidence of gastroesophageal reflux disease and characterize its features in children with interstitial lung disease. Gastroesophageal reflux disease was established based on 24 h pH-impedance monitoring (MII-pH). Gastroesophageal reflux episodes (GERs) were classified according to widely recognized criteria as acid, weakly acid, weakly alkaline, or proximal. Eighteen consecutive patients (15 boys, aged 0.2-11.6 years) were enrolled in the study. Gastroesophageal reflux disease was diagnosed in a half (9/18) of children. A thousand GERs were detected by MII-pH (median 53.5; IQR 39.0-75.5). Of these, 585 (58.5 %) episodes were acidic, 407 (40.7 %) were weakly acidic, and eight (0.8 %) were weakly alkaline. There were 637 (63.7 %) proximal GERs. The patients in whom gastroesophageal reflux disease was diagnosed had a significantly higher number of proximal and total GERs. We conclude that the prevalence of gastroesophageal reflux disease in children with interstitial lung disease is high; thus, the disease should be considered regardless of presenting clinical symptoms. A high frequency of non-acid and proximal GERs makes the MII-pH method a preferable choice for the detection of reflux episodes in this patient population.

Characteristics of symptomatic reflux episodes in Japanese proton pump inhibitor-refractory non-erosive reflux disease patients.

AIM: To clarify the pathogenesis of gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms in non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) patients. METHODS: Thirty-five NERD patients with persistent symptoms, despite taking rabeprazole 10 mg twice daily for at least 8 wk, were included in this study. All patients underwent 24 h combined impedance - pH on rabeprazole. The symptom index (SI) was considered to be positive if ≥ 50%, and proximal reflux episodes were determined when reflux reached 15 cm above the proximal margin of the lower esophageal sphincter. RESULTS: In 14 (40%) SI-positive patients, with liquid weakly acid reflux, the occurrence rate of reflux symptoms was significantly more frequent in proximal reflux episodes (46.7%) than in distal ones (5.7%) (P < 0.001). With liquid acid reflux, there were no significant differences in the occurrence rate of reflux symptoms between proximal reflux episodes (38.5%) and distal ones (20.5%) (NS). With mixed liquid-gas weakly acid reflux, the occurrence rate of reflux symptoms in proximal reflux episodes was significantly more frequent (31.0%) than in distal reflux ones (3.3%) (P < 0.001). With mixed liquid-gas acid reflux, there were no significant differences in the occurrence rate of reflux symptoms between proximal reflux episodes (29.4%) and distal ones (14.3%) (NS). CONCLUSION: The proximal extent of weakly acidic liquid and mixed liquid-gas reflux is a major factor associated with reflux perception in SI-positive patients on proton pump inhibitor therapy.

Impedance-high resolution manometry analysis of patients with nonerosive reflux disease.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs) contribute to episodes of reflux. Few studies have assessed the frequencies or compositions of TLESRs and reflux episodes in patients with reflux disease. We used combined high-resolution manometry and impedance monitoring to analyze reflux episodes and esophageal motility in these patients, compared with those of healthy individuals. METHODS: We evaluated the frequency of TLESRs and the relationship between the reflux pattern and esophageal pressures during TLESRs in 14 patients with nonerosive reflux disease (NERD) and 11 controls. Study participants underwent combined high-resolution manometry and impedance monitoring before and 60 minutes after a solid and liquid meal. The diagnosis of NERD was confirmed by a 24-hour pH impedance test. RESULTS: The frequency of TLESRs did not differ between patients with NERD and controls. In patients with NERD, TLESRs were associated more often with reflux episodes than in controls (93% ± 6% vs 66% ± 19%; P < .05). Patients with NERD had a higher percentage of pure liquid reflux episodes (33% ± 15% vs 10% ± 2%; P < .05), whereas controls had a higher percentage of mixed reflux episodes (45% ± 16% vs 67% ± 17% in patients with NERD; P < .05). Patients with NERD also had a higher percentage of reflux (liquid and mixed) associated with common cavities (74% ± 18% vs 50% ± 20% in controls; P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to previous studies, we found that TLESRs are associated more often with reflux in patients with NERD than control subjects; this association increases when only liquid and mixed refluxes are considered. These findings indicate that factors involved in the occurrence of reflux in patients with NERD during TLESRs are different from those in healthy subjects.